 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 ' ~7 R9 s, G) w% e8 l: f7 k4 m6 W
, W- ~, `! N/ u( p0 h
7 M5 @2 Q- ^! l- \" IIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 6 f+ Z/ i" m+ y9 Y1 V. f
# C; ?- ]5 P/ ?8 a
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03( X* J8 u& `5 t, N' n
" V! h: E8 a6 L( w2 J1 c: V5 `comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
/ e/ @$ Y1 d& m8 Y# q. A; X3 X4 c( s! S" f
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
! P8 o7 N7 _$ L8 k* x' S- ]) m |
|