 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
- Y8 ~. s. r2 V5 d$ X3 ]2 P2 w
/ H* l0 h O: Q6 }. E! t
4 ]5 N' `" g# f6 p9 ?4 x. u+ YIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
2 G- L* e, o- V8 y2 ^' o/ W5 u2 N% n9 J8 e. ]
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03" I, K% L, T$ b3 o+ b% ~/ |+ o7 ^ D7 a
/ ]1 \, A: U8 d4 t/ v+ Acomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..+ p) A( U `5 ~' N! t2 a
) ^4 |0 z) \, W, ?% O2 r) g7 W8 |
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 4 _0 M" X1 e$ H5 n
|
|