 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 : ]/ k6 c1 J6 [; H. \
s; g) w- ]& H( M8 s) B
4 |9 ^! G8 z" \4 z) GIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. ( P0 S9 @$ u" ]! n2 b5 f
/ @) v# k' J2 O. q7 A* T e$ y% N' B8 U
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.031 l& q v( o3 S
3 ]) q; U: z! C9 j% c( d' wcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
' N9 D* K/ l8 U% M; J' @% a
9 K% h9 \3 ?2 y* NNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) - k) _9 N# }4 ~3 ~
|
|