 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
8 U, x# l, G! }
; }0 h7 [2 s! P; o& g4 H
9 z6 F9 ^2 P8 ^# ?你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:6 {/ Z2 P6 R9 C d% B% |. u, M
Ralph Klein% R, L9 T7 L5 @( j `% z! C
7 R3 ]3 t8 W# g: e
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!" Q$ n3 L% L0 ^$ p1 X2 r
8 W' p. y5 K, \: L
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
! G' c( b. a, D) ?) v4 z# J4 i, n- f2 d4 x, w1 H; g6 C
5 Y" @7 v. [/ o3 E* B4 P9 Z6 X
& t1 ]) o/ ^8 E8 {6 h
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
/ m/ C7 u* y# ]! `0 MHistoric Alberta budget balances:
6 @+ b5 b( b: j. A# r5 T; B( j
) ?* b" P/ \ h5 q2 E4 Y1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus& g& q- H7 `- v" I
6 f. f" G$ R+ y/ j
1982-83: $796 million deficit! g# ^9 n5 ?7 l$ c* T* o0 }% b# a
! e" u5 g7 | _0 E% V
1983-84: $129 million surplus, C$ m+ L+ F4 V- Q( S9 N: u$ F: D
# f2 N3 i, { ~& ?1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus% E* R U# N9 R9 \
! K4 i4 z& [* T D1 V$ b
1985-86: $761 million deficit
. ?1 W' }1 ]7 c& H/ P! B# t+ Q# A {! ]* q# l
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
: y# {6 z. R* h& V% {; G2 C( c3 B
3 S8 i) Q( V4 U# M9 [. O1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
+ U8 m9 h9 o7 n8 M2 H
% I I2 C4 v" q% n7 W. ~1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit2 v: p/ _7 y" E; [3 l( j
+ G/ I9 \, i! x1 D W
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
& @( _* C- l9 c9 F7 H
4 u7 @+ e E6 W1 k1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit4 d1 S- N, H" Q, v. g
* l8 n5 h5 ?( _/ ~$ q1 Y
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit c; h; i W. z5 Y! L/ K7 q
& f8 f. J% \/ |" V+ N: C6 z6 T
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit- e$ J9 X8 M; h4 d5 _5 |9 A4 @6 v
6 K8 e( D: e2 M# ?; i) C1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
2 \ t. v/ ~# H0 m# v. F2 ^' w9 ~+ g+ B
1994-95: $938 million surplus) V/ I5 z6 h% n* U3 q
+ }- Q, z7 L# l, y8 s8 L
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
0 E3 S# R4 J0 n8 O# E# y
" Z% c. A7 _/ C( @8 {1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
7 I# ~0 {, d+ h+ u' ^
5 W* `$ H8 k3 d* a) ~& L1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
0 L, c( c9 l: |, B! @& W/ R
4 v# I r" e7 g, t) s1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
k' A% r; g1 L' \5 {# c3 Q( A. k# N+ n- D* o
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
% g! N# f# L4 b/ b
) G [9 F- z7 |3 C5 ]2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus- O! |( J9 m/ s
8 m. ~( g( l% H
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus) x+ n! [! D, ]* }, M3 x
8 a: R: |; N% H( `; ]
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
# \- c: }" p, f R3 V' Y* }# a; }' }
) y; j/ _' _/ s4 \) J4 R/ ]! R- u2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
7 v( n. w/ N; w# \3 T# j) D9 N- s! \1 b; C* F
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus) V9 l9 W( v$ n( K5 l& U
, t0 c5 R3 N( K: d2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus$ @) s6 D% P' B( d2 l5 L! \% ]9 M. X' {
6 _3 f* w0 a& D9 D+ X# u5 z
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus' b* U- }; m# P6 P+ Y& @
& Q* T9 b, ^7 n3 u. G" @2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
' \& j. e6 U: j+ W; i2 N1 K2 M1 I0 ~
2008-09: $852 million deficit% b- R( z, j! M, o) ^+ S
. Y E0 z- c' \0 U% \- q
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit4 q5 `. S2 y6 u' M* n: A
+ q& r/ X8 f1 M# i( U2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit: z3 f$ P8 C' O) B: V6 ]9 Z
$ t* J3 ]$ W2 c, c7 S- m
2011-12: $23 million deficit
( K& @! J' |: g* P8 u7 `. y
# F, a$ H% {+ x0 j! S. J8 m! J2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
{! e5 A2 e! y5 J# M
* ]% z8 t4 e. N8 m+ p. \, k' K2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|