 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 ( O/ o) W) E# ^7 w& A% m
2 _% i* P) P1 B2 v2 \! @6 u) s" ]# Z: T
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:" A {( ^! x; X; [4 T0 {" `+ `
Ralph Klein2 s# K& l3 P3 [0 [
/ ^9 D6 b8 [( d0 L/ Y我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!( D l: Y* h/ R @
: G" ]. K; q( r3 G1 V2 @: \所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
/ R+ ?' V( C" E+ F9 D* b6 ^
& n0 z0 q! d7 Y% D) d3 C7 ~$ m6 g
$ x$ |3 C# m# i/ x; e/ |3 l0 q/ ?9 I/ o& K* B
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades$ Q7 O5 h1 t3 V. r, b8 J7 m
Historic Alberta budget balances:
- K* g( v W* }; n8 j* P' R/ ?! O0 F1 v% q2 W- y8 |
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus! m9 _/ P& ^0 `$ Z. K6 ]
E0 w* g* J; Y( z2 _* c! |
1982-83: $796 million deficit
) F" ^5 ~4 p1 N" n8 j/ j% {5 Z* _* T' s- I5 q' p+ Q8 W& s; W" Y
1983-84: $129 million surplus# p; C) A4 W9 j0 R& j
& {7 _$ N# d6 f" i1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus0 L) k/ P, j! I5 a* H
3 P1 K0 Q* Z x; c
1985-86: $761 million deficit
5 e( i7 E# R! O+ Z) B3 S/ Z7 i5 Z! n2 J9 F8 p8 R
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
& P8 P0 a. ]6 j- B" Z9 U2 w. d- } {; O; @/ G
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
h p/ T. c4 q) \( E& k0 X8 w+ S9 }- U5 v/ j1 [
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit y2 T5 O* ]6 J3 |8 o8 z, n& @
7 e( b$ ?; V% _) ]: j1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
0 T- o! g4 \2 c7 x7 R
8 A2 {5 }' V) t1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit4 h, j2 j* ^) q- K1 W
* [9 F. J* y' l3 p( f$ r- K( E1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit; l% z- P" U; D* l, t
. X9 r. R8 M d# _: j: j1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit1 e. p; F3 F9 m3 ?$ S! M
5 `( _7 ^, e- d6 N. i' o4 N8 M1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
+ `! j0 V$ ?: Z2 b; s3 H
- Q3 D5 B: f# ], B- b1994-95: $938 million surplus/ V" r. ^1 X' P+ y
" q7 N8 j# p2 k: l, ?
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
0 G L* h# [! t0 m# E( h% u+ v: U. E6 T
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
( n; h/ r' ^' m4 ]+ {5 |9 I3 K6 r6 w% S) j
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
6 Y6 u( b! y- G% ?) i: t# H
- P3 @7 c" { E) d; K* m1 O1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus" |. `2 c* M$ {6 ] o4 L
0 I `) E9 [/ e' n X" f, p3 X* f1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus. `% q: Z5 u5 a( A1 b" {
/ e: W1 {2 h5 w k2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus3 A% ~9 D8 I3 ^, Z. J- ?$ ` r# D2 ~
i% H3 Y0 i9 i2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus. j/ a+ o$ ^9 \; q `* J
9 i. J. h. N. F5 G2 I2 s% o2 J2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus6 O; `& z0 g/ q9 A$ ~
' h$ U; G0 w5 X. C, m% h( m
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus( z1 V) W- s- h) P! g& v' g
) Y3 G8 L0 n L2 }1 s2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
4 p* K/ _- }9 W O6 y0 i+ Z
7 I/ e4 x/ |9 j2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus0 Z/ i/ N6 a- A+ P
- d% ^" U8 s9 W- M0 o# K9 R
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
; l; ~1 Q# D3 m& A: Z' o7 K& n7 B$ _. F& `! J$ M; v1 w5 w
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
9 ~; l: R( @" P; g2 g% }, s! i, ]4 e$ `. w6 i) `: Z# y
2008-09: $852 million deficit9 J0 P3 S" p2 P b" Y0 Y- t! l8 p. N
; i5 L' ~/ D6 `; s
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
: ^* P: Q$ s3 `* N' J+ }6 k* k
4 R5 l; F4 m* r6 u6 d$ A% H+ i8 _2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
7 u9 r* ^: d* S! p. W- N1 t3 q( H. Z; P
2011-12: $23 million deficit
6 J, @; x8 j2 Y! F. R! u; @
. K Y1 s/ n/ i) K2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
1 ?& F1 L+ O' N, O; _/ J, A8 u7 ^, h6 t
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|