 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
- A8 f! H- u1 P: z. N/ }9 E- A) E3 A: P1 }8 D: I, J
: w" E9 ^$ g3 J% n2 k
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
- t! f3 c* `# c6 ARalph Klein: Y. X) |( v' F5 U& @5 l+ G N: |
7 c" N% I7 D- S我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
/ K5 T: Z- X2 g1 o- p8 H" x/ ^/ l
) n- e+ O8 Q( x+ ]" u! u- E所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。! @ v$ p8 Z. C5 \: c+ h3 P
9 w' v) B9 |) D! H; V$ Z; C
. S, |5 A. R: a3 J/ Y4 ?
4 V" D }, e. |; Y+ E8 c/ A* X) ]http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
B9 O9 X [6 n: l9 yHistoric Alberta budget balances:; g6 G, O! O0 K6 M. P1 ]( V L2 Z
/ C/ Z( O0 ?, B+ K; F; R
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus( E# |0 g' V; W% @# D/ M
: s6 O; V! y" J: j
1982-83: $796 million deficit, N5 c. w% ]( c
$ E3 d4 d3 d% G2 N4 D+ E
1983-84: $129 million surplus
/ i+ N/ u% [- k8 U Z% ^- U, t% z8 y
- }& z' h, v1 Y" }% r8 _. z1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus7 N; F6 ]; e: r, u2 ?8 S
$ C/ a$ h# S, q2 e% L) Y1985-86: $761 million deficit
! x2 x) l1 q! {' f+ t; V! O' A
- i2 e3 P) o5 x8 k+ T3 R1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit1 Z" x0 _3 I6 j) k6 w! x
5 V# i6 J- Y0 M# u7 W( O* p
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit$ T( k! S5 R8 y( Q* Y
+ I& K$ D2 Z1 m: U
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit* h( b" J/ n' I$ C0 y, n
o/ Z! M; ~; l9 G/ I1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit# w: }. v y8 a- s/ H% ^) ]
{0 h; `& u$ x/ q, P9 }, P1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit4 u8 j$ J% J7 z7 c( c: t4 }
# ]3 S7 y6 R; h% j5 I3 w
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
2 Y0 I/ b2 Y* x- ^0 ~0 W4 S2 n. m; y9 O
4 c1 X }& x* c, E1 P1 C H1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit' {3 R3 Y. |' ^7 q4 u$ a
$ o! l5 G/ M2 @: W' q {/ |' d2 @" Z
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit' Y; d0 y5 t% J1 C
e+ \$ Q( ~6 y" E% |
1994-95: $938 million surplus+ j( V+ S) P, ]+ f: R
3 s5 S6 Q) k% _6 g& {; R1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
2 S- u7 |/ s% L+ @. Q2 L) M
% n! D8 [/ p0 V* Z8 l# M" E1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
& ^( ` u0 m& E- S4 j# X
, s6 `+ v2 s6 r" {& [1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus8 D+ w/ E: l$ |( }9 x6 P; i& W
8 V1 t& ?2 h5 R1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
$ U, y: H" `: J7 @
, Q; x( C6 y" A4 T* i) I1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus6 V) x$ J" H- F$ f- n, z
4 c6 R( ^9 t# r/ r
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus" i6 g; T6 w6 Y; H1 y
( h/ {( m: o2 U- b7 D( m, r
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
m3 y# ^: Z8 n! M" [9 m' v& {! H8 {/ v' w% V9 C8 @. F
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
1 E6 w9 `1 n. h6 t% _. K- m5 }2 A0 @9 r9 k1 X! {4 L
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus1 f: c: r. u3 x
& }! Y" T( K0 s* ^" p
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus1 [" d3 g- Z2 t2 ]' j& ^, J5 t9 r& `
5 }' f! ]0 ~* X2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus5 s& E, t5 W }7 ?: T; s
) u. b/ g7 X0 E, d' ?( _
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus3 J" ?/ m% q0 S0 q
3 b; e8 H7 B w
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus+ h1 x a( I! u
9 u9 W, S/ I* |; t3 g _. ]3 T2008-09: $852 million deficit! G3 h0 p: J' q% ]) k
: t9 H; ^) Q! f' B& A; I
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit5 d) d4 r# a0 B! U4 F$ l) @
( H. z/ F6 e, W: Q6 k- _0 s' ^: m2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit" E5 V6 q) |- E* p- o0 {0 u6 v
7 Y4 w, |2 H& q
2011-12: $23 million deficit
1 t$ [ X6 Q( K! p3 B
* {) z- I+ A: Q: S5 y2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
/ t8 l3 d( j4 J" H( n8 t- c- f( X1 Z9 ?! U! D0 M9 k' w: [( {
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|