 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
' D" c6 O# b3 T# ^/ t1 V! L/ I, L; t# ]% V
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& P0 i* s7 {- `- c: ^% c1 N% [1 D" d6 E! u- J. w
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
' C3 d# h8 o) m" Pexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
: W/ h5 B' F% b5 |5 w- Lquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic6 b/ ?0 b( r# o7 `
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit0 P: q0 H7 \9 S# a t
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and J$ [( I d* Z ]7 F; f' m* V- ]
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 N; g. [8 {# b
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal0 O' O) Z6 L6 I% `) ]5 v* k" r
LePage Real Estate Services.
0 x U% S: ?2 Y% R, [# s
K" B* S' y- P* i Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters: P3 s7 [4 {+ \, `9 `! V3 j( J V
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
" r p2 p! I5 z ?1 j aconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and2 G y: v( e/ }8 ?6 w
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
0 Q, a7 k8 U2 B% k3 Rresidential real estate sector.
! k; A" m( @0 V# _ A# o5 E" U/ f; h
0 m" j" t9 P4 h: ^( R/ F3 ^7 x0 ~ Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation/ Z2 V' \7 W4 o0 f
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
4 ]5 C+ e( E: V( M3 z9 byear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
- ]1 ^% ]: {" W(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380) n; s, k2 q. X, H
(+13.2%).
+ g H1 l) B9 p9 Y/ o' L
2 ]! Q) x* e, W* N2 z* N: j E "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 g0 R$ |3 B! G# T ?' R! [6 y% lduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
/ }1 l% w6 R% K0 H! Q# X# qfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are/ `, w9 |- a# C/ a4 ~7 X/ h1 T
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! Y! S" h' y* R7 s
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.1 m+ h) W7 \9 Q; _- W
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 I% u9 A) k" o7 c1 M( a! z# ~welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy8 f9 K3 c% r% {0 q! {0 c& h# f
balanced market."1 I' P0 q4 j3 M$ e; p, t
6 k7 T2 U: T* c$ O$ P Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,) S2 I: s7 ?7 \8 l* }' x
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
5 Q- c. N/ \. E; oto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
( z8 D2 V; _. L- _. W- }, p8 xthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
7 _. i, o! y2 f+ V; P6 _9 c( ~energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
6 N- J7 U( ?1 smanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
* @/ [; m. y1 U! Cbreaking price appreciations.$ d5 [) U6 K7 ^0 S
3 D I1 @( v6 | Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
) V) g& v4 N& \/ I$ `/ M7 J- b9 Aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the/ Z% _6 _, ? ?; V
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
. N2 U/ @$ S) c( D/ O2 y% e3 C# ~ ^0 b d
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
6 m) g5 i$ R8 zeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
4 Y. H8 K# ^/ {2 H$ w2 C6 I& jconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off$ d. S+ d3 a/ S* ~: ?" S0 G
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ n/ f. p( q4 g/ B7 v& V$ W0 l/ @/ |2 `3 HIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 f3 E- k, Y4 _# qgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of/ E: z7 u( H. i1 j. [
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
8 M6 k h) k- [ H
* z% `9 |: Y! S( w9 i4 n While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing0 }: I* \% ?( D6 c6 r5 i) @: @8 V
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
$ [; H6 U; Q* s- {3 c) g) ^% z5 Yfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
S# H. S6 a% i5 s1 ~are markedly different than those found in the United States.( b6 c) h2 {6 k
. M& v, \( i5 C7 G/ z4 {: j Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the1 A. e/ |' ~( ?0 Z
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's* r. h7 x* w P9 t
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the, b" _5 \+ x; _
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general; S; K+ a7 m- h6 D& D- B
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
5 e6 e0 d. a2 U% u$ L0 ]downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and, F. }$ M: l) o& |6 d
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization% D$ p) C0 V. L. g- G; ^
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
( Z- n$ v8 ]: T( D3 n3 L$ _
$ u! `$ X, J0 N2 X, j <<
5 ~" i" x# r9 V( `. Y3 q$ p2 N REGIONAL SUMMARIES1 Z/ N, a4 |) O4 O
>>
- v' F/ O+ L6 V- P- D7 D! \% ~1 i& ~* ~# u
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in& [8 A% o% i' { L: m6 a$ d0 d
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate$ s9 W4 \6 m" i, [4 ^8 K
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
0 R+ Q g3 M# ^* [! ?looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
+ U2 L+ ^7 k' h- Hrenovations.
. J5 v% Q% Y1 P/ W/ I/ T+ v k: \* J; m4 n6 P" V) H& g. Z. _
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
: w( V$ r, f) U, ?increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation) x! _ `+ w7 K8 p
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and; {7 W; Z( a& r3 H+ R3 {5 e0 V
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.7 [4 r, T `( s( j2 P r$ Q
0 a( T8 F8 u, G8 n% }: n+ F) n- R
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer! w" T( g$ r5 V V- K/ _
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: g* q2 m" ~% B! r ~" ^5 U( I" pquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new m6 _" [ I) V/ g
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% i" i% B( s) `$ r- b Ato the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ `$ d( }! M# U; o+ uand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
t1 W* l$ q8 y! r; i8 U7 k. ]+ L& v. d0 ^, t; o& \" g/ X
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced7 m* t. r7 C ~- q- H& h
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
1 j. N2 G: T9 @+ Y1 W- p9 F( Rhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
$ w6 B- u1 ]9 v( ?was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
8 @- u) F9 I% @& @dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 F/ k( s7 z6 S" T5 F7 q/ m3 Lbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
" @$ H, M0 H. i* d' u0 c% t* e& z! a/ L7 Q( ~8 l# H
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly/ [5 }$ G. r+ b2 H
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
3 B$ [9 i$ Z% E& S) ]+ R8 w( npriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,8 ?2 s+ l" P! Q
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
- Z( t7 b5 O; h+ h0 P# gfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.; c2 z- e* u9 P: U/ u
- H. Q( J" a* F9 k
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house4 M9 e3 J& }$ H. z- ?
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
2 C. G' a7 ?! ulevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
% ~. c. `. o& J+ @8 \2 Xfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
2 O& \8 Z: s3 G ~( k/ Fwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, k7 \8 h* T# q% c. E3 a7 \4 Tpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before9 i8 G" B$ P% d) f; X1 B4 \+ \. V
making a purchase./ { [) b$ x+ }
( W8 w% B' b& r. O9 T7 d" S. a
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing9 h% b( W J. y6 E
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong) l. S# c5 j/ S U" I: \; Z
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city9 ^, p# w) M1 e" f' A: b
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
! n7 u- n7 L( x& E( J0 C4 G$ Vattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown/ O% }2 ^8 C. _0 Z+ }
amenities.
6 Z( ^$ ]6 l( Z6 `6 M/ _
% `. T) K$ ^) b9 P+ K. N The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
8 T/ J @( I8 J" _# Zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
" r/ ? C+ f) [! U" f9 Facross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
. x$ ?# Z& ^/ c4 X0 W) xcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
+ S' b3 ?+ x+ _5 @' ?driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle: R( ~# m& s3 h; O
residence, rather than for investment.
P7 u: O( C: s9 k. f0 y
5 @ j# B4 b* y O) H The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
_& ^/ z9 V) E. [house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted/ B9 N4 s9 Z* D+ N) P/ `
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer' X/ y( _& @' y* W
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
6 u$ Z2 p: h5 Hrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
9 u7 O9 W# X9 k. k2 cthe market.3 y( d& A4 ^- j
# v+ r8 Q; S, I$ l% W/ `
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
8 X8 J1 |/ z" R5 }0 jJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In5 W6 ]% t; p2 A, z/ c
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
% {% `* d) X& |9 Y2 xmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
/ a, p! s, T: `/ E1 {) k* P7 J5 Fto the shortage of available inventory.
8 x, e! c4 c9 Y, ~! _' T3 c; V
6 ^1 B c2 O/ I. h3 X( ^1 @! x Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
. F) v' h( R/ vmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 X+ q: a) {- `5 m" P4 h7 K c
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses* u' f/ ^0 p9 e! @" V5 q4 P( J
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! N# r, I7 R) z/ j: u
2 R) p* X" h8 {9 n" K9 f ]* B Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
+ ?' a' x8 ]( U4 J- Ain the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low& B+ v" L! P, s) x% o1 r
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
) ]4 c$ p) P; [0 ^& Bpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring+ g9 X* G& h+ L4 T/ ?' k* { l& M
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer& F* @. C$ _; ^, |+ g
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
, G' e$ z$ V& y7 kbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.; o+ Q; b% N1 c% J6 j
+ m4 r* C) ^; W
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
" E0 N3 B8 w: n0 i3 Y/ L1 Y% [as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; G+ u2 ~4 q% n7 ` u7 x
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
5 z2 [" o, P3 x9 ]9 lmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices* @4 S W1 v; O/ e. H' U
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
: m; y' ]8 I; `6 `1 fin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
/ C& ?& `% D$ S9 x* L. w( K6 ptowards the end of 2006.
) G' |7 q- W( I, J i- N' D
: g ]5 s% z, {! d1 UWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of% x( g$ X0 R1 ~7 B0 V' l1 \
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
2 ~$ U0 J9 E- Vto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
! j' A' ^- o/ j* ^9 M3 q7 Pgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
& Z& ]* k7 S9 i' P: b2 c, Eforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
' n% q* Q5 U' x# h0 u. a) n: s& Spressure on tight inventory levels.
1 m1 f+ z8 e: n( q9 c% j1 R% Z* C R, A
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
0 x. m# b$ g3 g% Kfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people- D! H2 [' K" }
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
$ c' I8 _* Q7 \7 m- l8 ~4 ^' Nwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching* O- y& ~8 J$ E) x- |- j
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.- L; j, O: n& w# U' X6 D( O
8 F& K! H: ~2 t4 t! N& _3 W/ @ <<1 X9 z6 ~- d$ ]0 ?
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
% R) ~; |. b7 O: J
& H9 j9 V2 E) @! Y( K$ o% P -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 m4 f x& D. [ `
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey5 f& y4 M! n& e/ e L2 u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) Q2 j- u- h" X4 @. U 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q30 J( T9 j! J/ o* b! @! R
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
/ H; C' @# p; j9 J0 B/ P0 Z) v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* y0 r9 [ L3 y Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
6 b; v- S- H3 _0 @7 s: ^7 ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 j% H1 J% M2 h2 h5 m8 p6 J Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
?8 Z q9 V) U- N -------------------------------------------------------------------------; B9 b; @+ R! @+ `, ~
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000' q F& n2 ^/ F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; M. q) p7 g: o' l$ H2 f5 A* x
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -3 F9 w' d) r* ^" s% f: w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% A) E) q s" T" K7 a9 [+ P
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333; R9 ?" h( s+ U2 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! N. u) g4 C3 ]) o$ {9 G Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
9 q: {/ d4 A- [7 R _/ f$ I -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 R, D* ~2 B& I# t
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185) b7 v l+ r: X0 e# h: z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 v6 L) D% F y) h& } y+ ^
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250+ z; c# [% t9 N7 r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 ^# h+ l- x) ?: U- h Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7668 X# _: t8 e# w- i
------------------------------------------------------------------------- h: F8 V- O4 I1 {% s/ z
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707$ x7 ^ U+ L1 _* \& b6 o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 l1 Z" Z. E* j1 A
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5001 J# t$ W- \( Z7 m# x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 { ?1 T5 D9 z
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389, D' N. I* X( m8 s R- j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" {% @$ R( Y% H6 }6 N+ v
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
3 K$ H7 y* [# g8 B+ P1 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ~2 ]+ J6 B" P3 F" Q
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500% r' ~5 V; b3 \" m8 o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: H# R& |; c) U1 w Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000+ N \* I; y' n& H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 H2 ?& W' o: X' B/ ~
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860, T C4 J1 S$ E' c$ D- \/ G2 E- c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: N& e: h* y1 R5 [- F
' u$ L- C2 D0 T% n5 p3 x6 S -------------------------------------------------------------- I* K! [" A0 K ^4 U+ y( ~
Standard Condominium
/ p7 G5 Q7 K: O1 Q7 v; R9 @ -------------------------------------------------------------7 H5 Q/ q) a1 J" d7 m4 t5 g
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
* H9 X' x# D$ t2 W& E/ u Market % Change Average Average % Change0 ?' ^+ E! G4 n! c0 l! b! y
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 u; R$ J( x6 M7 F) c1 D2 ] Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9% u+ Y4 R: p8 u! T
-------------------------------------------------------------
) C/ D$ p! S7 Y/ t/ p0 k* f# \ Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
, N+ W' C/ k/ b/ q q w8 r -------------------------------------------------------------6 K9 o- J- }2 q O7 N- t
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
' o3 `4 U8 \( c9 S% }: J) M( m -------------------------------------------------------------0 `9 Z: ~4 ?! [# y
Saint John N/A - - N/A
4 \4 [# X" g$ j8 D -------------------------------------------------------------
0 u D/ N; B+ m2 @ St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
/ Q" f/ I3 m( F* b0 x+ V' B -------------------------------------------------------------
! E; q6 G5 p K* j9 U' ? Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
1 x/ Z- v4 T2 d* [% i3 { -------------------------------------------------------------
# [! r" o) L* J Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
/ p6 y8 h) q# {$ n( a' u% N1 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------: e6 v3 ]- A8 p) v
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%) ^+ z1 l7 S# h: b4 T9 o: W
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ P1 D+ I2 w8 s `& b0 m Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%0 _" `; v# E; i& \ H$ z$ q
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 e; v) a) ^: n Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
% G+ s) N! h/ E+ b9 V -------------------------------------------------------------
; G+ o% U" [' V. u+ y( I! Y- X Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
( q2 u6 ` `7 q9 d4 z( {4 r -------------------------------------------------------------& v# [7 p6 a; t# ^2 |( ]5 g5 n
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%. H; J5 C4 \2 Q: T
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 {/ a: i, w5 z" E9 F( z2 g4 G Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%! r* O. `( @+ i- ?! ^' Y7 v- @
-------------------------------------------------------------
- I; H5 D1 B: ~7 c' d! _4 H0 k Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%7 [3 _% W* K4 n! X
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 b, H% @5 V' q9 n1 j" O Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
: O+ H; k# Q/ T0 B- n -------------------------------------------------------------$ f* z( |, O8 x- y4 T% W' o3 U- O
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%5 }2 |& e9 H6 k8 j6 w
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 Y6 F7 v, ^( y, J: K0 e% _ >>
" D9 L n4 Z1 V1 v& ~4 _3 x, u9 z$ l) ]- `
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined& v {, }; e0 j9 u
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint W5 l$ c( Q! a% I9 t& r0 U
John and Victoria.
! @. ~1 j( }8 M0 g
" ~8 E0 {7 B; y2 c' J, {( t' S6 s1 X The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
4 k' A& y; S/ e' Tcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
4 b* _* r6 D' |9 khousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
8 K. H0 ^9 s" x$ F" H2 G, creferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
2 d& Y- |8 a: p1 G3 K2 E9 Ntrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities7 J$ T$ v# _, Z, h
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is$ u; G% F. y: P( B. y
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current" u0 ]* Y# H4 E5 H k! L. I3 _* e0 {
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable+ D7 p8 U) p$ l0 z# ^1 r, q( q
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on6 b( o: M5 c/ j* `7 P+ V( D x
November 15, 2006.4 O% N6 }) n1 b3 {2 w. a
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
% q5 l" w M a. P7 Mfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
1 X; Y. j) C: O4 x/ R: Qprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
0 f1 u \7 e9 Iavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|