埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2170|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
+ z- x6 @' U+ m3 g0 a" F2 h! R# j( l1 B* o, ^! a/ F& w; r
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -8 t* F( Q+ d7 E) o2 k5 |
+ j! O7 d9 o8 N8 S
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
" t0 h9 _" g& z; \3 xexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third$ Y4 [$ p- h6 p# {' D$ a5 [. k. ~& y
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic7 a+ x9 J3 ?; |) ~' m
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 M7 t" Q8 `4 |price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
, i6 P- d: m% U7 G# w+ {" Emore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,( H% h: |% H/ T# s" |1 f: D
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. }2 X8 _# R" k& q: b
LePage Real Estate Services.
1 L: Y/ S/ A: s+ Z. w+ I" T$ o# z, [1 ~4 V4 a* S# }& Q( ^! H
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
7 W- d' R+ U3 k3 m# Z* ?& q5 Xare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
$ n8 N$ x  _: S2 q% zconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and2 x) r- @& R) m2 h# K7 P# m$ M4 v$ d, V
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
9 K$ e7 K7 n: {/ h/ {: C4 y, uresidential real estate sector.
7 z% @& e" U' V" a: R8 L: U' Z; z* W+ E' w
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
: c4 A: m4 c- n1 i3 S5 L6 Boccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
: Y- J$ m7 G3 ^  {+ c; i$ Ayear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562) m7 Z4 |7 x/ A# Y6 o, P
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
. x& m$ I7 t4 ?* ](+13.2%).
' z: Z5 Q; n3 h6 j* @& h: k) ]5 e/ H8 V' T2 f% w
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth2 H! O& L0 |8 D9 F
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
0 B, {4 g3 h0 z8 W' Tfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
+ \; A. Q. G- Q# t! ?5 Rpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
8 e  ]5 b4 M5 Upresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.% T% i% z+ Q' |+ u7 @5 N9 O
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
: I! f" e1 {' ?; j; K2 Zwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy4 P/ ]- L" n7 v) [* ^
balanced market."
" Y  N- n% `  R3 B6 s
* h/ \8 q2 O. u    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,- i- l3 F: ?! k0 H. k
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift+ w# r8 q3 J* o4 ]6 Q9 x' J6 r% `
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
; E- t9 w5 o! P: nthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core- ^* h9 Q7 S, r9 o! h+ x
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
7 N1 \0 C- Z5 G' W" _6 X5 Zmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record) b* O1 l' h' z& [- O
breaking price appreciations.
. \+ q  l; T. B6 Z, H  v( |% r' k, `$ h
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
2 ?. i# F* J( ]# Ieconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
5 _' i$ p5 A$ {, [4 |largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 I1 F2 S* f+ q
' I# q0 j2 i- r/ O
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
9 G- f& \, b5 [. K  D2 Seconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
7 S1 M& }1 g* e0 lconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
- Q7 `  e: J% O2 ~8 G  ^. |3 Yslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.) C' b( }. X8 z+ s6 _
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
! A3 q$ q* ~% M$ t1 _greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of- I, `  ~, Z9 q: n* d
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
* `0 I8 u3 _5 w4 ~/ P9 G3 l; w  v2 m# i3 K! F1 F2 }) u4 ^4 o& ]
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing) m* V) A% Z  M0 C
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
6 s' k5 [: p  u9 k4 Y* K# Nfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada  {- _3 \/ h- g+ V
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
) j" }# ]& ]# Y  h
8 n' W7 n0 V+ k! |; @) r0 o, C    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
2 q  ~- |) K6 G* G& v( R0 LAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
8 Q1 Z  V/ Q0 x' }7 Y8 Bfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
2 p1 T% R6 L# W  p: zrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
+ u; Q, `+ b% M- F8 @affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the0 K4 c: }) [1 k4 O) {
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and: G5 Y- D2 V& L: M  B8 c2 U+ ~2 I" [
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
. a. z9 y0 f; D+ M8 C) i$ qmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."7 q' J2 j8 N! z) H
' d, r2 }5 a, c8 R7 J/ A
    <<2 f  {$ h$ N% W6 C
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES' O* B) \5 F( }1 \9 ^/ q
    >>
/ c8 Y* A; u) \& E1 h- I" v6 J' U# N7 F
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
2 f8 G9 D" K: gHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate. k( ?+ v& h" x
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time  e  y  U. q3 S' X6 W8 [5 ~& O
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
% ^2 M6 I4 B* r- C6 z& u' r- N) wrenovations.
8 q1 W) m) L! A7 a' g  m3 E' h) U7 y* d  r" P2 a% g) e
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
* W3 J  x5 |( X3 @  b. hincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: L' p& a8 _' K6 }
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and  K4 S. U' i5 u& M( V$ \
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
9 C6 i( S5 D6 z+ d5 l: b: J. M0 p/ _( [$ U
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
6 ]5 H# }! ?, Vslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
& X) L' l( X# V; L+ q2 jquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new/ s# Q. V7 r' k8 [2 M6 p7 G4 }
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
; X( G1 Z$ w2 ~$ ~( \% eto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
) T9 c0 w  \( L, \and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
. n* D0 C2 K8 W4 d  ~5 s6 P& |$ ^* ?7 V9 X9 a* m
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
. A  K$ i0 D+ d5 j* nconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
1 L+ ^, @4 X& {. H1 Vhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
' h$ j0 Y- {1 Q$ A) Y, f! cwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian! u0 w( q, L2 l; _( W1 n! I( S) @& X5 E
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
& N6 C; ?; Y# qbuyers with more options when looking for a home.6 |4 v. N9 P; p9 x4 ]% b
' C) y6 ]4 n! \  m2 l2 r3 k$ j+ N
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly/ \3 ]' |6 J0 ]$ p% h* s! n
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes( J  i% S0 V8 Z  Y# t0 d- Z( U
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
& c3 F# ~, O% Q9 Las some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last3 l( T6 k3 g9 a  ?) r  q+ U
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
0 o5 V! b- y  @# m
$ x9 N* C6 W7 s* x5 {7 d4 ]    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house+ E* l6 G, S0 g8 n4 q2 x8 c; T
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory1 b2 X8 ~, c4 t7 q
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
5 }8 t" r/ U4 R3 k& s2 pfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,/ s/ R% X3 v: T. y' H; i2 {
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the8 p- O3 P) E) `' ?/ m) C
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before8 {& V) G" ^* B9 S
making a purchase.9 h% f( M, R: E6 l

" S. e: i& j& u0 {# t    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
4 h5 C& j$ U; x6 }7 B( Qmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong6 b" S: s) o5 d3 d, }: Q
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city! t: D4 P/ v$ A- O+ c5 Z
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
, J! h) ]0 @% F1 Xattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
3 y9 f* j' o& _7 ~amenities.1 W5 Y/ [1 _* S

0 `: [1 C' g% L( k    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
  z% B( C; N. }. _throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
/ w4 D  B' X' C6 T% d5 f  x5 [% K6 [across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
$ N. g* [9 g9 K6 n7 o+ E' Kcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
4 ~) C' b8 U; c" S+ f6 }driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
& K4 r& a+ V( I* v: n. zresidence, rather than for investment.: ]) s- m/ e8 q% ?$ T6 ?5 A4 g

; r% @* I( i% @, i, Y" d    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as9 O9 R- M$ b& g$ Y  C4 h$ g
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
0 o6 [7 g0 _: [6 C$ A. M1 R! lin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
8 o; e3 a: L* B$ ^1 O5 A5 Mconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! c) Z* O" R! }5 C3 `5 c. i; lrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter, B- ?7 C' J8 B/ E4 K! w" _& f
the market.
! r7 d4 g, P. C: C; F( N& X0 L5 x/ @; [) S" b, K
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through: O8 O: W5 v( d4 f: G- h! _
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
9 O$ _' B9 W! n. K; rAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring4 u4 g. o1 H- @' x6 d) b) ^5 V, @
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
$ [* u. y  f1 F# x& C1 tto the shortage of available inventory.$ z, p! z# r7 C% |( W. N+ T

+ D1 ?5 E4 \! s( r    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
. ^& [( C, L7 ]/ R. cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
! A8 x" G  v- H4 _+ @  }vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
( N, I# ~  J" s5 [! q* x; c6 q8 Dstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.; ?3 z* t. ?: {& g

! A4 I9 X% a3 s& A! g7 s! J9 [9 k    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- Z# i& d$ c4 c4 Z# Y$ F8 V. iin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low- H7 J5 U6 @1 r$ t
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
+ h8 T! C: v4 i. spressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring8 R' l5 |* m  [, _( M0 N: P& K
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer0 j4 j) Q% H  h6 j
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as! e# y- u) F4 [
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
4 A- V$ Y# A  l6 T  _2 y

5 K6 v& t' |% k( O3 z- J    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
9 v$ s1 W, u. \" c* Q  ?as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton9 M* ~. B" H( _6 Z
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,' v( p+ y( t% |" [. j
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( Z4 C- Z! S  F: K
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve8 p# i0 N0 L$ ]4 h6 O3 m" }/ A
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly/ B! K  E; K. n1 b2 R" q8 U
towards the end of 2006.
    2 c+ S. t" r; w1 {( ], E3 g, r
+ `( M7 z# a$ m; q# Q
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of, f$ f* n' n7 |1 m) I+ O2 i8 {9 Y
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
! S( _# Q" a6 H& R5 F  f1 gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse: |) T& f3 j4 l5 u7 _, F
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
0 W. O- |8 Y: z; N& i# qforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
+ I9 D7 n+ e% m. l& c8 d( R6 Opressure on tight inventory levels.) ?4 j) o- X3 A/ z+ {

3 t' C0 G' ~$ I* o3 p2 Z( R# C    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
9 k  F+ T3 C# J3 W7 i* `# ~  D/ ~fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people. X2 f# Y% n! h, V0 K
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;/ K# G& V$ ^0 K- M) |8 h
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
9 t0 F; y3 n7 t: Nfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
, ]5 K/ T& h# f2 @* v
& N) @6 n. T9 E+ C1 g6 f& b4 u  {    <<
, t' r3 K" t# X: S# w      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
6 c% @0 P7 O" |: }& Z
( m5 `6 t7 B* a7 K* ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 g, b1 c: s& p3 M; h                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
7 Q% n0 ]$ |. W7 g  h" E3 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. W4 B) ^6 _9 j0 y                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3$ |2 l: y$ _8 K+ p1 O+ q
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
, r7 {9 w+ O: d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 c- F0 d+ D" F4 k  x    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
, A- C( s. r- D6 ]# n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 D7 k' g, d2 o  K4 q    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0003 i3 d; ]- ?* Q+ A! X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) _3 R3 q2 v. T7 h" l7 r
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000/ d4 H3 P. \5 w4 g  e$ z  U5 A% `! ]- s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 P+ e. }, H' y/ f3 U    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -$ h2 B1 A1 T3 T9 O7 ~: q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: S$ r! O8 H9 @0 P2 y    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
+ S0 N$ H" N+ p4 ^6 p7 P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% h8 o* `9 ]2 r, ?    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
$ X8 t& `( _2 L0 m* n: S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) `. `5 q6 E4 Z: t! D5 g# `
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
7 G3 T( z2 a8 H" A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: Z$ u  |3 H( |) n5 @. |
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250% k8 U% s! _0 r% Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& @* b' w6 {+ e6 d    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
' k# a  R5 z0 U; ?4 i* w- p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& d+ k; x+ {/ }9 \0 j; N3 k# _
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
$ `7 E) {  t& v. y+ J3 [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ G) e* |* h" z* O7 a& o! c% j
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
: T6 \, _; p# E4 M" z. ?( q& [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 b8 j/ h1 V$ ^% }' G9 F% j  C    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3899 W! i7 P" v. e( e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ i- B8 I/ z3 u5 L/ l2 z    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714; x6 q" |9 l* L: n" L* K6 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 z) x3 w  [7 w) [9 W' I: ]    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5004 @! V, P( M- q8 Y2 M/ p* @/ B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 e6 [& @, r& n: f! O8 w# S    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
- c) v1 _0 o' W, T6 U6 g4 d1 {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- x3 R: l3 @+ [! F
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8608 [& q" `( `  L) Y. {. _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. D1 \9 b( u$ x1 [9 L5 u
7 X1 \9 S3 v! i5 |2 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------3 @1 \# `5 t, Z# A! ^! {
                               Standard Condominium
( C0 h* x1 M+ ~+ b    -------------------------------------------------------------
' O1 e/ m' k1 U) U% x8 i6 x, `" {                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo7 Q5 W* S' \2 {" `2 K' g
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
  b( K, w( g% y3 p    -------------------------------------------------------------
- d9 F, a( H0 s    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%8 g# _" ~* W  W' M0 b1 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 v: [; w% w  W' Q
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
- Z1 H. p  A$ Z; b! j    -------------------------------------------------------------
& `( f: d* G8 o  I    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
: ^0 M' @9 D( {' H4 o  X    -------------------------------------------------------------; V6 Z( N! E6 ]. ~) _
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
6 ~9 }6 ]& C2 E/ r& P    -------------------------------------------------------------
- t  K3 }2 Z. ^! ?8 Z    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%# z7 G- N. U0 v3 d! s+ E6 N; o% `
    -------------------------------------------------------------" ~" I2 ?$ P2 }4 R) N' E
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
9 l4 ]: t0 y0 l, i1 [8 B    -------------------------------------------------------------! F2 \( U/ f6 @" R
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
1 k( z  D( g: t7 }/ R5 l8 r$ w    -------------------------------------------------------------
  k% a" U& [1 E5 i. n5 [) K7 n    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%4 y+ Q- Z2 P1 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------. w7 O, u% y5 i
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%9 d7 s+ x4 u2 P( k! d' n
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ F/ `7 B" G  A$ Y* j  |    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%7 f* f/ }1 B5 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, Z" n1 |" t0 U# B: y    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
2 G7 }, b* Q1 H9 u5 q- N# K* _    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ l2 t5 ~9 {& G, |* n! Q2 e    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%) B3 ^7 Y7 q2 R& T4 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ r  g1 K& f8 k9 o  c: Q  A    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
( U6 |( ^  m2 D" Q9 G% d8 u* N    -------------------------------------------------------------: G3 q& f, U( t2 A) u( ^9 ^9 K* p1 L
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%: d7 ?+ I# Z% a3 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 L2 B( P) r/ o$ Q* g    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
" r7 ]$ {& N2 [1 y- t% @    -------------------------------------------------------------
- p" {* {5 \. E  ]8 t  {+ A    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
* c, Y3 ]8 i3 H+ f7 ^8 ^- \    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 e2 u4 F5 q1 P3 X, ?% Y$ e  H8 z    >>) t4 G' |  `' i7 h

' @% R) M6 Z: q, w; Z0 M    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
7 W/ Y  Q2 B$ X  L- d6 [6 d6 sin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint" L/ `' H* s+ s4 \# w# y0 F7 ~
John and Victoria.. ?- u) w  G& \, T8 u- ]: a; }

3 H  R6 z( G) d! p/ }    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
7 H+ W0 j5 m: h" a) M9 Xcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
6 ^$ N) `+ x' D* c8 rhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release0 u+ `4 J; O% N3 M/ {) l! @- l
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price$ l  D" k0 ^) S+ \- e
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities( s- ?' |' Y: Z% s
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
" I: L; |# w9 F; _8 navailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current* w6 r0 r3 s' x. N5 h3 o
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable1 }; m. I4 w9 i6 l
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ T$ p9 v# u9 x5 K2 n
November 15, 2006.4 {0 V* Q! @. L, a( q
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of; A4 b1 y- N8 I* P# E
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge2 X2 @+ A' V( F( H$ b( S
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is. I3 `5 x4 G: f# N7 Q
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-13 02:41 , Processed in 0.112546 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表