 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 8 Y V4 {/ \2 u# t1 t
) i% f( F) F6 J+ b0 q& \- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
. u" i+ F1 C0 l2 |, {7 O) k. {1 |& w3 T$ y8 F
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
% O% F0 p7 d# M2 U2 J% d( H! _6 gexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
$ Y) E) D: e. f& wquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
" X7 b9 U6 T; Y1 t" ?$ win the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
, c+ d0 v, W4 c1 @price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
# ^- d8 w0 A) \+ @7 b# Jmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 ]2 F' J/ D8 ], h* x% M* [3 v& Y
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
$ W6 }. a( h/ c; SLePage Real Estate Services.! T, V8 Z5 s8 |, X7 E5 ^( j
: D" D' O( l1 c0 } V
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
5 X' I6 A6 X0 @ D# t; F& P uare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
( c5 a+ ~* x& s' Econditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
' D4 K/ l) |7 g$ m% H2 v3 gsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
* }% w+ \* R( r6 f4 lresidential real estate sector.
1 P8 ], L) D+ v, ]* ~! z1 {, O
& @+ |: I6 k+ v, ~; W% s+ P Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation( C4 O4 E$ I7 ^' h: k8 R
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)8 ]) h# q: n* J( a& W+ b |
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
/ O1 S7 g1 N4 y# q+ A! O(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
# R8 `/ f$ n+ L2 Q# m6 Q(+13.2%).0 h8 z: b: f3 z+ G0 H
1 K" ^! ~3 V P# U5 O- \% ] "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth& z4 W- H/ a9 j0 P- [
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the5 e/ v9 |& [, a7 u
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
8 C j0 S2 C) epoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
0 C, t% e9 W& Q1 Ipresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
* [. D2 i( A: i"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We* x) s8 M X3 s9 n9 `+ }3 C
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy* K1 Z$ b) q2 w7 b! J8 w2 J
balanced market."
7 j0 N# l2 o+ a6 h8 d' @# _" p0 w7 d( v& |
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
; }) [; d! c f$ U5 S" Y) |considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ Y. F: S: A- P3 ^( k1 R
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued3 S! H, f! @/ O# A7 ]
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core. v3 l; E0 w; b b5 U' w# I. T
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
* u3 M2 Z2 c7 u1 V+ ?8 y: Q3 imanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record+ E4 f, L7 b* n, n5 a: z" S" Y6 ~
breaking price appreciations.
% G% B1 X) H5 h/ S# c* y& I! ?7 z% s9 r1 ?% J! K) X
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
2 }- ^. m; T" E1 }9 Ceconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the5 O( Z @3 E7 [# p
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.7 t8 o+ J& u. F# L
! q1 x- \2 M! C
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
/ d+ |2 r d/ jeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer7 Y$ G' c6 o; s; I4 |8 W
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
% J, [! U; `6 sslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
4 _) G1 [( S: C0 U, M$ z' qIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
- v& y2 n1 d: p3 X' ygreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
( z. A- b- H# [- Qprice appreciation when compared with 2005.: E, z% i2 m) F
0 M e0 I! k9 a! J- w$ d! h
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing7 r8 |- R4 l8 K
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and& ^. Z# c, Q% C2 G! a8 ?3 ~5 T
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada5 T- X! Z" Z3 h5 l
are markedly different than those found in the United States. T3 A0 M J# x: d! c9 }: n
6 k) e0 b* o( P5 _& E0 O Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
- k# N+ [% J1 B$ N# `4 g- B' oAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's: J1 G, a( Q, ~, ^
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the/ M* M. R( `5 S
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
0 t, b; t: V p( e- F1 k; _6 V- Y5 D9 Taffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the1 ^( Q* G0 O4 p; U0 f
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
5 c9 R2 ~- K& C8 m' |aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization7 G4 i$ N! W& D% r m7 Z
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ @& D% d3 ?6 x6 o; E
$ l# Y" R2 P. C7 }1 F4 ^
<<
# U. I& m" y" o! W REGIONAL SUMMARIES
5 X+ Z+ i% P4 V" P6 O >>
3 V$ S8 k! q) o$ @! j+ S0 |9 l9 t" J0 L2 U% U5 I/ ]
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in" w- I3 s$ h5 H- ~8 y* I
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate5 U, {1 T+ s( X. v! l3 T$ T
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
5 Q( R& b4 p& `2 u" _6 J, B9 l6 elooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
- w$ N6 ]& X, }! \; q8 k0 y! nrenovations.
/ {' p _; [( p) [* @% ^& j- J {4 v; d
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
2 X' e* p& h5 G9 _8 v" h' U( |; Fincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation [! f" h- [7 k2 F
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and: M1 d* C6 }( j; \& S
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.3 ~$ _% m) j/ h! }7 e% J3 ^
" z# b5 K0 b' M5 V0 f% y The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
3 _# C- G( l6 L0 d8 N. Q, e, F& R$ Xslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the( h$ h5 }4 U" V, [" R, o" h
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new& G( N r6 [3 W' e. {5 A, ?3 U/ [
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
5 j4 p9 L- i( r3 a6 Gto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 A* c N, \' K. G: n! w, b7 K4 ^
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.- x( b3 g& a2 z! k
8 @9 I/ a" K) C2 Q/ Z" ?- K
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
+ D2 u4 s" ~1 f' x, x; tconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
! A% k$ m4 |( ~! a; H$ S" e/ Thomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
; q, v6 B ], N: hwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
6 }# e0 I @+ S' j% F' Wdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing/ e( l. M4 Y! K: h$ t
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
2 ?" J9 ?# f7 c a: d- z; F* ?5 X( b ?+ ~' \6 p
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly& ?7 }) @8 C. C; R! g
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes% w; z9 Q$ f7 J3 b _3 n/ y
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
0 D, W! T4 a" _( Kas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
4 w( v: j3 d9 v" q9 w+ ^few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.5 e7 d1 S6 j7 o2 K. q' e$ P$ D/ |
) h* u9 d5 D5 o ]$ W4 w Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
. v3 W9 i+ H6 x! iprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory. {- G7 O9 ^/ j- s
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting+ N: P7 d& Z* N6 [
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,' E) |, a/ B5 A: H8 L& R, l$ O+ i1 T
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# ^: o* ^9 k$ k' t* P7 Cpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
) f. g% t4 G% `5 Pmaking a purchase.
% C& _; `9 y3 J& Z5 ?! ]
8 m/ _* b8 i9 i { Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ {. P5 \6 A3 z1 s- b
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong7 x% ?8 U$ R0 F9 Z
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
% p+ l% O9 e4 p- b% B P+ Rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) I; f h$ i) c6 Wattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# d4 c" \! t ?1 U# _
amenities.) [8 O; l- P5 n& W2 y' u6 h
! j, Y6 F3 j) \* Y( U) E3 i The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels/ d/ U0 `) @& D
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand8 g7 W9 c; Y) B0 X$ ]* k: w
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has3 |$ f% u ?( z+ d b' D: c
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
7 w. z8 H% H2 b& l: k6 {0 Ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
( _! x, B# C' Y ]7 hresidence, rather than for investment.
$ D- i. Y9 v+ A t7 K% |6 P7 Y: `! u% \) C' O) Y1 W7 f6 j" M
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as/ P4 U+ f" C% q& S a' y) G
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted% b9 V" f1 d8 Y
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer- V- A W8 U( G* J
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization+ }6 v+ C0 s9 D" o# b8 y" O$ o0 p
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter' J' j/ I0 I" a" E
the market.
% i2 Q2 U- y O. r& c
0 K4 w- d$ D% a N2 R0 i In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
: P9 R) }# b; hJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In- T' I$ v% Y {. |- F5 ^7 R H
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring% }3 U5 k/ F" e& v- G' T
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
8 l* U- r1 ]3 S& O5 m# ~4 A4 B/ Kto the shortage of available inventory.
0 `/ P5 s9 A! d5 l, t
0 I& F# {5 y' g* j9 P+ U% `& J! U Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
# s* {3 D% j! n. o3 u4 T$ s0 k5 c" q6 Qmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
( {: ~( @0 u1 U* H Lvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
, c9 B* d& s* u. q) s% x p) Estruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
& c1 W$ E; e# Q3 X8 W! g' e
5 ^* b. w3 N( \3 z" G Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
8 q4 }+ i4 e2 O, e2 p; j8 pin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low% j! h' p2 \: K1 ~
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ |4 h/ ^- c- N% S" E1 qpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring5 |, |! }* e4 ]7 y" w* L6 o5 p
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
+ q0 E: E3 W6 p1 w! c4 @8 C+ f& Eseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
]: H; j# W5 S6 R& n; abuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
# m* J: d J: A8 Y4 b/ e) n
( X$ X, [! C3 w! r7 ], v Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
1 e+ l9 Q, V* h. q M$ v6 v; Yas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton4 D8 x0 e: I2 u7 m
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,; S# S" N* o% R' ~' M3 |5 ^
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices" T. C, @8 T$ k3 d' ]% V
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve# I6 m* j- n9 Y( T! z2 [
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 f, c3 @8 a8 o- k8 h* p
towards the end of 2006. 2 t. o& f0 x$ \# M9 D; {
; l/ V" R5 Q% E' G. T" u: G
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
! C1 V( g r5 F3 C. |9 Y% Q+ O& g3 hinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable/ ]( j, S( s0 [, A7 g9 J4 L- B
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
1 \' ~; U* n+ L; l; Mgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to/ R, O' `! c( i! H* v4 o1 n
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added8 w8 h( W: f C' g; J4 d! z9 X
pressure on tight inventory levels.
9 Q% _! y! w! F5 x' d% |7 ?$ i7 |' X2 P9 x: R, _3 O
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic0 U, _, G. P. w: V
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
+ D& w5 K) t; w/ W; ]# F( Cinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
9 L# J. }4 W% @# a# b2 A/ q* xwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# l2 W* u$ W- R8 a% f2 Z
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.; x: {& C: @, K1 d* g% ]
9 D+ i! `- L8 G3 O
<<! N" U9 e/ G1 j9 V b: ?4 Y4 w1 y
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20066 N6 D, ?- p# I" d: E
: t& z5 i2 P j# i- f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 r$ j1 W4 ]9 n+ |8 J Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey" b \$ p: k1 D" U& b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 `/ G4 C R5 n
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3' w! v( ]; a0 h& w. w# A" O5 V
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
! I9 [0 C* R w7 k$ L) [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------; X9 w9 M* y2 a' @3 B" N, R
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
: h9 }7 k L% Q3 c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" [4 W; r/ E; K0 t Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000/ O0 c1 ~) p( Z% w. F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, T8 N( O% [* W1 e2 {
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000* i- a6 z0 Z" ^3 h4 o. {: h* i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Y# O* d# h. ]0 {2 n Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
. h6 B& v6 ?: T' ^0 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 L2 e/ I0 I3 n! [ f3 i St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333" a+ k( T7 S3 W, o$ D7 u% X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& C! K: Z0 S( _3 X9 Z8 l
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
7 c0 i w) ?- G* M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 N6 b$ ]$ z x& o Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1852 f: {; C0 i4 E3 b; _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ t# P9 G" u: o9 W( ` Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
8 i% q% [/ I8 o; _9 H5 i0 A. @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 R* i# R# K, u; ]; u6 z+ @
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7665 S7 F5 \9 A/ y: R3 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 [" ]1 v4 K6 } Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707 M3 p+ n# e% L+ ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 a: X+ r% ^' J; g" @ N# @
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5008 {( P7 ^4 _+ w5 B0 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- z4 ?+ t- v' f* h' L
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
" B" d; S2 D+ k- K3 ~" `. [2 G8 r; v -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ J# M3 R. h6 V) a `+ s* ]# `% a
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
W2 _8 S a) ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ^# C4 p' I$ S; [6 j Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5004 {$ {( V+ ~2 M2 E) _ n0 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: Q9 V/ L4 ], b# a/ H
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0002 ^5 {! t' l- W- J4 m" W1 j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 T4 R; _! L+ N; I6 \! q# d1 q National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8604 q* b8 `# k$ t5 j) O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 z- Z. A6 g/ ]0 a" }9 a O4 y8 I- t6 ]2 b
-------------------------------------------------------------- s3 E8 E# \! J1 z- H) l
Standard Condominium& P) [( R! a6 h$ ^
-------------------------------------------------------------1 g- B8 J3 M9 N: `9 K
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo6 _2 J% E' {- r9 b
Market % Change Average Average % Change
7 V- N2 X5 E# b+ F! ~' @ -------------------------------------------------------------
$ x# D" M# j( r7 U' p6 Z* I Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%, I2 S4 x* I W$ w7 h# k* q, L% F
-------------------------------------------------------------, S/ Y' k4 O5 l7 J3 `& L3 B. O' J
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
; K% g. `9 K ]. p9 w9 C2 Q j) d, @3 v -------------------------------------------------------------
# b# i- o7 a, G9 H. k Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
' A6 g+ i8 Y: \ -------------------------------------------------------------' E0 v% V l" _; O
Saint John N/A - - N/A
) c2 ^/ Y4 ?7 e -------------------------------------------------------------1 b0 V! U! Z5 K: G
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%+ |" ` l, U+ _( }
-------------------------------------------------------------
" e# p2 h$ |6 M Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%) v L2 S8 M1 A9 }/ ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
( A1 O+ W# }( h Z% ] Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%( B$ w1 I) G1 d0 i
-------------------------------------------------------------( s1 ?4 j: X- \2 ]( b2 q
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
$ q% n0 W# A; v$ I( U' ?1 r! W% L -------------------------------------------------------------
7 x B/ p8 j6 q) v" a- K7 t Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8% f: @# d5 c% H- b* ~, A9 I& x
-------------------------------------------------------------6 L+ y* X6 [! y+ O x- p0 d
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%: x( Y* E9 H' z7 P8 g" w% L* j
-------------------------------------------------------------% Y% V2 @- d8 u
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
/ L* k0 Q* v3 N, y9 O -------------------------------------------------------------5 F1 B' c8 R. s/ N
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
9 n. D$ O" S$ K! W( U% b0 [' F -------------------------------------------------------------, t# b, j" n6 k
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
* p5 L7 J% `2 ?/ x$ R) ? -------------------------------------------------------------
# n5 Z' m5 F( q- p Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
- P: @8 B+ ?1 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
# X7 [9 w7 V. A! [7 r* L Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
: b G3 b3 l. y$ w } -------------------------------------------------------------
, W! q( ]8 i$ F( @% Y, X; o National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
1 g6 ?5 V/ N- F1 s5 w" c" ] -------------------------------------------------------------
3 L4 ^8 S: p; @: n; ?! A) n% y >>' V# x; x, }- I+ I7 P: L5 y$ t
3 S a2 t( e/ {; _5 P( T; S Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined0 s. |* Q9 r4 u( B$ r/ o J
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
1 Q; C/ \! y1 _% A/ ]John and Victoria.
, _( o6 y& a% y& w
4 ?7 Q8 Z! {/ N n5 N The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
- {4 z1 r9 W+ n3 w1 v8 b* \& c, Ncomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
9 e [5 O3 c* @) Ehousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
' I3 B2 @4 Q0 A% S; ~; Mreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price. R3 B/ l. k8 n# @- Z, D2 d
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities" Y; R# ^3 h& ]# Y" a% S2 Q1 f. U. T
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
1 g' X! U% `: u+ Q S% `available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
$ L! ?6 Q& z* Hfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable/ M+ h" q5 K: e/ B! ^
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on. Z/ r$ l) Q# N; }" O* w) E
November 15, 2006.9 N. R' }8 V% ?0 |
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
# s4 |- I( @2 e/ }6 D9 i0 gfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
8 I; G' Z8 z* p- e& F4 Dprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is* f9 V6 o6 P3 Y& Z
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|