埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2169|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ; {* ^4 c: b8 b+ |: `! A' i- y
6 V4 z* q' F/ o6 p* d1 e
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -  W1 L  `0 O; _% p- L
/ N7 I: C+ R0 o9 u
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market, Q. |9 B1 k. C3 A, s% {6 ~
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
4 L0 T( A2 e* n1 Pquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic1 ^% a. y4 C; P! L2 M8 ^
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
# |% J/ q9 M( Y$ y) Vprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and" A8 y% G6 W# D. I* Z' F. I! d
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 l  K2 @3 L, Z( y! T8 G( aQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal9 W: k! M# r; Z. ^1 X
LePage Real Estate Services.
5 V' T: b$ K$ K& c3 b/ H/ @7 F% S' q: e* E  a. P
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters; ]! e% Q8 G+ f: u% y( ^
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic9 v: g0 a6 X2 a- x! ]& [- m
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
/ y( h6 v, b& S( @sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
" i9 V8 I& a: f" K0 _residential real estate sector.6 Q) a8 m6 {" Q

8 @' Q3 e; v: H% e) R    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
0 {2 l3 L+ {5 {( Aoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)8 T# w6 t) f' f6 W( ^  E
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
3 W/ n1 m2 P+ g1 `(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3803 b! F: @1 O; e& ^, o5 F; z
(+13.2%).
6 T9 @& L1 @' q8 d
' n0 U) \" S0 ]- v. R7 e    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth, L  b8 r) J" i) \
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the1 E/ X: t% P+ `% S, G  Y
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are, \( P+ {  g3 u4 a  t4 d
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 d) w, I/ C# s; Dpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
) u: L$ V  j  Z" k* t"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We* R2 A. s/ k% W/ Y6 @1 X/ I+ p7 l
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
8 ^2 w1 r9 v& j$ ~+ ^3 Gbalanced market."
# `. A+ E& g! T, ~5 K
3 N4 ~0 `3 S/ m7 D" X( J1 y6 f    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,6 X( b9 _! n$ W' D
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift! F1 b* P( ^3 \( R* |0 g
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued2 _' ?8 l" C  k3 J( t
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core4 G5 m9 x5 ^4 l& I* w) m! i. X
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
/ c- h; K( ?" s+ v/ `4 Umanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record& T) C+ v& Q3 s/ e
breaking price appreciations.
1 m1 U, z; }" s9 k. C
+ P  P: J) _% U4 Q7 y0 \; F    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
3 t. H; N- \8 z6 P9 B& S: |  Oeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the) V( {6 ]9 z' H( n& Q; q3 b- k
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.$ I$ E. q3 G" A2 m2 J8 L

9 u5 f- I1 r# m, b) f2 O( H    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
0 e$ i" A7 h- o- v1 A$ reconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer) V, Q; }7 b* p9 b8 }- m& q: ?; b
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off% s. l$ Y" A. Y' p1 x& a* C, x
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.3 v+ A+ j7 l8 q" j) C
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers7 G/ s8 L* M" p1 x2 W5 ]- O
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
: V0 X4 d* i; [) o4 |price appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 I6 B) g8 _, m$ S+ z+ k8 d" \, t! S# M& I# c  }! ]- R
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, ?4 w' [1 f4 D' bmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
; g  h7 x+ _2 ]" g; M9 \financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
% F: [0 B- C, Yare markedly different than those found in the United States.
$ e8 X+ Q* o/ Z% b, o
* J* p1 {7 H8 V# o' o; t  F1 F6 ^* }1 @2 M    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
9 ~6 N) a$ p6 r; s0 `" cAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
6 ^$ S3 n! f" }5 b* c: E' ifavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the. N% @1 n2 c2 |  p' _
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
1 ]# z# m: J  N! q( O3 y# Oaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ c4 x! _: ]/ Y# S! e
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
5 T' n( B! q9 I) I& [8 _+ Laggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
6 W% H9 t, n# Z0 n; umortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.": j: w4 ~1 `7 @9 z

2 H# W& t9 }, V6 J    <<
4 b% _9 T3 h& X5 Y. j                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
4 E9 }7 f6 k' [* o6 @    >>
" r8 K) a" U" R& B: K9 y" v0 Y4 M9 a  T: l% P! V+ z2 v, b
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in& K9 T- o, @& N/ T/ `
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate. m( D8 n. E0 m4 v) J+ v+ T. q
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
6 P: m2 q) n4 G4 C7 olooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
4 L2 k/ l6 _+ F: h4 U8 R3 brenovations.
; u' x4 y! U! I# K+ y& Z
( T2 r3 u5 q: g8 ]2 X+ F+ u5 P    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
2 N+ v0 Q! z- ]/ j- i( a  N2 E4 j/ Q+ uincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
' P& \' ~* o6 [( |. g* `  }compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
) a# q/ h" g$ sSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.) p% K3 q1 n5 \9 N

, F# E# r5 }7 e: H1 f    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% k! h  g+ o) y! e2 Q6 S
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
/ F  Y! M' J6 G" I: r" I) d9 s# \quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new$ v6 n2 ]) W/ B) M( _* s, N  b
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
5 {' s$ x2 S) q2 k* c7 m" u$ Xto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
4 i# j- k' r1 `$ ]1 Land are instead opting for more affordable housing options.6 A* I- q6 P4 q3 u1 k
7 R4 ~! C: v5 M& s+ v
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced+ ^" U- B3 E6 C& }3 f, c0 ]
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their  `- w$ ]4 j0 J4 F3 F! z
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
" m1 l( ^) ?; c# J; gwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian7 `& n7 I: Z/ o4 l. S. `
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing2 x9 _& A) F% i% ^
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
  p8 X3 c0 x! Z- U3 ^4 v& u: `6 r. v0 T2 e
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
, ~" L1 F% H- I1 O# n9 uamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes# v- x6 f8 j( C* a
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,( a4 R; K# D7 i' s: ]* W3 y1 d# a7 Z
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* H% I: W% `. m2 l
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
; B) o( \8 z2 G2 H7 \$ W; A" h0 h# b% @
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house0 o2 ]+ G8 t2 H9 A
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory9 ]; _  j# U  p* {( Q: h+ I; K
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting# q) t  b1 U4 R+ X
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,; v6 G9 r8 v( C
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
: h0 R& s# C8 [( G' Kpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
6 K( k2 i/ m+ Gmaking a purchase.7 n. A# e9 d  G) P+ E
. |$ q/ M( L( k
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
# L8 t" F& E: y4 ?markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong- R: u0 B& Y) K0 \5 c% O( m* c
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
  D" }" I# Q$ i1 o  |' j1 ycentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting# {+ s( a' ?5 Z  h$ Z6 g
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown% |+ n$ ^" I1 c2 F" l# f. I0 r
amenities.0 R8 ?" ^- h# \4 H8 U" T/ J
) @6 ~/ _0 Q8 m. P- W
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels# L$ x3 s- R, n$ U, w( _2 G$ e
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
9 `- [( ?* G3 oacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
- Q( A: N! R% e; M# rcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
, ]8 C  @& h: C" ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle! v, ?% O# m5 {/ i2 S0 i% ?
residence, rather than for investment.
1 n# Q0 K/ _' A9 I( u) j/ q
. N3 J- M* S1 h' H    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
7 @6 h( |* B* R0 \; hhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted0 n. s) [$ U3 ^( _( f
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer, a- u' S9 ?( m% l
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization% J- m4 K4 {& ^! D# H: E
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter$ k; X! `( k$ b
the market.
5 \+ K$ C( G, c; t$ c- P
7 q( Z' S: q" c3 H* h* l9 ]8 W    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through( |6 k2 L% T- I0 e# w* u
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In+ I9 Y5 E# y% q; H3 N- m
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
1 C; G$ R/ V' |4 nmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
( @* ?- ?7 z+ i; uto the shortage of available inventory.4 v( M8 W4 U9 X
4 B" v8 A$ }6 f! F. S) X8 z
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
! o0 ~' k1 i  [* Tmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
6 z4 t; {( |7 D8 B: ^/ S; z6 r$ v# Wvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses. e, `9 x& N: A
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province." F) T3 j5 a7 S

4 {: Y0 l' Y% D% C+ x* `- [    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases& f  v9 T5 z/ P* t( z" @/ b7 p
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low2 W: @# L- U: G7 Z* q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
, {& V$ ^. P; @0 F) ^+ bpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
7 q" [5 e5 R6 \8 Q7 E/ Pprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer' Q" R" s1 m* d) C7 J+ p/ p; x9 P' n$ H
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as5 Y/ x0 R. ?7 g& K* o1 J6 J/ P
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
& d0 K2 F# k2 u
2 ^4 W; u- {1 {" _1 r
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
- D9 }" x* f+ z8 xas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
0 q2 z# A. [8 Bremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
) w3 k% p" {$ M5 ~1 imaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
, o# D# u! j3 y. Hincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
4 x1 v9 m$ s* ?, h- oin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly* W4 ^$ N0 ?  }# N+ f
towards the end of 2006.
    + j% B  J9 B9 s$ p5 k7 C

- @+ L. f6 c$ ]  x0 vWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
0 @( p/ u' p& R" j0 {inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
6 E) H+ B1 `( ^% Mto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse: h2 e& y. F3 Y! N
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to) F+ G, z% L: k5 Y
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added2 ?# M7 S5 d+ r: H: l. |
pressure on tight inventory levels.
" m9 @6 i! J/ J  u: ^$ ~
7 v; A4 C) K& M; o2 l7 T8 w% `    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
1 x! Z  K- E" q8 ^$ nfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
* {5 {$ d7 f+ p/ Zinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;. q% X7 |' n( o, j9 U
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching9 N0 E; v: l, Z
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
2 g2 K. l) H! V1 J
& |8 z$ F8 w2 ?: o" X    <<  D# q8 n  E- M8 e0 v, S- ~' n( q
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20064 X2 L# ?* H5 Q6 `- k, e

% H. ]& G) l. l! w8 e1 a1 J- S0 C  Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 d5 o( ?8 f6 O) {  k
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
/ U0 R  I, L! x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: u3 c0 o1 M! R1 ~
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
' E5 K3 [) \! g    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
  s* G/ A* \$ Y; O) [% W* q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 S4 Z2 y9 s$ p1 ?3 g* `
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000* K) L7 e# g' R+ ^( O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  e7 F" b: `; K2 b( m    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
5 f# l7 |/ T  y$ M$ `" B) k) e# \& o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& \' d0 A6 n1 a2 S
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000/ x4 R, Z+ y+ z0 \$ X. F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ^6 h6 W' D' j; v- C    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -9 |1 l2 Z0 @8 b+ z9 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  f4 p  `' q. B$ T8 R
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3331 n; c+ F7 V4 S5 _* p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 U" a4 U, y6 I, z- s: b    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
0 m6 \! w4 Y" i) Q0 R- b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. g* l' z0 \  r    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1858 ]6 i0 r; X  ]& n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ?. ~& a" l. I  i/ K    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250; E% E8 U  R# p0 W0 M" j, Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( y; {6 Q; k: |    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
; s9 r6 U# K: N: T- w1 u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: }. M3 v0 z/ L7 D- T0 H/ S    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707* V: h, @2 b5 }8 o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 x# S: G. X/ N# D8 _    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5007 h/ u, i/ p# J) ?* S6 C$ @. I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ Q8 ^) \8 @: N1 \    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
. N) r" P0 R1 F& l) F' |6 @. z4 }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& q6 W3 |' A6 y    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714: I) @! P: t: z; f0 u! Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& w1 A' ?* L  r  Z    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500) S$ d, e' H9 B% a5 j' v6 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ y1 N+ |( g% w* ~
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
+ a' V$ b5 u" {4 N; O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" _; ?4 w' t5 r/ W) N% u5 J3 B
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
( |# E( R6 a7 y- z: j; j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 W( U" v4 n' X0 S

. g' T+ z- w3 a4 \- y, _    -------------------------------------------------------------; b9 S* {3 H$ B' u% w1 _3 \: y
                               Standard Condominium0 s1 {$ s/ y6 q  ~. A6 L1 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ v- q( q; c  r; x9 s+ H# c. I                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
. u6 H, W7 w: ?    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
0 v8 R9 {) j  D) T- R    -------------------------------------------------------------5 N) q" ^; {( y* l8 [2 n
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%- R" d! C8 K, U" ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. N  N* f# g. R8 V    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%  B5 g0 S4 K3 i) |$ b$ U5 o5 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" Q9 R, z9 I5 R+ r& `    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A6 }& W5 C  z4 K' n) Q- T/ R# E. j
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 A+ w% F  N9 T
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A* {1 m3 k, ^! y7 P- A7 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) L0 E: Q0 p7 g- Z: B) Z+ q    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%( k6 Z8 @4 k9 L/ B% t/ n' Q- [
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 l- e, o$ S: W7 U2 t8 k    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
% T/ T$ B4 G& X- \" H% f! s    -------------------------------------------------------------
& @- N2 V( K# P; q    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
) s* y3 B$ w) o. l    -------------------------------------------------------------
* [  l' n( G, i    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
- T+ F5 X5 [4 v% q$ ]" ?! \. s! o  K    -------------------------------------------------------------
' Z, s7 i7 L' q* K1 I) |    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%' v( `7 p, g, F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- G: ]) f2 I6 I: R( {  x    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%4 o7 A) \* C) X
    -------------------------------------------------------------! V; \$ I7 ?" A
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
3 B3 o% o- P5 @- }. ?    -------------------------------------------------------------
* t* \; d0 q( q. q9 v8 I) n. `    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%( k5 t0 T8 ~- d
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 `3 _( `9 c9 `! V7 N( v+ e* i    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
& v  U' w4 h2 T8 m    -------------------------------------------------------------4 j) c, R# f; h7 a7 ^" k
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%! b3 p9 q# F, a6 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------% @7 _7 t* j; s! f' [$ X
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
) b6 F3 D1 E4 d7 m. j& [    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 d- {" K' Y" F( H8 d- A    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
5 W' x2 _- X( c. m3 ^) u, y1 M  [    -------------------------------------------------------------
' ?' z5 U6 t# b5 O" }' L( P4 o    >>
2 y- N+ w# O6 c6 U# z7 \
- i# q8 F4 E! V6 U& U    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
, j! A1 A' E) }6 k0 Yin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint2 Z0 z! W: c- Q
John and Victoria.3 k- F6 e" G6 R: F" O( e( X

5 f: h5 @0 m' H; i0 U3 F: h/ a    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# I) u  D6 f3 Z) O) Rcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
& f/ B, l& m& r& Thousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
1 d# v6 w' P. Wreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price4 \9 q# M( N* d) o% S! V
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
% }0 A" K- N: S$ |' F( Racross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is0 }+ W3 {) K6 _) r* b& n' }
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current; a4 \* L4 j" x& W3 j0 a
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
% c9 E+ h1 Z6 vversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on' q  l# H' Y3 \) N) i, c
November 15, 2006.7 _4 ]- W4 Y1 |# ^  b! P& W. c+ r  l
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of" Z- H) c% Q5 R  P2 ]8 M$ h6 M
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
# b& P9 \  N7 ]3 \4 U4 }1 lprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is# h- b( d+ I  L3 `% `
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-13 01:40 , Processed in 0.128087 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表