埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1939|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable # m6 P7 q7 U; v9 H3 ?
5 [* m# V: Q! E- M& D7 @2 Y
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -3 H# H$ E, ^9 ~: ], t3 w/ W
7 R4 J( }" F: K  z" q- Y
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
. w/ U4 ?& v. @exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third& b4 u" z% F  a2 F7 n/ v5 ]0 n
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic& J. Q# @4 f* q* B6 r
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
5 }' Z' E5 E5 ^5 c0 Eprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
0 |0 w$ e% E7 a; ^2 P5 v8 Dmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,( D% G$ R, b: q
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. K, g0 x% Q% o( K$ O8 x
LePage Real Estate Services.. z- i9 v" [! C4 Q/ m6 K9 @

1 }& @0 U8 j6 {; d7 |5 P    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
8 d% v% f+ e0 H, w/ @2 uare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 p9 {- b- ^0 P. T3 o( Econditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
' F. ^; z1 |7 n; \. ^: E: t, ksound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the) J6 n& r. B. H$ Z
residential real estate sector.% \3 h. O4 x1 W& ~

2 N$ T4 Q: x5 y; W# G" a$ U    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
$ C. {! C: b" f1 t: L  ]: N1 Goccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)  x: E$ e* F! M( @
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562. p" u/ B, n0 w5 a  |: L4 |
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
& e% o( ^! ]3 g% K% u, x( i% \2 y(+13.2%).
% O0 \5 W. G/ ?, E0 L; d9 d/ ], L: [3 Q+ x. E6 |1 Q  {
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
4 E8 R* q0 ?( }* J# j1 P; zduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
0 k8 o% S) C$ o& gfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are& n4 F# [( x: D" o
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 X) n* K7 O9 B/ xpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% ~! a  a1 e+ |3 J& {  A"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We! s- b* q* [0 T& \+ A, ^
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy+ i9 |2 e9 l  x* ~
balanced market."* Q0 w5 C( |  d- k. I

3 y0 B- ]- d6 U    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,# Z# d3 ]! e* G+ o% l& h8 x
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift, y4 q: c" ^' ~; d" G. x" Z
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued1 _. m0 K% b5 f- s
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
" V0 e7 o/ A3 ]; r0 benergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,+ ^5 B8 f& a, s& ~# K2 _" p
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record. C7 S, C. }. v# a: g
breaking price appreciations.
7 v1 m; \; [' ~# i. ~) G
" T, D# v; M: Y" U- Q5 z( W    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding# I& S4 ~. b% z' A" [% E
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the+ l+ L8 ?  N; ]1 l! b
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.: ?* m3 a: f9 S( ]5 I7 I
6 Z  L" K5 N) w2 o: N, y2 B
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
# J5 J7 @* h6 P% m+ u" A0 reconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer" P5 R& F/ t- c" N: B) X% v3 m
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
% n; y3 \! U# K6 p* P2 g6 e# Z# |slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
8 Y1 g9 o# J( aIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
* T4 [. U. q+ B# B( Igreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 k% I6 ?, t' w; X( {
price appreciation when compared with 2005.  K- a' j) X  ~( f
  N, E+ r6 C* m0 d6 h. Q
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing6 P; J9 G) }- O; A- i
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and$ ^% X! ?" J& O% y  ?$ I+ G
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada" x9 q1 J! ]; |* p- k) ?0 ]
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
5 O' b4 \1 M! h! Y# v
; W% @( e' y+ p' z0 k( [    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the4 X4 t3 S, [2 [7 g) D
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's1 ?  R& x+ F8 _; n, o, p
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
9 f0 e# A/ g! G) l! p) U+ x. X% P$ W. Drelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
5 T, K: l# X, V8 [( u! Uaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. l4 Y' V  ]! O% z1 E8 r6 Q
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
$ A4 j( d& X, E( c  Z9 a! Q: d# _; Aaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
; v: }4 Y! o9 u' W) E& Wmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
  b5 t& E- G& N0 I3 _/ N
; s( f' y. Y& {$ M3 c$ a    <<
! g2 x9 {5 a3 I* p                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES8 c4 ]9 q7 V& q
    >>) C- p6 V9 a; _% `( E+ g

0 L* u) Z1 `( G1 F& `9 A    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in7 V+ C) a) ]! d1 W- n
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
& S+ _- Z7 m7 Z) f3 j/ C3 fof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
. F1 b6 _1 E$ x: v8 P! u: Mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of$ V! i  @( e# m+ N; Y0 _% |; @: B
renovations.
/ a, _4 S) Z( G* G
5 a& `' r2 @( w3 g7 n) E( ]    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight, x+ m4 o  \4 e4 \
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation. N& ]1 r# X6 I2 w
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and% e0 e5 H" l3 b: j3 Y. e
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.1 W) c$ d) p! W7 _# [9 o" L) k
, ^: @2 P7 O) j  E1 r
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer0 @1 [. b  R# Z  c( u
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
  G1 N; q. \) ^- ]% dquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& ~# K0 k6 E/ c% G. `3 v: I3 Y; P600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores! s$ Z! V  @0 M+ C/ M
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes/ N" c  i. G, h. L8 D. u9 O
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
; s, f& q& P2 s' P! b- Z: D. |3 [4 G3 V
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced6 h3 o7 r, c. d3 F, s
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their- |  z, S5 z/ F. [; I
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
1 `: K( X' }- k2 O/ A, nwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' H% U, h% A2 u% X5 x
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing/ t) G6 n! |7 m) _
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
' q" J7 z; y3 \9 b- ]
  \9 f( n8 k) G5 o* d' j    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly6 I, A  E" V! K& v/ e, ?& g
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
  u3 a) m* R1 t8 Xpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,5 z7 M/ e6 U$ g6 X
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last3 M# {7 o5 q' z7 q! S
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.6 y' P4 a: S! w( e# @1 V
4 n0 V  u) ?- V% J! }0 g7 F: U- \
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
" L. M' F" G7 G7 r1 ^prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
2 P- Y9 B( @5 ?9 {1 e& e6 Ilevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting( k7 }/ {  r' B% `6 o, A
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
0 r$ ?2 s2 w* dwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the4 b& d4 y5 k4 \4 ^# z0 |
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before5 E+ I* g  O) _) M
making a purchase.
6 H9 ]* T" {+ p7 f; e6 }
* D) i- z- b1 f$ g% v    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
7 {" w$ y5 ~$ ]6 |- ?markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong3 i9 n0 e- N  `6 S# v( y
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city! X9 G7 ^6 @# b5 @1 t: \
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
# s- Q: S! e" ?( Tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
. j% o, A; T5 r( ^$ m6 r% Hamenities.
+ n1 D9 ~) N. v0 Z
" b& q5 _' a. J3 f. a    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels' n* @" `* j3 x! ~$ R. r4 F
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand: ^. R+ l; \+ {; ]0 }
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
6 ?) \. ^4 j- X+ ?continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been$ {2 G4 @2 `$ u5 Z  y- ^/ P
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
+ D8 t) ]4 }6 `" B0 w: aresidence, rather than for investment.4 y8 f+ s+ [2 g9 J6 u! y$ H0 g& w6 C

4 Q: Q, ^$ T9 Z. ?: {( d5 y+ i    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
0 }4 l0 J# ^& P) m& q4 c2 K  `house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
/ z- _" `2 X9 F, c( H$ \1 Zin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
1 R% }$ _  A% A9 V7 D! Iconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization7 ]/ T' Q8 K: O- D" F3 g
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
9 T: E  @9 `/ kthe market.
3 |- U8 O5 _" x0 b' f5 Z& {- a' n2 e1 x
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
! G2 T0 s. C& ]% j+ s$ pJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
; ^5 y% Y9 t6 r$ CAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring- Q4 [$ S9 A6 H3 m% L; g$ o
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due' b  _" f! d5 N* a* R
to the shortage of available inventory.) r5 x8 d- |) C% n' k% I* R: N* }

" @! N4 [/ v3 P    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
6 p3 g1 {8 H/ Y* J5 M4 Qmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains& B; D; e* v7 u$ Y7 g0 _# t
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses# `3 s8 f( w- z( p
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.! f- y' d' D! R+ u5 p! j6 H

+ q. ~+ T+ ~/ i) b    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
! m9 D0 g* T# x( v7 o% d6 ^+ Ain the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
! k" V& K% R& U2 m9 c- Bunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that+ T4 ?7 }" \/ x2 l2 h3 s
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
$ |0 P4 C/ A  m: }, Oprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
: U! G" z, }. n3 W7 ^7 xseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as* x* Y* o2 {  g
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
! j* z( h2 s5 L0 f0 a

  c5 l2 G' x: }/ c    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
( z% R* n0 J7 v6 @  b. aas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
' U' b5 F8 M# _7 Cremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,- q( s. @) D1 q% `" \; n
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices6 U/ i  [8 _7 `0 h, H" ^
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
8 q5 {0 g4 f' D( B* P6 Fin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly8 a+ \- c+ Q- {4 Y
towards the end of 2006.
   
1 ^* H( m9 S3 K* x9 f4 y
; m& l1 v' X  g$ h6 @# zWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of# v" |3 a1 T. W; Q% A, T: q
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
" |, p* i  u! ]7 a! S, J' Ato meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse7 H" ]* L8 S- u3 X. N
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to( S- c# t4 B, x
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added; M) r9 e" y7 m; g7 b! l
pressure on tight inventory levels.2 K9 \7 b( L, P) \: ~
# ^# B0 T7 j; @! K2 Y* ?
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic" Q! R, S' v, ~" @
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
; ?% U$ r2 t$ j: S6 l* Pinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
5 h- {- G  H9 n' T) B- swhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching: |5 n) l5 t' H7 G& T. D7 F
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
- z2 [" c& l0 j9 z$ W9 d- d; K6 n: V( a
    <<1 z4 z. S- J6 r
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20060 Y1 f" W, X. r- m
% ^' ?" K/ M- m: U* D0 U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' l. i3 c$ l8 W  E& O
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
  j# d! N# V, G! H3 p% X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ N! r) _! @: w0 C0 x) @
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q38 F" Y- Z. U5 q0 L7 p+ K1 M
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average7 f* K6 k3 x0 _8 _$ `4 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 u# G  C; u0 L    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000, }4 F* ~5 E  {. r8 z) X7 Q3 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, a0 s/ |) F4 v$ q( K- R3 Z1 E
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0006 N6 A: K! J9 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* q# e9 l. |6 E7 d2 t    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
2 I' f+ X& P, d' }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# }+ r4 r6 K8 |/ D2 _
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
4 Y. k# K7 `  g0 A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 J8 ]  h5 r( ?. v7 O    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3337 G2 r, f. }, X  N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) Z7 G( `, {0 f! u
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
' y/ j, B) |8 j. w; J' g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 D, Z  I/ f: L2 X( d! H) B
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
6 B: e* d6 g) b/ G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' @6 l' Y+ K+ w/ G7 W5 ~    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250! X/ ?8 c6 j1 h7 y  Z$ A& |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) ?* h1 A6 G7 h    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
4 o5 b% R3 S4 m; Z) x( B/ k6 g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# D( M. @* ~; n- }' h
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7070 @+ Z- ^7 |  x% F% N8 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% H; m+ S- G& y# C
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
* n! T( \, g. V+ [8 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 U& K4 n7 V7 V& x) l; M    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
' G+ W, W2 p; J# l+ J1 k" O' U2 }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  i' J( {. \$ I& [' w" m7 T9 v2 o    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
' ^$ G/ R7 c* n( ]6 h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 R  r5 B9 t  S# U4 q( o
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
. ?9 o% B# r' z9 d* d+ w  S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 t9 Q0 i  Q$ h9 X    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
0 _( T% ]" @( }2 e4 r  C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) d+ u7 Q7 k5 P3 b    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860; R; B8 P. Y0 H; a- C, `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 ^  w5 e  C, h+ t3 C
! T7 q; U: O( M  b    -------------------------------------------------------------
# _$ q5 D/ ^5 T( [4 j                               Standard Condominium% ~9 ^- U) y9 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 H3 d4 P4 I) |7 |, u  f                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo" G8 [! P! y7 @( N
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
5 Q/ T7 i: z3 Q, J+ t8 t    -------------------------------------------------------------9 ]3 [$ S0 F0 {  [# _, D
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
- O* V$ K  {" h* n: U, c4 X* T% y    -------------------------------------------------------------, ^' b  ^( K$ X0 u! W
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%: x% S4 p" I8 S) m
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 i5 J2 h& ?2 v9 |* V/ G! l* \    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
; x7 V* {9 |, k4 t4 w( h! U    -------------------------------------------------------------
& n5 G: C' R4 Y+ `( v3 A    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A4 s4 w5 i+ k4 [$ L) m
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 Q1 v; r- K0 h& I
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
* k, Y  n7 e1 K    -------------------------------------------------------------+ t5 D5 R8 t/ h4 f
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%) K  K/ N: c+ o3 S/ t$ U  n/ W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. M4 A7 ?8 C+ d  Y' t0 E    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%/ n6 a3 f  R1 E( e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 F- D( A" o  u; n/ `7 o+ ^    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%: s; M8 m% b/ Q8 C0 X+ {0 ^1 w: B
    -------------------------------------------------------------, V# n: A0 d. Y; C$ T
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
  Q  b0 {, [4 P    -------------------------------------------------------------
( B. Z- ~0 ~& T/ A% ^2 ?, F4 }, M    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
: _  D$ Y% [8 J3 O    -------------------------------------------------------------
  K+ K5 W" Z5 m    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
) S0 ^, J" x0 p: R8 A5 ^, a    -------------------------------------------------------------9 t( x2 _3 P. F2 U
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
# Q7 l( a" E7 w& \0 T    -------------------------------------------------------------- J; W- m; `% @+ k
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%- A) u" q; u% _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ j* v# ~' k3 c* m7 a3 [    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
. ?2 }4 E5 `$ y" Y    -------------------------------------------------------------2 r+ V7 S1 d( g
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
1 k2 d8 G# J9 e; p7 j    -------------------------------------------------------------
( f( b% f2 c6 N% }4 C    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%! u  Q8 S9 l$ e. T8 e9 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 p9 P' r0 h, ~8 f8 W: m    >>( y8 o* I  _  I* M6 Y
, X+ D/ E0 f2 v+ T) h; Y# d/ ]: W
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 s. ?6 D/ B/ e4 f- F; D+ _" g. Uin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
" Z1 K" f' l% h  W( l2 UJohn and Victoria.
+ A) v/ T8 f4 K) L2 [$ Y+ ?) B5 Z# i" y- g& W
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most- g8 [: o& q! ]; W
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of! B7 [- ?. f4 p5 @
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
2 e" c3 K& ^& \1 [% Xreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
0 v# r( K. ]( o& m/ n. g$ Qtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities0 `2 B6 s; `# d- i; A" M  |
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is/ V$ K, D6 @# K' [
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current) i% ]! L) G7 Y+ [" g* c0 a& H9 j
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
% j7 g* X0 U9 W: b& u) vversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on% D& P3 g' C5 V: D  \  V+ X) m. T
November 15, 2006." ?, O% l! o3 C
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# B. U( Z+ s$ n6 [
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge4 m" [* E5 P+ h2 M9 N3 G. e0 v
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
) Y" R! ]: V! ^( F4 y* yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-11-17 18:46 , Processed in 0.173517 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表