埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2327|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
' o) \3 J6 a( e+ L. \. `$ N; E! u; `9 c% B2 M  X: r/ ^
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -. z9 _; n6 \2 \- E8 E
! ~- J4 r4 j8 V2 }; V2 V& k5 G: c0 N
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
& Z3 i. v5 r1 M( \% d8 Oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third; b- m) j* K6 J1 t" u
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic: p1 L6 P0 g& V9 N8 C* A, N5 [- n. e( S
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit' K5 t7 U" T$ C6 M& b
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and1 Q* j9 c$ [8 J, D
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
' E# @% H9 f5 R# TQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
3 Q4 F/ ^9 ]: n& }9 uLePage Real Estate Services.$ K5 g- W0 X! f# n- D. L( ?3 A* N

9 ]+ z, C8 D, l% t- ?    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
6 K" v! f* {* q  D  Sare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic( [; s# `% {5 u$ @% A2 s; a
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 y- Q3 i, j0 G' b4 y5 t1 V
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
# @1 `% O5 e8 H8 \/ c5 Q7 x6 f! lresidential real estate sector.
6 B) W7 @6 ^* o) w# h$ I
% E) I- x5 N# Q) ~2 r. z    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
( }" n: V7 B4 o  `' `$ B+ X& e9 p& E6 Doccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)% i& g; z3 H. U: m
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
& T* j* C, O0 @: E! ](+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
7 Q9 A/ j% Q! H! W: D, n(+13.2%).
2 @' J2 Q# P$ h% P
* u0 I) G4 q2 ^' s' `- y# e    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 w2 s1 k" P) F9 ~8 Xduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the7 E1 u5 B: |0 Z
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
$ ]2 j& |( a- d) Ppoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,  h( P! ?$ d, K! g3 {- M5 m/ t
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.! K4 S. a# d. ?8 `5 W5 v+ X/ N! Z/ |" z
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
: Q+ \, m  X+ K8 ?9 s/ Hwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 C; S2 U' v- \# [: l6 d2 }/ Lbalanced market."
  v" }$ ^6 g1 ^" ~3 ?6 ?& Z
7 c2 [7 B2 O' y* @6 p' M( m0 s    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
  r3 F0 {, j. i. Y  Nconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
" s% X6 C9 ?0 `5 O6 Q) @to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
! ]6 R2 e- g  r# Gthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
% h, {: B* @# Qenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,' {5 g  j, v6 C& A/ r$ H
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record+ j4 k0 g! v- [
breaking price appreciations.; j& o( t/ A! r8 l5 ]+ }( S
& S5 N1 H& C( M3 W
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding2 C, `& ^: `4 N: L' d
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the2 x# @! p/ Z( |: z7 n+ l9 g$ {
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.. n+ Y/ _5 t3 p  p4 [" M' F9 E+ P

# D5 m, x0 C$ a! |2 f    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid, _+ Y' Q* |5 J+ w9 A' q
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer) d; y$ c# |! I9 _8 i1 N- t( z
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off: X  Q7 y/ F3 X% U! t3 G* o
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
: t* m3 E: U0 w( hIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
! w8 l6 o) N* E  U- Cgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
6 S  M* f8 J9 p$ T# z; V, gprice appreciation when compared with 2005.& s" Z; e& b3 t, _: g6 q! h

7 _! g  d% b: k+ {3 B. l    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
! P' i+ e; l2 d+ V) N1 z+ M/ `* |* k' |market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
0 C& e# z2 k( Xfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: w4 k# X+ Q/ h# _are markedly different than those found in the United States.
/ }; i$ U# S- G; ^" Z  r) S0 X: g7 O; t: D0 L8 V7 W
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
0 E% L1 x: q% _' kAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's7 T, T' t. k; H9 s, y' P! X4 F
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, f) |# ]6 S  K  K8 Z! f& Brelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general9 O" C4 g9 o1 S9 ~
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the; E" P+ X3 B0 M7 @7 y) Y
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and$ g9 ]9 G' C( r
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
; E* P$ i3 t' m# Y, qmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; B$ P- K4 J1 \8 u9 p  b' i7 A, _

# |* D) u3 P6 L9 o- T: @    <<% o/ n$ J) G  d# n/ [/ {
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
4 v6 G& t, }6 c) G; X    >>
! a& d' m. }  B( v1 m. }: m$ ~0 Z" x% U+ }
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in  X5 |, c/ J! c- T4 e6 S
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
9 X$ e5 n4 k  A; wof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& n- B6 p7 U& S+ {0 r. V1 vlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of% ]2 g- J& @# b
renovations.
$ Y& S, j6 p/ _* o
* g: c+ L5 o0 i# O8 U- u    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& ^# Z! q3 L  H" @
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
5 n4 w, R* H; R2 x# G, r) @# gcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and9 ^& r% g) B2 o$ a0 i* e% Q5 M
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.- k$ w# o& v$ [: O: I5 _- a
+ L/ r/ g9 K9 c+ B) t/ ~
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer6 y" Q+ k( |3 W. w9 z7 O3 P
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
1 h/ D3 g3 e; equarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
" D$ g' ~" w" u5 @5 o3 h600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
4 k$ k9 P' \9 g% u7 Qto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
6 I7 O. I! y& b+ I; j; tand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
0 @& e  ?2 I# q2 O; H
( ~. m. Q8 C5 y( y, J3 [' x& \/ Q    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
9 b. S5 ?/ W% E! J1 I* [0 zconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ \7 F% g8 P# S& n2 ?* n- Zhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers  n1 i. h- T/ p2 t' i/ w2 |
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
- K. Y( {  w  o% b6 Hdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
2 ]: R+ e! o' v3 [9 k9 Gbuyers with more options when looking for a home.' t9 v8 y( {' [5 B9 e0 A

) ^8 F2 g/ ]* u6 ~4 ?7 m5 r7 T3 |    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly$ ~$ `: s$ A6 v6 [5 p' N; m
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes, i0 S5 ?" G8 C8 J5 s- K
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
9 t- y; W) b2 ]6 bas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last1 c8 v2 o$ x" ^# U- [
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
: E3 g& K8 V5 x5 j" `2 X
3 F$ ~7 ?5 L2 }1 `, j2 {+ g    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house/ @8 t) ~/ Q$ r# z
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 f+ t6 [. M% y, o/ jlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting! X) g; o! R7 u9 J& [+ J7 j! {9 G
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
' }& c9 A$ ]  u/ m) L9 kwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
% f5 n9 H) M& D3 K0 Y7 @( Ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
4 Z6 w  q# s* q- b, m/ h; Wmaking a purchase.
& I& M+ G% P; i/ f4 ], ^- B3 J! r8 E8 ~
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing  V0 d9 Q: g4 E$ ^# y
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
) ]1 d4 M  X0 C( }" Nconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
4 g0 R5 b- \! u' V- C  _, [; \centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting' Y/ k4 Q) k# B# |1 s! x8 w
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown4 l5 u% M9 ?. N* T( Z) U, n; K0 B3 q
amenities.
! w" {" j4 V7 {% z3 H  A
4 v7 {7 H! R4 m    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
$ @; b4 G4 z" ^3 F' hthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand7 ]! k; j# h# s, u
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
5 q" ]: [& y2 s* @) n; N* ycontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been; \# O) z0 e  d8 V3 K
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
7 d1 i* u$ U) o: G4 ]& X% U7 `7 Aresidence, rather than for investment.
4 Z( h1 }5 X* R, u2 W8 T4 Q+ @+ _) x! @& Y
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
. I9 ?! a! O' Z. L: }0 vhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 D- ~& @; `9 z! |$ G
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
7 \0 ]! \) O$ Y3 w5 C3 Nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
7 @; i& l, |- t* p9 M2 I& |% {rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
3 j) B* _! ~1 U: w, a" h& |8 Athe market.1 }. o% J$ m9 s. q

* s! ^) f( J6 o- _7 z% r    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
$ }2 d0 y" e( s* kJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In- y( O  u+ c; C5 w, z# }3 [
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring+ ?: L  Z9 @0 Y# J# {, i
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
% F* U; O" u: q3 G3 p0 {9 ^to the shortage of available inventory.
- G8 F5 R! |3 v, l3 i$ g) S5 d7 _
# J1 g6 H4 j" D( A    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
+ ?; N! C! I" m! \momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
' u  \: F" q& i* M  yvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses  i, c/ c* m6 S2 {2 l+ G  a8 K: R
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
1 Y& \) N# Q9 }/ u0 u3 l' _$ z" p; T5 \/ ^2 J$ L
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
8 g1 n5 K7 _0 l+ m  z5 ]in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 C. @; e5 y% d4 h  N7 w: yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that/ @: M7 s; {, y; [5 g
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring& h- T" B2 W8 E9 o- ]7 a0 x2 m
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
0 H; s. o9 k. H9 [5 J6 f2 ^/ x1 sseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as; \2 w; s- }; M: ]: s' S, Z; x
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

* i2 s8 A2 @+ Y
) |9 g, b3 Z5 s1 v# m& t    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter: c/ ?& E6 Y1 b: c
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
. F5 `% R* k& hremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,6 U% i6 t6 N. u7 y' z6 S
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices! u# N7 g. ^1 ]5 e
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
7 S6 w& S7 i, e% k/ ~- f$ bin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly  ?9 z  H/ I4 V0 V$ G4 L
towards the end of 2006.
    : m' f) U- D4 P. \( d  K. N

$ E1 f# A, ?  q7 ^' B/ M$ ]2 H5 sWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
2 s: A6 z' ?" w3 o, ?  W/ cinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable4 x# S9 f# S5 h9 P
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
  ^9 F1 C  D1 D' ogroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
. o. Y: G1 f# @6 `; Iforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
0 N" l1 g4 u5 y6 M# Y6 F# \! Apressure on tight inventory levels.
8 A* H5 F  e+ V" g8 t
4 Q% I+ O" C& E  I* a' v    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
$ b7 O  |1 W1 d8 V7 d1 A. rfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people9 X+ [3 F) G! j! ^& Y0 K' N
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;# l* \5 S' W5 F8 t( ?- r
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
) o8 V# d9 T0 [3 q% C* P- Kfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.# i; F5 B- R) y8 q4 F3 k

7 d* F; @: O2 a) B! F( ~  j    <<
6 Q) y4 B" @6 ^4 o1 b* c/ D) c; O& I      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
0 c' O( U( v4 ?0 Z0 q. z
5 m  i2 o7 j1 H+ K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 }$ t' E/ a( I: E+ O& m- y0 }
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
0 h% Q% Z6 E7 }8 E4 O7 T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 _" n* B+ B; m
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q30 c( `# m# J! K' ]" ?  F$ l
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average$ ?& g# ]% K% I  }9 l. p2 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ c. G7 q+ ]2 O. D0 P    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0002 Z  r6 G1 i3 ~- }! y! [0 {) m& ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 P7 T* Y6 b4 m8 w
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
! A4 j) G, \6 z4 ^- l8 v7 c. p! L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 d0 {) P% R! m2 Y2 X5 \
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
* q* t+ e# K; @" N  {7 j0 v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 T! U" _6 [' s6 n" ^+ T0 s! r- E    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
3 u  f. P" q+ `( @) \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 H: ^3 T0 r% M0 V    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
2 s# h& U2 t, R4 S4 `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( w3 t+ q3 M: y- f- g. v# g6 J
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
' K& ?* @0 I+ Z# V0 H$ H- Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ [3 K: {5 r  V- ]
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
# l: v7 q8 m- @9 i2 M1 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 a0 _6 @; Q4 U$ H6 ^! }2 m
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
; ~4 l  |% e/ P  o6 S9 l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% e4 N' I% e! x
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766; T) s( D# l3 _6 N0 r" X' B+ z/ B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& g7 c# [; Q1 L- C) G% ^8 C4 l
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
+ z  L$ c2 N: U2 P+ M; K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 O: d$ v% U# Z# L/ q" {' g
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500# y6 R% P' j! w; d6 L3 Z) w% m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: t8 P( @" O4 i% O    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389! @9 b! K$ G2 u1 g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) R" s- o5 B* M7 U, t( _    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
* [5 b. u' o' u9 @. j+ w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" F: N7 v! p0 {. s    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
* X2 r  n$ |. _" O5 N4 d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# b1 M0 F' K/ ?0 u) a    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
: R# T2 D# j$ ]0 z* {, g+ \% t5 B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 }8 M+ R7 m# a; D$ U. ]4 }    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
- I( b: v! r0 R+ {) h* {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: o% ]- u2 R" U5 m$ N( j) l0 P6 n/ q$ L; ~4 I9 O- K8 [0 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# `- g5 w6 _8 B                               Standard Condominium  _) U. L1 D4 V) G
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 ~) v: J& [5 u                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo/ r$ o$ O0 E0 q
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change1 b$ x9 H* v0 r8 i7 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 x  I! D. a) }' R4 `% c
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%  i* u& D" K% ^2 W5 j* [* |" n  g  j1 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 x$ t2 Z: Z( |+ R4 [5 ]/ z( s6 `# n4 x
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%# t7 \+ X" c$ E6 h: j) b( Q+ ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 X  X& c  `; B6 u5 t% ~# e
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A( i+ s* v+ m* e" e6 o+ M6 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 K( n: e2 m5 _0 `* d4 d9 e" [* A
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
  t7 D" t, H, x9 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 N7 T3 m1 i9 E- s: q" m, v5 |& \    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%" D/ @& R9 O9 O, n# f- W4 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------! m& s* I! _" h5 z$ f& c+ {! `. o0 l
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%! C+ {& C8 w4 ^3 l7 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ J* Q1 c/ x1 b/ f7 v$ Z    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%( C! d4 N) k5 R, e1 L7 u6 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 K# W( Y$ k% D- E2 J6 U! Y
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
# G( B, c" a$ _# N5 W    -------------------------------------------------------------0 t; R9 \  ]( [4 a% b
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
2 j# S$ m, z- g% i& q& a; r* p/ `3 g    -------------------------------------------------------------! J# r+ G$ \7 k! E) S
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%( m* k8 k& \2 r$ K( _
    -------------------------------------------------------------- {! v3 Y; b$ i3 e9 U" X7 D
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
) X) A. i9 K' Z; o    -------------------------------------------------------------
) ^- t# o: R0 L    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%: S9 |1 e0 q  \7 v0 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------& P* {& D: O" K* Y$ ~
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%+ W& |1 }, O* m: K& R6 z- ?: \7 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 D: D/ v+ D- Y% }/ ]
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
( K5 D" p6 N- \; |4 X% C, g1 V    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 ~/ Q8 _3 R; n2 ~$ S. I  N/ P    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%$ x/ W) X# A( v7 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------) s, }. J: T2 B! s# h+ ^8 q! b
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
$ O& E/ A% T! ~- I9 Z" O: d    -------------------------------------------------------------  f; s% j9 m# A( U
    >>$ l: X& p1 a( P) V! Z  }
' N% }' p* X1 Q
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
! G7 ]- x( z# w: z+ oin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint% g4 V" D' d/ x- `8 K% c
John and Victoria.
- Y! {  T/ A) b' f; F4 b4 L$ g  J8 L/ y8 z( g3 e$ v0 \
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most- G6 X/ P/ c, q6 h* k+ i/ g& j
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
) ]! i( u5 [' _* q8 e" U+ _housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release- A+ w, E3 }- S$ f! m
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
" ~& K" E7 ^* }% C7 k0 P; X" Ltrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
1 \$ j3 ?' H) c$ C' }! z( @across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
) _7 l6 S5 p7 N3 c% u; t% x& ~, ]available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
0 F8 Z$ \/ }" Vfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
) j, e: a. x* V" ?version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on; d  Z/ I9 J; f6 E, |
November 15, 2006.
# F, N; H9 d  Y* E+ {5 I    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
3 i$ M) Y7 ~: X8 s6 C; p& ufair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge9 |3 @9 K" u9 y% H: N, P5 v& y
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is) w' F9 y' q: X
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-6 13:10 , Processed in 0.495092 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表