 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 7 m- j- t7 H6 _; {- q5 K' x f3 v
# _/ L9 x! ` `7 Z& Z- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -1 j! l7 {+ `& x: ~) ^) o
; @% a" P' F+ [- f/ |- m! c TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
0 i: O: x' r( t x. ?) kexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
9 F* t) [# z5 |& {0 Mquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
# D, {8 f. O3 z& V. k+ S) {in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit" |& d' H- @/ R. i! k
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
' [: Y# p1 `2 B8 O4 o/ Q- R1 Y: qmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- J& r) q) @/ ?0 B! ~$ C2 F, H
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
4 P" g$ _% W4 X* b( ]LePage Real Estate Services.
2 z+ ]) [9 y" X4 Q# h
- c9 Q# T. _6 F( k# c' W$ o: E Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
) Q5 W6 N F2 T, |; care forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic- D2 t! S9 U" a7 L$ p: r
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
2 e+ p. C0 \- F* o, x) Q X# ~- Hsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
/ }$ _& X a q( H1 b1 Hresidential real estate sector.
1 `/ v: D0 O# k8 B
) c8 ?+ j9 i, k% q' Y' B0 v Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation* }3 d2 Z9 T* _: G- u0 A- |+ U, M) @
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)2 s( L% ]* q: |4 D3 l
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
1 x1 j6 |# B) G7 L(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% l! I: e& A. f! [- K7 }(+13.2%).
$ g7 c2 Q4 z' T$ b9 W
& G; m' k' a/ l "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
9 g0 ^0 G3 Z5 K8 H* n* ~* j& rduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
8 u1 K! q. F: S0 _. Xfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# l E0 P- B' O gpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,; Z, m! |/ W3 t; Y8 K1 G+ a) u4 l
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.# ?- {* v8 T4 v' f9 M6 w; x% ~
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We$ O$ t! M" o" U9 V' G' R
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& Q! C$ J$ @/ X. R c3 e) M
balanced market."0 ?7 ^) c" z: Q2 d. V
) M" c$ @3 W7 o0 J5 i+ u Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,) B; }7 P: @% `# s8 `
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
- X# r" L) s6 }6 {# Z; bto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued$ ^5 m; X9 | d6 g) r) ~6 x
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core8 J4 `& h; k: ~
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
4 {( m2 Y4 g" m4 S. @1 W3 jmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
7 l* Z( f) G) N2 c2 i6 }breaking price appreciations.
5 n o ]# B# T- W# V1 u! D7 l" `
/ Y* X3 C* Q$ R }6 e8 ? Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
0 _7 _1 l# T$ D, |) S4 ]* deconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the$ q: k- l2 S: X% l+ r+ R- i' [
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.0 Y( o8 @+ t6 x- T \2 T+ q) ~) z
]( Y" c+ ?/ g5 s* [# w" K+ d1 ` In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid1 Q' q; k. Z# f3 r/ m( ]
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer6 ^: X4 {6 [7 O3 Q& L! f1 ^2 H
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
x2 z& Y* j. w) i/ bslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
% V. T& K6 {" |; ]6 i& u& E) m; {In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
( a$ c8 r7 T R1 ]$ F! G r' Zgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
9 k5 Z( C( S7 C. {0 Dprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
1 L% f+ [; r) H
) q5 A( q/ K1 s1 Y* H While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
i( ~7 J) F8 p: amarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& @3 Z# Z% w: V, Tfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
6 r5 S$ ]3 J8 ]0 F) x" k$ Z1 ]( kare markedly different than those found in the United States.
$ K x: N: v' s% L S8 M- g/ w9 L% Z! G' r& \, _+ T% F
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the5 Q6 d# f/ H9 ]# e' E8 j7 u* S+ T
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's; V5 i$ I$ A1 q
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the# I l+ s7 b6 `7 l! i# @/ O
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general! \3 } a0 R7 o8 b/ i
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
" k& [" q8 S* K y1 p* Idownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
- ?7 B+ x! ~: e! L2 ]1 ^: eaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
+ T; i2 t6 i! b$ m* L' }mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."1 L0 O# |+ C6 z. [. D( ^
( _# P a/ ^+ M7 B4 ?5 r- T <<) ~1 c" s9 W( `
REGIONAL SUMMARIES7 }. U2 F7 e, L# |3 y# s
>>
! p: Y- [+ x- z/ o5 v y; L1 I; ?, r" ?) n, K
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
/ f% x3 z, B( H$ L! JHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
2 J2 ~# H' ~$ \9 Z, Hof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
: g% }4 y1 o9 mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
& P7 i8 b; B' M, brenovations.
) N" _9 x, L5 Q! o3 s7 i6 {2 u* E2 f; L" m# m
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight N! R. L$ b4 _+ r7 m' M1 W
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
& m: _+ o# i! J7 a Y+ Z/ bcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 d. P- g* e/ [4 W7 }! ESeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter., j( t4 o9 U( ^( o& c
0 Y# B, V3 j" q5 f# l: u0 ]
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer9 K/ q: S) s) e: N* Z) A
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
/ l) \. m+ T/ B7 D3 Z. squarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
+ d3 f9 V; y2 I& l% y. W600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores# T. Q) g) y. E3 ~- j q
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
. Y0 Z0 ^9 W- S3 \. ]. A2 Z. Qand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.& g8 r$ g1 e* i% ^
/ i1 q# Z0 T V" z
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced2 V, T4 H! T% f0 F$ i8 j
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their. G+ b' x: f* K$ O* |6 ^( T* b
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers% T/ {1 w6 E. y' ^2 ~1 ^8 F
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian3 _( k" x6 r8 Y% I' z
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing' a2 v% D/ n9 q0 z+ D% J
buyers with more options when looking for a home.3 a% [: q9 z9 R% G& ^# K' B, P5 K
7 J0 ?7 J3 h' ^
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly9 x7 ]- j% l. u6 z' c
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
) F7 i2 t- k Hpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,& O( L! `8 K% E
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
) l2 c# \7 @! Kfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.; W, `% W$ D' X0 D
$ e; ~/ b8 a) t
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house' L) L( ]" d: h1 @' F
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory/ ?1 M5 J0 n5 E7 {4 d
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
( l6 G [! O' d; w9 u- m3 A9 z1 kfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
: p3 n+ ]) F7 }8 d n% `9 o4 fwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
8 a: T. Z0 r- E! i Tpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
" d6 c' y$ w- ]making a purchase.
& n+ @) n v9 \2 R8 n
; z7 Z. _' _3 u6 W0 v% @ Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing8 u' N1 S$ b, L: _- G1 Y
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong+ X" E( Y, |, g9 {$ G* I! m: R
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
6 u- W7 T+ O- m' s: A. }centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
6 B3 B, O6 q4 B9 F) ^) j$ nattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown: ^2 i7 v) O) P' |' i
amenities.
5 v/ j, _7 `! U7 b) \' K t
2 m/ W- a3 D& `' D) h5 \ ^- o The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels! }6 C( K! Z& k( o' K- `
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand2 o X s1 G% A r/ }! m0 y
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has* \% y. U; r: I! Z# ]& X B, S
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been. z' Y$ G' c6 T8 u) b' a: i; a5 |
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
; O" c9 e% e( T) ?residence, rather than for investment.
6 z |; {8 Y1 N' H5 ^. e. J) V) R8 ^# M6 z* s3 \' X0 o7 D
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as9 T; l- o0 o. O
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
' O$ S& B' f2 }4 Jin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
$ M( N; W3 h( m3 g+ ]8 n2 p% \confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
& T* j3 o: r8 y/ Prate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter/ G( s8 v# }. Q( u" P. g0 q
the market.5 K4 Z: ]0 t5 l T5 z' c7 _ |
, G1 U1 j) _ y. D B+ p6 y% | In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through5 z: S. ]2 w( t- Y6 r% ^" w
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
3 l' Z/ K, ] k; z( r& }2 G8 oAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
3 N7 [9 N8 q& V+ ?8 hmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due& y+ n- {$ A0 s
to the shortage of available inventory.
# a3 }6 n5 E' a1 N7 j( x8 o) j8 b4 G1 ^( ~ t$ E
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
7 p2 n+ ]' v a& W3 I+ z4 Gmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains1 `3 B! @7 t: W
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses# }4 E+ {3 Q. [7 w( ]- T' K
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
- P" d. t! o; O2 z2 J# C+ q6 J' f0 B
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
3 w# a3 B c8 ~in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low c* K# l8 a1 _' ]3 ]6 U5 S7 g& i9 q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
8 {- q; O/ @) C( G( h( [+ Opressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring) M- y. I1 o6 L" u
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
' f% Y" ?8 g" M2 Jseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as% \% i c, j+ {$ g* _3 N
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.9 }# `2 P+ ~8 l7 h% H2 q
& r" _/ b0 G% ~$ V- z5 G
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter# s" [$ m; j* K F; R& n
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton4 M7 o J% {( U: Z& _
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,& F. H+ C, V: R( w" l
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices v0 y9 F. H' d; V6 r) T Z) [. T! H
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve' T9 g& G! j2 a
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
5 A* a' ]- O% g, w6 i5 P2 Btowards the end of 2006.
4 A* D& X' p4 Q$ D( C
5 p1 X: v. r7 {$ L! u/ CWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
% x0 \8 i8 y% h+ ~% M. h6 }$ d+ g# F2 Rinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
2 c$ J! z! P- P9 c2 C# Jto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse8 h8 d0 q9 U( Q& T; R4 D8 ^- T
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
6 q* w( O2 A& y, w! q* Y; Wforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
" Y( K- J+ A7 k2 E6 Jpressure on tight inventory levels.* w- l y; r; I+ Q U
4 O6 P* I. y; P+ l# X
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
1 D/ s& F! g3 R$ {5 F. }fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people l$ {* f. [- ~, q0 V2 r. ~
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;, o' J3 Z$ G3 P
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching4 o& s3 p- i" T# @. K& l
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
- h: o! z9 q/ k5 z7 R: G* d. i+ t- A& s
<<5 C$ F+ l+ o9 F* x; u/ C: }
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20065 v, l1 ]+ }, \1 T
5 R, i3 {0 ], P0 O- H" H+ z+ n) _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' B& d7 z4 K6 O5 i
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
( }& o7 H' m: }, R. [1 t9 w/ ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ~( D; N& }$ M9 t2 O+ A
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
, x1 y o1 ]* Q8 ?; x Market Average Average % Change Average Average
! }7 M6 o% Z/ i. n -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. X, \6 _3 `) U5 B6 H Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
" s2 i3 Y& X3 F2 e. L5 l L -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 j4 m* V/ q/ L9 w6 {9 {
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
" Z0 w& ?' ~& P& E8 q, o4 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------: I5 j" f) {4 L6 `) d& e* w
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
, a/ S; ]1 w6 R+ D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. t- k: X0 \) Q1 k Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
`0 b& z, G3 z! F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) R8 Q3 T" R) }( k/ t St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3333 I3 i, [" \ T, F6 T- v+ u2 A: B8 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# y4 P, p5 t) l( }! z8 Z
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
/ ]3 |- @9 \% ~/ g& T$ [5 p& t; Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 J1 n, E2 o- @( t Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
k# x. {( x, e" [4 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ ?! U( P% x, G3 C
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
4 N8 Y- z1 v4 e. C9 K# T4 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* v6 C- @# E0 e, r6 J5 v* f% b Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
/ w2 G9 p$ c: M2 A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
e1 Y9 }+ K8 G1 C$ O- z Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7070 f5 @7 @/ O; [/ Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 q+ H" @, b; ]* s% V
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
% s, B+ G" l, b' o: k -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 K1 c5 \% k& c/ v
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
2 T- N3 z% l3 P2 y# Z4 ~6 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) }5 H1 `- ~7 H0 |7 ^' _ Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
: p5 u" }* o; L0 ?6 N4 P -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! G( c0 s0 f. P% y9 r9 Y4 S Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
3 p# y( o& Z: r" f5 D( g- ?+ ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------( F+ K0 [5 N" V( i
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000! ?! R* g6 z# l! C/ D* e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' c% m, }- l2 ^* k9 n. p( ]
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8604 @. M6 w# D1 B( C" I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 ^/ S) ^0 h! q3 U
# ~) \4 t3 T7 ?+ }2 M: i f -------------------------------------------------------------
8 N+ \. Z1 B3 J& o- g Standard Condominium
6 y! x# w4 u' Q" u -------------------------------------------------------------
R; q0 Q8 a: p' | 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
0 j% I; e+ p% d O Market % Change Average Average % Change
9 C8 `6 {# ~$ k h7 D -------------------------------------------------------------
' ~9 I0 [# R4 G1 O+ |# q Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
# ]6 }/ {+ J# m4 ?+ y -------------------------------------------------------------
( L3 ?5 T R- [8 X, w Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
/ x) w1 y. D+ S$ e6 V4 ` -------------------------------------------------------------
0 v2 s9 M) ]7 {2 `" O* y Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
! {6 D# b3 [/ A1 [; G' z- N -------------------------------------------------------------4 K }5 B# @* n% j( }: }) j
Saint John N/A - - N/A
' K$ K. E# A8 B: U1 |( T6 c -------------------------------------------------------------2 S1 Q3 e: J% n% ^3 O* ~! ?
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%5 F+ l# k( \# ^; W9 S0 ^7 O
-------------------------------------------------------------* G' e2 C i- A) x5 {' f# V* T
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%& f( v4 h3 C* f3 a
-------------------------------------------------------------
* E( M2 H% E: J& }- ?& ?2 Z Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%- b3 F% \4 _) T* M
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ I, u: C9 b3 E# ^9 d+ E Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%' r3 C: E# S" C- i# v" ?
-------------------------------------------------------------, _6 X: c8 P6 \+ P
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
! W: H7 p, T" O -------------------------------------------------------------2 H7 N* K) C# U
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
# H( x3 C2 ^1 O: m3 t -------------------------------------------------------------
1 E( s/ x3 W: x' O; g2 B Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%) o' y3 q5 c% |8 ]2 y& O
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 g) i$ _6 U0 c" [1 x Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
8 f0 K3 z* ^2 d9 Q* f! {& X( A -------------------------------------------------------------9 w0 W1 d& [7 h
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
) p" @. Y- q2 S% }" K/ e -------------------------------------------------------------6 a; n+ k2 s- _0 X! {
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%+ [8 D+ z+ B7 B$ {
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 r% y0 E) R+ d, A" e% s5 V: X Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%$ i3 H/ r. H4 y& G* Z
-------------------------------------------------------------4 f- N5 t3 e" B/ V
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%5 g% K5 b# J7 @$ z
-------------------------------------------------------------: A7 U9 \/ x8 E. W: U
>>
& W7 e# H; @5 @: J$ W7 z i* [+ h' a5 |( p+ W2 Q" E
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined M3 G! f8 ]7 \8 J+ [4 m
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint, A1 B+ G1 `8 ^4 B- E. g
John and Victoria.
/ L9 G, n4 J3 E* v7 E) H& P; ?1 }: P! c
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most/ P9 B% S+ ? S' z# V' R3 m
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of; _1 u- c0 J- O4 n( t6 z7 T1 M
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release$ Y$ h$ r9 F) {9 s& Y1 v8 N
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 v: W( a+ v9 n. E
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities2 ?7 ?& D i3 @' ?4 A$ G
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
' }4 {, K8 K. P1 R, T' ?( Javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
# n/ S1 I, M; r. }9 ^) \figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
5 a. e- m& B( q, t; n) rversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on0 b, n+ a! r/ T. `
November 15, 2006.( u( X$ E2 H' r4 K% ~ d
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
3 X% m1 w( v$ ? @+ @fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge# w& K. ]5 K2 l
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
- ]9 M+ u$ J$ E4 Q1 f3 w* @available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡