请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
% \0 l9 y- g8 y, X2 W: F# [+ }6 I, ]0 W
值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

0 V0 n. R1 ^" M/ \值这个价钱吗
" Q! W) n3 w+ _6 S6 ~; F# P粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

8 @0 h  b4 d2 S! z去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

  T/ r$ S" W, x眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
: Q' ?2 B) W7 \9 |* G8 W* j" Q+ s9 b+ ~) yAssessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
' K( _- @" }* p100% Complete: Yes
& D6 r! n) K1 e  g, `, kNeighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
! h/ G% K4 M. v! C% _& ~  VLand Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
0 o( A. Q; \" G- V3 r9 @8 MLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
( c( {6 b7 z" N4 G7 t' L6 UBuilding Count: 1
Year Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
, y) g$ f3 R2 hApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
# V' ~9 g: Z& ?8 [. q3 QBasement Development: No
" U8 D9 m5 I2 ]) WGarage: Yes
9 F& G+ H1 x/ t0 WFireplace: Yes
+ _" s. g0 Y0 _* H0 L1 iWalkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.