请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
* b  t9 {3 g% x% C
5 z) T- m- d' D5 O; Q值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

  g7 ]# \% o% P! P" r$ |值这个价钱吗
. |8 D9 C/ _$ z3 U- O' c0 N" \7 X# x粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

5 w3 |4 d* ]# j+ J( u1 h去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
# G* j; e+ k1 Z9 [Assessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
, a* w% n: n* ~* O: d: ?- b( d! KNeighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
& _- Z' p* R! yLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
Building Count: 1
/ N4 I7 }" U3 ~$ n9 tYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
Basement Development: No
$ u) ~( f( |5 j* y1 |  A* x% e7 mGarage: Yes
5 s7 C% ?5 M" q/ W, n4 l8 ^Fireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
5 \7 t" h- M" O: X- Z- J3 L) ?Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.