 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:9 ^' }9 x% f, Y9 h/ h" t, A! u& @
9 k6 o/ d: C4 P) b/ H
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
R# M% ?; _1 s6 D4 t4 J( S3 C: _9 K5 A" F K% O
**********************************! z3 b: I; v0 A* O2 `6 l
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
5 X; q+ b% y* r5 H
! g5 m3 V( v, w$ A5 q% G) u9 b3 R$ Q1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.: O0 e8 X1 ?; m1 @
. ]6 C1 }+ b' W9 {' m
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
: @, I) r/ k& ] Y. A* Q U" ?7 ~3 q' F8 M+ o* \4 m; w4 A8 K
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
, k1 }6 j6 G* W$ i4 F& [1 Y4 h8 U# p0 q" h9 |+ s5 X5 D
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
6 g* C! R* p' G$ m& m' Q; C/ ^. o. t. R" Q& P& }
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|