 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:* W( y7 ]4 M2 f$ Z0 ?5 b& n2 u1 a& D8 G
+ U. X' C+ ]' E7 @$ l* {2 ~
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。( S! y( n; n* I) P
) p6 ~5 T- ] T- S1 a* a0 g: d! ?
**********************************
- ^& c6 g7 s/ t/ W) s, YAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:" n: r$ M& O. q# ^. h
$ J% W( X- ^0 j4 I. m+ p3 F
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
' `; {9 y: x R4 W- v
- r# g: i% d7 p! y+ y# K ]2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
" r6 \) U- d. |* S6 H+ U7 S% U7 h' ^& p
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
3 W8 {$ R8 ^9 a3 f/ v+ B! d4 V* e+ Y" Q
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
: }3 U2 N3 s) P& T: ^
+ _5 j5 @# j+ N: V5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|