* |9 P0 i& h0 o* i& a" n% a
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. % h. d% H" }: F/ @% }There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.- p9 b- ?# c" O2 [, \! Z
$ k4 [: i8 Y4 y4 G4 l6 H( F& p
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.3 m6 t6 M' d+ G. i a* V: H1 t
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 1 l; Y6 ?5 y" q9 Y 9 B& |! m" X) ^1 W: H9 z/ M9 X* a8 U
( u) D# s" v! O X' i
# P9 z h6 J. Y+ _- m) O ]4 {+ S % L9 L0 J/ N- j 8 L* r) D7 [2 M) _& C) m& ?小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
- j4 V1 i0 S1 F# R2 J3 |: q
1 c7 c# Z8 t7 q2 k c
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, 3 M) b$ s) d7 }0 M6 ^1 R6 a+ T. Y Y4 s! j y6 D
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 : }$ W6 f3 i- o; L( Y' m8 X 5 e9 @$ f0 d( e! T记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则