u! |6 y6 M# q; q7 @/ |4 sRead the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. - O1 N+ Q! R4 p# yThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. G2 t0 G7 a( q, u2 l+ ^: K: v8 ~7 M, B9 s, k& D' H1 Y6 w1 e4 O
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995./ B- W7 I: |1 o5 T1 a
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. % ^) B, D: }8 p4 y5 d9 [, L7 o. B8 Y* q# _
( ~/ |8 d8 T, _( @& p6 c ^( ^# m* \! X! `
4 ^4 }8 n5 f5 e- d" N) s 5 }, C7 n- N4 |8 D. y e0 [- u, V! K+ n" E- @" f f' U
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
( j* x- c8 e' E; G( _8 q % X4 i5 ~8 L) f$ b$ G' X+ i没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理,- r- T d) P1 C- n: A
6 G2 z. O' [! t& h但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实* z2 Y' t0 q r: v5 m I( r9 d( r
4 c/ B! t0 m) X/ u9 f3 Y记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则