Which lot is better?

fourseasons

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
& J5 P' ]) H$ C
, S% B5 `0 A5 X# ]: ULot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
% l  {6 ?6 w' `& X+ ]) f: \$ kLot 44 in Block 5  $198500

Link is here:
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/Mact_4B.pdf
- d2 ]( a9 ]' ehttp://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/StagePlan.pdf

执迷不悔

Lot 38 in Block 5 is better

Rapala

44, bigger lot, Conner lot, close to the pond, and not facing school yard.

fourseasons

2# 执迷不悔
/ q( R! y* `0 i1 @: E+ s
3 K! D5 m+ c+ m/ Y' b/ H
0 B- k. M, R5 `7 Y$ rBut this one is gone. Have to choose between those two.

fourseasons

3# Rapala

Thanks for your feedback.

6 |$ Q; c; E3 H$ q) F/ iIf the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
. K/ f$ r: j7 k8 z( A5 J. u! ], {, M
44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet) and you will facing other people's back yard.
$ f( S% u- F2 X& W) u* i0 ~6 A$ \
Thanks anyway.

Rapala

3# Rapala

Thanks for your feedback.
% O# p( H4 K8 \. \
If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
: \& o4 s9 a# g' h$ h: u, \$ _1 q
/ S7 v. n( ]8 i' F4 ]' y( ]# R4 ...
; ~0 l+ `/ k  T* S* R5 Bfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

You don't want the baseball hit your windows, do you? School back yard is good for some people, and bad for some people(no privacy) .
* h9 R6 _0 T9 u( F, ]4 G# s
46 has two backyard neighbor too.

辣椒

- M! l; p4 W) r  p' X3 F# `lot 34对于我来说是最好的啦，虽然钥匙圈是宁静

WST

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
5 M9 L) W. }0 l$ _2 o
Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
Lot 44 in Block 5  $198500
! n! Z" F) |5 f% K
9 p' J- E# Y/ @Link is h ...
5 A$ C3 O; g8 s$ g* }& sfourseasons 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

3 z6 W* e! v6 h9 j8 X$ |, D以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
8 w! @# X0 u7 K! }' _3 [) zlot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
# t/ F: N$ y* W3 L7 m+ e8 H高压线，高速公路，学校，公园，小湖， Ravine, 大湖。

小黄

当然是44好。前面通小池塘，后面是小路。小路南侧是池塘和贵房子。车库在北侧，客厅在南侧正好和邻居相隔较远，客厅可以做两侧窗，或者做成八角形的格局。
1 L: Z3 O- n0 H' S  C  J
6 Y( @5 O7 c9 v: r: H. G0 |46虽说是靠学校绿地，但那块绿地地势高于房子，不爽。

小黄

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
6 C' k- m1 |; g6 B6 plot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
. c# ]3 ~  ~- e' t9 e4 }5 r高 ...
) i8 g9 P5 C! A0 zWST 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

4 z$ S4 F3 i- ^$ e最好是高尔夫。Westbrook那些很不错。

小黄

3# Rapala
8 L( E2 T; j3 m" K/ b! ~1 P
9 P! G& z- [* P" a8 g44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet)
4 r9 [( ?* v9 `5 Wfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

8 f6 U  D6 z3 Q! i% o那只是某指定进深的宽度。
( x- C$ B+ {. |3 ?* g
& |6 |6 U! f% C7 |0 Q: T' {房子的射影不是方形的。在最窄的地方只有车库，34肯定够用。等到了要摆客厅的进深，宽度肯定已经不止34了。具体pocket形状要拿开发商的图纸和建筑商一起讨论如何利用最大面宽。

fourseasons

11# 小黄
; F1 `" E) ?8 b2 ~( L' B
# h! a  T5 A5 N9 g0 |
% ~$ m1 o; b2 {  w看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
  v' b8 p" I  F% _还有site plan 上注明44是RC (Restrictive covenant),有没有什么说道？

WST

11# 小黄

5 ~+ D* b4 w8 h. B
看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
) X- Z9 f) A6 k另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
还 ...
( W9 t1 O7 L5 _0 D& Ofourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

& g, A8 e8 U# g  P38 是pocket size. 我又看了 lot 46 (block 3) 的pocket是38。你再看看。