Which lot is better?

fourseasons · 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?

Lot 46 in Block 3 $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
Lot 44 in Block 5 $198500

Link is here:
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/Mact_4B.pdf
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/StagePlan.pdf

执迷不悔 · 发表于 2010-2-1 10:47

Lot 38 in Block 5 is better

Rapala · 发表于 2010-2-1 11:06

44, bigger lot, Conner lot, close to the pond, and not facing school yard.

fourseasons · 发表于 2010-2-1 11:07

2# 执迷不悔

But this one is gone. Have to choose between those two.

fourseasons · 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

3# Rapala

Thanks for your feedback.

If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.

44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet) and you will facing other people's back yard.

Thanks anyway.

Rapala · 发表于 2010-2-1 11:54

3# Rapala ( \2 W5 {2 u$ u

3 I# s' o+ W  D% WThanks for your feedback.
- T9 D0 O  v! y+ W& g0 U' x& X* I8 A# X3 W) L
If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area., G( Y' U- g6 @) ~5 u* w
0 l+ O( S2 z" Z7 u; ?( a* r, Z
4 ...
: N: C  c6 i4 R  K- Ofourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

You don't want the baseball hit your windows, do you? School back yard is good for some people, and bad for some people(no privacy) .

46 has two backyard neighbor too.

辣椒 · 发表于 2010-2-1 12:49

本帖最后由辣椒于 2010-2-1 12:51 编辑

lot 34对于我来说是最好的啦，虽然钥匙圈是宁静

WST · 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
; L5 M8 v+ R, O. P& r1 P/ D7 @3 N: y
- M- i9 U9 }3 W7 X6 J8 l6 RLot 46 in Block 3 $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
0 u, o1 M* c" A% @) ~) e/ I/ o- a- fLot 44 in Block 5 $198500( Z. P5 Y7 ] {0 z
6 l/ t, Y# W% ?5 \$ ^# s! M) P. o
Link is h ...1 j/ f9 e9 F; c! [. b
fourseasons 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
高压线，高速公路，学校，公园，小湖， Ravine, 大湖。

小黄 · 发表于 2010-2-1 19:09

当然是44好。前面通小池塘，后面是小路。小路南侧是池塘和贵房子。车库在北侧，客厅在南侧正好和邻居相隔较远，客厅可以做两侧窗，或者做成八角形的格局。

46虽说是靠学校绿地，但那块绿地地势高于房子，不爽。

小黄 · 发表于 2010-2-1 19:10

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。( _( s# s! p( a- I+ ]* @
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
$ z& X9 p; x* w3 @6 P$ Y% ]lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：4 m2 z& y& j: M& j
高 ...
7 u" Y/ M7 {% @$ ]% }5 G* ^1 Y( zWST 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

最好是高尔夫。Westbrook那些很不错。

小黄 · 发表于 2010-2-1 19:14

3# Rapala
$ F# F! I5 N: E0 J2 \
8 F2 T, E( E, t6 d3 b3 Y* d44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet)
1 l2 _1 g, a+ h8 X6 qfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

那只是某指定进深的宽度。

房子的射影不是方形的。在最窄的地方只有车库，34肯定够用。等到了要摆客厅的进深，宽度肯定已经不止34了。具体pocket形状要拿开发商的图纸和建筑商一起讨论如何利用最大面宽。

fourseasons · 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

11# 小黄

看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说 “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
还有site plan 上注明44是RC (Restrictive covenant),有没有什么说道？

WST · 发表于 2010-2-1 23:24

11# 小黄
  R8 P6 Q$ L" S! _( o4 {7 J, Y3 K# p) U, P/ o+ y3 |# Z; }0 E1 O

- W) L# q% t7 ^1 r看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！+ \& m2 S7 d3 p# U2 U; l9 l
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
; _! K; N3 ]) y( o3 `4 @" I' G还 ...: {& b! c* e* D  Q1 V, j0 _
fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

38 是pocket size. 我又看了 lot 46 (block 3) 的pocket是38。你再看看。

账号		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册