A survey of your preference(house type)

ceramistpalace

Which of the following you will vote for:

$ G8 X4 U) i& `* N5 W1 C+ nA.   bungalow
B.   bi-level or foundation-raised bungalow
# r3 d2 z) ?4 c+ p! wC.   2 storey
. @6 n) A$ c  K" j# rD.   4 level or 3 level split
8 o/ i$ z( O' ^+ h1 D& ^8 V5 x! c
# P9 ~, @1 o( l& d  AND

What is the reasons for your choice?

ceramistpalace

seem like nobody is interested in this topic.

享受生活

bungalow or 2 storey

ceramistpalace

$ B" t4 G) S0 F8 l2 I; M, r 3# 享受生活
your reply is a rare gem. And  BTW what is the reason for your choice?

青萝

2 storey.
0 @3 {. {, b% [6 G: z/ r: E7 J原因是：各功能区可以很好的分开；采光比平房好；楼梯带来的装饰美感；还有就是便宜（相同面积的2storey和bungalow比较）。
4-level split感觉上分的太琐碎了，随便从哪儿到哪儿都得上下几阶楼梯。
) E& D6 \# F$ ?3 c/ H& ]3 V自己的感觉，不知道说的对不对。

宋兵乙

如果不考虑地价，当然是bangolaw最好了，方便，不用楼上楼下的，适合老人孩子。
$ L' ~7 ~: S  F; e4 {
5 H* g7 S) z6 k: Y但是edmonton 现下的地价，同样的地上盖2 storey 最经济适用。
) ?  K9 E3 Q% H8 F' E
/ {1 K9 T6 F8 y$ x最不喜欢的就是4 level split.

YOKO

1# ceramistpalace
% s2 t! o9 h$ x6 bA and C

ceramistpalace

2 storey.
原因是：各功能区可以很好的分开；采光比平房好；楼梯带来的装饰美感；还有就是便宜（相同面积的2storey和bungalow比较）。
( m2 O- x2 }% M* Y. b; a$ T3 P4-level split感觉上分的太琐碎了，随便从哪儿到哪儿都得上下几阶楼梯。
8 w" C) R1 U0 |& R自 ...
6 S" F2 R4 d& R青萝 发表于 2009-11-11 09:13

6 n7 k+ C/ A% w1 B6 z6 y' ]There is no right or wrong when we are talking of PREFERENCE. Thanks for your response to this survey.

小黑炭儿

I like bungalow because it's more convinient. We are living in a 2 story right now and there are too much running around, upstairs and downstairs. It make me tired.

propeller

C.   2 storey