原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: " n/ G, W4 F# N8 }. ^+ w1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行. . F) @$ V# S. I4 m0 x. ~2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了.* L; }% ?$ ^; H' N8 r- a& K' i
5 Z9 \% J d& z' U# z Q, e( c
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧.) d3 ?/ I* q' \/ A N3 g
& _1 d7 m! T f3 b" T) ~+ @. y
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005( ~( b3 |: h6 i3 U
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" : W* t" |% r* ~: ?) q/ t. { 4 _ [$ h& u& d ~) e7 Z"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances.". a9 J" s" e3 r# E$ M5 R/ D
& j V) F6 i: c7 i8 n8 D
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
# a3 k3 u9 m; @' L0 f0 ~3 F% }0 p6 y6 e3 k' p' z9 `, t5 [! K" m# k5 |- _; e
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: & F1 b: z) C- V$ g* L2 \% K) `. IHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 1 \) e3 U! k2 j2 _6 ^$ ^The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"# b+ J# j1 J( ?1 i7 L/ Q
, R0 D) {& }: b* k$ W; R* ]0 c"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: " ?; t p7 V, v7 _. Y & d1 s$ R, R3 XDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.