 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
) C) [/ {, F& J2 y" s% Q楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
& G, N8 A# a9 U* a2 b" A5 C' acorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... - Z' ~- y# a6 V. _9 _
2 @+ G* w% m" V8 e3 X* B5 E! _7 S您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。+ B! i( A6 C- q- u
4 F X( S2 c" _ B
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.+ n& d. {, F2 }1 P6 n$ @6 ?! N
" j, }* O2 p% ?% [; X! L, j
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
" C) n# A. U( k4 V6 B
) ?0 l0 _1 u( Z4 L: u另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。; N2 Q' d Q3 i- v+ K: |
( Y* R0 n+ ?1 n
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):, b0 \ I8 B( S3 ]8 W/ }
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.- b; q6 y6 M, Q0 ]4 [
4 w' a5 p! b$ o
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"." k2 X+ K# z/ o2 t9 ^; P
: L5 h: G. F5 {* W) nBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.( ^$ K: w( s2 t o1 v, A
4 R/ Z0 N7 C" M4 t3 i' I) [2 @
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|