 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
. b0 q$ o9 `9 h0 d: @楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
6 l6 N- p# b9 |corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
! q3 Q. }( {. ~7 x
$ s1 D; [) T% i- \. h8 d/ [" M" v7 {您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
& r" K( s* O( e9 }
2 v" I- |' K! _' M% b安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless." }- w& f$ @) {, r: ?8 ?
5 Q! {' `6 Z" X7 d
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?! Y3 K6 s) D" P0 o$ x
- `0 w3 _& t- e# u% f, p
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。; y# y. |. R m5 R* l# c6 q
, U% ^; X* s0 p( O8 q% |/ s7 m
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):. M- J# g) y! K4 w$ a. _; c. t. a
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
2 i* m3 B% ~$ `, z" C0 [ [. q% p8 e0 r" K9 H5 k! x$ D0 A# K
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".5 c/ i0 o; L+ C u% R1 B! t* F
) c6 X& Y8 [) F9 C2 f
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.9 m6 m$ ~4 R* C6 A C$ W+ [" I
+ r }0 \+ r) ?/ J' A
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|