 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ; l" M7 w9 F* Y$ n5 \
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!2 C# M+ Z8 g8 I. j, F
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
3 z4 w& C( W4 C9 J% }6 P
1 P4 Z* j% h& v) ]) Q您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
4 |; @/ C9 @' B- e! N* p9 A7 b [4 f, S
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
]7 Q' N( K V6 h4 j% u1 Q d& |
( l- {3 |' b: m/ V; \不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?* l; |% p3 o, E7 y
, r' K, N) J# z( J
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
/ |- ~$ k* w7 L6 J) U& _* x2 _: b/ Z7 V; A& _6 y" n
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):- D1 ~% \! [+ }
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.. ^0 O: A- G1 r
0 ?4 G1 p" R7 g `$ t% |
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".2 Q4 e# K! A" J4 I$ @5 g
1 g5 J2 |1 `3 W3 a/ s1 U# gBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
1 ^. T, w; V O1 `1 J5 K3 Z; ~& N2 B7 f# S! i- u
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|