 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
* T$ M* s- q9 t$ j! w楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
B9 ~; g: B8 Jcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
; M s( ]! n2 ^( a# n, P5 d
?, U3 ]5 @7 R- L1 X. f您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。7 k' X# h* m8 E3 z4 e( D. l
. Z2 p0 X! }6 |# t1 R$ K
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
9 P4 s& p% A, }$ q
) O* `* P: }9 T( |% a' q! A1 Y! Q) B不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
+ a, F5 j( V5 F- ?3 R6 c
' y! Y: A W$ a: a另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
- R K* \5 I( }% z" V! N W4 E+ Y5 f4 {7 n2 n; Q$ V$ b; i4 c
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
1 p8 R/ V% ~+ \- j# N9 aYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.. T S: `4 T8 L5 E) C! m( @, {
+ R* E) M% V1 L9 S# T
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
5 i1 i& _$ G, q5 _6 c
% a& f; a6 e+ A6 t2 vBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.. V# U2 j" r+ U% F3 R) e" c3 B
' a' L2 h! q( y' F V. M) Y: c
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|