 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
5 S' V( A* N) h& L% Q/ L楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
. O0 g" w9 C% G& u/ S a5 f' P$ |! Dcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
2 [8 d4 T7 B$ n2 m
; u0 D( K0 b9 D4 B您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
$ h6 @+ u( `) d* I: i; D P% l' T! {3 w
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless., S4 J2 f+ V7 o+ l, X0 }
) W& g4 V- e/ K% x4 b# {3 X* q不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
5 T+ G% J* v" ^, u
i7 G3 y4 \3 G9 {" @另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
( e [ n0 v6 ^
$ y, k3 c. o g. m% s; a& S关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
4 [6 c+ Q8 S, M! L7 O$ S" E- c( t$ G( uYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.: B* |( s* L( [, p+ s8 h x
1 e" i' ], O' }) |0 r# t8 B
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".) J" v1 [; Z4 N4 V' |
1 x8 ~6 x% u2 _" M+ D# bBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
9 ?& n+ D* \& b" I
0 r6 k f4 k2 ^; F$ s' }[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|