埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1742|回复: 8

Real Estate Reporters

[复制链接]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Attention Real Estate Reporters: ' W# f* g8 H" t$ e# H

1 `" C& o, Z) X$ H1 e8 qDespite US housing woes Canadian real estate remains upbeat
  s$ [3 @& R# D/ F- G    TORONTO, Nov. 5 /CNW/ - Leading real estate experts are predicting the US
! v( Z; D4 {7 Z! K1 r+ I: Fcommercial real estate market will slow in 2008 and follow a similar pattern
* I8 ?4 V; u/ T; R- _) S0 A$ N- _; Tas the current residential market. However, according to the annual Emerging
: t0 U/ [9 t% yTrends in Real Estate 2008 report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
: _" `; y! N) u+ A4 u" j3 Wand the Urban Land Institute (ULI), their Canadian counterparts are much more
* M3 E# [% v9 c" U8 _& dupbeat.
; N4 x$ U  }; I) ^! v% V9 Q" S' \    Now in its 29th year, Emerging Trends is the oldest, most highly regarded8 @% |  m" X. c8 r% s' h, v
annual industry outlook for the real estate industry. The report reflects1 Z5 j6 z2 ?8 ]# A# H" ~
interviews with and surveys of more than 600 of the industry's leading real
3 J1 [8 c3 N# V3 S: w4 Festate experts, including investors, developers, property company6 u' _+ G6 Q, ?1 }0 F, a8 B$ e
representatives, lenders, brokers and consultants in both Canada and the US.
* u" w- @7 M$ @" l8 F7 A1 fOther versions of this report are conducted in countries around the world
" y! ~6 s+ _, k/ |* Fincluding Asia Pacific and Europe.& P! Q  @" ]* D- E: O. M) J" x
    According to Chris Potter, PwC partner and leader of the firm's Canadian$ s3 c* {4 K& _. H4 N5 I% y
Real Estate Tax practice, Canada benefits from a more conservative investment
* ^3 F1 e9 J2 Genvironment than the US. "In Canada, institution-dominated markets appear to
6 ~7 E4 Z3 s3 _5 }5 E- |be avoiding 'transaction mania', but real estate values have reached record; N; r' u+ J7 x* s) ^- X  i1 |/ O8 {
highs and a strong economy has accelerated tenant demand for space."2 z; F' M6 H; U8 U4 x6 y
    According to American respondents, a healthy correction south of the" b: E  s2 o& w
border will likely bypass long-term investors but penalize late-to-the-game
$ ^- g) S0 C0 w# U! sspeculators and overleveraged buyers. Canadian respondents to the survey& k( N+ V; D0 X* l
remain positive about sidestepping any serious impacts of this possible US3 a8 A7 E4 \" V8 b6 l2 R
correction. Close to 36% view their prospects for profitability in 2008 to be
& _& f+ Q' W. P' B5 Z6 `very good and a further 22.4% say they're excellent.( k9 d1 ^4 a; p  b$ d
    The strongest areas of real estate business activity for Canadian
/ ?/ I5 Z& j* ^3 r( ]( w( l( Q1 yrespondents is predicted to be within real estate services, followed by
7 V  K& {  h; X* J7 c5 g! C- xcommercial/multifamily development and homebuilding/residential land
! d; A5 Q& K) ?- ]  Ldevelopment. All property sectors share positive prospects across the country) P7 Y- t+ E+ D3 ^/ n' |" Y$ I! v4 _
especially industrial and retail with respondents, on average, stating
, i' x0 A/ S8 Y$ W. Zdevelopment prospects are expected to be modestly good to good. The" _5 R  }2 q  {" ^: D& k; T6 n9 @
residential for-sale market is also expected to fair well, but might need to- v& C4 ]: L' o$ I3 k5 W2 P5 y2 G
take a breather as homebuilders cannot keep up with the current pace and5 T: w/ L' C/ P8 k
single-family housing looks overpriced.
) m9 K( q. E. A& u+ I% S8 Q+ n2 J    Office stock is seeing limited inventories and dated product fill up with
3 N) T: o4 @: U8 \tenants. Except for Montreal, where office vacancies are nearing 9%. Canadian. d; C3 S& x0 g
metropolitan areas boast below 5% vacancies, and rents have room to push7 l! h( C7 ~* V. p
higher. The survey is also showing that costs and land scarcity is limiting: {3 ?( }, t+ v4 \1 I
new development. Hotel investment and development prospects are modestly good,
" m- U& i% `8 R2 Nand most respondents rate this sector either a buy or a hold. Rental
! m1 |- d- V' {* R' D2 ?* qapartments are doing well in major cities with high immigration flows. Primary
* L+ |( I0 h+ y  M4 z; lwestern cities - Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton - are veering toward housing
: N  w- r0 S- Q( Yshortages as workers, attracted by a plethora of well-paying jobs, pour into
, D  Y% [8 H# K3 d- P( p9 kthe energy zone. Apartment occupancies are soaring in these areas. Development: ]# G& ~0 g- ?
in other regions remains difficult because of costs and land scarcity.$ E' M: M) g4 j1 m5 Q8 A9 j( b
: J4 v' Z" s& ~% b. A
    Canadian Markets to Watch) o5 }/ f' ?8 b4 Q$ A3 T
4 E8 d6 o- k; {4 w( e9 R" S% f( M
    The report comments on how Canadians like to live and work in central+ Q) k: H" C+ Q
cities, as long as they can afford it. If housing is too pricey in 24-hour
5 K! t* R: ?4 cneighbourhoods, people move to inner-ring suburbs or beyond and commute back6 o+ c" U# @" p0 ]" p% }
into the cores. Investors, especially the institutions, are concentrated in
. |* V2 O4 @) K- S+ ]8 }downtown areas too. Planners and developers focus on infill and more vertical
* R1 {2 a& }1 [; \/ @4 R1 L9 ]projects, which reinforce the urban cores. The hot-growth energy cities out
8 u" X+ m% i9 \  m8 Twest - Calgary and Edmonton - score the highest ratings for investment4 v8 f; F$ k( ~! k( g
prospects, development, and for-sale housing, although it is not certain
6 l) }0 P9 L0 n4 Twhether the recent announcements on royalties will have any effect on this.% T' W* w8 M, ^( b. E
Toronto, Canada's premier global pathway city, and Vancouver also have high
4 c7 r6 M3 M: U0 y; Uratings. Ottawa and Montreal follow, with Halifax lagging.
4 M4 h, v  x, x7 X! ~, D  j6 R
  j' G! s+ c2 Y3 }  R    Calgary/Edmonton
8 M) O1 F& \% A! H) m: o0 p  L  O$ R% P5 B
    Calgary is the Canada's "resource" capital and North America's number-one3 y* I0 s, J3 O; N1 B
boomtown. Survey respondents foresee strong buys for all sectors: 53.5% give a
4 s$ ~( N8 L2 z- X" C3 ^' Fbuy recommendation for Hotel Property, 52.8% for Industrial/Distribution,
- a# u9 o$ o3 U; H/ B: R8 i48.1% for Retail and Apartment Residential and 44.6% for Office Property.( p% E$ L9 F/ `
Furthermore, on average the majority of respondents see Calgary For-Sale
. d" Y- ~+ `* y! f0 m7 R. z( T, CHomebuilding prospects as very good. Edmonton is closely mimicking the% \5 O( n2 I/ S# L+ p
Calgary-style growth wave and as long as demand for energy resources stays
& r# I6 o% G/ o1 z" n, Xstrong, this market will continue to do well.5 _7 ^/ p/ h, k' E
7 `7 V3 |6 `$ h. a% @
    Vancouver
9 q# {6 K/ W/ ^# J$ j6 m+ V* [( ?+ k  i. T$ H1 r% V9 v) p
    Vancouver's diversified economy is roaring, the mining industry is0 S- a# z! q+ d9 e, K
booming and the city provides a large port and a high-tech center. Outrageous  J! |' k5 t5 D
real estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors and the* C% x2 O0 N+ l7 X: Q
market is extremely hard to crack. The 2010 Winter Olympic Games is also a
  K9 W# b1 S4 T5 \, E+ R. I3 L- W* ]( xgrowth driver and accordingly 44.7% of respondents give Vancouver a buy
& y* n& h  R6 orecommendation for Hotel Property. A further 43.5% give a buy Retail, 41.3%
6 O. W! J$ R# ]" H% `7 x4 Ifor Industrial/Distribution and 36.7% for Office Property followed by 34.1%
3 X" p* w5 U  c+ k* g, ifor Apartment Residential property. Vancouver also ranks in the good to very
" f) o! w1 s, U2 m) fgood mark for for-sale homebuilding prospects.3 _! p# J/ h4 B$ T
3 T" `, {6 c) ^7 ^: [
    Toronto) R. \6 J+ R* W( r% @$ i

; }9 o: q0 z+ q! V* P    Toronto ranks as a major global pathway destination, 24-hour city, and
2 t* U+ p2 C9 @: L/ T: I9 X$ tmanufacturing hub. Compared with other national financial centers, the city is
" [  R6 x1 ^9 ^# c: g4 Qrelatively inexpensive. However, the rising loonie is hurting manufacturing
! g9 O. ?8 c( m- l1 o& ^$ aindustries, and clouds over the US economy threaten to stall out momentum.
: e) p  ?! [: M. ~Three new office towers are under construction, adding 3 million new square1 x' W" U! n& J% O
feet of office space. Notably, Office (49.1%), Industrial (46.2%) and
  Q7 S1 h, N5 G( a; Q" oApartments (40.8%) are given solid buys.
- ~5 j& s) T6 o, p% E) r
/ l) U7 _) Z6 }6 {2 Y* ^4 P0 L0 Q7 [    Montreal
- ~; K7 ^- k" M" D7 r5 o
) L8 D9 k- S/ V( E, V    Montreal continues to face concerns about market stability and overall8 [5 W3 g, ^7 y' O
growth prospects as major companies no longer choose it as a place to set up
4 @7 n6 m% r2 C8 p/ ]4 ~shop. But, plenty of government offices fill space. Of the larger cities in% B& p5 w/ p0 K3 t$ H
Canada, Montreal ranks lowest as a "buy" recommendation in all real estate- j4 t3 |5 b7 z* q8 r4 x
sectors. However, respondents generally rated all Montreal real estate sectors/ d  O+ f( z$ e/ p
higher as a "hold" recommendation.
$ r" Z; Y7 O' n) S: K, ?8 n# W/ A+ O4 z1 j6 w5 `6 Z
    The report notes that best bets for investors for the coming years
7 }7 |4 l. A! h, Xinclude a focus on all property sectors in the high-growth western energy
) b4 _# y& S* M( o1 V8 ]! M8 F; jmarkets, hold on central business district office space, develop infill condos+ S  I& V" O5 b5 J2 [# u* L! Z* n
near subways stops in Toronto, buy infill sites wherever you can and invest; r. ^( r# `, K# E
overseas. Potter concludes, "Domestic opportunities are too limited at current
% K9 P, w! d$ Y1 m! L4 J, hprices."! g/ q9 K. a8 [0 B' V: {/ I4 `
    A copy of Emerging Trends in Real Estate(R) 2008 is available at$ d, H7 F0 r' z* M8 |& \$ n
www.uli.org or www.pwc.com/imre.
7 G. W* r9 ^. l( J- K7 v# q9 k3 }5 m6 x; G0 b: h2 [5 m
    About PricewaterhouseCoopers$ h6 s3 w3 ]1 h5 |

8 p1 E. x! T6 f3 k    PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) provides industry-focused assurance,
: N! R) @9 h/ e2 ~' B1 k4 |2 |tax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its+ _' X* H. j  U# ]! M
clients and their stakeholders. More than 140,000 people in 149 countries8 ^0 k8 _- q$ F; A7 I( r/ T# T. S  W# x
across our network share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop
3 _4 o( H" _5 w/ y9 B2 Gfresh perspectives and practical advice. Now celebrating 100 years of% u4 A. R& n5 M- [3 k
excellence in Canada, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (www.pwc.com/ca) and its
$ {/ \3 @7 L+ v$ u0 E. A) trelated entities have more than 5,200 partners and staff in offices across the
+ H( O' U5 W3 d; @' O8 \' m- v' zcountry.4 R5 i  |( F4 J' M! e
    "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario! K1 R7 K2 T; C% p& h6 b
limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the
4 M; Q* f1 Q- N, h6 Y4 E1 IPricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,
% s- g& m- X( C8 X- `! m+ J" v+ heach of which is a separate and independent legal entity.' X; N  Q& V& h" v, G6 B

2 y/ `- E! z+ @! ?    About the Urban Land Institute" N1 l9 M7 |0 I. K. o, @

5 J1 a  @8 C- E: N, |( {    The Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org) is a nonprofit education and, z+ E$ X/ P( e  E
research institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide1 U* o: Q9 z$ S/ ^5 b
leadership in the responsible use of land and in sustaining and creating
3 d) D( [5 X# c# Ethriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute has more
8 s3 v# u* u5 d* @) z# r% `than 38,000 members representing all aspects of land use and development
( z# T$ u( `8 }1 m! Q  [% Zdisciplines.
! o* y5 _7 K7 G) S, N9 U    The Urban Land Institute is an active and growing organization in Canada.% C+ w# ~; V. ?3 [% Q
With nearly 700 members across the country, Canada's first ULI District
$ [/ N$ }+ k) Y6 vCouncil was established in Toronto in 2005 and a second District Council is
. p) v" R0 A8 [" gnow being formed in British Columbia. The Toronto District Council will be
* n4 m0 v# W0 q. [' }) u! Z% U, Q8 ahosting a special event on Emerging Trends in Real Estate on November 20th,
, x! n$ I3 U  x# W2007, featuring Jonathan Miller, the principal author of the report, Blake
' D, c5 T1 y7 o& A+ p0 V" G* N( [, FHutcheson, President of CB Richard Ellis Canada Ltd., and George Carras,& n: x8 p7 d# k+ q! W( ]9 Y, Z
President of RealNet Canada Inc. For more information on this event, please6 Q4 z2 Y1 i, R9 }7 n
call the Toronto District Council Coordinator at (647) 258-0017, or look on
/ W! O7 z) u" L% \the web at www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066.1 B4 A' m" b( V& m& v" K) b
3 d2 G' s! g  o7 M

- H5 w1 i1 Q# E$ h+ O
- u7 X$ t6 g# M" D) pFor further information: Carolyn Forest, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,- u: B* [& V5 a7 x
(416) 814-5730, carolyn.forest@ca.pwc.com# W5 k/ r5 w4 c0 |, @# d* s
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releas ... r2007/05/c4080.html
" i0 n7 I! N, k2 x
& \, B& q, @. k. ^[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-11-13 09:08 编辑 ]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-13 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
注意房地产记者采访时说:
, T6 n6 }4 V. f; ~4 Z
% H, J/ o. r9 l) z5 V+ ?4 I尽管美国住房疾苦加拿大房地产仍乐观
) S! ~7 t" p6 Q    多伦多, 11月5日电/新华美通/ -领先的房地产专家预测,美国
1 J' K8 [. k" ]& B- f商业房地产市场将缓慢,在2008年和遵循类似模式。
+ C7 K2 g# h) K% \' v3 d由于目前住宅市场。但是,根据年报新兴
5 N$ T$ [0 f9 E* u趋势,在房地产, 2008年发布的报告,由罗兵咸永道(预委会)
4 m  T7 m, s; C. [, G2 P和城市土地研究所(宇力) ,其对应的加拿大得多4 M1 W) ]  p4 R- X
乐观。
+ {- e% ~$ A0 D    现在,在其第29届,今年新出现的趋势是历史最悠久,最受尊敬的1 u# s8 }. x3 R7 U" m1 X
年度行业展望房地产业。该报告反映了- D/ O$ B' T. C+ Y- h0 U0 t  J9 v
访谈和调查, 600多的业内领先的实时
" m( K9 S( ^8 S& x  H9 n/ I& G地产专家,包括投资者,开发商,物业公司+ m# m3 m& y5 V& c5 `$ h
代表,放款人,经纪人和顾问公司在加拿大和美国。
+ a$ ^1 y1 d9 Y" H$ X8 z( Z其它版本的这份报告是在世界各国纷纷
' g0 Q% Q  k. c4 q包括亚太地区和欧洲。 0 B/ ]* `* }% N3 }# \, D
    据克里斯波特,预委会的合作伙伴和领导者,该公司在加拿大
! Y% M! j: s8 A3 k$ L- q1 b9 K房地产税的做法,加拿大受益于一个较保守的投资3 f. d+ x# z/ T0 y: c2 c& R
环境比美国好。 "在加拿大,机构主导的市场,似乎+ r( z4 K6 P7 r' x6 l7 v* G" s9 F6 ?
可避免'交易躁狂症' ,但房地产的价值,已达到了创纪录
$ ]; u: F8 e( l; I; q高点和强劲的经济,加速了租客的需求空间" 。
* m" |6 ~; k% `' y, ]2 [( H- O% W/ \    据美国受访者中,一个健康的校正南方的
2 ]' E0 P" w: a. l/ ]# W6 C边界可能会绕过长线投资者,但惩罚下旬至该游戏; C+ C4 T! @/ |8 O
炒家overleveraged买家。加拿大民意调查被访者
/ b+ R. f& U+ l. k/ b% y继续积极回避任何严重的影响,这可能美国0 b9 f6 `# m2 T0 d. f, Q9 n! y
更正。接近36 % ,查看他们的前景,盈利能力在2008年将2 }; A6 p  c2 d' S9 d1 s
非常好,并且进一步的22.4 %的人说他们做得很棒。 6 k4 ^5 E* C! T9 K/ {
    最强地区的房地产经营活动,为加拿大
* W5 x! u: A. |' b3 l受访者预测,要保持房地产服务,其次是
" `2 I/ @1 T8 t* l0 X/ C( _商业/多家庭的发展和住宅建设/住宅用地
  o" B, O" F) n- x的发展。所有地产行业分享积极的前景在全国推行8 m7 T5 x+ m& O5 @/ [  A# s
尤其是工业和零售与受访者中,平均说明3 D# A3 \* B' G$ X
的发展前景,预计会虚心好,以良好的。该
8 [) \+ m3 J8 J" d! p/ }住宅为售后市场预期也将公平好,但可能需要* H3 V3 K7 Z; V6 Z
以喘息为营建不能配合当前的速度和* }7 u$ V1 `$ V
单个家庭的房屋期待过高。 . D, f9 n/ D. r0 c( r5 O
    办公室的股票是看到有限的库存和过时的产品,填补了
2 K9 c7 V" e% T$ B$ L2 _租户。除蒙特利尔,而办公楼空置率接近百分之九。加拿大
; @% ^( C, |) c5 e大都市区夸耀百分之五以下的职位空缺,以及租金的空间,以推动
4 Y) w3 P- R5 r+ w* M) P* f更高。调查也显示,成本及土地稀缺限制6 ~) @  F- {2 T; r! X! w4 D
新的发展。酒店投资和发展前景是良好的谦虚,
) g1 f- e+ M/ G$ F6 U$ C和大多数受访者比率这个行业无论是购买或持有。出租
* j  [, u# j1 S. `; z" n公寓是搞好大城市与高移民流动。小学# l1 U5 l& Y4 W5 \6 }4 e3 v
西方城市-温哥华,卡尔加里,埃德蒙顿和-正转向对房屋
) I% m/ U: F6 S4 Q- l短缺的工人,吸引了大量的好报酬优厚的就业岗位,倒入" e$ W  B' U  C6 [! r
能源区。公寓占用飞涨,在这方面的努力。发展
/ O3 H$ ~2 e/ {1 ~+ @) t7 v3 s在其他地区仍然很困难,因为成本及土地匮乏。 / \+ z$ ], t" N# Y
5 ~; \$ q3 t) h- K
    加拿大市场上观看/ ]6 }0 T5 k, ^* }  n* o+ E

# g; o; `# b( U1 @  H% Q0 v    该报告对如何加拿大人愿意生活和工作在中央
7 e3 [7 y$ P; k! t城市,只要他们能够负担得起的。如果房屋是太昂贵,在24小时! u( o, L4 A/ {# a& H+ N. ?' N: f* Z
居民区,人们搬到党内环郊区或更远和通勤回1 p0 k( J5 O; T6 A) ^6 Q
进入内核。投资者,特别是机构,都集中在% K8 H1 c; B/ y" `, {+ j6 ?( g1 A
市中心地区。规划者和开发商把重心放在加密和更垂直
# k  m# A+ @9 c' I% A  i项目,加强了城市的核心。热点增长的能源城市
* G7 D6 ]' g, d0 I4 j西-卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿-评分最高的收视率,为投资( U, i, ]' Y5 r
前景,发展,并为出售住房,它虽然是不肯定
4 G2 U3 J* Q3 a: ?/ G: ~/ L1 c" C是否最近宣布对版税将产生什么影响。 % P9 p+ P1 u6 P; F" H
多伦多,是加拿大首屈一指的全球通路的城市,温哥华等,也有高
( J( ]; y+ v9 Z% ^4 [评级。渥太华和蒙特利尔跟进,与哈利法克斯还相对滞后。 2 G& ^  H  V% j9 p
: y' P7 A; A2 h+ R
    卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿
# x' t+ Y; w' n" B3 y- q/ O! e+ E" v6 E/ p5 g0 q
    卡尔加里是加拿大的"资源"的资本和北美洲的头号
: {$ b7 F. L# \# r7 \新兴都市。调查的受访者预计,强买,为各阶层人士: 53.5 %作
# r" o+ \1 D9 o; Q% p1 l; t! i购买建议,为酒店物业,为52.8 % ,为工业/配送,
$ x# c; |8 c, `5 e48.1 % ,零售和公寓住宅和44.6 % ,为办公室的财产。 8 s  `3 n9 C6 X, g: ~; O$ _: x: N7 y3 X
此外,每日平均有超过半数受访见卡尔加里为售后9 R+ i4 L$ B' V3 \8 i1 B
住宅建设前景是非常好的。埃德蒙顿正密切模仿了
1 p1 G+ g6 x6 O; U1 Q卡尔加里式的增长浪潮,并且只要能源需求的资源留, V2 v# o- F- k6 m2 R
强大的,这个市场将继续向好。 3 K/ n! @, ~" d2 U7 T; ~% z
, k" G2 _4 l, c: u
    温哥华/ n! }; @; L2 B# ]# g

, k9 h$ g9 _7 |6 r* S& z5 J& z    温哥华的多元化的经济,是波涛汹涌,采矿业
( @# h: n6 o- d2 Q; R7 w红红火火的城市提供了一个大型港口和高科技中心。岂有此理$ U1 E5 |+ J% `. X6 J: U
房地产价格挫败购房者和商业投资者和
. J# [: i" k& m: ]7 c+ W市场是非常难裂纹。 2010年冬季奥运会也是一个
. L# l2 d0 c: I) Q* P主要成长动力,并据此44.7 %的受访者给予温哥华买进% a, T/ b* w) T" m/ V* @
建议对酒店的财产。另有43.5 %给予买进零售, 41.3 %
2 F9 q2 }) g+ w9 A$ b- O工业/分销和36.7 %办公室财产其次是34.1 % 9 p; p% Z1 Z' `7 [: y$ m
为公寓住宅物业。温哥华也名列在好的很
  i% K) C* d+ C' c8 s良好的标志,为买卖房屋建筑的前景。
3 [) V# L$ b8 ^9 ~' r% D6 k" g
$ C  S- l( N: t8 H/ X( D/ {    多伦多
6 Z# o' g6 K# v5 O5 p
8 ?! R4 i  C. m    多伦多队伍作为一项重大的全球通路目的地后, 24小时市, 8 E) h! o. s- ^* g1 T4 j
制造业枢纽。相较于其他国家的金融中心,该市正
' o5 X) ]" u2 U6 q4 X7 x  _价格相对低廉。不过,加元上涨是伤害制造/ M  q# A7 a3 a4 d, f& U/ q
工业,并云在美国经济的威胁,以贩出的势头。
3 B& c! r* ~" s' a6 K三个新的办公大楼正在建设中,增加3万个新广场; q! {/ \$ G7 S
英尺的办公空间。值得注意的是,办公室( 49.1 % ) ,工业( 46.2 % )和$ Y3 w8 T  s- V# K: o7 i4 ^
公寓( 40.8 % ) ,给出了坚实的收购。 ) d3 r& m+ i3 F% y9 S- N
/ Z2 y: f% I8 R+ i5 @1 ~
    蒙特利尔
# t) `0 v8 E) F8 s2 s& X7 i
3 u5 H8 L4 V9 X! g! f    蒙特利尔仍然面临着关注市场的稳定及整体
: C  _- O# m6 p. k经济增长的前景,因为各大公司不再选择香港作为一个地方成立
4 m" R8 _4 d! h4 y: o店。但是,大量的政府办公室填写空间。比较大的城市
, Z+ l. {$ C* ?1 n, S% w加拿大,蒙特利尔排名最低的是一个"买进"的建议,在所有房地产
4 N4 x# ?# i# ?( ^2 i3 u部门。不过,受访者普遍都被评为蒙特利尔房地产行业" L' L# u' C$ f3 t
高为"持有"建议。
+ d2 h2 ^+ T0 f! i% B0 b
7 Q2 |- U2 ?: ]5 M" ?3 v    报告指出,最佳的赌注,为投资者在未来几年
  N: j9 g/ y% C- `1 r; x# g$ o$ a包括重点放在所有地产行业在高速发展的西方能源
$ B7 Y2 I, ^' F- @: e7 t$ u% r  o市场,忍着中央商务区的办公场所,制定加密公寓$ G% V) l' c: E, H+ P# G4 K
附近的行人隧道,停在多伦多,购买加密地点在何处,你可以和投资
- \8 }& C" e) \% @海外。波特的结论是, "国内的机会太有限,在目前的8 I, R# s: y; d! E. X: ^6 Q7 A4 p
价格" 。 " m! O' I! Q3 C( Q9 p4 Z; L8 k& f% o- A
    一本新趋势的房地产( r )的, 2008年是于
6 i; h- ^( @8 C/ Nwww.uli.org或www.pwc.com /伊姆雷。
7 H. o' R6 f0 j6 E0 N6 B, e8 a6 D( [2 I+ y1 g
    约罗兵咸永道
* r  m9 w  D3 x' u. x! J$ N5 u3 `+ D9 Y; n: x" T. y
    罗兵咸永道( www.pwc.com )提供行业为重点的保证, + b  \; s- x% \- ]1 ^3 a; G8 |
税务和咨询服务,以建立公众的信任和提高其值$ C5 c! r: D. l4 X2 o
客户和他们的利益相关者。超过14万人,在149个国家# T5 w" ^1 h4 Y# P6 N
跨越我们的网络分享他们的思想,经验和解决方案开发. A/ ^; q$ w  t* O7 S
新的观点和切实可行的意见。现在庆祝百年的; |$ `& A1 K' E. I4 I2 b: l5 h
卓越在加拿大,罗兵咸永道物流园( www.pwc.com / ca )和其
' r# d# ?" f, v相关实体有超过5200名合作伙伴和工作人员在全国各地的办公室
. v" s! u  b4 j! F4 m; r国。
9 c  S' d) p# ~1 g+ S     "罗兵咸永道" ,是指以罗兵咸永道物流园,安大略
; b4 ?* q  A! W8 h有限责任合伙,或视情况需要, . ~: N  |6 s. b" e/ V
普华永道的全球网络,还是其他会员公司的网络,
* K8 z0 J( C/ a- n0 m8 f1 \) ^* D) N; E+ w每年这是一个独立的法律实体。 ! p. @) {# E4 c6 e5 w* ]
$ G$ x, T, |) E! D9 M4 N6 y
    关于城市土地研究所所长
1 K4 G1 w: H+ m
9 l! G6 A. k  j; \# |7 ?# A8 F& ^  u    城市土地学会( www.uli.org )是一个非赢利性的教育和: F/ K# y  @& g# K8 s1 v
研究院的支持,它的成员。它的使命是提供3 W; M+ v" M# N$ i, _' y$ \
领导,在以负责任的方式使用土地,并维持和创造
4 C: L9 h( s8 A5 s  Y蓬勃发展的社区在世界各地。成立于1936年,研究所更4 a( ]) R8 l$ K. Q3 M! p
超过38000人,代表各方面的土地利用与发展7 }- m$ A4 I! J
学科。 7 a% A  |6 t+ V* _. N: X9 j4 w, m' u
    城市土地学会是一个积极的和不断扩大的组织在加拿大。 - U. b( g" [6 p. V% D- q/ g
与近700名委员在全国推行,加拿大的第赫内斯区
9 _( ]( v7 y: `理事会成立于多伦多,在2005年和第二个区议会) ~4 ~0 x6 I7 q$ l1 E6 J  A
现在正在形成,在不列颠哥伦比亚省。多伦多区会/ `6 \/ f) Q4 B
主办了一次特别活动,对新出现的趋势,在房地产上11月20日, $ s2 q4 u9 [2 V$ U, m- G, ~5 h5 ^+ x7 V" Q
2007年,包括乔纳森米勒,主要报告的作者,卜力7 x" i8 V1 O& N
资讯公司总裁世邦魏理仕加拿大有限公司,和乔治carras , " F6 g6 j7 `7 }
总统realnet加拿大公司的更多信息,对这一事件,请
! ]+ y7 _) W1 x9 M% u. d致电多伦多区议会事务协调员( 647 ) 258-0017 ,或一脸无奈
" z; n# F2 n5 y5 r* I- N4 z网站www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=30668 r4 j' j  o5 ~( @! g) Z5 i( X
* V4 i/ L5 w1 Z& V$ |
4 |" k0 b6 v% K/ v* j
$ L6 i7 |  h% G( m* [9 o! A+ z
更多资讯:卡罗琳森林,罗兵咸永道物流园,
: s( M. H1 M4 a8 T. i" q! E9 ?( 416 ) 814-5730 , carolyn.forest @ ca.pwc.com
鲜花(4348) 鸡蛋(18)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的这个翻译软件好。
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:15 | 显示全部楼层

Up

老杨团队 追求完美
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 11:20 | 显示全部楼层
% Y) R. Z2 H9 S0 ?- ?5 {) o

1 Y( A5 ~, r: Q  O; l5 i: z$ B
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 15:37 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看涨派的忽悠水平有很大提高,请继续努力。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 19:04 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 21:54 | 显示全部楼层
! i  P2 i0 v; Y" @
u
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-15 06:03 , Processed in 0.251502 second(s), 24 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表