 鲜花( 79)  鸡蛋( 4)
|
本帖最后由 youngguncn 于 2016-3-1 00:45 编辑
6 Z1 O. d7 o; h) r2 u; m$ i3 e5 _. b4 B' @: b9 v' u
* C2 X8 B; Q j: {0 U5 H/ }/ B
第二个罪是criminal negligent homicide,是 class E不是manslaghter,class B,你就是把manslaughter和homocide搞混了。
( v! g% e& O' y) C纽约没有criminally neugligent manslaughter,如果有犯罪行为的manslaughter,是顶级重罪,像你所说的仅次于谋杀的重罪。这个在纽约叫一级误杀。梁Sir没有被charge这个。梁 Sir如果被charge这个罪名而且成立,至少刑期是4年,而不是说得0到15年。/ V# H9 i. g6 |
梁 sir被convict的五个罪名是以严重性排列的,第一个是C级重罪,0到15年,第二个是E级重罪,0到4年。/ r) d( l. D$ z/ j
梁 sir没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有任何犯罪意图和行为,梁 sir也没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有主观意愿去误杀小黑。
: P3 ]& x( I' M梁 sir的第一个罪我已经贴出来了。0 p3 _0 F! H$ @( u# ^& D
; O2 b/ J; O5 f# C: T梁 sir被判的第二个罪是这个
: L1 L# G% n* CS 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.
7 k( R7 `5 P5 o8 d7 C' e2 i A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with) }7 l! Y* @8 ~- W' }* H
criminal negligence, he causes the death of another person.3 O) N: D1 c$ J
Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.' K# K4 o4 }( P( m; T
criminally negligent的有多严重呢。NYC是这么排的。4 ]2 L7 o3 q3 p3 U9 R% ~* b
最严重是intentionally,然后是knowingly,然后是reckless,最轻的是这个criminally negligent。比不小心还轻,因为太轻了,但是还确实怪你,没办法了,来了个这个表述。就像你在TNT买东西,但是你还是食物中毒了。1.大统华把保质期擦了重打,这肯定是故意的。2.大统华知道这批货过期了,没换,3.大统华太忙了,想换没来得及就被你买了。4.criminally neglegent,大统华正在换货,你也不知道,顺手拿起来换下来的货买了,这个根犯罪一点关系都没有。
2 ^6 W6 m! Q, @
( Z, ^) m) ~$ m! K- I2 {如果这个你还不理解,那我干脆都贴上来吧。
3 J6 h( W- \/ \; `# Y5 [你说的那个manslaughter在NYC是下面这个。梁 sir要是这个,整个NYPD估计可能都要上街的。都轮不到华人。
, c6 ]" b1 k! O" ~0 i- [
" T$ X' e# W8 H+ a8 m) j# h- a( @S 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.7 G# ?# d% F: b7 r# h% ~
A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:6 ]7 c" ?# p- W. Z* T
1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he5 @, {# I6 G5 ~+ h+ l! Z6 u
causes the death of such person or of a third person; or
; |9 L- X2 L/ y 2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the) v$ H7 S z; v' S3 C n# {
death of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do6 K& u$ B+ t% m% q$ O4 S
not constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme
" B+ ]' I0 U" ]8 b9 Bemotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of
: c4 v0 _* q2 n t$ c, A) V4 ]section 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence
; l7 F* J1 S' s O' F. ?of extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance4 @3 U6 f2 R5 U' `
reducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be, ?1 o8 ?$ c4 ~& R
proved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or' k; ~ I4 S# {
3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks( o8 l. z; C$ t4 f
an abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is
& F2 x/ q/ x' k& r: vjustifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or
( B( x" b: H6 \3 H. k+ v 4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical
# A$ Q3 J6 e8 b' n$ Sinjury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly8 m, G9 @5 ~& v
engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury
5 i0 Y/ J2 W; bto such person and thereby causes the death of such person.
C2 x3 g0 \4 g9 J$ H Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony.3 y6 v# r3 @& {; F
|
|