 鲜花( 79)  鸡蛋( 4)
|
本帖最后由 youngguncn 于 2016-3-1 00:45 编辑 $ B: k( `5 b' V6 a
L, V( S& y' [8 f M) l
4 A3 h# b+ ]) v! M$ h第二个罪是criminal negligent homicide,是 class E不是manslaghter,class B,你就是把manslaughter和homocide搞混了。+ Q8 q5 H3 N, K6 }
纽约没有criminally neugligent manslaughter,如果有犯罪行为的manslaughter,是顶级重罪,像你所说的仅次于谋杀的重罪。这个在纽约叫一级误杀。梁Sir没有被charge这个。梁 Sir如果被charge这个罪名而且成立,至少刑期是4年,而不是说得0到15年。
" x' w; ` K+ K6 ]: c$ H梁 sir被convict的五个罪名是以严重性排列的,第一个是C级重罪,0到15年,第二个是E级重罪,0到4年。
; @( Q; E1 R1 p2 P3 O梁 sir没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有任何犯罪意图和行为,梁 sir也没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有主观意愿去误杀小黑。
$ \. a9 j1 F. u$ K! @0 E2 H3 G梁 sir的第一个罪我已经贴出来了。
/ n7 x, I/ j" m/ |
7 i, ~5 o& F% b7 g) e# o% b5 {1 p5 Y梁 sir被判的第二个罪是这个6 _+ d( B6 u5 O' ]; F
S 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.% N1 H3 l' P3 V9 P$ V
A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with
9 X& p5 r0 M$ C/ F& V/ _criminal negligence, he causes the death of another person.- b: V2 I% W7 x
Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony. Q3 Y7 L" t7 ?- h) C w
criminally negligent的有多严重呢。NYC是这么排的。
4 p" j. Q6 U* ]: k* U2 j/ L最严重是intentionally,然后是knowingly,然后是reckless,最轻的是这个criminally negligent。比不小心还轻,因为太轻了,但是还确实怪你,没办法了,来了个这个表述。就像你在TNT买东西,但是你还是食物中毒了。1.大统华把保质期擦了重打,这肯定是故意的。2.大统华知道这批货过期了,没换,3.大统华太忙了,想换没来得及就被你买了。4.criminally neglegent,大统华正在换货,你也不知道,顺手拿起来换下来的货买了,这个根犯罪一点关系都没有。2 w3 }& E. V1 @# C
% k$ u" p# Z( a2 S [1 L. o3 a u" B如果这个你还不理解,那我干脆都贴上来吧。
2 v% `6 c. I6 N% M8 k你说的那个manslaughter在NYC是下面这个。梁 sir要是这个,整个NYPD估计可能都要上街的。都轮不到华人。
6 C$ a2 h, N0 E1 ]% m/ C# |' O" Q1 k) H" E
S 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.
& s2 t, C, S6 M9 S A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:$ D) {/ }: g. `; |
1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he. R' Q2 V' ^5 ]2 h" \. R% O3 P2 _
causes the death of such person or of a third person; or
* Q/ k0 `' M5 `* ?; |3 ] 2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the
?. n- z; g& E% Cdeath of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do
( B( l- u. C! R& @* u! g, Dnot constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme
" B) J( f0 y" |! p5 @9 [3 femotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of
& p! E' y. y" T4 }* Hsection 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence
5 }! t: n9 C6 ~0 pof extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance
, X% [6 H, ]3 r" {" B( ~2 areducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be
6 [. L; R8 \0 g; T* {) ?proved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or
w6 S2 g- p& x( i% y1 f, K, _2 r 3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks% ?( z5 R+ m1 d) v& n$ |
an abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is$ m: c7 O7 ]& f
justifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or! `4 n8 n0 H! t) d2 _$ W, B
4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical
6 a* K3 Z* i4 R/ }injury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly
2 {2 R' l/ t* }2 K" i/ I d9 qengages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury
+ t) ?/ m1 h0 _0 l8 dto such person and thereby causes the death of such person.
1 f& h- _9 g( V: x/ q Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony.7 T2 G# |! N+ Q. a- r" L
|
|