 鲜花( 79)  鸡蛋( 4)
|
本帖最后由 youngguncn 于 2016-3-1 00:45 编辑 ! h% ]$ H9 n) ^! w6 N7 v
% C" M; l8 m! F
( A E4 [7 ]& @/ ?
第二个罪是criminal negligent homicide,是 class E不是manslaghter,class B,你就是把manslaughter和homocide搞混了。
- f" t/ N1 M! T4 I纽约没有criminally neugligent manslaughter,如果有犯罪行为的manslaughter,是顶级重罪,像你所说的仅次于谋杀的重罪。这个在纽约叫一级误杀。梁Sir没有被charge这个。梁 Sir如果被charge这个罪名而且成立,至少刑期是4年,而不是说得0到15年。
0 j! u* U, D* ], @3 X梁 sir被convict的五个罪名是以严重性排列的,第一个是C级重罪,0到15年,第二个是E级重罪,0到4年。
- r2 {" `$ `$ N; {$ A$ c梁 sir没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有任何犯罪意图和行为,梁 sir也没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有主观意愿去误杀小黑。
3 S1 P- r0 }. A, D6 g6 |梁 sir的第一个罪我已经贴出来了。
. ?3 t% x0 G8 A+ }- T$ f/ n7 ^% h# X, C3 e4 _
梁 sir被判的第二个罪是这个( J$ C$ p: t6 ]: m# q
S 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.9 n( i% r. ?- ?7 g6 o. x
A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with
& z/ ~- E( H8 |criminal negligence, he causes the death of another person.' J' B9 p5 n# `/ C, n1 g
Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.1 n6 F: C: p% z0 X
criminally negligent的有多严重呢。NYC是这么排的。
. w) J1 {1 X% F% N最严重是intentionally,然后是knowingly,然后是reckless,最轻的是这个criminally negligent。比不小心还轻,因为太轻了,但是还确实怪你,没办法了,来了个这个表述。就像你在TNT买东西,但是你还是食物中毒了。1.大统华把保质期擦了重打,这肯定是故意的。2.大统华知道这批货过期了,没换,3.大统华太忙了,想换没来得及就被你买了。4.criminally neglegent,大统华正在换货,你也不知道,顺手拿起来换下来的货买了,这个根犯罪一点关系都没有。
* ^3 O" _8 P; n# ?1 g* T- M9 a9 H$ r d
如果这个你还不理解,那我干脆都贴上来吧。
) F2 z$ z% n9 j3 u# C( ?- X你说的那个manslaughter在NYC是下面这个。梁 sir要是这个,整个NYPD估计可能都要上街的。都轮不到华人。' L0 K; Y' c$ f: ^' P
( B I% h* W) s( w! o
S 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.
W. h4 T9 i- W& u! a A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:4 q& u7 \ u ^* d3 U$ P7 t
1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he
8 Z) C/ _! l1 v" S+ j) p8 S% Ucauses the death of such person or of a third person; or
: @7 i: u5 \. ?8 v+ \ 2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the" X% b1 J$ Q( }/ Q; ~: f
death of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do. w( V9 E' ~+ [- |
not constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme
& J$ a4 e( r4 L/ A3 qemotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of
1 [* J' N. w- G7 q5 M; esection 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence
- ]9 y6 w2 G3 [3 h: Eof extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance
$ p+ X: H H1 y2 f4 }: N# ~& Wreducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be! h' z' V" _; ?) [- `
proved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or- w% U; j* C& \4 w* N$ ~& C
3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks
6 T) m6 U/ }6 c( z# ean abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is
- J. U. ]# k0 l7 A$ y5 y% ^8 ujustifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or; P$ p; h0 e( U) Y: s& X
4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical
. N& L* H5 ?8 Z6 m2 Y! Z- Winjury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly
# i+ r* T' e4 C8 t+ vengages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury
* _5 `3 {6 F# w/ h; uto such person and thereby causes the death of such person.
; j( M0 h0 H+ N Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony.' h3 I$ n) z1 H, B. ^, y, k
|
|