 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
本帖最后由 小黄 于 2009-12-21 13:39 编辑 ! r: O4 K* I4 x3 `3 k; v
你也别整呢些弯弯绕了。你就说吧：CIVIC和卡车撞，谁比谁更吸能？谁比谁更容易死？) o3 x5 e2 H8 v
降龙十八掌 发表于 2009-12-21 11:33 
3 E6 T. w& q2 F7 G$ LThere is no data available. If you do have some, please share. But please don't make up scenarios and data yourself, that's 意淫. Use a published source, or statistically controlled experiment.% |' @( N! O5 ^, G5 F; d
8 ~8 v9 q! \4 l% XFrom the existing data, there are 3 types of death:
$ p, J; w) r( t8 F1) MV: multi vehicle collision, like when a Civic hits another car/truck' H ~2 }3 ]0 B4 c
2) SV: single vehicle, like hitting a tree, or roll over
6 G5 ^0 {8 q* |( F+ {- P' {9 l' ^2 h# B3) SV Roll: roll over, this a sub set of SV.
5 S( A+ j& S- k6 e( m
4 T) O2 }4 C. ?& L4 }For Honda Civic:; g: k V' d' K* F4 C0 ^
MV 34
6 }( b/ }* R iSV 33
) h4 J2 F1 _5 w/ nSV Roll 13
4 m+ E( ?' I% _0 d. z6 w, R
: g- c8 k7 \' m* TFor Ford F150 (including super cab, crew cab):! y q% b# i+ @% _8 ?
MV 28~34
% b! W0 W/ I0 }SV 79~948 o- K4 j% w) [ w: Z# M
SV Roll 48~82( s# r/ z0 [4 F( a0 t4 h9 O
$ C1 [; O0 {. U$ M4 x' i$ UFor Chevy Silverado 1500:
6 A' f' L9 g9 w4 t) B0 EMV 40
" ]0 e) X# u3 j) u% dSV 851 S9 I- d9 S! N
SV Roll 61
- J. L# i( T0 `' r, ~+ h
- z l @5 Z/ L# `- C1 B$ s }As you can see, not only would the trucks roll over more easily, they don't perform better even in a vehicle on vehicle collision. So, yeah, Civic is definitely safer than F150 or Silverado. |
|
楼主: kismet
狗仔卡
发表于 2009-12-20 16:58
显身卡
