 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
; Z( V7 j/ p5 b) X8 R4 u4 m& H
+ v4 Z5 T1 [0 E$ f# T) M诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。+ S% z; O1 j8 N" U! \; O: @6 B
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
& ^; P4 W' D+ h' h
2 r/ h( v9 F" g' z9 A- f( yhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse1 |$ h; A4 ~6 y8 _+ G* U7 w' U
" z5 T: n) o) P( F1 |0 v$ \1 tBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
' y" V6 r5 K& p' ~
E# N' N2 Y; R4 G# q) @( j: bOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.) x) @+ N- w) r/ U. A& K0 Z
0 a/ X: t# E, Y) p( MThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals./ k* z" D" m' r. [2 i
% d' K& s- U) DHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.. C6 p5 L, j# F! u1 W# |
& v# @4 [( R( t+ g
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”+ P9 g; p; \8 }; j
# {* ]4 _' d7 y0 e: ^$ S R# m
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.8 ^- C5 x2 e* r; p+ E
; X# K5 L, P4 _! J, h+ f rBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.9 k7 a7 p L: t& N+ r
6 W6 J9 u$ o2 S- Z, ~( Q
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”( A) V8 Y( a9 X7 n5 V: m
; j; o ~* s$ K$ B. b2 g, }Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”* a/ @! }7 z, }4 }5 L2 r) T
6 G, w% q$ l9 Q. c& A
& U C. x5 L0 S& L, s; t$ k& T, e; D" O1 n: t
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
3 x/ X+ I, k: v8 D
% b/ Y, m6 U7 H2 yIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.: I$ J9 D+ H/ ^, I
9 Q6 w# M) L5 c( {0 \Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
& w7 C$ x& ~* i8 K9 n3 `% [$ u0 {) J# W; X* j+ ]
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval., N& X5 h* } O# O
o) Q6 N0 T$ z( N9 F
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
4 ^+ i& {0 E) h1 M% p* Z5 b, I T3 d7 `5 m- R8 K
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
2 n; l5 v6 U t) y: t, u) W) M5 U! \+ a; k) a7 m& s
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy., F4 y: \& `) ]+ @! _, J
b% M5 W- M2 ^. F2 A3 d“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.0 ^5 E$ u% S! a6 u
5 _7 S% t% w5 g
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.( r( A6 T" J/ u: Y
) j! h9 Q' ^; I( k
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”6 \5 \$ L5 s, ^4 X" c+ m: Z
D: U& i2 X6 B0 z, [$ ~ |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 k5 z0 b( ]! A1 A- H
