 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
& r; T% S' z, t9 e6 N: |- e6 C% G2 Z9 [7 |' L% S$ U
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
$ i4 j O6 m. @% f阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
, D) ^% Y: M' i: L8 B- S# u: y* v6 c- u, H- n, g
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse7 t, T5 f5 Y [% ]9 N* D$ d
, h) @9 J9 F ?3 P4 Z: c& bBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
4 T2 }# ~. K0 u0 `; }3 H
1 J. u! S* G6 u- I( n; E5 oOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.) B5 r: |5 k4 ]5 ~/ \
; [8 s- f8 \ i" O& Z
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
0 u5 H7 F6 i3 t. L/ o/ h! m( I7 H- e+ |' n
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.2 V# j3 F9 I W' k! ?2 {5 A
7 r& L7 `& y/ H0 }1 X1 p6 oAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”6 {' u# b/ [1 i# ?
% {, l2 \6 }4 o, h$ ?
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
5 U8 ?" z) g" I. T+ m7 ?9 a3 z4 }% R1 J
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
9 z) L& u+ ]; @1 j4 `4 Z% F' Y3 x" a g3 ^$ C
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”4 K1 p( A! I2 ]5 d( Y8 q
/ \# B8 O5 Z) N( l: C1 y. V" d
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”6 e1 w& B/ K# e2 @
7 g2 o0 z. U4 U- }+ l8 w
 & l" T6 o7 o" n5 V. t/ b
2 r7 e; X7 {5 p% ~' W; |( r. CThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
7 z) d( Z* u+ j; j& f: J2 U9 p7 ]9 L2 T
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.& @7 m6 A8 R/ y& ?; M$ C
/ }1 X5 C7 o$ F" x) y+ w
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
) [, ]# z! D! l' P3 Y" t% C
4 y# e j9 O( ]% m- D; iGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.. k; a6 }! \! Q' k. h; [
8 _$ X- [ \2 ]. X, e, L* o( vBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.$ D- H; y5 W4 t" P) p
5 |; l' C( p/ l g: Q
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.: j* a" i7 D* r3 l5 p4 Y" u1 @# n
8 n! I! m0 R3 ?1 j
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
8 v- j, C- |5 r* f
& K0 t- v) @; J% {“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
2 E5 Z t/ ^8 ?* q; I: m2 `
$ k+ R- i2 {6 u“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
; F S' ]9 w. W
% ?! b' Z6 j0 z* O$ D% T- s“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”) V& M* N3 r0 T. [6 H$ R7 h
. v: a8 Y) q" M# s7 m
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
