 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
) p2 B% p2 ^( h! w5 k L
3 L! M7 L N) y* _7 z诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。( D$ ~- ?% Y6 z5 ?7 g( V
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
/ O, W# l- n4 o% b
. N) F: @; b( c! i: h$ O! Mhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse, _" o% S9 [+ q; C. ?7 n
# K7 v1 X2 r% I, X9 }Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
) K* b" P4 S; v& ]& [$ s1 O
( I# ^4 M) X. G$ z, NOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.- I' a* M& J" I
* M5 P% u9 w! S; y f
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals./ O8 u) `6 g! l5 x* w1 R: r
) }3 D8 B% M7 k, W; \; Q
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
+ u6 l% r% o' y5 U) n3 M! p& Y6 ^ d5 L3 V- q9 i
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”* A! L! \; |+ r- M, ?
* f/ ]- ` ~4 _3 w* g( l jActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
& y6 M/ z; ?) I( T! m: @6 N( W
5 ^7 Q0 e0 V9 `" yBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.' B, d/ Y' @, f. P
) `7 v" d1 l4 r Q“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”2 C4 M& U8 Z6 r8 Y
& b' g/ P$ x& s% m
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”4 d+ h1 ?: \2 l5 r5 k
- o7 v% j$ Z0 O D
 / F" H8 ~, F' W$ S& q( F9 P
2 M* v) z, g8 z: E: T
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
6 S1 Q6 K5 K+ {; i i! F% a, \; h& I9 r% d# c
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
+ C& G8 F$ W+ I! [3 V
2 d+ ]: z* ~5 {, hNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.4 Y: Y- W2 d" j" a
# x5 `+ G* o$ L V2 FGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
+ t& e* f' @* b0 Y' o; E# N" Y, B9 |7 t7 V5 g7 C2 b
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.# I+ m% N8 w3 H% e
' s3 y: O/ b2 H+ Q: K- Y
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
1 _( {8 ]2 U9 T* N m0 ?
: b) U; ?2 A4 H m' B* KActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
7 y4 c, M# x1 }( S3 B+ n* c
7 P# G3 L+ m: T2 g7 @- b“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
8 { m% Z* D- |6 ^1 m+ L# g- f' o2 i, r
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
$ A- Y; B! U1 E' C1 ?2 s/ s
, b W3 p/ p; r“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”& q& n$ u: R) H5 a: Q- w
9 x& P3 A- M; n$ S. u% V |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 ; X" a9 G/ A5 r7 N8 F
