 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
/ z9 K; H; e7 _9 k% e0 d
# t" w; m4 ~9 P/ }, d ^- `* x诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。) R7 b- c: Y2 }) c
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。1 I7 M( f4 Y& |7 v
8 N3 r7 y/ h& s: C/ b+ W/ \https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
: d2 Z. |5 I9 s; T. f: o9 @& N/ \! I, T
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
" I5 e0 n6 R2 S* U7 l2 p, R. z) J+ h& `$ x7 ~- t
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
$ U3 `2 c' [& t- P, j# s" q. x5 E% _: K" z" f) F1 e' {6 f
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.8 A% y( b7 b% {4 ~7 t! N- U
! m- H3 P7 q8 }
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
3 G! V! j2 x& W7 d
+ e: S8 l: i( S, k sAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”" \* o6 \ `3 k! U/ `8 D$ c" E' I- n
5 Y0 y: y6 S' t, LActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
% d* A0 k$ ?. r4 L
$ @8 J k" x% ^2 N/ S6 L# LBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.+ P$ K3 ~/ F' t) ?2 m0 D' G
S1 y& W, Q: E- {“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
9 E& D% Y; }8 d2 ]
# M' u: Z5 c+ x* ^; K9 r: W" |9 U- vPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”% p7 L- U) s4 B% Y
3 b. j. @. L5 V( }: {2 b
' j8 R' a$ [8 f( _4 q- J
0 j3 Y- Y& b z. u+ {The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.4 z/ @ y; f% c9 C r5 M
. d* r+ Z- a/ _+ S! {
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.' m( Q/ Y2 |/ e# Y. E8 v, Y1 }- P( a
4 j6 ~- | L3 A7 z' ?
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.1 ^, J" _5 K( b; u2 R, [3 a
) v* D+ u1 ~ X" Z/ a8 oGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
; f% _) q" k& d2 n! q; Z
/ b$ `' i) E/ a r- U- N& n+ ?But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
5 _9 u5 o( U1 ?% I+ u, A% Q( r
4 |2 g, f3 \% D% m% n# _- uTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.8 Z0 V. \. O. a3 k
6 r' e9 U3 H, |# ~( qActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy., \$ Y1 N8 w2 s, N" \8 D9 \! Z
' y% B9 o1 y1 d3 \“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
0 n' R* l- j$ Q% B/ ]( L, |6 k& ^- [3 I7 I2 Y+ W
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.: d0 B4 [; m& u7 I7 E" w
$ K$ D% [8 N8 l
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”' i5 C! [3 U0 J% H6 v9 U
6 A7 x, [) L4 R
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
