 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
! Z/ _" ]( h! k: M
( D3 S8 m- o) ^# q% x诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
' I0 k' W J5 V/ J阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
% R# V% z4 w; w6 A8 y& Q# m
^6 g- o# X: i/ q s! O1 O3 Zhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse6 m, n) h; c' g, ~7 y
+ }! Q) N) d0 `! H0 ?* MBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
5 c) H5 B# o5 {
, W4 L3 p3 f0 @ H, B' y' uOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is., s& ]) _+ a9 J$ U
% w: d) E/ \6 O5 t& m$ ^
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.! a% [& g1 H6 M( g8 s
" V* J; j, M' b8 m1 QHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
. z5 j; M3 Y5 D9 S) X- L8 q4 X' f$ l
* |9 M3 P. L, P7 ~# o1 m+ a# BAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
, U1 X2 ]9 k) H2 z7 R' q
& t7 x- l3 x# p1 v7 J! NActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.: p+ k5 [& t3 {
4 U/ R3 {* b- K. t) Y( g
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
; x) o) t b$ B5 }
4 t' E9 y* t* ?( K! G“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”7 }8 ]5 _0 ~% F3 S
( j% B& J# n4 m V3 V5 b8 \Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”+ K* Q+ L8 @% f% a e% }
/ E: I' ^; ?0 A/ S3 r; f9 \9 M
# _" ^/ Q; t' M+ D* o5 M8 T
0 Y4 b! n5 f; UThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
j2 g& F7 P: n% g; H% n/ L& ]# V' g. n0 p
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.- h! f" q( `" G* r5 Y( c
% k) v( F$ ]2 l: @7 M& p. ~; K9 U3 l' @Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
# n y/ |! h% Y" u7 P
' ~" Z1 A$ Y- L8 L: u4 i1 PGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
! c! N# K8 q( W. y3 |9 ]
1 L! s* s$ Z8 W+ T9 EBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.* d) t# S- i: j% V9 w' O
* c4 J! D, Q8 W3 k! _Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.7 F, c: k$ }6 I+ Z! @7 O. h
# n+ o2 m- Y) AActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.9 k6 g0 b: v6 Z
4 y) n4 R9 {* ?7 k* H, O“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
6 s) y- g0 G- S; v; n' o; ^% v& @1 @7 G. X% f
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
, Q" e( O- Z: O. G @8 c- O ?) V/ I
& v. a/ g" y; ~& Q. j“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
# U1 C; P5 E7 @: M
2 `" \ f7 Y& l: d/ N$ Q! P |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
