 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
& Q$ [% v- R9 C3 L% r/ q
4 m8 [3 G5 `4 ]. B7 P( Q- G: C, g
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。* R2 O# Q' {1 T( A2 w! h
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。$ o1 Z3 z& [) K1 c% F
# y; U' ]3 E7 v" a ]https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse1 e. A0 a' Y% L! ^
/ p6 ?5 F$ S% t9 `5 O6 qBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse, a& K$ J2 c6 C# M( Q
* T- G3 c( y+ R( M3 |4 n+ W2 nOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
3 l1 I+ }' @% F
8 C$ C; ~8 W: Y% {That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
) S( y' t& c- p* s$ q
/ a. Y" i6 E- N, B; Z+ lHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.! D3 k" R* r4 m- C& w! [
{, {4 l. E) @& D ]4 a& c) Z. ^6 F
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
8 l s, e+ E& y# L5 M( h; T# M: M: Y; e' l6 A# q5 B* q
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.! f% n! D5 q1 A( j
# c' f: R* I, I, b x' |But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.% E5 c7 C: q( F$ m. v# k
; f7 R; m- f1 p, Z! Y“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
4 B) R: c3 ^. p
+ c: D& t9 m! @; \Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
$ S9 m7 @6 \+ J0 x. p6 I! ]$ u* a/ f- s0 P) a1 j
5 Z+ _3 I6 d& _/ c1 M
* k9 G7 J3 [9 E2 Q' i: H6 VThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.1 p2 a$ A4 h! N' Y% U% _6 k
( @* _9 x- _8 l+ o- E8 h
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
8 _+ x0 o( \7 Q8 I! J, M
8 s3 |8 w0 ~3 l. B5 A: V4 ENow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.- p( Y) ?, F( q5 ?5 V7 _
; b7 V Z3 ^! o. L/ v- n/ R
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
1 U- r- Z6 [& c. r# C k7 o6 }% [# ` }: I* d5 G7 p' k5 \
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
. p/ E7 e, ^) q1 X5 X& i8 M1 N! y2 v6 R( T3 z' o3 h* i
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.7 q0 o7 l% i# \7 x
3 L5 i( D5 q- t: U" n4 c, p% gActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
$ m/ m& }- N2 l9 U! |5 r
* K6 k" F" ]6 g# u“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
- L' ]5 D6 e9 W* N7 V. X6 z# ?7 Z0 L4 B+ P' a1 B
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.' o8 }% ?2 w. l8 z6 g6 E) v
- V( T6 Z6 ~- L, W0 t O“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”: B! ^( t7 j* p9 W9 c
% b; q; ], ?) ?# W! ]! V
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 5 u% i+ ]2 e+ ^, [2 L3 p8 i
