; s- o( e0 y4 ] k2 {7 m$ n: P $ C; @ }9 Q2 \7 Y# U4 f' uSorry, I don’t see a correlation between my statement and yours, so to make myself clear: ! L* x) X8 X8 b" { ' b7 O$ Z3 p ]4 x9 SIf you’re spared from tedious household chores merely because you are the main income earner, it’s only a privilege.+ e$ k+ x) i2 |4 u4 M
2 l9 M7 o- f4 ?" f% _& Z) S1 EHowever it becomes a right (more or less) if you can earn enough to spare BOTH from those. % ?+ k! F7 I' U$ b" r4 ]
; A/ |+ J! x9 D f) S I' E9 [; }5 z u8 F3 G
You can’t value homemaker production by her implied opportunity cost alone. Not from the perspective of society as a whole, anyway. 6 Y9 y% K# W9 a) S
- Y1 m% W* ]0 i |
P.S. when did you piss off Sumash? lol.
SheJing 发表于 2013-8-21 10:42 4 r$ M( o9 Y. \0 d5 r. a3 fYou can’t value homemaker production by her implied opportunity cost alone. Not from the perspe ...
\2 l) u5 Y+ h; B 5 n9 g8 A0 V( a2 S$ O Y+ g1 S
投入产出经济学并不能适用于所有范畴。