 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 6)
|
本帖最后由 bigsnail 于 2012-6-7 11:17 编辑
1 B9 Z1 k/ F# r, T7 t& M% H
0 b1 c6 `% y1 O1 q0 z. zopen your mouth and wash it with detergent
+ Q0 j, o% A( A6 h2 U" Y* K
/ I% }6 r& Y9 B5 J, |9 M# a. S! ^2 lsure there is no rigorous statistical evidence because there is no way to manipulate in the experiment so as to fully justify the causality.
' I2 e$ q5 e; ^# b) W9 L3 @* G, Z) c" f+ n- P2 d
And remember:
, z: `; u4 M+ k) ^, l% L- S' a$ Y3 L"there is no evidence that A holds" 9 N- `6 @8 }) _: u1 l
does NOT mean - y& h d4 m6 I; |/ S, u9 k
"there is evident that A does not hold".
# r& I* c4 ^2 K- |3 S qIn fact, A could hold. }3 t4 } R, V3 q% R6 i6 `8 n i. k
It's a matter like observability vs objective existence.
+ y6 F) f7 k h7 M3 ^So what you say doesn't constitute a refutation.6 ]) i# Z$ p& } T/ f. E V
b7 D' M6 g: H4 u2 b' q. }
It's mainly by argumentation. See for example:
6 ]6 `* ~ e$ d, j& w
# Q$ [3 A/ j# k: |5 e _% \* |"Does the death penalty cost less than life in prison without parole?"
+ h' B8 `8 |: ?6 ^in* _) y4 r5 e0 }' p" s
http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001000- P+ _# r2 w% {1 ?/ r1 x
( f, |; }# _7 O$ [5 D) |Remember, things are more complicated than what you think.7 J1 Y( Q' F, m3 ~, c
|
|
楼主: weidsun
狗仔卡
发表于 2012-6-6 21:15
显身卡
楼主
发表于 2012-6-7 14:59
