 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 6)
|
本帖最后由 bigsnail 于 2012-6-7 11:17 编辑
3 H5 H, W5 u4 r' Q- o: U5 L1 L
" h$ Y5 K! S9 T5 d iopen your mouth and wash it with detergent: c$ `$ n0 X2 b) i0 n5 g
" v, k6 Z+ C; f+ ]6 }( r2 Jsure there is no rigorous statistical evidence because there is no way to manipulate in the experiment so as to fully justify the causality.
. e3 n% D- Q" m, ^5 }, f, x8 n4 g Q3 {! B
And remember: 7 ~; J; {- o3 m0 D$ y L
"there is no evidence that A holds"
$ h8 k: x/ G; k) g( Ldoes NOT mean 3 @% ^/ }9 g' W6 x e" H$ l! M
"there is evident that A does not hold". $ }! w, v1 S: g& _& d6 A
In fact, A could hold. 2 r# K& E: V2 e5 y2 b% l9 s
It's a matter like observability vs objective existence.
F% t0 j+ q x; n s" ]So what you say doesn't constitute a refutation.
V) T3 }0 b4 i4 N9 P+ {
" z% a7 [- y& W' B" I2 l5 ZIt's mainly by argumentation. See for example:
9 }5 I! K/ A1 h6 r( i8 t8 s% d9 s# W8 m' G) h4 Z( j
"Does the death penalty cost less than life in prison without parole?"
" F& H0 v" l# yin4 j; u7 E k5 [! @
http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001000% m$ T" H' d6 V6 t) {
- C, b/ a: K# D5 wRemember, things are more complicated than what you think.9 W# Z) V9 W/ Y" }( }) K" j( k" p+ u' Z
|
|
楼主: weidsun
狗仔卡
发表于 2012-6-6 21:15
显身卡
楼主
发表于 2012-6-7 14:59
