 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 " e8 u* o3 N9 S/ g/ s: i9 I
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?. B$ J3 ~/ N" i% k: I, v
; g: m- s1 [. L
这明摆着是两码事9 l9 ^7 p8 U0 {; o
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  `- c' i3 t; E0 E1 J2 y! ]
* Z' G" r P8 E
can't type chinese at work,0 Q( ?9 G/ V. S! Y: U
6 H3 @9 g& F- w3 L X% w) a# W p0 G
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.5 R- g6 t- i. [
) v, |4 c' z* E) G
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|