 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 * h8 |- Y% l0 o' W* e
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?7 q5 q! H3 a' h0 U) }0 ]: _% p
0 \6 u+ n1 S# G0 x' t7 T, a这明摆着是两码事
, Q7 X2 h8 ~* r nsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  , o/ p. X; P2 Y# F! H& D
+ w" T0 s: k; k$ L S2 Bcan't type chinese at work,3 w' j9 d/ W! j5 L& r% l$ H
1 L* _# e/ W- v0 [6 t"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.6 n c, Z0 _+ c& D- a! z2 k( u
- v1 b( v" d) C
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|