 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 8 ^2 s# r2 W4 f, ?; H/ G3 L
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
* Q% r/ U) M% q2 ?3 I+ ^
6 e6 g6 F, h1 E! F& f* y2 c. Y这明摆着是两码事
9 {$ H; g6 Y" Fsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  $ b; _" f! I% S( ^2 X' Y
/ G1 q; a, ~ Z' h' {/ v2 f
can't type chinese at work,
: `+ p& \. g! b7 c8 `. y) \$ ?8 r6 {9 h2 I2 L" X
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
G" x) H t. ?2 A' `
6 j+ E8 h d1 \2 K" K, L- L9 c! n! NWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|