 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 ]3 V5 W N( B( Z$ Q( \
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
8 a" f" @" ]+ A: R j2 y
; W; m' H/ p% N; @% u( ^这明摆着是两码事) j- b$ J. r v1 g" `
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
0 |" L! ~, `" O( H- d( J( t" z9 o# X" B' l9 [, A k4 L
can't type chinese at work,* Q& e0 w( ~" K9 e( o
0 K. ?6 o& t# T0 h- p6 x"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.4 o) U0 ?/ Y8 I) e
# L: U3 P* b9 k* HWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|