 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 5 V4 M6 W6 x+ i
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
% E) J; O* y' j) A }& ~. q0 Y4 @0 q, F. M4 b$ f/ W
这明摆着是两码事
9 u" d1 y* \3 \, k$ Y Qsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  & C A1 H1 b5 C5 h& J
5 A2 c9 _( {4 ?7 G8 n2 @
can't type chinese at work,: ` i( A: \) C/ `, A
1 |; x% z6 Q) j, i: m$ T: c0 L"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
) y2 g% [7 |0 H8 z0 n0 M& [* Z, m: v# l$ p7 j* P! }( \
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|