 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 2 }$ ^' b5 R5 H2 y K! G- V2 Z
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?3 _3 W% Q. W& A( O! ]
8 _3 z/ |' m, q# _8 p! e8 H, a! b
这明摆着是两码事& T3 A5 q( s/ z( O7 Z
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  # x }5 _, ~+ U2 n7 \3 k- \& K
% |/ @# k' J" @9 {: P/ i
can't type chinese at work,
0 [* m6 |7 `% ^+ [0 y& d; B1 j' g$ a8 k! w
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me., \9 U" p7 c, |, H
4 D% O o1 o: `+ g. D4 d/ j2 OWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|