 鲜花( 27)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
原帖由 Homework 于 2007-3-30 19:30 发表2 c- F$ B' [' d. B
为什么呢?北面的Twin Brooks不错,南面的Rutherford也可以,111 Street对面的Richford的有些房子价格不菲,为啥就MacEwan不好呢?+ m: z: @. s( ]
+ Q9 g1 I" X. ~1 t4 l$ \! s
; K1 K/ M7 u% V" J3 m, Q. C
MacEwan is fairly good. But not as good as Twin Brooks and Rutherford. MacEwan has more multi-houses (apartment, duplex) and the number of rented house is higher. The followings are the comparison based on the data a year ago.* y ~, i1 I7 u$ w
8 U$ W8 ?7 l' y& K% a Single house/total house rent house/total house/ S# B- z3 `/ i0 |( H0 v
MacEwan 62% 17%
4 z$ |, e3 I9 y, f8 O) _1 vRutherford 78% 4%
" U0 r, {* r: O' T$ BTwin Brooks 85% 2% |
|