Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
/ V3 y# b) ]3 E* Q
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
- [: V& S, |' z
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

- i8 l6 f5 T& l( U0 R; H
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
# U" q9 d% Y- n/ H6 |6 ?New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

" j- a: Y% C- I3 k/ J. YIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

# L: P% @, b  k- l Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
$ ?8 P' A8 A3 h9 E" w Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
8 O8 D( O# L# Q' {San Diego  22.8 29.7
5 b4 o9 E8 b. \0 gSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
) r2 ]5 E% ?$ D4 F1 _; d1 c$ XDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
! R( v9 L" D& g- ?5 ?7 ~  vChicago  17.2 20.8
+ K* P; D1 X" ]" o  F. _Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

! [5 L; ~9 e" B% j% g! t

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

# c9 B! ?- L, `5 t0 q% @6 i4 t- q
9 L! c4 T" K6 ~3 a$ b5 o2 SFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
6 \4 l+ W  [# {
it would be a good reference.
6 w' e5 ^# o' y8 ^
& z6 i' L7 c- \3 _9 Athanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
8 l8 [6 j" W% N( A3 c
/ c8 c  n1 |8 W; i. n; G/ p[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]