Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
$ |( L* S* Y9 b8 ^Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
7 R9 U1 p0 L, E( p+ j" H; d3 ~
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
3 r1 X# k& O: s4 `, o% Y' ^
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

4 Z5 u! `- \% Z% p$ g9 a( G4 NTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
) b8 s8 k" T: i7 T% s

# E  q- N' W: _# ^In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
. b3 n' w7 }/ a; M! I/ g& T, m8 i8 R% MSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
7 W7 c/ \; e2 c4 hYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
1 h. K7 F- x- k0 W' a- ?) }
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
: M( B) z  w9 b$ O4 B
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
0 a% F( ^6 V$ s8 U+ G4 t. A: }4 l
* a/ p% k. v+ F  T Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
0 t; ^8 p2 o  U. q6 w Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
0 {8 o. ]8 Z+ E( p. o1 b$ m: hSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
, H5 x& m7 ~. i& G3 ]Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
$ ]2 a" A0 B1 ]/ l8 L/ {New York  21.2 22.5
- {! N5 T- P# N2 b1 h" VChicago  17.2 20.8
& a: h# k. d2 }* a9 B, m/ E# vWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
6 Y$ p) F( P% ]0 L1 [
) A" D1 M" s0 Y8 ]3 G' i

4 c+ c& o# P  R6 |It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
/ q4 r. F% T* G/ z0 e
' F" z7 v) Q; ~2 N, v$ b/ w3 e
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
: e( L# i2 t8 t
! ]$ X% X, l  K' kit would be a good reference.
' P! v# g' Y. B& N, _0 m2 ~
. u1 g9 ~+ x; C' Cthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]