Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
9 W: N5 j7 a8 v6 ]
1 `2 C" n/ }+ {- [' r- ~Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
) `4 Q7 c0 O4 j$ \' B
6 j! H$ @6 Q! x: A5 K, NLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
7 Q$ u$ q( y. u5 o$ f6 I' g
4 Z0 W, t, V) @4 Y! i0 y* O( h0 MTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
1 L& g5 y# R* M) S

In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
  ?4 U5 d3 S, W0 c4 \9 ISan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
8 |9 C  I- n2 [/ y1 j7 K7 D5 ?You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
, _7 ~2 Z. M2 H2 ?3 i% z3 f Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
: t* {3 o& K  p0 Z$ MSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
: V" {/ {+ Z, F' tLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
& g1 @+ r% ]( ISeattle  20.4 25
7 v" e, o6 J7 _' Y. C/ ?( ?; nDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
( w1 _- D& e6 x6 y# SWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
: `3 B3 _- T! _. P# j, V& E

4 z+ u5 C- g, F1 w' r  R
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
( Z, d4 P5 R( f+ O: r' _
% Z3 d1 X& K# Q3 L, ?- k6 T/ B' l
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

/ ?. w# `* X4 [6 u& F$ hthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

( d2 L/ E3 d9 l$ y2 @$ {9 H/ h1 ?[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]