 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 ! L0 g0 r; r* d! P
Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14( ]/ {. x" |! A8 {0 Y4 R2 Y( [1 b% e
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
3 U$ i' x6 P) @$ i3 M0 @/ i) K. I, y
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
3 x4 u# O2 y% y) D" b Z) |, \
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.036 s2 T) T; z! q o7 F5 k
+ |, ^) K; m" c0 p$ u' |
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..2 F: C" _% d+ k; ~, k
. N' Z: D% X5 F. v1 W/ c0 u/ b
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 6 ~: q2 o! R9 m
|
|