 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
( ]7 K% }8 x+ o5 |% F6 \: \
8 D" L8 p0 q8 \4 g2 @: t3 ^1 G6 [0 {; [% L: M- b# T% W
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. e, g3 @, c& f# G5 B, K
& C& N- E' B/ r0 N% LLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
6 p% N8 [* S; q8 s9 m* C; z
7 S4 d5 J8 h3 L# w, Z3 m' ]comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..( I* f6 E/ N2 K d+ [
, T* x7 `% G, f3 l3 x2 _; x4 x
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) % a. d0 M: ~ B
|
|