 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 ' y0 ~0 r; q- m- d8 K2 j/ Z
R& m$ K1 h0 y' P, C8 }8 S
+ o+ k7 R7 c) @" y/ J你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
& w# W5 M* T# b3 lRalph Klein0 d, u" h% |& r) G, b: ?0 O
9 e" B& V% p$ |我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!- E5 a5 p. Q1 m! _* B
& D5 `! ~6 l0 r2 j
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。% {1 C' C7 F- I5 `9 [4 @. u
. d, |$ b1 A' \) Q; s0 i
7 G. j' V/ p* l% P, Y5 u- ^6 Q
8 l9 G5 r" D9 R
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades6 j( |' S0 w8 {, x, n
Historic Alberta budget balances:
) Y' S1 U4 A8 C: U! S, o) R
* S+ P2 ?5 I4 L& q- Q% u7 F( V6 Q1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
5 P2 B8 O2 o& }: R- o f
2 d9 J2 J7 O, X1982-83: $796 million deficit
2 J% a) E& V% H# m Q
( I" A, N' P( l0 N1983-84: $129 million surplus
8 j$ M1 f1 y+ {
, s1 F" J- p8 O1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
* K3 k7 }4 k9 e0 Q: u9 L' j' I& g$ K3 \3 M8 K1 W
1985-86: $761 million deficit
$ a2 y4 H5 T0 ?9 H
8 N: D' a; J9 b% m' a2 Y2 u1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
" T2 O" U- e! u7 f; v! T
" \; `, o* W' [( b# U2 d! b t8 Z1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit- l- N) P8 F5 P* D$ A: o
9 ]9 w/ B/ j3 ?; S- ~1 d) \8 z
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
* m( G! L8 i. N% f3 }
. w4 |* O) p9 e! {4 d a% f, G1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
$ f7 ?( b% {; ~2 ]7 N9 H, F% s4 A1 L
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
3 R% A* V( ~! B
& T" g3 ~' U+ G+ }* H2 [: z1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
9 ~, [4 p& x& {4 c' z
! ^; j8 c1 d# m+ p+ ?" K$ H1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit' S- p/ Q$ r! _. A _0 r: `1 K
' L+ C1 Z' V- L$ d, v, A+ j
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
" x2 o, C' r: _9 Q! _6 _
$ M/ l* u! O- a3 O1994-95: $938 million surplus: k4 W3 y7 u* n) B
. y7 G# [; e* R' S! C T1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
. u0 x2 k. _2 _0 u- Z. E8 I
$ i. ^3 E7 K( ^* H6 @0 Y" {7 e1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
+ j) g- V" e# D- M7 i+ V+ f' v C% H- b
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus+ r' Y- |. x0 I o) g& N
; J- V) V1 Q* b. V8 `! B1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus; {. n% f' M* Z$ f4 [5 X8 K8 ?
?: T! E5 d5 ~! X. E
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus3 P# W( C% h1 C4 Z/ M' O
1 b" `) o* Q9 g3 ~4 f) u; S! U2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
; n# d/ B3 O; V, A ^: n6 A" P( Y
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
/ C8 Y+ J' J$ U5 r. `# |
( Y# M5 E+ ~0 l5 J8 r' S; [6 ^2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus7 O6 w |/ e! x7 l4 W) z9 b3 t
1 ]8 y) E: s! X- O. L2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus4 x- w4 ]2 _$ i6 p& X( C
* l& k6 E5 P, Y( t+ b- S
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
. i) R8 a6 q! o# ^* k+ m6 W( u8 s/ e: S
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
, c3 |9 C- \; g, r+ s0 z) d0 K+ h7 S2 r7 r; _/ \/ F
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
; r3 E! Z$ a2 |8 ~/ F" r8 x% v/ M9 \
+ _. C' J$ C0 T, ]" s2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus2 S2 ?% K s, `* F, g4 z) F
/ G; a6 k" B8 c. M2008-09: $852 million deficit7 ~; c$ ^' b$ ?" _& [' s6 I
' d6 s6 O8 T g* i5 H# f, e2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
+ r. O4 F0 ]- a, |- X6 c
( a* B" K" S4 o0 |' l( ]2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
* d- y# N4 Y6 A z: d" }
3 E6 U0 [/ N. P; x2011-12: $23 million deficit Y: H, H( `4 h! n9 H, J4 Y3 R3 |1 a
2 f5 u2 M+ t& Z+ [" k3 q2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
' s* y) P: q' W
$ q3 |2 w* C8 ], V1 W* Q2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|