 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 . h% U+ ?8 U2 ]" i
5 x- D( d) X/ \# [
7 L& y9 Y2 f) E P你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:0 u3 o' O9 ^" [+ i! u
Ralph Klein" L+ L" t+ T8 A! G+ I0 N
7 _" B) l% ?0 B/ p! d2 ]: |0 w
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
& l7 A7 h; ~0 b# x1 j- h V P3 ?3 W8 q- `" y1 F! F
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
& B+ J' L' ]' ~5 R* b; b- d
3 d, j5 k9 c8 F% w: `$ }1 p$ ?: X! e* C A2 l
) [; E$ W3 e; g" W5 D/ Z
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
1 z- k! n1 k! a2 KHistoric Alberta budget balances:1 ]# Y. g) C1 s4 v' |
4 c" e/ V% s# `; [3 N
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus! B: P; c( R X/ k/ o# s
: W) v4 h- L* c* T* {9 W' \% {1982-83: $796 million deficit4 ^/ {' t7 D+ q) ?- Y( T0 U
r# E, I; W ^8 w, k1983-84: $129 million surplus
& x7 B" T& Y! ?6 y1 r# B2 m& t8 S% m5 K% a& U
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
, {, r& O! O( z: b+ n c' W" j) W( K( {
1985-86: $761 million deficit
2 l7 @. q+ p8 p3 t1 J4 ?% @% J8 {/ @4 G$ {- p' L
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit* B; C/ b* J2 S6 U( |
* }) x$ S# @* [% }1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
1 |& X8 [: `# B( j) \1 [
- q; f" A2 O0 [4 P/ X! s6 o) ]8 j1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
* Z& Y; S5 w2 t& R, w/ E( M$ H/ j) M$ C: ~4 n3 a* ^
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit; ~: U* M2 v9 X4 u; h+ W3 p
" @/ H6 }# a0 g8 }( _' B1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
1 c, j9 P4 U+ I, G2 i0 |# ~. ?' }% r Y8 c$ r# v
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit& t, N' p( v& i
' L: E I8 O) ]6 N6 P4 b( I! o
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit0 x9 Q$ x& c V0 B
+ p2 G) H& m7 s1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit! Z L; R0 q; @3 z9 q, {' ^
8 w. r, l. A/ K# |- _1994-95: $938 million surplus
* E( \( Z6 j! o" K2 y0 R+ m
5 e6 x0 T- A$ O6 h; Z1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus$ n) @3 u; s: U3 K/ l
, H7 R6 W. l9 [( m' P- e+ p
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus% F' X6 T" `/ U& g4 ?% ` ?
# \+ u# \9 W0 P1 K
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
4 }" u- h% V, d5 U, ?4 r. z3 m. A8 x, m. V% \
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
6 V' t4 {) Y! l3 i8 u( s. F9 Z7 A' T) e
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus% h! \/ [4 l! Q3 I
( h, _8 |+ Z; c1 P6 a2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus8 y ^3 W- V% n" W2 r2 b
. m- f/ C- j4 q$ M" K& _
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus( p/ D) O9 g. Z+ z3 ` B2 n
) W9 P/ ^/ K8 ?6 T" V2 C1 D( N# k
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
+ c+ ]: m2 K/ ` g+ R
) t6 a" H2 y& z2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus7 ]( {& n$ M% e: o* I: p" Y
; z6 u$ _7 z& V3 G
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus. \* w4 w, o' }, t/ P$ \
7 A" H6 ^1 d9 M+ e7 J, P X; Q. P2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus- Y$ n2 I7 R. Y' `: J: z6 i
8 p0 S J6 i) m# _2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
4 B+ J8 @) ~2 O5 v% a
! l) ?8 e# u5 E! S) u9 G2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
9 W& `- P. ]! K7 q! H/ \
% m3 [& l0 c! D2008-09: $852 million deficit
$ e1 r; M1 O+ F; G9 G8 X2 N# e9 U
$ Q- ^" j9 W. S' n& B" F8 ~8 j2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit: Q6 t4 l/ b5 Y# F" _1 a$ \
# d6 U" f% r! {! v( y7 g- l
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
2 a3 ^, P/ Y6 `' Q9 V Y: A
% |! V( G, l/ Q2011-12: $23 million deficit
9 r* R, ?: q: R5 H( r; l/ H! M3 o. X
0 a z, Y5 U7 b+ W9 T+ c2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit& ^: ^8 B+ P9 X* |6 |1 w$ ]" D2 V, z; s
- j8 V9 e- \! W9 m
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|