 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 4 n2 X, Y( A) ?3 N) {
% b6 z; ?9 j* z' p/ `
- N, d, h. }# Z& t9 T9 p3 i你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:* f3 d8 z( r& S1 p6 @4 A5 a
Ralph Klein
$ u' w8 J+ @, q2 T- b
U0 E4 q7 t, z6 k% S我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!9 v, P' l4 W% n& A( `; t$ y# b2 O
- [1 h) A/ z3 f! X' {8 V
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。/ [7 p+ w* X0 p" E0 p4 a3 T# I
6 L% a$ k9 I- f7 ?3 o$ Y s; O4 P1 h% R/ g. I0 h1 h
4 J( q. A* @: \" x5 qhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades6 J+ Y8 h. ]. k: s
Historic Alberta budget balances:
2 _5 ?8 S% P( c+ w1 k
0 k& X I) N% h# n1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus( N" j# a" A0 B) W) X
" K& g: D7 }, m# Y+ z* s7 r7 T
1982-83: $796 million deficit+ N( ?) z5 Z+ s
2 |8 p3 p% \# H8 c
1983-84: $129 million surplus8 }) [4 v4 G" v' A. z
2 g- h @4 B' `4 B1 s+ A4 B1 L1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
! n& ^/ Q8 e) V& B I' ~" T; e4 R4 f1 Q3 X u5 f2 ^
1985-86: $761 million deficit& F- H$ F0 X+ S6 i k k# P. X" y
2 |; u, V v7 i1 F( ]. V. }
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
; R, q% Z( }# N8 M* @! X l$ C9 @; R$ W
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit( }# x6 D5 e% @/ B6 ?0 z% W
1 D4 o5 V; T( ]# f1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit3 F- r. b$ A$ F. [3 B/ O
5 o* p5 J& Q0 b4 y2 T0 o1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
! C2 H; X$ \; L& L
/ m e% W9 H5 q# t' i) F+ d1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
( c2 g& g( A' B: P5 y0 @' r' i
" N! a. G+ q d2 g1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit) Y# j2 X( e6 K
; J' W0 v. b" \) C1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
1 \; j {- p6 a
6 l& m V9 r7 r2 i* T& U: j8 L1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit) ^: w W/ g7 `+ R* u) u
4 o/ @8 n8 @$ f+ b" z# n
1994-95: $938 million surplus
. {: v/ k7 J& B- }/ s$ V2 l4 g/ Y s' D0 \, m: n8 U9 s
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
& J9 Z$ s7 C* ~
# K1 a8 v5 n/ Q/ w5 x3 e1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus% Y) `+ y) \ z; t
, c% O, [- w8 k8 t
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus' @8 Q i2 S+ [5 q
, W5 o% f1 N1 e8 \; l
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
. q/ ?# M6 a/ ]) W! {9 B) r' {! Y& m0 a7 `3 p6 G
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus8 i1 {$ P. r5 I: X4 P& \6 r
+ m- r: J2 n7 d% n# @8 e4 F5 c2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
) ]& {2 l: y/ L5 I& q) {8 Z
& s7 H; a t. @5 D# Y) H- s2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
' C6 v5 k) i# \! T
; f* f9 c6 @2 a2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus% o0 N- }4 K5 H- V, F' d0 ~" X
8 ~1 k9 Y$ n0 M( [( a6 ] g' x2 a `
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus) f/ c% y0 W; s2 V/ e* z1 ?( s
E, F) A7 j& P2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus! ^: v$ e- S/ u
, E. c+ ^) M5 `4 z# k0 O( d2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus8 i* G/ n$ G" V: o$ F
1 F2 y8 ]* K1 M5 q5 }) x" N3 ]1 W
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus0 N: a, f" L7 }* R; K- b/ ]
6 y X' M* F4 P1 _2 n9 i1 M2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus, ~& b1 p: X( m
& s) j+ E4 F; k( \: _2008-09: $852 million deficit$ R6 R# t k" K- E9 s
& _% I( p4 b1 b4 C% y
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
- P) N7 w" r+ T/ K$ o7 p0 R7 f
6 R) C1 y2 {+ Y! A, U$ v2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit: ~* L$ T, `0 G- ^# i
$ c! ?+ x- G+ g9 k2 O* X* B2011-12: $23 million deficit
" T& S* K+ V+ Y/ j4 ?2 K- x9 k& ^
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
; I# b. v6 ?+ p/ M0 h9 b, e9 U& Z0 j+ o. d, @0 S% C2 {
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|