 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
, ?5 S S$ ?7 N- n+ T5 C1 m
% k1 b7 u# D9 H$ c" c6 F
: ]; c. ^0 w$ ~/ M1 m, c$ L你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:! y( `/ k% s& u8 W0 h3 {0 `: A
Ralph Klein$ ^4 E Z& e8 G7 g6 c
- H4 ?' J. m+ X) J
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!' V" \2 G ?$ s! q& D
1 I9 c1 {9 `: Y) z所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
: H* \5 A$ t3 f2 S
8 U" c8 n8 w* Y2 f) W1 i" [& }+ a; V
! t- \' J1 ?/ \# U
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades. B0 [" u4 p8 M+ s6 ]
Historic Alberta budget balances:
6 z: f3 D2 _' m1 X \7 ? {: r% Z7 x
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
& V& K, F t; f' o- E4 ~# j+ }. k9 X. K
1982-83: $796 million deficit$ G a2 X& V0 U4 i4 k3 p0 E3 F! d' g; _
, i- I& v1 Q& K, E
1983-84: $129 million surplus' d1 ^* r7 m6 A
/ U3 H9 O0 v1 D6 Y$ W5 t5 d! e6 i' w1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus3 I" Z8 b P- A
8 h2 Q, J9 i+ ~; R% w" l( K
1985-86: $761 million deficit: ^- \! z' }* q* K/ N& H
) Z9 i' N& N7 I& a8 I$ ]
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
1 |- w% B; o4 t2 }& Q( a( T# d1 J7 h/ c2 h' y+ C3 Q
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit9 V8 d: V6 h5 {: l+ l
+ J; N. Q7 j9 Z2 L
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit* a" F; i" E' E* ]
- @" A* {9 S* b2 w
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit0 b$ M2 n( r( j2 ~! t% @5 H
' P. i5 S, ~, n/ c
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit8 v0 \9 Q, _) c, M9 X' w: U3 s
3 V1 P1 s! n4 H1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
4 j* ^ s) l( b% P' G" c- _9 O0 i' N# c, Q0 _
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
% M. G8 `/ B. O7 J* c( M4 W9 z# n- [- G4 s: f6 b4 ?3 n f
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
! N9 g) z7 b. i3 R0 j# ^3 S2 U/ w* {: L! W
1994-95: $938 million surplus! ` A$ Z. R4 F$ w7 c
8 J4 S+ J, Y$ b0 B; _
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus3 h% F7 T, T% E: y- @
}. y: C) O( o6 E: j3 o1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
$ Q' @# J- n" U! q2 N( p, h8 Q
% Y8 i9 F s% U1 y0 ?/ N, d4 F7 j; c1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
9 e ^* S w d' n4 {% E$ Q5 m% q. s2 U& c" D0 N- \
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus8 t. Q1 g8 {6 H( h# X M4 @
; ?+ E: u" B L' g5 ~) h" k8 Z
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
3 P8 G* t7 ? v/ T }( M7 `1 ]1 ?0 V3 S5 `3 {
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
: k6 U b- N& ~; ^1 z0 B4 K% F% r2 |/ c
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
/ X+ z1 V* K% \) s. L/ S# v! Z$ s; @- s! g4 N* r
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus3 R+ n3 ]+ i3 t4 @7 G
2 @0 T5 M3 ~! p
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus7 L r9 N! @6 G F& c5 ? j
$ b+ A; |7 M: e4 X p
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
" `- ^" F. t9 W9 s- s4 I" t" [! p& E
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
3 V/ |6 v0 O( S( j7 F# T& e2 T, ^" G m, N! M: O
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
& f' _5 P1 ~$ n X. F8 v7 X0 s3 A* O& ~! ]) W0 J2 V: O
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
# _! Y) _ @2 ^, U1 U
) G7 I1 h% u; g3 Q2008-09: $852 million deficit6 [+ j- D! |; Z6 b
) j9 b# [0 ]) a9 i2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit9 Q, D6 b7 g# c, K/ L
2 H# E0 L9 B0 X* G0 D/ J) u2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
Z0 t# L! z0 B8 E" f
& I" s7 t: j! T1 Q/ o% W4 w2011-12: $23 million deficit
: b+ j: t2 m8 b$ @( b; k- R ]3 R v& k$ e' m
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
$ r% [0 a8 P+ Y5 E+ }( X4 N" c2 q: i% G. w1 t. o% W
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|