 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - p# s. t3 O' A5 i5 ]5 a$ M
: r2 J- {# J, H, M- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -* l- F) O- B1 G! P
& `: X6 h% q2 u% B TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
& i# x2 A1 X6 iexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third8 H& U; \; @ Y' d; V
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic7 } C+ c$ s; N" }
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit8 J1 c0 b2 V [6 X! x( Q
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
; f( E" z* F1 l6 Nmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,8 i: u; y& J0 y W, {
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
. d( y* Z$ z" v: p# R- ?, H3 ILePage Real Estate Services.- |: f4 r7 F+ L4 s& Y2 i
5 N1 W' O" G/ J0 k- a Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters8 j/ c& a* }3 v/ w5 L0 @* P1 B7 N- p
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic+ Y( ~5 E& e9 z! }% H% c
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
! q }7 w0 v1 Y8 i& M& t* K& Asound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the5 k4 d( C- H, t2 a0 V+ p. k
residential real estate sector.
3 C j1 T6 [/ d: M
7 b. _$ x' R' X7 J Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
* A" O' }& R& U% n0 U: N u1 ?) }occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
9 L3 T/ t$ [0 s- oyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
7 E1 g2 A8 S X# \% l9 Y(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380. C p& y( A) Z: ~; ]
(+13.2%).
; x; Q- w( x. _+ z
3 y6 O7 ?7 Y; [ "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth. S" H H- R7 F+ K* M+ C w
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
5 T3 B/ h2 o: `: \" ~: Bfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
' E% e" b' A* g6 U' E, Z+ o4 K, ~9 Kpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
) Q M9 J4 l4 ?" xpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services./ N$ z; q* ?0 ?: t6 Y* c- C
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We# j% C. D: t( M# u7 h
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy M6 q/ o6 V0 n& D
balanced market."
/ n ]. G% F! E! D: W2 a* x
" Z$ q. V" s" A9 L+ D, X2 R Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
6 ]( j4 h. s' _) D* Rconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift! x5 h5 O6 ~' c8 w7 E
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued7 l1 G, f, P$ d Y7 Y4 R+ F
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
& I. `, w7 T2 [ B* V* }energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
$ m Z( e1 [6 C6 X; q! @% |- _5 Zmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
2 y2 c# n* j, Rbreaking price appreciations.
- P+ H5 a7 g/ `- B0 T8 t1 L1 ?$ I7 k/ W3 x
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding/ Q8 H: a+ V# D; {3 x. z
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. h' q) E" P3 D5 L/ N
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.: i, w; N: b% H. v* `
' @$ ~2 i) Y9 h3 I/ i/ d- k9 f
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
1 M. h! k* C: b, [( h, l' Leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer- ]# y5 b) [- f
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off1 @8 d; J: C3 `- _
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.- l9 g6 J! S" h1 U' v7 B. b1 N4 p
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
) E8 s9 e2 h. G1 Bgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, y1 R j& m8 {
price appreciation when compared with 2005./ K# G6 r0 n# i, N& Y; k( e- V. e! S \
' m h' x8 P( N- e) z+ {. K- B! U While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ J- m# }+ ]: P( {5 `7 S. p
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
, j8 {" o5 k, v9 G9 pfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
( S% e d& j3 u& j# B6 o/ f% Oare markedly different than those found in the United States.
, G* i. x Z2 r6 z; o6 _/ x, k/ h7 | x
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
9 S* ~3 e* t! V# l$ `& s$ H6 mAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
. I' P$ g5 z, ifavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the) c2 R6 I6 }* i
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general C! h3 J2 e7 {* K' F
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
1 L4 ]; e: O1 Y7 x* Q8 pdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and/ w* \& o5 K/ ?3 P* X ^
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
( r% C9 U9 Z) k$ Umortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."! j- `: V! l' L5 N+ G+ t# X1 ]
5 b3 t; S9 B) } <<( @2 I1 X' @4 d5 t3 T4 H1 ~' x! a
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
1 Y( h2 X& J) n >>
7 Y. m' h- I5 g2 `
0 X, C- D" i( l1 E$ N, q Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in) Y+ k8 f: X/ s) J. P
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
* y/ M0 I( x' m [& h! ~of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
1 a2 m$ i- Z' [8 Q9 N G1 R0 N/ o$ Qlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of4 H1 `1 D& q" F6 s1 v, z! s3 }
renovations.
! H+ x4 G' p6 T1 ~" J L( }
7 F6 x9 S# N2 R, x7 D: O( l The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
$ r; K6 J4 U/ V3 j% N y& Wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation" m. P$ o G1 a6 B5 h
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and1 z# ]5 w. ~& F
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.+ k) Z4 s3 d1 `3 X
" X: [" U2 s- s7 q: O6 ?
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer: m$ S" j) Z+ b* a( Q# j& T
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the- z c. y( a8 v$ o% [
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new1 U7 `: X! l! F: t2 F% r& @3 y
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores, W. X; l7 y! m: b. `4 p
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 Y( x: q+ e: r+ Vand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.' x2 Z0 N8 v& P
_) k, h6 z ]5 b/ z/ B In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced) y6 \% R$ h F" T/ {3 L: S* U
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
: `2 d' _4 c. x8 W: n( thomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers7 _: F& L: M q S$ R" x
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian& i. h* s5 g" v4 e
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
, N$ D/ h o" W( z, Kbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
% E M" u& {. B z J' Q8 @. F. v; C. o. O, m
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
/ v) q, A7 x) O- O! vamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
8 _) L# K- C4 B* z% ~- Kpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,3 G, B6 e* s2 ^! v; U: q
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last) H* x1 C9 B# }" [+ L$ W, D, J7 r
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
" `# ^; ~8 n. i$ G; o; J5 O
]: O' m4 c8 @ D Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
$ R6 B+ x. D" b% U) v) @6 Fprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory9 V8 s; {: O1 z+ k, ~' V
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
# q% T( }+ `" k! j. A- R" B! w! ^' [first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
2 h6 v$ v* z) ]( p& a: ywhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the ^# ~2 Q6 _- D% z0 Z
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before1 M$ N6 e6 i' \4 s3 A. q
making a purchase./ |4 u. \/ k X2 _5 U# F$ j7 ?
R$ [; w$ h: t4 R, M9 }4 c2 y9 i
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
D/ N: E) c9 P {markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
/ F% A: r( E6 {+ x& ?% ]2 hconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city' b8 D! \0 m5 |5 q
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
* z y$ x& y$ N4 |- Zattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
9 e5 d' v6 U8 j$ B. ramenities.
8 `0 S0 E0 {. n0 m" \+ d6 b C0 I0 e/ {6 _4 c* t* u; E
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels" ^ N4 f& ^ }. I V/ V: u4 x
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) a/ u' o _2 v5 B$ ~ Sacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has2 r8 o. T; J4 a. g2 b
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been {; H" O) A, l. B \( @
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 i- h2 X4 J3 F' U$ A) Z1 d
residence, rather than for investment.. Z4 J W- [ d# _/ }3 M
* `8 b1 g# S7 {' s
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
8 k6 `+ Q2 ~ Zhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
: t& d( w+ k& b# H+ G( o: k# `) min a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
" u4 [$ m* }* }6 l$ o; E/ nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization6 i. P# c# a1 }( J. \& a
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
2 l1 P/ z; M4 A( `& Tthe market.
/ ~/ W$ v& M+ h3 L1 |& @4 L8 o# u4 e+ t! p- D
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
' ^ m6 m3 \! Y0 `/ v9 s% WJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In& E. w! c6 [3 c( K
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
/ i: o6 w% V% y! amonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due$ i, P0 V' g$ I4 H1 }" k4 `
to the shortage of available inventory.& l& }3 q8 J5 V$ ^2 S
, e7 |& W; `" b) e9 ]! D* _
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its' Z; I X" k8 t8 g( `2 c
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains* O3 n. v6 D& y
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses! `4 P, B! G/ e# ]
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.# c- z W" A6 y' B7 R- e
6 I1 N; p' ]# x2 R7 p Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
+ d* B6 m0 y& _! [+ M' }* \+ Oin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
1 m- K' l* ]" s7 T& W* H" Wunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that# `& R$ U. i4 H2 ]9 u( o
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
7 @. e7 _3 A1 h G! N# zprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer7 H$ e1 J7 e$ w! L, I8 S, f
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as% g( a6 h- q( s4 S. F
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
3 G: ?+ M$ b/ i3 I6 u. f
; H& K: t2 ^/ d Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
/ F' d: a$ W) B% B1 l* Has activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton' P7 I: b0 P/ t
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 z2 p* J8 t& N8 D/ ^5 q
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
+ j! K: l' Q9 B5 {increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve2 d7 _ z/ W* z) u' }" {# S
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly1 m- c3 C1 v) o4 E( \" \
towards the end of 2006. , L" [5 a7 B! a
! z5 ~2 r+ Y+ [7 i' s
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) j# l7 k4 m9 k, binventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
5 g& W6 N% `4 S2 }to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
# x) m! R' S: _+ Ggroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
6 N1 i6 n- q1 z, B) h3 x/ v* h: m5 ?foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added. y1 d4 J$ F, }5 e0 R
pressure on tight inventory levels.
; O1 y4 f3 w& D" O2 b$ p H
" l& ]8 k. [' x }1 K Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic0 C/ O9 s- C% f
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people. i8 A+ |1 y2 g2 v* F+ K5 U+ E- Q
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;5 V4 s; k& D8 E; p: A0 W7 k
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching1 p' \/ Q- o5 g
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
: U: r! K. B: N! x) ]' M; @& M3 Z! [% m2 W% y3 g$ S) a
<<
/ C) i/ |5 |* i# K Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
, L' X5 i. K3 G, a
( \; G8 m7 J) H" d# A9 V F -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 A; e) X. P2 r. P
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey) [2 ~. {, \ W4 i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% t, E3 ~: t2 |# b3 z+ a 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
& W5 i1 C f$ m4 ^- n. \4 X Market Average Average % Change Average Average
- R. |' _9 w6 v- S2 [! @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% W G2 `' X. V% }, g Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
" z* P- w( h, ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. m/ g; R2 b& J Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0007 ]# h6 J/ s: |. H8 r2 R' i e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" a4 e8 s+ }2 c! I4 _1 _0 d! ?$ Y
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
$ @ ~) r5 Y" p% x! u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ g; l- a. y$ {3 [. h, N Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
4 Q: Q3 g3 x+ T: I& x -------------------------------------------------------------------------& r8 ]$ K# \2 @ v0 S* Z
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
V6 n0 e, g) D& E8 |0 t1 f -------------------------------------------------------------------------, C1 P7 S& N) ?3 k; q# I
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
5 N6 H; _5 \# L: K/ S9 K& q -------------------------------------------------------------------------! P& j" L# ^/ \9 A+ X& c, q4 A! w
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185, @2 I: c7 z! n/ l8 x4 v% x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: s; g% m2 O2 Y. a. o# X5 `
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250! d' ^" K! H8 n! f3 s* [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( z6 u" o* Y8 g- f7 [4 B0 U
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766( f- T N4 n) e0 R& n& o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 i7 I4 P0 @2 }4 r Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7073 ^2 S$ u: |3 g% X" q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ i! n& _: G* _3 w
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500$ U7 w, }$ X/ d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' l6 B& ^! v! T) }5 \3 z* [: i4 C
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389" u0 A- E0 w/ Z8 W+ X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 J3 K# ^( Y1 y
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714# [/ Q8 z8 U1 y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 c0 a% F( t2 F- J! Q
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5000 `, E+ g, _9 h3 r6 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ], J; F% E$ g L f Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
4 w9 }/ R+ J$ y" i -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 f" b( i$ O4 g ~8 R5 T
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
4 s* V1 r4 m2 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 \* {0 n- W9 m' h5 J# L; B5 \% N0 F
* ]5 n9 r2 _# V9 | -------------------------------------------------------------4 z: J6 ~9 n3 M5 W
Standard Condominium/ B1 Z1 ], C/ H& D2 b& Y- o! k
-------------------------------------------------------------
* y8 ^" _' d5 q4 g 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
" v- L# |' N: x8 r Market % Change Average Average % Change+ o$ x( a& n# T6 I; q% ^
-------------------------------------------------------------
( k+ Q* q8 E/ b r$ c7 a0 k% X Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%: p P( V& W; a& W
-------------------------------------------------------------
( Q, ^* t* ~. s1 G5 a Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%. W8 D' B; K. k; r
-------------------------------------------------------------
- x, x+ |2 [$ ?" I( p Moncton 4.9% - - N/A5 D8 ~: \/ p: y; B5 z6 e% D. v
-------------------------------------------------------------7 R. v1 f0 O4 u# d7 \3 w! N- U3 c
Saint John N/A - - N/A
( v! q) q' v/ g' I -------------------------------------------------------------
" t7 K) _; Q' t) T7 g. d St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%, S, W+ h% o4 G4 z. d" ^
-------------------------------------------------------------8 K. B' I: t3 h( N. ^' r2 `
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
2 a8 e6 Q2 h+ L7 L -------------------------------------------------------------
2 N k; D! A% J4 ^ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%1 D" l: S6 H1 r$ |
-------------------------------------------------------------0 a; r% q- V8 }$ b( B- a) e( a+ G
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
! p* w# A$ `+ u1 H3 h -------------------------------------------------------------
8 @3 Y( W a- c) W2 K( |( _ Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%# Y1 B+ [" n; l0 R' E8 Y/ H
-------------------------------------------------------------
; \) S0 n# I7 N2 ?; F+ w Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%) u& W' R: c$ i1 S$ R/ E) A9 S
-------------------------------------------------------------! K; B$ \- M! y- P& \
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
, s- |; w- E& `& q4 ? k -------------------------------------------------------------
: l) ?( A: S- y; n9 k* m Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%( W/ y* Z t( d* `
-------------------------------------------------------------4 c: D7 H, \- u3 B2 D
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
' N3 y5 a# f ]! f; K" T0 C; W" A -------------------------------------------------------------
, D N5 F J: R9 v+ J1 N Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%7 J5 a- x8 O1 X. O) N, X/ `
-------------------------------------------------------------
; j" n) ?* R6 B( U Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%( \! o- i: q |
-------------------------------------------------------------2 U- c" C2 f8 K2 c/ `9 a/ G- j
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
6 Q1 p6 q/ x4 E+ ~) c: S" G -------------------------------------------------------------$ d/ v2 k( x7 `% m
>>8 W; @& g0 d, ^- V* \9 d
# b1 `2 ~8 r5 E! l( b Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined$ j- l9 F6 F- k6 g$ M
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
* l- z9 H( x' rJohn and Victoria.
0 n' t% e1 q: I8 Y( H2 ]
- e! Y% z# Q6 ] The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most$ H9 s+ v( V0 N! F! ]( E* }: u& }
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
2 s) [1 N- ?+ r, }; N: i! Zhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release' x* ]( a8 R& ?! A
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
9 o B6 g+ ?9 I- \5 K% `) n4 Wtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities7 ]7 \3 [, p) C3 U( z
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is0 ~# S4 z( L. [$ w
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
) A- H4 F- l; Q% b# F/ lfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable& [% [% E( W7 R/ I) ^( `# V* K. H9 `
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on# ~/ d" Y z6 z
November 15, 2006.8 ?+ [6 t7 k2 X, P/ o
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
' f7 Q8 A/ p: bfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
3 u8 s! _- l# B4 K; ^provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is: `' ]6 S" j# `6 r0 R Q
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|