 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( D8 l. p; F+ I0 P4 G' C; M( }( H
9 ?: _( {" _' D9 K2 `- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -) M; _4 D7 O6 X: Y* {: C6 `
3 F7 a- T, Y& |
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
- A, I, I5 |0 H6 W/ e0 pexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third& q+ {* A+ X% f3 u: n8 n& ?' K& m
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic* o! _0 i" |/ H$ s
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit% t5 n3 }, q( w& g$ {, z* `! P
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and5 `+ y6 x% r, i: B. B
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
) k0 H8 ~$ L8 W) t7 d* CQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal; s; P6 K) f! [/ z5 V0 }
LePage Real Estate Services.
1 `* w+ n( B! S4 x+ x! f) ^; R r1 _5 p
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! {" R; N' c8 r& x4 D
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
( Y* T. A# P! e$ W Hconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
. |2 _* G8 J2 x( Z; ^- Ssound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
( o4 \; K" B) P; R# v* i, [* nresidential real estate sector.
3 x4 [. O2 g+ O$ U' E; O3 j( X6 i- d! L; J
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation5 H' H9 U3 ~# S5 B
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
& U, [! `$ @( L8 {4 F2 `4 u, lyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5629 `6 H% s" h) ^* D
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
3 A: A4 X" o# X1 z; A# I' b% @! I( D(+13.2%).9 s5 k5 b2 ?% O7 ~1 K3 @; U
% G$ i$ N9 u a9 }" f. y, D5 `
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; U7 t) C& s/ e7 w! R# mduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the; x, t3 l5 i6 E1 u9 f
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
- l8 v+ _& L' H6 D2 Ypoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper," A4 k7 q1 `- `$ a5 ]1 ^, q
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.) F5 C% D- g3 S4 H B1 Z
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
4 v$ ]$ {5 t/ \- Z7 }welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy3 ]3 T+ X7 O6 b i* Z
balanced market."
: G0 r& U+ p( D/ c3 X
/ y3 z% H* }, ^# r: G' q Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
2 H! ]3 |' U: N! j, @( O8 m9 Nconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift* E$ X) b7 o+ l) a5 [# ?
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued! m9 W+ m* [. u
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
% X8 \# I; u& \2 r7 ~- m' @energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,) ^% Z0 ] W3 g8 Z( P
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
6 K3 n; {% j! C$ w4 Gbreaking price appreciations.' c3 R% N/ o7 m3 q! ]; D4 v
& z7 A7 Z6 l1 A% ?+ H0 | Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding" L& o1 ^. z6 h& J5 j% G
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. b+ ^0 }3 {) g, Y" U
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
. T" T( ?* G* v0 n# E7 v! ?9 w- W+ ~3 J; ?$ @
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
, s7 p' ^0 d2 x5 X: i9 Qeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer; p" @$ V/ |; l
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off3 r* B& }7 S5 t i& `
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.. {- _% b, Y' E4 ~
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
; U& D/ \' t$ Kgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! \5 I, y5 Y( p0 L4 `6 Z4 a
price appreciation when compared with 2005.2 m! j0 w" {' ]& d, I
+ b; I; Q4 R# C# M T6 s While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
6 D) c4 R2 e' `& H* F) P! hmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
2 m7 p- n1 u+ ]: }financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada; y3 d) B5 d0 \' f
are markedly different than those found in the United States. F) o* Y$ t. X6 k9 Q
# a1 W- K! `) T& r3 D
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
# r5 ?" e+ `9 t' e/ W9 s" N, sAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's# C1 c3 j9 U' K4 l0 C) v
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the7 T- v: U4 d h; x% V
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general( D! ]& Y [: I; \
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the4 }% M0 f* A5 j! l
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
' ~% e) l' N! L# ]( f7 `aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
: H$ q7 A' f+ }( @) Tmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; U9 t P" Q0 W- y" m* b* G
: i! @7 P2 u1 X' Z; y r. e <<
5 |- W* H6 k( ? REGIONAL SUMMARIES( y7 _' u1 v% W, o9 Z1 L( i0 A
>>' W9 W" w1 K0 {* v
6 j6 p4 X" Y& O/ \ Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
( t# ^/ R9 u: [' i$ lHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
6 g4 I. M9 @7 v2 v4 fof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 b# J# }" i& [' U1 H+ Q C/ b6 U* f$ w
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of4 Z s# ~+ {- f
renovations.. _9 z& G+ H( F0 r, l, m
" t& K, J3 x2 m+ B; Z
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
) y4 z$ M* v9 X9 t j" wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: F9 c$ l' {1 j0 F. X$ l
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
6 J* ]4 H; K1 h) w# n( M+ _0 [) [September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.' t V) v- o& R6 V8 Z
/ @; A! B) n9 p1 c: D3 B1 E/ T The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 n- l6 b) Y0 Y3 pslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the. C) m( f* C" w" L
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
+ m! u, F7 b% K$ [; I% D8 O600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores# I9 m2 Q( u$ O( [/ a F- [2 _8 l) S
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes" Z1 g8 q# @* z
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
; s+ ^9 E- F+ q, C! f) c
6 v+ g/ v( h- R2 t' Z In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
+ o8 P b# P7 ]6 E4 ]conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their- e' K9 O6 m; x2 O4 k4 l8 `
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
) }) K# ?# Q( s+ uwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian I0 @5 }& i1 i+ i% W/ D$ o0 [! B" a
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing* G. ?# M* d* O% e
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
1 I% Q# ^/ }3 _& S* n0 U" _- {% ?8 h7 ^. C! O4 W
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
3 l4 e/ k) R4 ?# c& g* K! }; Q' zamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes2 F9 w. }6 o1 i/ T& W$ o
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
# S5 J2 L# H( T2 G" n7 Xas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last+ U8 E' |. p5 b: d
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
0 k5 C; N. i, W$ h% x; h
9 V" J/ @0 W7 M! l! {# X0 \ Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house# z/ I, H; Q# l+ A' J
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory) V( [. ^- P/ M6 ]; i2 V% f6 h
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& u0 {% B$ K8 g% n- k( wfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,3 d8 G& R" g( W
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
% z8 w* Y) ^8 G T2 N% ~; S: ?pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before: p+ m8 R4 [' V8 o
making a purchase.7 G" n- T: Q3 k R0 J( ?
) d% N1 n& H/ n' {1 e# D. a8 u Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
: d9 R6 o3 e Mmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 S$ V/ ~2 h: ~* y2 X' v% ]9 ?
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city8 p: g8 [& Q( G
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting& @$ r6 r3 o; [8 A: z5 d
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
. b1 H Z9 |" n0 I! V3 k& Samenities.3 A% p, k& X3 ^# ]* f% a! h# f
: E8 }% m9 C$ d! u3 G* \
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
; d- m9 u" e% P9 R& W: B) w1 K9 a: Gthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand. b8 ~* j0 @' I
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
) R5 H7 g7 X7 H6 `; R; a& g0 xcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been/ X5 v2 q9 }3 l/ b
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 }3 F. z& ]. V$ L m
residence, rather than for investment.
3 @. C3 d& D) L/ i- M2 T2 h' N8 t# x% r- x6 [3 V
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: L* N" s0 I. C) {6 I2 fhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted1 r0 y$ B5 O7 H4 B V! c
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
& w [" s) B8 k( Hconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
$ [0 ^5 E4 y5 W3 C% X& Zrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter8 X4 \; V S& R3 g
the market.
0 f' Y% [; B* T4 T; e
9 y G) ?: @& q+ v In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through1 Y& G1 d4 g" ?6 s1 o* l
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In# ^4 t' e, E! }6 }* o9 ~, b
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
! O* |% Z& u7 g6 P- x# Jmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
2 G1 w* K9 c$ U8 Y) s+ dto the shortage of available inventory.
+ g. Z' }, p) @+ X5 D; P/ W u& ]( T. _" i+ W; F9 C
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its; y, i$ A" Q8 [- M$ M
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains' c) D. [9 ?+ H' f T
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses R. }% y' X: S, P) z; M' Y* K
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.5 q N' b" t2 I' L' a- Y
1 J' f7 T% j Z+ |( Z! P Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases) D$ O0 X' u8 a" C# K
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 S* B8 r( ], ]! U! e3 z# `unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that+ U! C) T& z* g# l* w. u% k, }
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
0 U5 E4 h0 K- U! k( f7 Qprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer1 x& f' B# Q1 c, Y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 i. X6 `8 P' l3 mbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.- e! m7 {* n- o2 V+ H# c
. B) [& r5 O( M, @
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter y) N( l. j( c+ K' `
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
$ m: I# K7 C' K$ t9 I; j, o7 ?remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
: Q g/ Q$ b. z, n( X4 z" z7 p7 hmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
- y' z& s* q& D, X, Qincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve9 `' m5 ?' _3 v' s0 G5 S K2 C, W
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly" O3 W3 r x! T6 t0 N
towards the end of 2006. 3 T' T. Z5 D+ c$ y' n7 e
' ^: Z6 z! g) N0 z% g; ^
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
8 i5 O7 m% K8 P ]' f% ^$ _inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable2 t- @4 l$ E: C& I! K" v" C
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
8 o5 V. f- s: I+ ]! vgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
, y6 M8 u- |0 `. @foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added0 K+ _" z8 t: o) g9 `! s# i+ @
pressure on tight inventory levels.2 P2 C' n. J+ r, E9 x! A1 b
+ V' k& _# V0 E3 B8 C1 O/ o Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic$ H& L& m5 w+ i
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people9 \& S1 s0 Q$ m8 ?
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;- l9 L# H4 y: N
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching& P/ r; ]: A6 n/ X3 g3 H! O
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.' z4 g# m. Q7 H
; g$ v: k! D4 m6 z7 {! t' W8 E8 W <<
6 ^* o- A! }& e Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
, A. j" i$ ?/ E2 H
3 G1 f) C2 \, P! A; U# `1 R' K -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ b+ r0 ]% S. O% E ~
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
6 k) K4 m8 k) g6 E) a R& C -------------------------------------------------------------------------) I% [5 M: h# @2 i0 o
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
; b! Z0 s4 b4 X3 H Market Average Average % Change Average Average4 k$ Y0 |7 x" n/ I" c/ Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. U' E2 b2 r% T Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0005 z! e, L; k$ [; C' J0 o o" y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 T# N* J# N$ P, m5 _
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
, S3 }! k; A3 z8 L1 w/ w ------------------------------------------------------------------------- E0 k+ b0 Z+ z6 L4 s# Q
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000% g8 e& Y Y D3 g$ S5 \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 T6 K6 G! n- a& a: b/ }3 P6 W( r
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
' I3 ^8 G, Y, ~( S; n) Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 h+ Z, x7 K! M% ? St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
. f, s4 n( a& a: J- i4 P: G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ i& }# _6 v2 }8 | Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
0 Q# L- x% |4 `+ l -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Y1 T* Q5 v$ B2 I! L
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1855 B6 \/ \6 S. ?% D e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 E$ h1 y9 b3 E: X$ K0 \
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250; [- p; w1 s7 k# g6 J$ Y8 d! k+ L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' Q% P. D# x) d6 ~ Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
9 W# S, m2 a7 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------! C/ W, C3 M8 s5 I$ X9 F* |$ A
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707# {( N7 J I* C. j; G8 `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! F6 j3 C+ E7 n) K% f$ ~( e* M Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500& j4 u* Y2 P- i8 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 M7 e7 t% w. W
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
# i% T# ?% Q7 r( ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 \; ?& K @% ?- A Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
* e; s" S) c) y; I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 b/ L* w# H1 a& ^& R: k6 M$ V Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5001 F* X4 a. Z8 U" O6 I$ Y5 i8 L3 X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 F% [8 G0 ~% O" m" q
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000, Q3 T$ ]! Q* y( q+ |2 f4 _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 C) {/ Y; n& `4 O$ l' a
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
" t, p/ S1 ^% L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 g; H' L8 i' _* F# E; e; Q' {3 e' u( x- l4 k4 y' ?2 y
-------------------------------------------------------------" c" P& p, l$ K8 w
Standard Condominium) n5 j ]# a Y: Z$ j. N
-------------------------------------------------------------, o$ |& U6 J) v, Z, h1 h
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo: X& S" j" Q; D& }" Q
Market % Change Average Average % Change
0 X1 u# S' e; N$ r$ B- P -------------------------------------------------------------2 `( E; N4 ]8 |: _+ n `$ |
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%. k" s; {4 G6 X* U
-------------------------------------------------------------4 ? z/ e, t6 U) s( j
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%$ u" r% M9 w1 H4 Y8 g
-------------------------------------------------------------( N- V4 C! h* ?+ H9 P! T
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
! c/ F; r7 H" k2 @7 v+ G* M -------------------------------------------------------------2 `. n b' h# e
Saint John N/A - - N/A' V8 g2 @- K9 \* p! v
-------------------------------------------------------------' X) I& f, _/ i' I( z2 x X2 A
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
- E! B$ k" w+ X* p$ G -------------------------------------------------------------
$ C* i# I }( d1 _' [. I Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
% C8 ?! z+ K, [" e -------------------------------------------------------------
# k7 ~4 C. ?4 t8 P* S Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
# r. A- k$ S, v8 u! S% M -------------------------------------------------------------
I4 Y+ m; ~( R. ^ Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%, _. H; ^9 x% [/ J1 M- z" R6 B) V. S
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ U. A& \, o* \& E' Q# A Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%4 {1 C: q C& B F/ M
-------------------------------------------------------------
& p# B$ @; R8 h _, o# R9 K8 | Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%; t4 |2 _3 U( w: Z7 u
-------------------------------------------------------------+ B" i8 K2 c( T& A9 Q
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%3 ? x* T/ n6 U( }
-------------------------------------------------------------
' }( j: B9 x6 j7 m* y1 Y( N1 O' M Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
' c. r( w# t- a5 U9 u) R' Y -------------------------------------------------------------( `% k5 K/ [: t* \, \7 X/ J
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
. i' U( b* c) }2 Q& y( {: K- S -------------------------------------------------------------
2 F5 K' k s. A4 ~2 P' m* D Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
; Z( f' y0 C5 U" U. P -------------------------------------------------------------, x$ D% w% U5 V
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
* K& F* c: w' ` -------------------------------------------------------------. x. _+ B, |4 \$ J+ @/ i- _# s) q8 A
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%; q/ ?' x3 o/ [7 S! G/ Y6 U6 c0 @* ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
# h) q4 v$ e% P7 W! P3 e >>
8 D- q0 Y. f' R; Z# r, C9 F% K% x# r& X
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined4 J2 R5 v5 n& |% r- Y/ m7 H
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
" `& L( k1 H1 H% X, R$ n* I5 P$ xJohn and Victoria.
# L/ z! L6 C& s
9 b7 z0 o3 E* v$ o The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most% X( x/ |5 F" E% _! _
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
" p5 H, a* v; ^) ~9 U" i0 Ghousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release$ p! h4 O/ x0 H$ l5 O
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price9 p0 B7 b8 Y% ?" I- \
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
) t1 ^) o4 Y" D8 Y7 t9 h( ^across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
! R* i1 H* D# davailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current( l( u B: c$ f1 V7 B: o
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable8 l- Q& N8 j. A; ^, M& W$ T
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& ]& i# N" \5 p) q; H+ Q5 d4 Q5 ~$ rNovember 15, 2006./ C( W- O i: | z# y
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
/ l/ A) O9 A# Y6 E- [. pfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
, i* s6 v& {$ r$ xprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is* K# Q7 J& p# p
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|