请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348

值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348
2 d, h6 D4 Y) ^( S- M% Q
值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
8 |* v% w! U! U, }' e( x; }skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
/ y6 t6 \* d# X* @; OTax Roll: 9982751
Assessed Value: $497,000
  x: X( G5 B5 N100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
4 c/ S2 ~: g4 c2 B7 h. o# zNeighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
) p1 g6 M! y! Y- m, t6 lLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
, c' C) i: q* q9 t* A% {Building Count: 1
Year Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
$ a+ ^- E$ e( V+ j) J' g" l( _$ q  BApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
( k( O: k  y. D6 v/ m+ e& D(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
2 B+ O/ B/ L5 Z+ \7 d: qBasement Development: No
Garage: Yes
. m0 k8 {1 W3 R9 Z% c: ]* v* n' o$ nFireplace: Yes
0 y$ U5 u6 e; B& d$ V4 h& xWalkout Basement: No
$ g3 z7 L, p8 X3 ?4 _Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
( ?! h% L+ }* k3 p/ ^: B# b
you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.