紫庄主,所谓的正义只是你当时的看法,时光流转之后,很难说你的看法是否还是一样;你从年轻时候一路走过来,是否有些看法是大大的改变了?如果有,那你所谓的正义也就改变了。程序上的公平有时候的确可能造成委屈 ...# n; U. Z6 o& ]+ }$ ~. Y) A, x9 z; u
猪刀小试 发表于 2011-1-31 19:04
! l% H# F8 h2 z1 fI agree. Everyone has his own version of 正义. As a result, conflicts can't be solved, due to a lack of common ground. $ _$ Y0 E" B& e3 q; d5 c% W* X
+ c7 S- ?. a$ ~& I2 @However, a 程序上的公平 is shared by everyone. Even if it's not perfect, it's a static thing that people know what to expect and adapt.
不多余,不多余,很实在。7 N5 }* |4 i0 E9 Q& S
不必纠结,我告诉你,正义永远比程序上的公平更重要。# q8 r8 ^ ?5 |- z7 ~" s2 K
程序上的公平只是让别人对你无话可说,很多时候你需要赔上自己的良心。 9 y+ o( F1 o* n5 R& r8 g ?追求正义,无愧于心,管他后人怎么说,何惧?, e/ i. k( u, r2 c |& I, H6 O$ n
紫光 发表于 2011-1-31 18:53
( N+ S7 @9 U4 \8 U. A. f* G& b; C" k. pYou are just being naive. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes. 6 d5 u' u. M0 g- L 2 V% S0 \: x$ P+ J# oLet me tell you a story. About a year ago, a guy published a book in U.S teaching people how to sexually abuse young children without being caught. Disgusting, right? Guess what, there is nothing can be done to stop him. Why? Because it’s legal according to U.S human right law.
You are just being naïve. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes.! U7 c. Y) P' u: H8 L
+ F% p+ Z6 C) k' c# ?7 K' F8 Y2 ?. V' g
Let me tell you a sto ... 0 q& ]0 c( X6 \' F- ztqbs 发表于 2011-2-2 13:20