 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:) Z/ }/ r1 a+ I0 @, V( b
0 S, U( V A8 H9 [5 _! U* @
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。, Q! E0 v; l4 M# M d
3 X6 R: c2 ~2 _! B
**********************************
5 K, J& m, R6 q1 a' B2 G! aAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
& T6 [; ^# E: f& \. u4 T$ K0 d/ I( s' U5 B, j. z3 ~1 ]/ A
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
4 X' {0 }& @; A6 R* H8 f8 K t) o0 o% F& O/ u. A# r
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8., G+ C0 a+ }0 M ^$ Y- j2 }( }
+ }/ e( Z+ ^8 ~* r$ W/ e
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.' U( b! T' V2 A
, `, p- g% K3 C4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
, E5 q, ]3 l8 U) O! V8 @( l) F6 a; A4 }: d2 c8 W5 O. i! }. a
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|