' a1 U6 M& h# q& F/ z. d0 s2 L2 J3 gRead the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. 5 V8 f) }. v* qThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. N% y0 ?; I6 c0 f6 I" D* c / f5 }6 ?7 |+ ]: {3 O- B$ O8 s
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票?+ y$ [0 u, g X+ o+ S6 H3 N$ t4 I
pchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. 7 Y( C1 U2 ~% U8 KThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 1 d5 r0 P. s* r7 o/ K+ i $ c% n" b& K$ I% k! U, T( I# U+ H$ q/ }* \" Z% n
; m% O1 Y0 s2 g) ]) J
9 x/ E1 o4 ]: Q3 t0 L0 a
+ e( v( K/ `% j1 g- {! O/ \
& M7 D0 A' C) E" ^/ B
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
0 R6 \5 x. B; @; v1 L4 K ' W% w9 M9 g2 a1 t没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, 9 X F- F# w: z 1 O' ?6 [, z; \* N但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实: v0 L5 b2 `* A$ P9 ^# _8 h