! j' K5 P5 g1 @. ?, r4 d
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.5 R) ]9 Q) }5 _$ Y( ?3 J
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 4 n3 C& e& N* {2 y/ } - m& ^2 g/ U* j {; p
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票?, k5 z1 x a0 z( O" A
pchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
! S7 @; Y. o0 P) m5 T/ V6 }! Y% _3 e / M @3 I' _, g2 R0 l
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.2 `1 P( A$ l6 [+ F6 _* Y S
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.8 s8 d/ T* `( d1 Y; S
) j0 x! B7 U5 S3 b. @& Y( A2 e
: z n: P3 k% h7 B9 i+ v7 q! h1 V
+ e; n! A, |+ M: b4 Z2 U, j% ]6 k. u% Z* n3 r3 q) g0 y: t
' S% j8 Y6 p& L8 X) L3 \. C* |
6 K. Y5 d) v7 o/ `: r+ a
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
2 M" P. U: r9 o. b- X- T2 V- v
4 V2 E r) V; J! q: H
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, " x) M, n% f$ Z. E& J! Q' s$ L1 I& M+ e4 @$ \! {0 \$ w
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 - t; `$ V/ e, R" ?8 q! W8 v9 h8 N- P
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则