 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
$ y" `# V2 ]3 e6 k0 I$ Pfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove' n5 ]- J3 k, h! v' q# w
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
+ X, i* r( C7 L8 ` X3 Qprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
+ C# R8 S* L- Cfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
1 ^- F/ J* ?0 M( d4 woverpricing compelled a level of residential construction1 W( w0 v5 _& A3 l* q5 q. h5 B6 O
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
$ w; x( R/ R1 a3 a12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past+ K. M7 L+ j' _4 s2 J
three years.
% k. ~ w: |8 M% @3 q8 vBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
6 i0 H8 B' [1 ~7 e; V6 M' Wtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
, t5 ?1 ]7 c0 s: T( `# f6 A9 iaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
+ z" @! ?) ^' {! {both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
; {9 m5 G: y# R7 a0 v/ Lto fundamentally justified levels.; k$ w$ A, {' m0 Y
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”" ]# K2 r1 I* `: c
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and6 B2 S* ^, q5 Y4 y
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”: E) d- i; x% v" C8 m0 W
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although+ y9 X) F1 A* M7 L+ w& w
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s, I) ?4 [% H% H! q8 u z
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where" q4 n1 C: a f9 x3 }/ z9 w9 _' J
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch8 s5 u2 i, V) f- x1 L; P! ~9 k- N, m) X
that is now being rapidly reined in.1 Y) z4 T' L. F; v. ^0 W1 O
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,7 I) |3 d: P k% f+ l- b4 B1 N
the construction of too many new homes over the boom5 w. Q9 Y" y1 J$ T2 f$ M6 v/ ?
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh) W- Y2 c$ @0 |0 g
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers' a% o/ K8 t# ]$ k$ ~( ]9 P
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will5 a; |6 @ R1 C# B6 F
remain choppy and new residential construction will be+ \. Y& ^3 ~; C4 H, i5 i e$ x
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction/ e' k& f* c& R! j
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this0 ?8 }8 d( s P3 `/ v# i
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide: ]6 R; z% r$ K) z! ?8 r5 h
residential construction will fall further to around) Y2 j4 @5 @, {+ ?1 [; d
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
# i7 M' d0 R0 L/ q1 q# m! ~3 _4 cin the fourth quarter.) M6 x; @6 u4 r! t* r
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,; ~# A! l/ t4 J2 d! O
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run0 Q8 o' S) ?, }
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
; ?9 t1 q7 k p: Y T0 ]$ Yprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
% w8 ?* W P3 v4 @7 `0 w x6 Q: ^* x+ b4 Xvalues since house prices should track incomes over the6 _" w1 j% M @& A( H, Y. g1 K0 @
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
4 V. L! _* W; lregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers- ~9 \8 [, i ?
of residential construction.: T3 [; B0 O3 h3 N2 [8 L0 K
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a$ r2 F6 m% w# Q: W! I) x
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction& y/ ~: U# q+ o& F; i8 j& s) @5 o
would have occurred if housing had been priced# F% a+ n( a+ D8 {: n4 t. v
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
! g; Z M p$ T: X' I7 ?( Wfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
0 d- n e- y! ]% Ounits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
0 ?# h# @7 L6 h5 Q& Umany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.* E8 N, A6 z) T1 u* C- C
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,* T' O5 a3 F) n+ l9 N" |0 ]# v' n
where housing demand will further contract under waning
9 `& [( G% u& n3 d; ypopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are+ c! _7 D. I, W4 @; U) E5 ]
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the" R) e' G. l2 G/ d4 `/ R( v$ R
very time that the resale market has swung into strong! s) n) p8 O/ Q! Y* |
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces9 G$ g/ l( ^$ A# e a9 F, D
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
( y& P$ _! } P8 Iweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
- i1 p; J$ Z7 d7 y0 x, RQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
N$ S3 p7 v( K- s: J5 m; Cstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de) f( a4 ~2 P6 ~
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,9 X3 \8 A! R \% |
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership/ V( [/ K, W5 z9 B" z( b; k5 y
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a3 k2 l0 B0 M+ g, l2 s j z
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
' O N5 T$ m M0 F- Mlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto; {; q+ W; i% c( e$ ^# r( c
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically7 L: |! W. R. l7 s! f& c8 a& V
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
8 e9 g9 P7 f0 o3 Nconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will- b# a U1 {9 `7 [6 G/ X$ i$ Y) {+ B
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
: _# F$ n8 O2 S3 r4 bcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could; E# t" ?' q3 e9 s& }6 A
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
) S z3 ?+ A# F! R8 i; o1 @! P% L7 \residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we! }1 Q- S* y8 c
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from0 J" r! D5 S1 [( Z4 d) b
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
/ \$ S1 H+ {8 T1 A& Y" b) q7 V. iyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,3 ?! n$ \$ o/ T M6 x/ m
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
0 N! `# p9 {% X( Q7 T' bOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING3 ^/ F! L' z8 n# `/ H5 |8 |5 l% @
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS( k8 e9 B8 }( x" A/ Z
Grant Bishop, Economist7 x" ? l8 f/ f! e( j
416-982-8063
, l% m4 G }; BPascal Gauthier, Economist! V) d# k; a& ~8 [
416-944-5730
0 C* @7 U' {5 ?5 o
0 U b. W/ N1 Z0 r4 z c" ?http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|