警察上不上法庭实际上没有什么关系,因为市政府/警察局常年聘用律师在交通庭坐镇,一场不落。当事警察到场不过就是多一个证人而已。如果你有把握推翻此案,则没有当事警察你就占了大便宜。其他几位的主意不错,错可以认,态度要好,但是可以哭穷,以得到减免待遇。: `: }6 z, B; I H8 a
0 L0 H3 x& g+ F q P
开车可是千万要小心呐!现在罚款比前几年高多了。
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005' @* l# F6 M: e; h; N
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" 8 P# j, u1 j- X5 m1 s- L 7 ^/ f# a% h! @& N"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances." # @- f3 C- x* ~4 \/ x 1 B0 z& ?6 q8 m3 A% OYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。9 [8 l8 L6 x; ^/ w w$ Q
/ W7 Y X* o2 B- s5 x
! Q. Y# O. H. Q! M& {: {
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: l% G4 f5 v, f, Z# E
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20054 @1 W) k5 Z) z( T
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"$ x- K2 m/ B8 W: E
& ]/ w) C: a. q- x# b7 z
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
, d* \8 X) f; NDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.