 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
0 B) e# Q" n \ }# Y楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
* K# w; G! H' zcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
0 F' z; f) \ F0 _) j5 K% w0 a2 b \8 v
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。6 S: M' t6 v5 T6 a& V
( I0 ^* |& t: ]! w# W8 ~
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
) ~) s N \5 m$ E) k. c! Y
" E. j2 U, ], C4 c C9 H不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
& p) U) ]6 G- O* m# m1 K3 z1 v8 b# u
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
: b3 }, @0 ]4 Y! n+ y' V: f g9 J: G* a! n5 s3 t# Z
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
Z' @. e) B0 z* R1 Y! S1 A" PYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.9 y8 F6 y6 Q8 w5 c# x
2 c D& D& c5 y) U9 Z+ ^( _9 ^$ kOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"., x5 o6 v u- `) {* |, s
. x0 @# h( d9 I+ Q/ M
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe. p/ F) S0 p' k
# f: V' a5 Y& F: R! z[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|