 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 M2 d6 B' f3 M( F- _0 x
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!) Q* @8 P( y) R" G. M
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... & ]3 k2 E- ?; ]' M- K- D
+ f( l9 e" S* S) _/ a) Q8 F9 N* u您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
9 ^4 p- L. r2 A* E* x5 ~' K8 s
. o( e5 l% H- s P! B! c安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
9 C& C9 M7 |" ?7 ?3 c" N) ]+ K! ]) y7 Y% Q4 Q) S7 X* L
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?. j# c B! c: d4 D& P
& e) T7 O! r* ~ @# x& q另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。3 @5 c) _3 i5 |$ ^. B3 ^
6 H" m% Y' X: f- ^, k$ \
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):/ p- T" S/ h4 z. [0 E: A1 A
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.2 Y! S, p- Z, Y* N3 [
7 m2 ^1 h: M4 n7 nOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".4 F# | L* D- a2 |- t w
% q' G9 z1 |) O& ABut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
- x# r6 ^4 K* @& ~, L8 N: D
) Y5 d6 B8 p# Y2 E- D[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|