 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 : t K3 T+ v0 |2 Q1 p' i
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!3 e1 }. z J8 D) {
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
( b: j% A; I, |" W( u) n9 o: R; y
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
4 U9 Y# e& m" D# S6 \
/ n5 I* e1 _( U: [+ D4 B5 X安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.+ M9 l$ g$ m0 [2 W
# W7 t V1 a) \9 _5 I I
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
$ R' n! n7 Z) S0 H9 }! ?
d. H+ ~3 P' ^/ e: H另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
# Z+ h; {1 C) @/ e5 ^# F
; J5 N0 d' q1 C9 l# b& ?+ f! }关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
' P5 }5 N, Y% L9 C3 S H+ V: nYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
4 e7 @6 O+ k$ e$ m8 c3 Y4 [9 U0 W- I( u' V5 d/ j0 g5 c
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
; k* x; R* o+ m
3 k9 [+ e1 _$ a; NBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
4 a& r" X. k. ? n& Q7 I4 {! |4 L J: s
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|