 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
- A1 }! {& [. r2 {0 \4 S楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!* O# z: P' q& J$ E
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
5 W1 t# G' h y s& @5 x% d
2 `$ @0 p5 @ P6 h您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
9 Z! n, ]; d* l j. K+ k6 [. q7 E5 Q: E5 s/ p
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
2 U% E2 w+ u6 Z+ O1 Y4 N" W
1 S8 \8 s) N: F; e4 W0 K( L8 I不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
8 G2 X* r+ Z( F& n4 w
, _; o! u, B x0 G另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
. G4 z6 O, l' D4 u$ |& ~, t7 d7 Z& g! ^
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):; C2 O6 E0 t& M+ Y$ W
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.. Y( t' i! V3 K
) ?, \; v8 T" q( u
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
9 f, l! a; g; L* [( l$ i
! G' G6 L3 k8 \; tBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
& ]( V5 Q9 \5 n- p# F. g* {7 H4 r
* J6 g" a5 a: }* k3 h1 M[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|