 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ; J( h; ], N2 l1 A/ X* `2 ^8 J* @
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
3 a( ^* \: _! [/ L9 Xcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
' S9 K9 U" i: }) E" [% ~5 x! ]5 |; } h" `2 ]. ~: P2 d Q
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。% y2 L. O! B; u" f
7 _' _2 L. ]) F4 X安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.3 R6 y$ G/ r- c* A" \$ D; D
1 g a _8 h" `+ V不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
3 E- K7 L* F) I+ r. p# G O1 U( s3 D5 ] \# B# e
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
w& N4 ~ N' f$ N$ d
* a! d% {3 C; A9 [+ F# W关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):6 V8 T) S6 r) z s1 h c4 B
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
- W/ v2 b& } ?6 G( j" ]* Y) ^( W
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".) @/ [5 f7 Z( U5 Q
% w; v! c, S- h0 L7 hBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
L$ l. ^: k9 ?* Z- e9 J8 P |+ R9 I2 v. s% a
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|