 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
7 s# m7 w1 b- ?6 j: ?楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!2 Z7 Q. v% b4 k1 D
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
( M! ]: A5 V( S" B7 |0 h. F1 \0 O# ?" F# `% w- O. t& L; V
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。& l- F- |& B, E. W
+ C& Q$ \. e. `# I4 H* q
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
' {# \5 D. I" K0 i8 O% x- P; V
; O+ O7 m2 B" l, [' q( N1 \不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
$ Y- n: r0 U j) w$ K( j) l* m
4 p# h, H$ Q3 k' n0 a另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。+ o* n1 f+ P. D# L# D
w. ]$ D6 |- ? Z) {; I* y' b0 t关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):6 v1 e! \# J- `9 }5 h) c
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
9 o# j w4 c+ U: e8 C: O6 p3 P! q/ `& E' s. n
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".- O. r ` z/ U) N( g1 a
4 i( |3 s: O" s5 m4 _ X8 xBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
9 X5 R9 g8 w6 _$ _0 l; F8 K
( Z9 Z/ P$ w ~7 k$ R[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|