 鲜花( 27)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
原帖由 Homework 于 2007-3-30 19:30 发表
1 t+ \" ], E* U; Z6 y) X为什么呢?北面的Twin Brooks不错,南面的Rutherford也可以,111 Street对面的Richford的有些房子价格不菲,为啥就MacEwan不好呢?
, ?$ C3 V( j* b; h, V4 V+ x 6 `8 F4 f. T$ A, W, s
2 f! w, `- a% B1 o2 U, |
MacEwan is fairly good. But not as good as Twin Brooks and Rutherford. MacEwan has more multi-houses (apartment, duplex) and the number of rented house is higher. The followings are the comparison based on the data a year ago.1 \# P9 y0 o) E9 P9 W& d
$ X! c2 A2 {' E
Single house/total house rent house/total house
+ ^ \% m& O4 SMacEwan 62% 17%
/ R4 Y' y! ]$ }# `- G1 IRutherford 78% 4%
& {1 t1 F4 W) [- H }, d6 VTwin Brooks 85% 2% |
|