Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
% q3 \5 m$ Q; `: A% N, \4 w! @
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

5 f% ^$ ?9 A/ v) BLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
' P& z6 _) N. ]" w) q
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

% k& C; K" q4 `, n: t( `6 \/ V6 L( w- w
7 P% J9 \" f# b3 _+ r5 lIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
* m& C1 P+ I: t5 ^; q% \' @" p+ L
& U; Y( H5 W9 v6 i- M* M4 I& rSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
. Z4 R6 c: y/ a9 z) CSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

1 T6 W+ e6 m/ h$ YIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
- ?: T3 [) z" [$ d: w# i3 d
5 g: C( ?$ p+ S! k/ c5 B Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
  N+ K; v6 f1 O& D& W7 [# s& q. V( gBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
* N1 _% b$ o! w2 N! ~7 ENew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
) E7 Z% E) v. ~, e8 w% i; ^% EWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



) D6 g/ u7 ]  R/ \$ s& }+ ~& Z3 F6 r3 iIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
% b% R% a4 H2 V: L" A& k+ j* i2 q

' \$ s" p+ n6 ]- CFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
' ~* g- ^. b  y. i% v
it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

% D! D# c3 F  `: U/ G[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]