Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
$ D/ N  ~. N  P% m# r0 Z) \
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
; Q& f2 G; a: _' o, x3 h3 ^0 Y  t
' ?+ _2 l# G8 `( z0 G0 xTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

4 x7 Y/ V8 d6 e5 D7 ]3 Z
8 y! G0 h# a3 s+ [7 n1 ?' hIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
7 p; H8 x4 T% }  m3 G: j4 b& T
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
* K5 O" T* L! B. M  c7 g) wSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
. M1 J& R( U6 C1 Q4 D! R9 vNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
  N& W3 D! O6 U$ q, ^3 L% P
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

! e, c, Y# Q2 lIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
' f$ a: Q5 H: {! |; I7 M
/ _/ |) h3 F2 r  c9 a' O$ f% X Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
1 X. I: U5 p0 j Avg. 1988-2000 2001
' R; N1 P5 O  H/ i! W, E2 {( J# gBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
/ j9 [% I# O2 }Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
0 ]' n" Y& b0 t$ E2 A4 Q% lSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
" D' E* P, _" Y! F8 G5 s

) X( W- s; `- P0 h  I
+ n) c% |' _6 m: Z7 H0 RIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
3 w* E; }  b3 V

$ x$ K+ r6 U1 X9 e. x8 n2 I' S  FFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
  w% Q7 V$ y. y$ i' d3 V+ p
it would be a good reference.
: h1 c2 H! k9 G
2 c8 K$ Z7 h8 z3 Ethanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

* n9 \* @; W  o" F; j8 c[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]