Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

- @+ N* T2 T0 ]6 C$ B3 V3 JNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
+ z5 F, V3 E, |4 N, n+ ]
( ?2 Y8 W+ y/ _& c- pLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

! b2 E1 ~  R* ?To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

8 P9 V9 b3 T* q4 ?
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

0 G( ?' @5 z" @" xSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
' C3 r; l- ]# @: h# }! o6 Z; Y* [New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
9 G+ j- u. l3 u& T" EYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
5 `% j% r: w7 M2 B1 ]$ q
+ E/ H, J- N9 j0 ~8 C/ E& a+ [If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
! f* {: |) [" \2 D" w/ W
0 o$ {" f% A% a9 w  C% u& |& yIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

; ]) b' c# J, J: x! {. b9 f Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
8 |6 D" {+ r9 W- [3 B! T0 P Avg. 1988-2000 2001
; E& u9 d  l/ S! b; R- o  mBoston  20.5 30.2
) V0 \. F( r3 V  Y8 e2 B; GSan Diego  22.8 29.7
& P! J+ C* x& h1 ^San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
( \$ L- a- V. p' A- _' j; E! w4 r- y( ySeattle  20.4 25
! \- s6 c9 A) x0 R. W, T0 Z1 @Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
' I! V8 G7 j6 LChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

" J/ ^5 b# b# u) r  B4 u' g# j

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
0 \+ Y) c* B$ I- A: N
- l) R! f3 Y2 m6 ]1 N
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

4 t+ l, h. a' Z& |thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
, n1 b! F7 G& O1 q+ w
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]