 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
. \+ n% x4 P% i4 SEdmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
3 |. C% B/ ~! T1 I/ K! \# D) M8 AOne party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
5 y5 c9 c% E o: }$ x6 f
; E' l" p Z& H& t% W' y" @If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
0 S3 ~% }4 w. g" Q+ n+ L7 C
& n. u2 Q$ ?: N- H) YLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
$ G+ U/ S+ h7 m$ t
' `. g" ^5 D. x) |) ^, Bcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same.." ^7 r4 P( [& D3 a/ e
5 O" z8 z c$ K7 K1 V$ Z" q4 }
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) ) J9 X5 n" w0 M. k' W9 L
|
|