 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 - X& y, g% X% J- {: \! ~3 |' Z" ^% `
. o H! K7 ?8 t6 n5 b
+ @% I+ }$ Q; hIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. ! r+ Q: U, x5 z
% ]/ L$ Z1 h& f; o2 d$ z. SLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.034 e4 N$ X- [8 i5 ?
6 L8 j W [& c: k) X! G) Q. C/ g% [/ s! {comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
& K2 C ` m" V# J. d$ b( L8 H. @; R
4 a$ d2 }/ f* ?6 u0 w# q. FNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
' r1 g U9 H' L$ Z |
|