 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 ( v8 Y+ s" Y8 M% h: Q9 L# }% C( W
! ]! K- ^+ c/ O: O+ I9 c
- Y1 p3 Z) f6 m
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
' U2 A- f6 z2 L' A3 Y1 J
& T. t- _8 a$ Y7 }& V2 fLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03' }3 j2 x1 D1 _# X" _5 D9 E) p3 C* e
. }5 t6 {: \, s M' Kcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same... p! o& m4 {' f) x
9 j6 B* G* Q3 F- Y9 w# k
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) : X. h( q0 Y# S3 A2 j
|
|