埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2156|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- h, x) p& R7 b% V; o
! R& u4 Q  u5 ^( v1 N9 V8 Q' S- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -9 ^8 V7 |. J* B2 o2 n! s

) u  B1 }: [. M    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market! [. L- @+ n5 P+ Q
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 E" [; I. {7 J- j' k) M# ]/ ]! O  G& o
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
( M% D3 b/ w, g6 i! Q9 Pin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
( m6 L, C$ f- [0 L. a0 Xprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
) ]$ J0 ]; t: B# E( wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,, F/ j6 D+ C# E4 e; d- Z
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
3 [9 W1 n& q5 D1 Z/ V- h! v2 k3 l: sLePage Real Estate Services.4 k+ [& m) x8 w- A9 ~- R) B5 {

; h+ ]" j. |0 r4 ]5 J, D    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! O  W" }+ J9 `3 T( D7 }# s
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic( i' a. v; d- W9 [( P5 m+ e! ^6 h/ r  `
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
& x6 \: I1 Z2 `0 @8 `sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the/ K; y+ c' Z0 w
residential real estate sector.  z7 b/ ?5 K$ R- M
* [6 y! q8 [6 u1 k# x* f
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
! G2 g- |) |2 ]- _: Woccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)9 W; D  D. J4 O$ S# \% k
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
( s9 D* q, y* n0 \0 k. R* b' _4 [! Z(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
- l( x- D( _& Z(+13.2%)./ r4 A8 i  \" |2 ^+ }' s

) ~: s9 o! j1 T. i( T# m    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
8 X/ z- W1 w9 C; y- w1 I2 Jduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
7 X' i- _5 r* L  O/ O+ mfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are8 |' Y8 B( p! X; i6 o# w  l: V
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
$ G& v7 d. L5 ]5 k1 v) H" Lpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services." L+ N% g0 d- @: p  z
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
, n- E" C# p' j" b1 pwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
2 b* _9 |, e5 s4 v4 Qbalanced market."
# H. i/ o3 t8 m
  p% D" T1 G9 L. u$ r7 `    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,$ W- z- o9 r$ S7 m$ X  ~
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift3 x! F9 i0 z9 c
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
! A# f: c4 o( ^# @throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core! l$ A+ d& C( D8 X& {5 L: E
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,# H" `/ Q* i) a; c3 `
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
$ p& o$ `# D2 n2 v! Mbreaking price appreciations.
* o6 }& G, |; s& x' o+ P" E: e+ l" O8 j* a
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- |4 f; @# z; ]3 H
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the' T$ R5 x# D! O* l* h
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.# j# u, F( m7 Q4 {& G8 H& ^
+ q  m' c0 Y; t& E9 g
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
3 f- r( f( d# i/ j# B8 \  Q1 i) ueconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
/ ]$ g5 i! O. Z1 Iconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
' t. ~2 P" E0 D+ [* sslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.& Z0 i1 ?- B0 |6 j6 h) }5 y
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers: ^  ?+ S! \- y9 \
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of# k+ e, U$ A- z+ i! |7 r! R
price appreciation when compared with 2005.$ K) `0 b" f' f' ^( P( E! b9 ~& l

6 g$ o  h; E) y9 k3 B) y    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
% c( S/ m; ~: m( I8 G% Umarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and' h) k2 c! n, h1 |4 F
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
! Q8 D/ Q: w/ `8 f# ^are markedly different than those found in the United States.
; L5 ~, V9 ]. ^; J4 Z) }* D& \8 v2 |: s8 X( s8 C" Q
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the. S, R9 D9 R. i* Q  S
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
1 ?. ^& n% x* Zfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the) n; @2 h2 N" r. U
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general( h8 b' ?( _' V% e
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
6 F  Y7 v- p7 v" {: Sdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
, u1 r" r0 `0 s6 Kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
% U6 `" _! H! K/ j6 ]mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
; e+ `$ T0 i$ i1 w, ^3 I: H+ n7 F9 N( ]2 K5 w
    <<
6 J! G4 h/ S" {3 A6 ^                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
& {# F( f: S- _( _3 ?* I    >>( o9 [2 h6 {# |, o
& P, B& A& N- p+ J2 A% G- h
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in' E' M3 h: Y+ E( l# p1 p$ R6 k$ I
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
1 D# \, r4 Y$ S  l  Cof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
/ I3 f9 a) M. X2 R+ [3 b- Flooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
0 o+ O" V  k& e1 grenovations.
$ v0 [0 O( z$ d: B% T5 \# c! ^2 M7 ^5 w; P  j2 \4 q# b
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
! T- Y2 S4 E7 N" }, Eincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
  c1 D% z5 x' Q3 [5 ~, _compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
9 M1 C# f# A0 x3 Q; X  d0 TSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.. `0 N, I3 |: S

9 R2 c, R$ Y" W% f, P+ b! S    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
- E- R  \7 M0 n6 k& ?8 I2 nslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
# N- {" z! {( i' c, ?) `. u7 x) jquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
3 G; Z) u1 Y6 ]1 X3 g0 r' }600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
9 ^4 l: }5 E3 Lto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ N  U9 |& f$ e1 J+ n  k6 mand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.. ^) s0 d2 e  Z8 B" R2 i
8 B' x$ ^8 m- b4 V/ t1 X4 L
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
9 O# i" i0 F% `5 a: Y! Econditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their/ L# ]% Y2 k8 c0 k+ C7 l1 V
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
/ k+ s' G' k" U) Q' ~was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian& F- m) J1 j6 W& Z4 \+ q
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
% b& k* h- l3 n' n; Y/ sbuyers with more options when looking for a home., A  s2 r+ {  R+ |2 ?- V

7 E3 ~" N# G) {; N' V3 y    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly8 K  J) Q: n5 \9 d% m' B
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes7 d9 {; [& g5 s# I3 G$ A: [
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
/ R* ^* \; t, d; H  r0 l% x& yas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
1 M7 x9 A' [5 I5 F7 \few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.# C0 L. a, a  x$ l, Z

. d) `$ z7 q# s3 e    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house  s8 F8 S5 e+ b3 W
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& e! [' a# f3 {
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
4 y7 B- L$ j' M7 p3 X& ufirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
/ J  w1 Z0 @1 F, r& _when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( x' A( ~% F& W: c
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before% d& A/ q6 a1 I+ A3 Z( S& ?, p
making a purchase.
' b! ^2 Q) }3 |3 x, A: C9 {
. n) \' U0 l' k$ w    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing* w. K, g8 Y8 o$ K4 Q/ R. U! h
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong: x; ~+ k6 z% O- M
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
, j2 w% k' V, L, Scentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
! T1 l9 g5 F/ L4 }attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown9 `& X0 g4 n* J% s! \
amenities.( V8 W+ S: p  m( B1 W2 d# }

$ P. X7 p9 c0 |$ s2 Y    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
; z1 u0 K9 f2 d; j+ r' U9 Uthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand! e+ E4 O( w. T, |! R% b
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
6 W) {2 R" D' C. U8 ?) ycontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been' a/ |' B" u. I4 V
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
0 L  F# G( e- M9 Rresidence, rather than for investment.- T2 S0 m1 f4 w+ I+ G$ \

$ I) m& y7 C& {  p% w    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
& I3 d5 N" ?8 J5 u( C# Rhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) j; I; @- {% _1 ~. b. K( Win a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
3 b' q4 Z- H/ E+ v7 nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization: Z9 B  d5 V- @" h: m0 r+ |3 R
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter& P& h( f# c1 X
the market.. Z( T& t& E2 u& e% |! u  r% g

' G& L+ [$ P" q1 ~    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
) d4 E+ k: g; x( ?- V8 jJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In4 e; ^9 h2 A. w% x
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
% c- Z+ c8 @: a* p5 }' Omonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
2 w2 ~7 [2 V/ \7 hto the shortage of available inventory.
6 H, ^- L$ |: s; G6 U9 b
; J' M' O' A, [3 U5 F8 U6 a  Y    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
7 q0 K# B7 A9 C- f- z" r7 |/ s( gmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains  U* o/ r& k! l' {) `' z( [
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
( [1 y$ J' R0 T) tstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.3 c' f: e# n+ @; L  H1 c
$ F' [% S- G7 H# r
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
1 o. D1 e9 Z" i. ?8 y; G2 J! }2 ain the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low5 N4 M8 u/ H6 H5 G9 s  d
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that  M$ N* v0 X! Y; i
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring, ?9 _$ I$ O' ?  e' R
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer7 W( ~  B1 m( t8 ]' ]# K9 g1 H
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
6 g! m; F* i) H* t- rbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
. O: O* @1 @9 v0 k' l! L9 @
& i0 O6 C* z( o9 k4 h( `2 X5 ~
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
" P0 d: ~# H6 ]5 A4 ^0 n8 }7 sas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
2 @, g% v8 C4 L" ^) X: q; q" Eremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry," c: ^5 b+ o& q# f/ F8 z+ C
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices* {, V/ Q/ p& o0 t  S7 h
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve4 Z' Z7 K6 l3 g  S; N4 i2 _( l  V1 u
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly" g. _9 Q- f% N( D
towards the end of 2006.
   
8 _! A1 @- R( `7 r& j% i% g4 d2 H, r/ P0 z$ W
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
# d, H. t7 c: i' M5 rinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
4 V# D3 m( C" u3 J- h, t) Lto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 Q2 {7 o7 j  @4 a1 j$ y9 o" H) Z
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to" y8 J+ ?9 P0 [3 n( g
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added6 H% P8 q% G! |2 j( N* ~
pressure on tight inventory levels.
/ {/ r2 W/ n5 s& }  ^' {6 O. m8 d9 r2 W
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
) `  a+ {4 V- C4 efundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people3 f$ y! [3 N! t
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! f  u( O1 l$ Qwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching2 H# X% [& z3 A2 O
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.6 l- l0 k+ E5 r% \9 Q
! q, X3 Q. E5 }: p9 x4 G6 g& Q
    <<" I( i! K6 G9 n- V% }
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
% X9 F; O' [, V& Z8 {" e& `, u+ R8 _" h/ P0 v* l  Z$ V, \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 U2 O# ~2 r( l6 n                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey! c9 Z  x* ?0 Z" f3 R! U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 H- S$ z/ u. A# h8 ~- |7 L                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3/ A- o6 C# C8 v1 d$ R3 M- G4 K0 f
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
- @, y" a* X  U  _! R! H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 l; w: R. a4 L    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000" ~% h/ c; S3 S$ m% c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 y. H% s& o2 M+ A    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
$ r) |  E# ^& @+ R% i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; u, n% N" R7 x! h6 z    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
; u7 h) |4 l* @7 R+ V- l' z' x9 b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& Q  x3 C+ Y/ P/ h. Y+ v, V
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
/ u4 n9 J1 Y$ z! V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( [1 e4 F% H8 z# }& x  m1 a
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333- i3 O; x( Z8 F3 R) @5 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, Z$ [% O8 j/ C% T7 b! R
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
+ U8 l0 f+ x9 @0 Y9 g, Q; y) m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, e8 f0 q# `- v    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185* o, w9 L* Q6 B# O7 Y6 b$ s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- E  r9 e2 v0 ]1 h% L! }
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
# b( n6 C' f+ W3 ]/ n1 h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 E! f& \. C* s
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
+ Z3 f  ~# m3 L, w' J# D7 W2 }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 f. D: ?% d5 g' G% u0 u. u    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7071 H1 C: d* m3 I& z+ D# b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ s2 V' D, a( E' N    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5009 c$ _2 O1 m! n3 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ R3 \: w4 G/ a' w+ n- b$ A1 s    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
) W8 I4 K+ o. O) _; G9 y- w( x# T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 N/ l3 k+ Q9 ^. _& P3 I" S, R5 i0 a
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714) [* u( z' \, ?% ^- c1 w9 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 ~0 g5 a  m/ {7 m: X    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500* A4 G5 e9 P) s# h# ?) D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 ?8 }) n- k( R6 C/ _3 P9 Z
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
3 Z2 q( X- h. X5 X0 R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 g' f8 @9 k$ _# s    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8603 Y$ O9 z2 R. m% t" E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# A( Y8 G4 w( D( l: \
; q& s; I# ?# E8 l% \
    -------------------------------------------------------------% k# t; x" ?" x4 ~- \1 B
                               Standard Condominium
. a$ |- e* B' _' ~, \4 p    -------------------------------------------------------------) h" c: A3 S$ [
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
+ V! h7 q$ h9 m# _/ _. z# I    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change9 r; s: {/ t9 e9 _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" P2 }% H+ j' W' T# d( ^    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
& F& V; U( Z- e9 B+ |: E' u' P7 I    -------------------------------------------------------------" G7 E2 n" B) A9 T. Z% ~
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
7 r: K; D7 j' K5 h, |" q    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 X3 u  v& ^& }. R" l. M+ I    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A3 ~# z7 I# L5 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------: F% ^4 W$ B$ o" i+ Q/ U* I$ U: U) B
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
% {3 r5 I6 t; \; u, @    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 A, |7 ]6 O. y; p5 n1 [2 m    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
; i$ Z2 z) t. A+ s" X/ ^    -------------------------------------------------------------) i0 v/ {& \' _  H) r& v8 ~8 k3 ~
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%" O# [: x+ ~9 q4 x& [: o( ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! O2 h1 U8 r/ T' q- z6 E' f, n) F/ e    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%- z# \; _4 m  E$ @) z# m; T& H. V. A* }$ {
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# @, ^- S  ?* _. o7 S    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
3 A  |8 _! f! p1 |' U; h/ h    -------------------------------------------------------------
. Y) j( f, y" ^. R4 l( O. g# ~- f% f: B    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%/ J* z4 Y& w: I
    -------------------------------------------------------------) b- r; M  d$ M
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
8 I# `! e7 ~9 Q; U+ ^$ |3 z    -------------------------------------------------------------3 i" `) t2 a- {+ T- h) k/ }; A
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
. ^8 F3 e4 e6 V9 x/ G5 V    -------------------------------------------------------------9 X  v, o8 Y, K3 X$ x/ s1 i
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%# m/ P( v, N$ i1 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, C2 s, R. ~3 Y4 z  \  I    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
9 A8 [# X+ ^% b. j4 l    -------------------------------------------------------------
. r5 C  l. y0 _0 g/ U! V5 x    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%  t) t# U5 \* e7 O! M2 y; }# D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- n% |- `! \/ g2 V1 _    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%; F; X1 v5 y( L7 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 i) _3 `6 s3 D  l) c; m( L% l2 n( V
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%7 o* d& u* p9 [9 x7 b, k
    -------------------------------------------------------------* ^6 X" F3 z3 A4 Z
    >>
& N) v* f- G& r9 j5 h
% y$ G2 M" Q& f6 \" }1 [5 r: t1 }    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
6 s6 m" B. M( Min the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint/ v: U  e4 D" y* P; A
John and Victoria.' v) V. L. ~" s3 I1 t# _9 h- k

; ]; r) A: [, K, q/ z    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most9 S) L8 I. h$ _, {1 p7 N
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
3 a, M' i1 T$ b+ h5 Ahousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
$ v" W. ?6 p4 m% ^references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price3 ?: |% j8 g! o; Q* b+ ?  R- W
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
) o, ^. N. l- X9 W8 z6 E9 `" s: c+ uacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
9 Y% h% R; `+ D) l/ vavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
+ d% O4 }) ~  B) ^figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable: t; Z3 {& d1 |+ U- U
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ K9 h1 M2 j# s# G; G7 F, `5 ENovember 15, 2006.
7 w$ ?$ v- M: |  l    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of2 c, G$ j+ Q* M5 h  V
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
8 m3 V( Z$ Z* }( H/ f, vprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
+ K0 S6 ?- k8 D6 R  P  Mavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-12 08:50 , Processed in 0.123516 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表