 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( Q7 u7 w! o3 L5 L: k. f! @/ o0 r6 ]
4 M6 J* H, g0 `& T/ `7 I# ]
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
. V5 D }" e, N; f+ p% }
/ ~7 s# d! S4 q) I0 s3 z4 K1 A3 b0 ] TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
0 t) v% \ L0 W2 {exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
% x; \# q( Z% n- Nquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
4 q- m+ v7 Y. T g+ e7 hin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
: d; u) N) L! T* H: C" ?price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
}7 Q2 T0 _5 A( M0 q; `+ v; Rmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 @; @ d1 k" ]2 k" {Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
8 G( Z |) d3 Y* J1 T! |, PLePage Real Estate Services.9 L; Z% x K6 m; H$ Y
2 F! I! i; _2 s) {
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
& ~% i, h1 N/ d# Y9 E; v8 vare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic; e4 ?' A6 ^( K, k
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and- q. H1 I( f# v- |' |
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
6 `; g: U% _$ y: U e: x3 f: cresidential real estate sector.
8 _& |2 v/ e. a) l% w* p) j
* G: ?! N+ b* g Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
9 }* V$ @% j) o% soccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)3 u% x- ~* ^; }
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
/ k# @2 H& u4 r( Z9 ~1 o(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380- H, l. _7 i. a
(+13.2%).$ w- F) F9 j. `* T! ?
2 w+ ?9 @/ [/ k _; x
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
, S ^6 M6 m9 o# w4 `during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
% v. t1 M! t% s5 t1 Ffrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
2 s' Q0 d$ w8 u u8 G6 X) U- Ppoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,: h1 Z# D# s7 [9 c
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 L' H* Z: K$ ~. X
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We) W6 C# U+ x' ]0 e* F
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy9 n" K" E8 U! w( w% q6 l1 j, j# P
balanced market."
\ I" ^; o4 h# T
, k' n: U" T7 b# p Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,7 _5 X( G/ `) A$ h8 s
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
0 ~7 ]6 V- M* w9 j& [/ tto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued# G4 x% Y; t1 \4 i' H( W
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core* x0 Q" o* ~, E( E* Q5 v0 ~/ G9 L
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,7 q8 @% p0 @7 h( Q6 _( w# e; j" I
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record$ x8 b0 p( ~8 _/ b' b8 Y- v
breaking price appreciations.
7 H! O6 x/ `5 L6 q0 _ u
5 b5 |4 J, Z* U2 _. x4 B. g/ q3 W6 M Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding: h+ d( Y' X* f; Y4 |9 @, O
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the( n' D0 Z- L: B; `' R
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.. {" N/ H" e. m+ t! Z
' k& q y# }# ?3 V7 P9 @
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
) w( y0 |7 |& R Deconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: a# F3 A5 I. f% P7 b
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
, Y( e1 \) ]% a; W9 `3 `0 Q1 islightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
% @' y% y' Z! S9 lIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers8 O: J) B7 \4 k5 v; K7 [ H
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of; m( l- C5 c& z' v
price appreciation when compared with 2005.+ t, A) c8 w. o
+ o0 h! `( o* {5 e& i) A0 I While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing: D) S4 D+ l& E2 M6 r
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and( C- n6 B( e1 c n: k% B, P) n
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada2 p( q; \4 A2 X) \5 `8 F6 m- H5 L( F
are markedly different than those found in the United States." n, K$ T& x5 K. S! W" G
/ }3 U! W$ ^7 H' n! x6 V+ g8 Q+ A z Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
2 p v' A! O& n! q" j! z, UAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
# j& {# L1 L H) I; w/ O7 M8 ifavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the! p# M. E1 O2 J; |2 Y# n/ ]4 j
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, q- V7 e( B+ s1 yaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
8 M. V" t" d2 U1 Rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
% @( f' F! n2 R. T' jaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization# e, W: w0 f$ V8 @
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."5 |1 B1 i# F& l* y2 l+ n
" [0 @0 F1 \% `& H# v$ L5 N <<
% z, ~4 m& `6 K( R. Z REGIONAL SUMMARIES0 o$ A% T( ?# \7 E: v
>>
5 z, a4 m7 I% w) w: D I7 ]: d' p' J4 Y# K, T+ M2 e, `
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in5 X2 ?2 e, \/ H# u+ r
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
t3 x. ]; p: ?of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time8 Q5 `/ J9 o5 J+ Z2 w
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
# e& l5 F- D7 P% N2 Hrenovations.+ a2 o; C8 a* R2 x1 r
( z6 ? ?0 _* a9 Y: w/ E
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight B! i" C0 a/ I1 N% y* O8 _
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation+ }' K8 R) D0 C+ `' }+ T! l
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
+ b- ^* S+ j8 A9 H+ H# C8 k4 X4 dSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.. g* ^0 Z+ v h
! E$ z( d: k. W* K6 t4 g The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
; _$ T# g0 n. Q1 R- t }slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the+ S" ~& _9 t8 F( j" R) W6 W
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
4 C8 V6 D8 T0 q9 u' {600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores# P! \1 _2 `1 Z# W
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 e0 |6 i+ m" Rand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
9 M" n4 I6 C2 I, d9 ~7 A( d' @, u5 ?. O
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced) O" G& v! X) n( R8 _7 Q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their1 i6 Z9 p, A, ]
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers( t: x/ r8 N6 L4 T, S* X; i
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
1 [% Y: [" u' }dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing" N6 V' M# L& a. x1 w7 V
buyers with more options when looking for a home.: }0 F7 e! T) |+ |% V8 \" g
+ [. D* ~1 f6 Y* z
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
6 g* M S1 E/ y1 p5 w5 l0 G& z$ Uamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( r7 P3 n3 @6 {' m8 Vpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
h. E, B, M/ E$ y9 v' Bas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last1 I) h+ ]) Z. ~& x
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
, I$ E. U' i0 }6 D/ i5 q/ q h/ a4 M7 v9 A0 j
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
/ v' Z) @* O3 W# {, P$ s* Gprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory0 ~9 |& ^+ H+ e6 H. @
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting, b9 G3 z# j3 L' V6 p
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,1 w. d, a' b( n2 `: `! H) W0 d" E
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the) u% L+ ?+ B% K, t p) j3 E
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
; z2 v' H) p/ o: v( F& B' ^making a purchase.% p; R0 {1 {2 |$ y4 L/ Z
5 L7 s! i7 n- m5 e# K: ^
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
$ A, h* l, p3 \" }# T. ^& e( [0 lmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
4 m! c5 e% [ Qconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
q1 {: o) G9 Mcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
7 I+ y9 {+ l# v; d e* z* A8 @ fattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
* I# t( C: m. ^3 S& lamenities.! N5 Z+ _0 [; `
, c2 x- `1 |8 p* U& d, L. E
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
) d. U! M( `& s+ D1 q7 l1 Qthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand& N/ \$ G; `9 u; T% t. B1 r
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has8 z7 Z# x `, d7 k. W$ a5 Q
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been2 j2 d9 n7 Z5 A- B# t
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle6 o7 e, |. k: l1 Y; m. O: r- b: s
residence, rather than for investment.
* b4 M# C2 x8 \
9 g7 i% Z& A6 H, z) u& h2 y8 `% n The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as5 G# h! ?2 V i* t- W0 a9 {- u1 Z
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
3 a% c' K& i5 d& T1 e' `. j2 gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
8 s. h, z' j$ b5 Q, a7 b. }" J' tconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization% g; _6 Z7 O4 V2 ~3 A
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter9 V* c: C( q% D. }# B. l
the market.* H& \: ?. Q/ [. X
5 \3 t" J* z/ F6 C In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through, `; f) {8 X& H, D0 I
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
' Z* f# A+ S1 p0 @- z/ wAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
( r9 Y; \6 X* S% J. Fmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
& l, h, O1 R/ [" Ato the shortage of available inventory.
$ K# m+ V6 E2 P+ ^4 X- H
! [ ]0 v" G. O. e5 Z% F2 D: a Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its: Q, K% D o) i# g8 u
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains) e1 [" a' ?7 l9 y. `3 N
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses4 b$ Z3 I) s) F
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
6 d3 c; S/ p+ ^$ D7 f1 Q1 M3 s2 j- U u9 c/ w7 _1 O3 z8 e4 v
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" @4 C/ w6 m# {- T& v! I3 P1 [in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
' w/ v# D# P5 Yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that2 q- Q7 A- v/ l+ H
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- ] D4 k: x4 v# qprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
8 C) b. S" {* useason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
( M5 Z/ U( d% n9 U* ]' ibuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
/ ?/ o" C2 v: K% D4 e
* y) [! A; y2 b Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter S9 I r9 A# E7 {. F6 V
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
6 w9 |7 O: c% ^7 }9 D1 ~, m6 Aremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,% R+ d8 j8 B( a3 C4 x6 x
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices4 f+ d9 }+ X5 i! t
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
0 `6 k- m2 F- X8 Bin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 W9 e! a9 s4 ~towards the end of 2006.
& i2 p8 x( [; a, c4 b. L8 J; v( S8 e- p& N! Y" x* T$ x
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
9 l) T- x' d' Y' `3 i6 z1 W8 H9 Iinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable6 o0 w% k# w1 J4 C& m# Y' U" Z
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ f! j2 K5 ^+ fgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
; u% b; {4 P. k, P# d+ Q% pforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added7 Q( e. e+ t& `* B+ h
pressure on tight inventory levels.2 T$ Q: M0 X/ J; y1 M6 Y7 M, g, \
, o/ ~7 E0 l* M' I/ C# f' H2 L
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ O0 Z& v1 C1 Z( k0 r
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
& j! d+ ^ m. a( C9 C. _% Winto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;5 e o# m- ^* m5 Y+ {
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching3 I" C$ M5 z6 h' ~" T" W; V+ {
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
* z2 I. R. J4 }- @2 }! |% B1 l
! q2 h1 E5 ]/ S, `8 o- S$ u <<$ L! r, t; B# G( J) I
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
8 u5 d7 u; q9 _% K, _0 X$ S, ?. l2 ]! u0 i% I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ O- ]4 c$ _ D) R3 a5 L2 y' F Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
7 d( w+ O! a$ \& K1 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 _0 J8 F, ? ?3 @0 ~$ }6 g
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3, I4 @& ^/ k9 O7 o! k
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
; Y3 Q; l: ^! B$ I0 f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 K; z9 d& F! e+ l9 d# \ Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
, ? g! K9 \ v4 _) p2 _" V5 Y# g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: k4 O/ I" Z$ y; a( h) |; a Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
x# p' t* t2 b9 H. | ?) ^$ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( I; O3 ?1 I; j- w+ ~* [" w Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
: X6 J8 t& K& R0 {& U/ L% Z0 x -------------------------------------------------------------------------. q1 k% Q" ~! C0 S" `: C6 T
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -8 J9 U: T$ W# m4 ]1 K2 Q0 R5 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 H. c) |) P# g. _
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
% V3 B& y' z# d+ _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, k4 d, n; i) P- x% K; Z4 @ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
* |5 u# B6 i( W/ z* z0 f0 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 A: L, m, S' m
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185, \4 A9 h% i% l7 U2 |' q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ H5 ^. K7 _2 F Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
7 O% y0 B* Q. c5 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# w2 j# t& j- l; N6 C3 Z Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
( b9 K% ^& ~2 g3 T) F% [. k -------------------------------------------------------------------------) R, u* [; f' p8 c
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7077 i d; p6 Z; d1 }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 X; i/ K$ L6 n6 ^, n
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
2 ?' j2 v0 A; N/ h" [$ D. C3 p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ B: v1 h# ?; l& [ b$ m& b Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
9 c, z/ m \/ X -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# `/ Z: ]$ {+ ^; j Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714( K! a+ {9 W, d( {0 @4 @3 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, h8 T$ @- o2 v% F7 i. O Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
( Y% `" p' R, K z8 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 k- q* l# s+ m7 R, V8 g2 l Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
/ h" K2 L1 j/ h' k H+ Z: ~- Y4 u& l -------------------------------------------------------------------------! J& a0 v6 u; p3 b- N& W
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8600 X# b4 ]: N1 l% q; X" b0 J2 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& `3 G5 q' ?, o9 [& X* k
! t7 C* K. b; i; ^ ------------------------------------------------------------- ^3 A9 g3 }; q$ X
Standard Condominium
1 M2 @ T6 J3 f' ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
+ L) W) \: v9 A# v: ?, S! I 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
6 G$ X9 P* b4 Z( A1 q Market % Change Average Average % Change
( _ l/ \& S$ ]3 d8 J6 e -------------------------------------------------------------& y% ^9 p8 a7 i+ _* p7 ~5 X: m( a; e; C
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%7 c' C9 r ^# `; r
-------------------------------------------------------------7 {; K/ j# \: P
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
9 ^% T% I) {, p3 M s/ i3 @ -------------------------------------------------------------
' Y& C7 d& Y2 L6 x Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
5 A. J3 I6 H) C7 x9 x$ y -------------------------------------------------------------
' n. H5 R% m( I% U Saint John N/A - - N/A8 ^9 L" t: @. [3 c
-------------------------------------------------------------0 o' \8 {* n, C; d$ O7 `
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%8 Y1 D. x. }/ \3 o& ~& F: J, a
-------------------------------------------------------------/ G' z$ Z7 W# \8 H0 J1 a
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%3 |7 ]* L/ H& u9 Q: Q) Y( d
-------------------------------------------------------------6 l' [$ a, e# ^9 c; f+ _6 g' o
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
2 D2 B- _; ]1 t4 x) [2 U3 Y: N -------------------------------------------------------------
1 N: D& f% ~4 T0 k( D, v Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
/ I) |* O" O8 O) F ------------------------------------------------------------- T$ V6 q/ f, d ?% N
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
+ p; o% z) \* }5 o9 b -------------------------------------------------------------! H5 u6 n) m0 V
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
# \; @% @: _% l' v3 L( n# O+ K -------------------------------------------------------------, K/ v0 s, o/ N9 H$ }) Y# `& Q
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%- G |$ q T; @. h' A) Z; T/ s
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 U d; L2 j3 n7 r& K Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%! i2 K$ W( z4 G
-------------------------------------------------------------
( n8 T4 [) x B' A! L6 Z" r2 d" k Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
1 K2 k0 F+ T0 G- b -------------------------------------------------------------
; f+ ^/ z8 G* K1 s; z+ ] Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
6 F, E# ~! s. @4 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------9 p1 I8 S1 z5 g0 z
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
9 n+ ~" o. w, v; k5 C/ r7 E1 } -------------------------------------------------------------
i9 n1 C3 ?; r National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
* _) a- V" S2 \% O# S! _* j w -------------------------------------------------------------
" [. I% B1 h1 z6 w >>0 W3 X0 p! I a" i9 R
! N# ^2 Z4 p% [+ }0 h: G1 N8 q Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined9 g* L0 ~' } z0 R; h
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint6 [8 Z; e. \1 I4 F2 d
John and Victoria.
^7 s( U, g2 Z0 x
$ R9 O$ @- N: o) R% F* f The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
% a; Z+ C! n2 J9 ycomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
" Q, D+ T5 D6 p6 H4 V4 |/ n: Vhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release+ _3 g: {$ D) K9 Y0 i. P
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
1 w+ ~/ I* x: ytrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
9 T. e$ F3 n. l! tacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
7 e9 \" i: P' Z: x. f. X _" D* B1 a- _available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
& F+ S- J$ E, }" ?3 e% |1 F' }figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable' C' q! v: a: ~
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on5 O$ e3 q' ^) @- S w5 n \
November 15, 2006.
4 l9 E+ t; I/ ]! N- ]. U# G' Z Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of* l5 C. E5 m P9 P) w
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge# D, y4 g7 `" Z6 e$ x1 u; i
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
- P$ _- [- G5 `7 T; Cavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|