埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2160|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
" p- A# z) r# H+ B7 s* ]0 K) q2 O" N3 p9 `
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
+ K; Z2 `% Y- ]3 E0 J5 J# t- ?9 F, Z$ }7 K  `' H
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
  ^1 \. V$ b) R! w& cexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
$ f% k% D. t6 S' Kquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic( M* A8 T, I3 ^5 |% G4 y
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit, u  g8 o2 [% L4 k: L; H) _
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and& r; k  L" n5 B4 t
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
4 o. X4 N3 ~, v; m5 CQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal  A. @- \4 b( W9 ?
LePage Real Estate Services.
" z7 G3 Z) `3 u' t5 A. K% y: `' ?& T& R) n* I0 d; x- r; i  g
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
4 \; d! e0 F* i  D( pare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic! a7 q6 ^/ ?% I* p: \  J
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
" G3 K" j! X6 {sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
9 S% c  d9 a( rresidential real estate sector.
2 }0 F5 g6 G* z7 ~' f
+ {; T3 P  r& F& V    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
, _5 p) ~7 q- k* w! O# B0 Toccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)+ G* e- X- @  E( _; y* W7 i
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5621 C; d. i* [7 w8 |6 U
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
/ t  [8 A) v7 y( f9 z- {(+13.2%).
4 u0 B) b. ?* {
. p; \; M- e, p- A    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
- }, Z8 }; K! O! Gduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the0 E4 e8 e1 n; }, z' \5 X
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are5 A) l( k$ b! l6 M$ ~3 [' @
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,1 _2 U+ ^2 ~3 A" C) N# m
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.. u+ p" c  e' m4 V5 h+ H
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We) U' N: Y; [# ~- L
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy' L/ G! }1 d. r) k
balanced market.") a; j$ O1 g/ S  @
7 y# G# G$ A8 V7 l: ?2 x  l
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,! D2 z$ P. P  x$ h
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
7 ~5 W( t) B" \# _. C, {to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
; l  j8 a5 u$ N) H* qthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
# [. \! F& {( y2 j, ?' |6 _- C/ i1 venergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
: J* ]  J' w- K& F7 Jmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record1 D3 C4 N, @# h) c. y) P. j; U
breaking price appreciations.
4 L0 u. i+ p% t% B
6 W" G# F: G  h' h, S* t1 R' }    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding' t! ^9 ^) P) P& I) z% y+ }
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the/ O; e, A3 G3 i9 `( R- }* p$ s
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.+ M, e; B1 |3 ^% T+ P

/ |# G, N' a* N* N  b* R! C' D! u1 A    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid5 {/ X3 r. ?' E
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer0 p# V6 \& _2 p' d0 Z2 G
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off1 O- I# R( g6 k. c0 Q6 U
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.2 W% C" \6 k# `  C4 Q. Y) `
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers7 D( d. Z  D. _
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of& s0 o# w/ e9 x/ B7 h; W' O
price appreciation when compared with 2005.' P5 S6 e  `/ T3 l, y( a6 u7 k5 w
" e1 u# x# K# F+ ]1 Q
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
+ h( y% X- i8 R5 l+ V2 y/ n: M; ymarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and* n* O' n2 l/ Y' m% K
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada7 x$ s) g5 k+ Q
are markedly different than those found in the United States.# O6 _" t9 j* R* u

0 S1 E9 C) Z1 L, A. y1 U    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the( S) [+ r. f& J; v* j
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's- }, S1 `. `8 q/ V$ j( ]7 o
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the! y! L& a. z+ k+ F. o) ^3 H/ ~& P
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
8 u9 N& [; K) Q2 I2 daffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
+ ]4 s* t2 H& m" C* |/ Xdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
9 d$ p+ Z( e' n0 W& Daggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
/ j7 e8 s+ U' lmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."- C" R( J6 m* h  N( U
  N& K+ E* h+ Q6 A: T# Y$ Y  B. H+ ^
    <<
! Z* t, A7 a1 X6 Q/ N" y: ]                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES1 V! N" \- w9 ^: |5 w- R
    >>* f/ j9 O" s* y* x7 r9 u4 a
3 G1 D# q# ?9 E; z; |3 w
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in; H) O1 s5 h/ H3 G6 S$ Z8 _
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
& e, a! w9 Y6 q5 aof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time8 A' m$ N% i( [) B# ^
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of" K1 d' o5 B  ~! v9 Y' z7 z1 ~
renovations.2 ~, i: U1 K1 T5 L/ M
4 i" y& b: l% e$ d
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight# U/ y. `% F" i+ w2 \; R
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- E  O  d$ F# S3 A9 d% d
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
$ k$ q, r: k9 u0 S% N: DSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
0 P8 t- E1 S2 \3 z" u2 T6 \$ k" X( M% ~
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer' X) {6 k" o2 o0 K! \7 r* A1 X
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
; j" w1 ~$ e& D* x9 A3 Zquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new, Y' I8 i5 P. C; w
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores* E, r* P( o* ]' E  g6 U( q
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
7 p4 K* [' F! v/ Sand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
/ ?( |& p5 ?' D) w2 h. L& \% @! V/ b5 {" C4 O
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced+ V) f  r3 O3 A2 s
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
9 d/ U1 a2 u4 H3 X* h) O& Ahomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
( t# y+ S$ W3 W* v7 D3 w2 |was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian. \+ u" W6 W, F, q) K0 a1 q2 m
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing, x# x4 |$ D+ w' h
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
- e  {. q2 s! D% M
1 b: w8 z% {. P% L$ f    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly) B2 U* Q8 E2 U
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
' Y; q1 F) u, f. E% opriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,4 o, |6 z; W% ^# _- Q! t0 [
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last; R/ y1 d, [  `* W- B; k, f, ?
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.9 K- Q  l) U  ~. a# X7 a3 y" P; c, m

, C# w  d- u5 P! R6 A" d6 H    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house6 x! B; u/ z; x- S  c* v
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
' j  f, s3 ~0 g9 l5 r: blevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ n) C' w2 X& \) \: Tfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,: W( F0 q3 A0 ~) J0 f
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
" B. [: X& o( `pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
- E/ s! q( G4 W) L/ C* @! D3 v0 Zmaking a purchase.
7 D2 g  K: B5 r1 f# b& ]' U4 K1 M4 K
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
2 j' ?8 c/ C- _1 h2 u1 hmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
" P- B/ a4 R3 w9 f6 A8 L% W) xconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, c5 p7 O/ L: M3 u' i/ d
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting6 S7 l( m/ e& \1 }1 P- K0 J
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! z3 j7 O7 I; C7 j! n  t6 o5 o
amenities.
, l) e* [6 G' q# ~& M2 V: P2 h
! |5 K! R2 c6 q, T9 K1 B& Q    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
# `% R$ }1 b9 a$ `throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand( Y5 W# }: O- }+ u/ O2 f+ c& a
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
5 G& _1 q, z" I) L% k$ Fcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been- s$ O' ]8 K. \8 _! o9 N/ t' P8 D
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle# s6 r5 [" J0 E  e: o
residence, rather than for investment.0 o  h2 \) L' D3 \0 p

2 d! R0 w9 a# ?2 `9 }  Z# z- h    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
# M  n; l7 Z, i4 A9 E9 k. d# Y/ Rhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted$ c; d+ z- B" a' g; [4 z: D, b' i
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer. f; {6 ^# [& _, [
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
  k3 G8 F6 j  j& \+ s! b6 k' o3 Grate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter5 d# X) n8 W/ i# Z
the market.7 i2 u, C, ]! L0 b

& t( ]; o  m, R    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through) Z/ y" Z% l& y3 u. F
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
1 H% q2 h" Y) k. c5 S/ m2 k* ]1 p6 tAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring! E* b  S$ V  i1 S
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due0 M2 d" s2 n6 q
to the shortage of available inventory.
* F1 W, Z: u/ J. q9 n- G! I; B9 U
  \+ K' ~; @4 H+ |- E; Q    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
: R$ q+ _# p$ r7 j  ^3 k  u  qmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains6 e( K7 C: X' F  n* _) L
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
, @8 W8 e2 J" E. K) Astruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
6 o+ \% \9 f, M, S+ n8 t7 Y" f& s# ^. x
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% \4 w3 ^0 X+ ?0 Q' `+ }: R5 Y' g9 m
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low( _7 a  f3 K/ k" W
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! j  y0 i, ]% A8 L' s5 k
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring, o$ x# [" H9 g3 f2 u
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
& F1 `: f& d# s3 b" ~' |# Kseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
4 M' Y8 d& v5 ?" l$ Pbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

7 G+ G$ Y9 L1 K: D3 m9 Y9 }
7 W- W3 L9 i! l' p* x# y: B    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
* J* E( i: o* uas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton8 d' J$ `  G% x+ Q
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
. n2 H1 _* n; K( n1 Fmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
  i% b7 Y' h  \1 I' P+ rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
  h, u9 \$ D$ Q, l9 sin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
$ o4 \5 k0 a8 [# wtowards the end of 2006.
    , W9 m) j1 d9 K. [$ g6 {% Y) Q$ R

# o: v5 c2 k8 ~; {- p# p+ ^While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) A2 n; |2 Q. c1 d  e* f9 ^0 Q
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable. z- S" X: T/ H" @* i& h
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse8 X" Z1 T# s4 E/ t/ z) |
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to$ M+ Z( c3 [6 \0 w( K
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added. x4 z  }! h* N" G  E
pressure on tight inventory levels.
8 s! I6 o7 L( d. c7 i5 H
( L1 _5 o/ x# w) ^8 C6 N: K    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
5 r" O% e; |. Cfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people! d' N; K( {4 {" s
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
% f7 H  X" K2 T3 O8 J4 M' pwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 u6 o$ G2 L% E" c2 Gfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 H! r# }5 J* v0 @+ ^
- S7 _; C7 i  @    <<8 G( ?! M# b0 [# o+ B
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
) f! ~1 Z$ O, j7 m* i/ N: K4 M% [* Y3 k. ?3 \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ x& u4 s& U6 m- o/ D8 H# T                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey8 f1 [1 r) H$ r8 x8 {; t9 E% N; E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' G# r) q( v6 t7 {# P                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
; R1 W" h; }; z1 D* p- Z    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
# F: i% d7 P9 n! Q: o! N    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Z5 i4 t; r2 O# j5 m& p4 R    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
4 @, Z8 \: {! @" U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; o4 v; }# m' D+ {. n! k1 v$ H! \
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0004 h2 o! Y( u3 |! [0 |! R6 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. ^) F1 @; K9 J! x" I0 r    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000. J- @  @: @' c" d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 c* O' c/ B% |) F2 M( m
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -" G0 j8 A& @' \: |: _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  c+ \0 G8 n. w& Z
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333! C/ i# p( ?" S, d+ ?% B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& X8 z8 c: H/ f$ H$ u: b    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
" _- ^' G# `4 E5 D0 m& D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ?2 i) n1 a# _1 q& z
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
8 ]- B0 q( R- `4 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' J9 J* c, x+ H. Z. c
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
5 B  }$ E* |8 v# I8 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 O# _: s! s- J2 r# ^8 K& ^# U
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7661 ~" e4 Y) x; W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ~" h5 }# H' k1 j5 r' h( F
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7072 P+ x1 ~; Y' q2 S$ C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  p& }- I3 W& a) @! T    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500* @& F3 e* u# m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ f; q+ Q% l9 Z: ^2 {
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
' p( E- T1 v( L5 f0 k' M3 K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 w3 j% _' S* T( D" J
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
' c; q0 Q2 |, W, s+ E2 t2 X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 U3 W& a/ t  K/ @$ P: p    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5003 n6 f' B; T1 @, {' L* @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' k0 j- W! C+ @# c  i
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000. C5 R) L! L0 b" h+ }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 W5 I  k1 n0 l8 F1 {- e3 u9 Z, z
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
7 j- j9 ?' `7 `; ?9 E" ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* m& n6 @9 D" \. t6 G" r6 c! k! A$ S8 f( _: X5 y  s% _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 G( F' r2 X8 w1 v8 L; B! _                               Standard Condominium
! u) K* `9 Z9 P# \    -------------------------------------------------------------
" z( m- F" y& `+ ?( W$ l                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo" |: O! @& F: X2 ?
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change7 r$ U" n7 i+ |
    -------------------------------------------------------------( H+ {8 @  L( j! ]2 r
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%9 o5 r% j. B' Z& S9 {+ I* A
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 T% A, [$ k# U" W7 ~
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%; l9 w4 U  P( l$ e
    -------------------------------------------------------------- \& @) H/ _9 F
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A; W( V+ k: M" \
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 P' d$ p" x# u7 j; W0 U+ a    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
3 r+ G6 ^* S! k) ?; F2 ?  I    -------------------------------------------------------------
& b' Q4 ]! L4 B* C  S/ i    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
7 h. B- U, ]  I+ J    -------------------------------------------------------------1 I" Y- Z6 D/ A; X" d
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%% C" |: t% J( R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! C) N" D0 W( ^0 g# }2 E; G    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%  s4 j1 `3 `! u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; H; y- j/ u& ^+ C" w    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%3 ^, p7 }- J: Q' Z8 Q1 T5 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------" _8 ?5 S( w* V% ?7 c
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
* {: `: G0 ?8 I" Q" p    -------------------------------------------------------------
, c7 R2 x4 g3 s    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
. d! W7 X* P% J1 U    -------------------------------------------------------------" y9 Q  l6 o. s. S
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
- h  u6 }: ^( i    -------------------------------------------------------------% f$ f2 E5 J+ Z/ l2 E
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%; D2 P4 l, r0 @9 M6 y; J$ e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' v0 K) H. {: z2 W    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
2 w; l1 d% [* M- y3 o! P    -------------------------------------------------------------% f$ f) W& G2 G% j
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
, D) c$ Q( m1 K' C    -------------------------------------------------------------$ P& ~  S( Q, Z7 Q
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
! X# w/ H! {* V$ G& l    -------------------------------------------------------------8 @" T. g0 W  z/ \/ K
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
' r2 }  P: s, `3 m: k    -------------------------------------------------------------
& C; M& P" e8 |. R' C; M    >>
* C) G" e& n% c4 Q, q# p# m- h; J
$ B9 y! l1 \2 x) E( ^* F; W    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
! S# K1 A$ \9 c( U1 ]+ s) jin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint# I5 b: R; E1 r( b$ g$ n" j. r
John and Victoria.# |# ^3 B- L/ C, G2 B9 H

5 O- y" E3 V' g5 k. v7 I- ]0 |    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
- X: b" \+ P0 }7 N1 m% kcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of" x4 T/ g+ @" i9 Z/ M
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release4 p: R# j) E7 H2 I3 U. H0 e
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price# z: ]+ v+ w" p( c
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
3 d  k- }7 n* E! a  O" Jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
3 d7 L, f: d2 b3 T" G& L+ ~available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current' Z2 {2 T3 L) }- O: H7 _# }
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
6 V  P2 y  r3 fversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ s/ [/ r  ?( `0 z1 e- X7 F: B' v8 F& oNovember 15, 2006.
$ ?3 j9 ]6 w" |: |" w) a& E5 u7 @    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of5 k& |& K0 h; f
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge4 d: M# D1 ^: ^0 y! ]/ ]
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
, \$ r% s( f4 O+ J, l+ O3 D! Havailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-12 11:08 , Processed in 0.138111 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表