埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2571|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - _. I2 {& k) M4 _
, m) v& @) z/ w( D
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -3 v( z1 \" v. B& Y7 m) q
( A9 Q+ P% C; I) M7 _
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market+ M: ?5 D( I( e( ^! q( Z
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third2 e5 l% x) M/ m% O$ u! W% c
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
2 A5 `7 V  m% l4 w4 y; G, zin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- ?3 x4 V4 N1 T( y% a' q
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and+ H; N& v0 @# d. I
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,3 n" M, C+ U* _1 V
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
! h: J+ `+ U9 DLePage Real Estate Services.
: w8 F& V% t, ]# o, }  h- X; @
% r8 @6 }0 i2 J) R4 {    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
7 v0 K$ o3 q' L# }( u/ x& jare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
( w1 L1 R% I0 [/ K) Uconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and- u3 X+ J( ~7 m
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the$ J9 T6 L$ z7 @" I/ N9 ]7 h
residential real estate sector.) Z0 q8 g4 y; G( ^6 g: ^" |  W6 o

& i6 v$ l0 }9 B6 S, C- ~    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
. B$ ]% b% f, i8 O4 boccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%). m4 Y4 \" F7 W& ^- x- K% @8 |
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562/ F. E9 }7 x' {% J# J/ H
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
" x2 W, `; f8 C* a6 q- m(+13.2%).! Y" Q+ j$ {# U* s

0 w6 v# n5 {) y( r1 L    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
" u# X1 c9 W+ v5 |( H; N3 n4 j" ~3 dduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the8 M/ _0 v7 m% N: D$ f
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are% S9 V6 p" i: @
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
0 k' w, Y% g3 m. j! v1 Y1 ^president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.% ?! e$ y% u. e( G% t
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We9 s% ?7 s: U" R+ u( c! A
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
* w$ @4 p2 D) V4 ?$ obalanced market."
. o$ O) m6 c. k/ j, G) |9 o, J+ _4 m0 A0 D. p
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
. q& g5 g  V, t) N9 ?! j8 `- fconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift1 d% g5 M4 a. q2 G
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued6 `, f7 O! \/ r
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core# Y  M% T: o7 c
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
, W+ N. x! C7 ]( \5 q! Ymanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: f0 C+ y& S) E1 V  x) Q$ S7 a
breaking price appreciations.. i$ M- H  f: D+ @% N* G$ G# L: d, X
3 k, `6 q0 A* t8 o' n# r" a
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding) S7 G6 o! l) ^; T
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the; O9 }/ h! P0 K7 H8 }
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.* c( V2 P! U, P  S, u
  z) q6 C1 F% X2 |: M5 M
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
, N! x7 y9 s5 M; D) s# p$ V# [economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
5 r* X8 k; e" b% M0 P& M, A7 D$ Qconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off7 H6 J6 b5 y8 {9 b% T6 [
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
; S5 h! p% U# lIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers, C# u, k8 R5 r* i! k2 S
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of6 u: f+ p) R& `
price appreciation when compared with 2005.* r4 J( Z- C) i. l. m8 `/ W3 f

9 c3 d7 J, s9 z& b    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
: S, C8 I3 x0 b+ g$ r- n' z5 S/ fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and7 {6 o2 g2 T) U* I. A
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada/ ~9 t% k( r+ V  A7 m' Q3 B+ K- H4 v
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
& A4 {8 g7 H! B. B) B: r. D8 Z/ r1 G, \* X2 E$ j
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the6 K( c3 D% M3 k: a1 r; D
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
  F8 X" m% t8 F0 g5 o  h. N& Bfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
9 V; `4 u& q+ V7 t( `- Yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
$ y5 L! v8 h; M# Q/ W1 Jaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the3 W2 S; \: j7 _9 Q  @
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and; B2 q# \$ C8 ?! O
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
6 X' p. i, e6 F, a: Lmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
" `6 r  q: G  X2 V2 a+ \
2 ?4 h8 ]: D( Q) L9 A2 h  F. n  x0 A    <<* `0 e2 Y- a) W* k! `1 x) |6 L0 r
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES( B( \, E5 f3 A( o8 L; J2 F
    >>
7 L+ G8 f: o! z/ p$ R- s
' s3 }) O8 |( W* v% ^    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in: O% o1 A+ f2 E% {
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate8 [! L  y( f8 G5 ]8 x8 T
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time* g0 b) _% V4 _, ~7 ]  c. O% c
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
4 h: W$ k3 y- i* c& u! F, trenovations.
, a# v* [  o- J
- T9 a+ X- U2 s) J% J    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
: A2 _7 {5 A! P( W! tincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
! c7 w$ v8 z* |/ q; Scompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
  X( Y  }" f# |$ BSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.: z) \% n1 G2 M; s
% O6 J" [7 T: b5 L7 x9 Y4 @# {+ A
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
# ^+ v0 Q% b% h1 P: w+ j& p2 islowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 X2 W6 {' A- l9 M
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
% L! |  V- i$ [600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores9 R2 T+ h% ]' O# v% N3 e" e
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes0 S4 L8 O: Q- c) n
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
4 G( n) P$ L. ]5 V5 C$ V# r7 Z1 x" _$ H3 s& H
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced: X3 J9 c) F( s
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their' w; s+ |8 }. Q) m. Z  K' i  g' X
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
; [: [% O" o3 r. Z$ C& w0 g0 Rwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
1 v( K) ~1 l- t( q% tdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
8 r+ k- Z$ u. a4 R* m2 v* |+ h; w5 |buyers with more options when looking for a home.
. O2 c  z  U- T6 I  N; E
- }. _. f; |; j    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly4 D7 W5 p7 {8 h
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
/ y+ r8 Z* B6 J0 Npriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
6 G3 L- s/ F7 was some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last+ e! d% v7 v0 }* U" f4 b4 g/ R
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
- l/ I$ X9 f2 \) z4 `: G  @) ~
# |$ M) E% [# h9 P# o; p    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
. H2 H: K" d6 M" d- j4 ]( `0 Cprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
9 I: \& S4 U% K; a3 |  m! W, @levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
5 S  ~7 t: @* g  Pfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,3 a" M. A3 r6 d7 o1 `
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( H1 b. e; z& ~3 h9 A* B1 |
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before- L; T9 Q4 L  q* q8 c
making a purchase.
8 K5 k5 a0 V0 A; z! {- v  s( |
% ]* y1 q$ t5 J    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
4 M4 r/ e; P9 Z3 i# B7 v& G! Q7 Imarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
5 ~: i4 O5 G" W- p6 {% n1 w6 pconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
( T# C" |. }* g1 m+ K& w! D( J5 ^& ucentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting* h2 b0 v& j" e0 V( N
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown0 q( ]0 M5 l7 {+ Q# _* D
amenities.
4 Y& s: @4 j/ s
/ ~+ v+ C2 x# Q3 K6 n    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels$ O2 i4 x- ]2 {' G" E5 a$ j  X2 S
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand8 ~# T8 a8 r9 j1 ^& n3 u
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has5 A- w! d& b6 ^% r, ~" O- z7 e
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been7 Z+ T+ R$ E4 w. }) i0 c, }# h  }
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 H; j, n2 E5 B3 U$ r% u; E6 z) @* J+ B+ qresidence, rather than for investment.
. G- g" B9 m% y/ _* L* l7 X6 J; c( B: H8 ^% N/ n- L7 d
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
4 s: d1 y; v3 M5 mhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted( E9 ?6 ]4 G4 u( F+ \
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' p0 T/ u; V" @" P2 K+ E2 w7 fconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization6 U: O3 }' F( L( H
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter6 j; k, |; S4 }3 e; t
the market.1 o8 `6 w! f9 x! _& u, [

8 N; L" P# K% H+ X2 L    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through. F# W; u* |" [  ?+ C  k, I8 T
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In; U$ A+ _6 i. N$ q0 |& r' Z
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring" f2 Y! I& s! Z9 U) j2 D; r
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due7 g# A8 j) {, g3 g# ^
to the shortage of available inventory.
! H+ R$ c% m! s) v# ?5 X! e; I/ D$ z
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
$ j8 B# r: P1 x3 d! a7 h: Y/ g5 ~momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains3 \& a+ G! d3 b" _2 ~" R7 X: f" d
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses4 |9 ?: F, d3 _# d* |1 c; U- Y- y8 H
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
% C% T9 @7 q) ^  {
' `( c! u. w6 D( `& W3 G+ J    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; c2 T: k' F, ?9 ^% k
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low- e5 T! x2 ^# z9 n$ a
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that5 r$ @0 w& o; Y9 r5 m2 e3 P
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring7 r' \( M! H6 P5 v
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
& s$ w! ~5 \* J; L6 xseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
1 r# ^: p# E9 a" [6 ~buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

% n5 b! W& m( t. A. K. o0 j8 D
9 t  R# ]% _& C% {6 b& u1 }6 ^    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
5 X4 H9 [# q0 ^: U8 U% Mas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
3 \3 q& |3 w) ?/ t7 r5 p: ?remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,0 @: l( o" O2 P+ S4 k! o2 b* q0 I, l
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
3 Y4 y0 i7 T" Q4 Y8 a  B# w+ \increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
, n2 Y7 V, K# l, V) }, Qin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
9 g2 ~; A' ?* N  ~* H9 ctowards the end of 2006.
   
( d2 A; _% w+ M. I( ^9 Q9 @
  ~: w, p- k: N3 G& F) u5 ]While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
  ~5 _$ {" n, @: J& Uinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
: k( ^9 C9 l4 t) Ito meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse0 b) D, K5 |0 l8 j$ q
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
" _, T9 A( Z( E: vforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added, B5 z5 W, ]- i( |
pressure on tight inventory levels.7 Q7 M  Q, y: e; x. N

* o# ^4 I; k5 p3 _: p    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
4 C# l3 K* ~& b% Ffundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people5 A( B( g& ]% U
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
" N! Q0 Y3 w9 E/ s0 `3 K9 Qwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: }+ M  a9 t  o) C5 s! P' D3 yfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.7 h3 h5 w  @* L8 E1 r5 n

) ?* g$ D, }! S! E2 s6 Z; U    <<0 D2 z1 Q! D+ x) l/ U- N( F
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
6 w- P/ b! W9 e7 \$ p1 S: q( u9 ^5 {' o) f$ u# z0 K  K3 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ U) i0 D0 r0 H2 F6 U+ o& D
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey- h- m2 O  l# l- X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 G. H( o+ a" U& j8 a
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
( `1 J( _. |  h: S( l1 F" J    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
/ a, o" ^# v0 ~  z3 J; ^9 y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) h; M5 A. Y2 O* s% Z9 ]
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
6 W; F# f- q8 b( ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! }  U0 t/ I) M5 g9 V
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
, J5 ], ^- C: `& @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 e- ]& }4 m& I& T8 B
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
+ |! X, m9 e/ T2 h8 M# {* R  L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 w7 r& S( [! X, T' P, P+ D; b& A
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
8 B" c( G; C1 y% N% ^# Y( v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 t) ~) {- j4 D* O( R: }
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
* n9 l# u+ B/ x6 N0 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. B; f+ W5 E# J, N, e7 r5 ~    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583% u# H/ f% L. f$ f/ _5 Z1 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ c  z0 s1 i" v" m    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185% a, V5 Q/ f, B& W% Y, o- ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ?  F3 h1 X1 u2 ?6 [/ t. i
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
$ m" T9 e+ V: H/ Z. ~! b" ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 Z$ A6 y' O1 v) S5 W1 J
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766. @! z+ Z8 ?" Y6 Z+ @; G; {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' L2 r$ w2 y: }  _, L) n# \
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
$ y& L( G- o% e% B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! \% [# B; d( j% J    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
1 I: l  g0 a$ B0 [* X# ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' l0 t( q+ U. E1 n# J3 Z    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
& a% E- E/ x# p0 i8 [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# b' r+ U- g# e% u- V) K
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7146 S4 \$ r+ A% g7 K9 l* }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% M) b& h' i4 L
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500; P8 U1 p) d1 I4 M# ^, M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 I% d) B! D" Q5 x! p6 t
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
( [, m4 ]0 Q. F0 |, b9 j0 F1 `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: `3 x& i; O. ?$ Z    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
  O9 L# h2 p( p) |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Z+ Q6 b+ f0 I
' k  ^9 N: f8 [8 [" m    -------------------------------------------------------------. k6 h' \# S8 N- D3 ]3 |) E  B
                               Standard Condominium
% d8 Z8 o7 [. _, v* V7 H    -------------------------------------------------------------* _  D! W3 g/ H0 K; g
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo$ w, i+ X1 Q7 n2 L0 v
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
$ R1 N) s# c+ h3 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------
( D6 S% _& D7 ]  h! Y    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%* ^" [: k$ @( I1 G4 u6 D! b9 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 I2 C& n& @% p, p* ]
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
2 n7 C# d8 ~: }0 n    -------------------------------------------------------------
% r7 H, E& w, ^; d    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A# m2 N& \: q' o- i( o( |
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 F& G/ ^* j9 i! F- V4 I    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A4 I) n, d+ i5 \
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 x+ M* S: h7 F& W
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
9 U" W% \8 i; i9 J! H    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 V; Q4 j5 X; H1 u- |4 W/ O9 W    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
  Z- d0 ?+ d$ o. }" x% _    -------------------------------------------------------------
# L( y# G- `; }, e& S    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
( E9 s# _* k8 W* D# Q' x; R    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 r1 V9 N5 m2 T) i; o/ R: n; `    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%+ V# L+ A4 U) I" \
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ F  C7 K  b5 ~
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%5 ^7 `& a2 y# A* I+ M8 u. U
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& l$ U# m( t9 z9 |    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%/ O/ {9 _/ n+ X7 e) a6 U6 D- R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 l2 a0 ~4 ]7 j2 ]9 k6 R1 ?9 D    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
9 a/ u7 @$ y! Y    -------------------------------------------------------------' p+ J9 M8 D! f- D8 |
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
5 x/ I8 W- \) Y. V6 O  E' s7 D" R    -------------------------------------------------------------5 _3 h/ u& l# z. |- U
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
, f+ n" P5 m. p" y    -------------------------------------------------------------
* T7 }& X: \4 i- e) C    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%' ?! e  E( i0 A5 n  z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 x7 N# x' R+ f) k# S; y    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
" ~/ T* W$ U: S( W/ J* P- }, \& y. m    -------------------------------------------------------------
- {) T* ?: m1 b    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%' r) G- f8 ]5 z. Z: K* Q  b: M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  @2 R) I) I8 _1 Y; w% a7 u4 N) R    >>( N5 h! ^* s* b
" `# S2 o; j* u
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined& o. V) Q8 G" {. s/ {$ p: r
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
! d- N9 H3 g+ Q) C& O# ?John and Victoria.7 S6 F3 _9 S; {. [) H* e  j
+ h% Z9 w% t3 @$ _% x' e& ^
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
8 m8 b& [# R$ O0 a3 mcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of4 S2 o5 L, P6 Q4 {7 M$ m9 J
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release4 [& g5 v$ R& b# L# ^6 F
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
; I; r8 U/ U  g( I: Btrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities, t5 m7 V! d" m4 X
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
; X4 e  h; d6 n4 Q) a- g+ g8 W+ Vavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current3 u2 e; ]8 z/ G2 ?5 V
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable' e* z- z4 F) `
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
6 K5 K' |; \: k' x& NNovember 15, 2006.5 {: g* o) H1 Z8 c$ O( p
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of0 [+ Z+ n# T, A# D. i
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
8 f7 Y: L- b4 Tprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
- a  m, ~6 P  ]. [/ d! C" ravailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-18 16:44 , Processed in 0.137167 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表