Roughly, this is the syntax: % T# A+ }0 N6 L+ G
" B) r+ N m B% M
Subject: Tom Clancy1 {8 y! p8 k2 ^4 I
" N6 ]. k" Y$ D1 P6 A- L% A
Verb: was best known for & `! Z. j3 F) b5 S & m N& G% f- g7 vObject: his hit spy and military-themed thrillers set }& F7 q: E! Y' P) p. s2 ]) C1 R
; Q, K* v3 H4 n+ NMake sense? , P" b9 H0 R9 |# X ], Q' _ X 3 y! s* `& M* S7 y& }: g: @3 M* D4 ?& |1 t
6 `1 c) A6 k* R2 p9 ^( ~; Q. {6 g
(Tom Clancy)( was best known)( for his hit spy and military-themed thrillers set)( during and after the Cold War.) ' C0 X) h& A5 G# i6 d% S& K, F& _& Z: m+ ]9 v7 V
你可能没理解for his hit spy and military-themed thrillers set这句吧? 估计是set,这里的意思是(一系列),或者是hit,这里的意思是(成功的) , p* t2 n' j a/ G6 ?# p: ~ j7 {; w& t+ q9 WTC 因为 他的 冷战前后 的一系列 成功的谍战主题的惊悚片 而广为人知。
带着梦想远飞 发表于 2013-10-2 14:41 " k1 W- `' t/ C" h7 W+ ~/ L
(Tom Clancy)( was best known)( for his hit spy and military-themed thrillers set)( during and ...
% A& _$ f3 e, R/ D% r y
感谢楼上诸位,这里 hit 应该 是 noun 吧 , 如果在hit后面 加个 on就好理解了 g0 @( B; }, x! ^7 u' g* n! a4 p0 A7 H+ q0 J. V
4 _ x7 I" u; g# s
* H% t( f3 u- T: V8 I
for his hit (on) spy and military-themed thrillers set
这个句子这么重要么? (Tom Clancy) (was best known)( for his hit spy and military-themed thrillers) (set during and after the Cold War.) 9 }" t4 ^8 `2 h: B8 T1 N! ^! S4 W9 S) ^7 }1 d0 C' ^% c
算是总结前面几楼的理解:4 k6 @* ]! V U! h* ^" L
1) hit, noun, informal for widely appealing6 K* a0 f. V8 {
2) set, verb (in the form of past participle). Here it means the settings of those thrillers are Cold War.7 J- r0 U2 b' d: b- ~( E
n$ ^$ D0 F( T5 H: BIf not for a serious advanced test, you do not have to accurately understand every word or phrase and its background information.6 ?6 D% ]' ^4 z9 T1 O$ E6 q
the key word here is the word "hit". it should be "hits" (plural) and the word "on" should also be used after hits. the plural is required because the word "thrillers" (plural) was used later on in the sentence. alternatively, to use the word "hit on", the word "thrillers" will then need to be changed to "thriller". both are acceptable but the first scenario is more correct because we all know Tom Clancy has more than 1 "thrillers".