 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 6)
|
本帖最后由 bigsnail 于 2012-6-7 11:17 编辑
V( l6 S, D$ {4 P& |% q* d- z% ?' m6 {& } l* S& c
open your mouth and wash it with detergent# ^& }4 [3 N, ^4 V- W
2 u" i: F% P- W6 j& L
sure there is no rigorous statistical evidence because there is no way to manipulate in the experiment so as to fully justify the causality.
! I: ], w, x$ ^, v1 C0 G& t& w! g0 t
: t$ J0 m% ]3 PAnd remember: / ?% ~" m( u. }' ^* @- E2 c! b) t
"there is no evidence that A holds"
6 x9 R; i; l+ j+ _- Bdoes NOT mean 4 h" o* I( J" W4 u6 |" N1 t
"there is evident that A does not hold". $ c2 X! {4 W# p: {0 J" J% R* y
In fact, A could hold.
9 p& t* Z4 ^' L$ {5 `- q6 YIt's a matter like observability vs objective existence.. K7 l0 ]5 S \. T0 A* a9 ~
So what you say doesn't constitute a refutation.
4 G4 ~4 D5 ^& l0 c9 x- e: L. Q! Z; B
It's mainly by argumentation. See for example:
, e3 K+ n. i" G$ _8 R7 J1 C3 K/ D
"Does the death penalty cost less than life in prison without parole?"* k% S) E+ e6 H2 L
in- O: C6 b- {5 R7 r" }
http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=0010009 K$ L1 h7 ~2 b* z
4 b' b$ N0 ?- U h6 G
Remember, things are more complicated than what you think.2 V0 a, L3 R* Y
|
|
楼主: weidsun
狗仔卡
发表于 2012-6-6 21:15
显身卡
楼主
发表于 2012-6-7 14:59
