I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache . E$ R3 k- n. R5 ^ u0 S/ B1 N% @/ {/ b, C. K& H( ^: ^
Calm down everyone please. " N4 z6 x# \: k! [8 Y $ e; ^$ N8 U" \% x8 ~6 q不存在 can mean two different things:! U2 ~+ X( C1 h8 {
$ X. b9 |( V9 p5 f& A1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc." M) N0 n2 U- y# h/ N
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头, `8 f8 \5 ^3 t
* `% H# [/ {! x6 H% ~! p
I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist& U6 B# t* v: Q% o
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:13 发表4 L/ |$ B; L6 \. ~ u! [. |, V
I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache" \# A! P9 _, K9 Y- B& y
' e; X" W, i9 C% Z6 k% B' j) [Calm down everyone please.) K3 U0 f& C. `. J- c: v
% q. F+ f6 s! V5 v# f不存在 can mean two different things: 8 ?8 o1 Q5 ~* W4 E% q* x( {/ E) T! c$ g" T. D6 w8 @0 S7 P) h
1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.6 M9 o/ ]+ U( K) K" A- p( w' l
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头1 G2 C1 G- K/ Z# C5 X2 F$ b
8 m( \ L* b2 a/ E3 N E4 `I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist ...
: q- {0 x7 O$ } ^( ^ w
" d) e( M1 `3 ^3 s* ]
小铜子,, 你的1和2根本不是对立关系.. 1并不能否定2. 1只能refer to current state, 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不能自圆其说.
3 U- {! ^3 y# i) X$ _& ]Did your GOD ask you to curse people this way?& z0 @+ D/ w# M. T
If you really have a 宗教信仰, I believe your GOD will shame on you!
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 10:55 发表 ! f% k' K! f1 q1 j6 e& C0 Z : Q9 v1 F$ v0 d* u/ n5 Y8 }, M. d, S @, O
2:" never exist" refers to 过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来一定没有!!!. C' k0 t% Y6 Z# i5 s! h @) I; a
' i4 n# {' z& I% Z# f4 I
At least dora meant that I am pretty sure.
原帖由 也无风雨也无晴 于 2006-6-8 10:30 发表/ w- S8 W8 \" w+ l" g w9 A
宗教信仰是一种自由,信也好,不信也罢,别恶意攻击别人, ...
# ` ~! o$ y3 w& l( F
5 v1 k" z' E7 R) t8 k7 DArguments on religious believes always turn out to become very emotional (if not violent). It has been like that for hundreds of years (if not thousands of years)) A2 S t% J, I
; P! h6 u& o" f$ {6 W- F( `- qMaybe we should stop argument. - d* [/ F, ~1 A: Q8 F8 x' c
! b: n+ T; O- \# s" {4 u
My commoent " Dora's 逻辑 is correct " was with the view point of logistics instead of religion; ^5 O7 k* `; F A& n