埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1944|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
; c9 Y& _8 k2 o' d6 A- }* h" m上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
- i. E" l# R; O# Q) ^7 ]( e, }/ O8 |# y) B8 T& b

# a. W2 z& k3 w

4 k3 p4 q) y6 N( @* N5 U5 ~http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf4 n0 R) w( C* C0 Z) Y
/ [( t: t( @$ W# z( H; W6 ]
: r% F2 E( d) i  u/ M9 N
Refund Requests' ]. l# k# ~4 ~* o
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
6 ?3 G- _* v; i- Q/ wpaid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part5 P1 m- W0 K. A/ K: @7 C$ s, }& r, o: p
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if6 z2 b) v# p4 |, V
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to  T6 V4 e0 }1 T% Q/ ?. D# p, o
Canada to the time of release;
- o+ _3 P/ Q" I  @(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;2 R$ j5 e- q, w! `# H. S
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;( p1 b  e0 E6 D' ?2 j
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
* S% I, ]! S! Qtariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the+ V3 F1 \% J( ]) l8 w/ M' |
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under
# m0 J: \' }, u5 rsubsection 32(1), (3) or (5);3 c' x/ _8 N0 v$ F6 u8 B
31 H2 Z# ?! J4 M
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
! ]! `/ Y: C6 l% jpreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
) [1 ^) d& h" V# G) aaccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
3 |8 Y0 u; M2 U) E2 R" B(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;* |: }8 _; F7 F9 n% {; i
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
9 ?: |3 [6 C& X9 _  t9 ?of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or% ~; I. W' V, j: g. M
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
2 h  S) a& K! I# `under any of sections 59 to 61;8 L- q& F# @- U7 K" S
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];* J& ^2 W' R( O" V  t
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
* ^0 i: |$ O9 P( ~' `1 d(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
' F( `' _6 y# l$ Jon tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of' ]9 Y9 i& q. U( k+ L
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).0 N; D: m8 O7 h  G& n* M2 M
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim$ F7 X# F# `) Z  x
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.: w3 O% ^4 g( O
(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless0 Y" q7 U0 S0 ^  B1 g( D9 i7 G
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
( E6 |" q4 R! ^respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
1 V5 ~$ ?; F/ E; S& s(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
# X# H4 d' L1 X' c4 ]" k& mprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
) X( [8 Q( r- Aprescribed information within
& e6 W, ~6 A: G) l(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)* i# M8 w/ Y  p
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
& N0 `) f$ o! I, `(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
- r# T: U8 s8 c3 H: O  O7 Bwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.5 [' d, J0 d2 n7 s7 C0 ]* ^
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of6 [: t4 B' p* ]# Z, n, J
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if  T3 X. ^& G% @6 O! a/ f
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
! K% i- n) y6 o  n% Qbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not% d* R& ~$ M+ W( o! a3 V
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
0 ^. C3 i) x5 G" g(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
; c6 w8 t6 e6 Hbecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is9 [+ _! ?6 g$ y1 Q$ S: S, |
incorrect.
1 D' D7 n" N. U! D(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
9 }0 O5 \6 ~1 \& l) N& n$ m3 \(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground% ^1 U% Y$ D; r1 w
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it" W- ~) V' x9 `# X+ x
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
' R  z2 ^9 E2 Y9 n) y' {9 \2 V. W1 ]: E4 x0 @- h
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-9-11 08:24 , Processed in 0.324949 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表