埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3412|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations: |( o1 p) a! ?: ?0 s/ X; `
上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?, L- ^, @2 o! h4 a2 G) O2 ]
1 i# `- _1 R  @" _3 u
/ `$ i& k. s: i5 N. q$ |0 f

# R* \2 h9 y# N3 g; Ehttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf) E2 n/ n" u' \
* v6 q, f6 k# t

5 p8 R9 \% W9 s+ b% N5 m: R7 |, \Refund Requests
' E( H; A0 T. J6 _7 W! C74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
6 p6 A- l8 `9 o( J* A% q& _5 c# Apaid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part
4 v8 K* ^+ s" P7 |, n) H- ?of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if- d' E6 D: ~5 u! x7 |
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
5 _4 b" M: t4 S( X& ^5 ]! UCanada to the time of release;
$ m, w1 W- R7 d8 x& W(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;
; |! }6 A) R. v5 c(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;. U' q" ]! K7 F" C
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
. l& I: z5 x7 W: S9 Utariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the
+ w/ U+ ~; Q2 x+ X' Lcase may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under6 H5 S- ^: q3 [
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
/ k' @6 G( Z" H2 \3- S* U) j2 \; E
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
) Q; m9 k8 {. b1 Y4 X9 L9 hpreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
. z/ v) y/ l: {' ?2 ]accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);4 _( W. a9 O4 ?
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
0 D4 B. h; d9 Z- u0 t2 m% `' k; [(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
8 ^+ D4 a5 g2 X+ }of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or
1 Z8 n7 y0 r6 ^% z5 B0 Yvalue for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
7 C4 z3 M, ^3 I$ ^% z: junder any of sections 59 to 61;+ h5 D: S9 U0 b2 {# k8 d
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];5 x3 Z% k! D: t4 `3 ?6 i
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
1 \3 s  X1 x# t- a1 n(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
  H+ H& }' Z1 r' B! l; Don tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
7 V. E5 ]# ?4 Y1 Gthis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).6 u( R( Z8 Z4 V
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim: g% m) C6 ~* p7 Z
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.: o$ P) J. M% V
(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless. ~, I5 f) @& l5 Z, i
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
4 ~. R0 x6 {, E+ j8 F6 g$ f2 D$ yrespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and* O; [% `6 l$ y- v; C9 ~
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be: z$ ~; `6 D  w5 O; s
prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
! k! }0 p/ x; f, a8 jprescribed information within) V) J9 I0 w& x0 Z, n2 j! G
(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)1 z4 M; G/ Y  [  ?, n7 ^" c" j
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and" N" i7 H% \% A4 Y! N$ M
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
  [* G, h: P' n/ Ywere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.
! o5 F+ R; K  G(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
# I8 @9 n* q6 L& `this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
8 C$ |" P$ s% U1 H3 X5 G. M! L/ O(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
3 r. M4 q) L/ h3 l# kbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not
$ {% j8 F4 x" c6 [7 w7 Keligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or3 m/ R4 R; [3 I1 a9 c: l, G- N+ [
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied% ^1 D/ p4 d5 F! u' I0 @/ r
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is
+ ?. ^- b, A) z, O; dincorrect.
& R  T' C0 g8 K2 P8 M(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),/ n  ?1 O0 D/ `; l" E: z+ `
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
2 Z3 v$ S( G! @6 wother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it7 B1 E7 g- [2 F3 u
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
, o% t7 f' c$ c/ P" J) j
  T0 E! C+ c: M) Q( J这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-19 16:46 , Processed in 0.078705 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表