! P& X7 M* v) w7 n! b. r5 e" cRead the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.( Z! @& _) N d& G$ F
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.& s: C) L& v& \0 H# Y; q+ _
3 K" E/ ~; @; x9 V+ ~1 p6 B; w
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票? T4 C3 N( N. \& Tpchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. % K; q& G$ M. V: eThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.5 M$ W7 A! F G. c
6 s2 u h8 u7 O/ N i3 K+ `8 _8 P* Y/ p( Z8 d7 z0 H
) R0 N+ z o$ m% f: [& A " `+ Q e* y$ a- N2 k1 ^( i& ~% L0 |" m' u6 w) ^+ W
1 q6 @% U9 a! i
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
+ f4 a( P. R9 h6 p0 K( X# u
/ m( p, _' G2 F2 X$ ~/ U- k9 G没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, & u4 `9 m0 ]) z5 V, \% q 2 ?- p) T* E- k4 y, ^/ J但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 ?' x/ v; a8 s. \+ T5 W
+ ^. l# e% r/ l1 M m/ X( H' M
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则