' R! n. e* K$ g6 H' FRead the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.1 a* \7 v! Y1 f
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 7 [& f, O- s7 P" j* S N/ |$ j/ A% \8 w, y
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票?4 d% i x3 _ M8 k$ L! U3 P0 |# p b
pchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
( d. ^, ^" L7 l$ v$ q6 S
: x/ C5 k1 w' m ?# O+ E- I
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.' y9 f- u' E7 Z) X
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. ! f2 N3 o! Y& I7 X4 ~ 9 H+ o' v; ^5 | . h/ m/ Y2 k% t* K0 R/ I* A8 Y 1 E3 }' h( @! D6 ^1 V' h 0 u1 f( P1 c& T2 n' [$ L0 z 5 F: G: l' N/ c% H7 d3 s& B1 H* s: U" e* T* J) U
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
% ^ P, k! [& S6 [8 ^' x7 j, ?: G* B( s8 d2 \) r
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, 2 u+ e+ J" E; r8 \6 O" C5 m! R. P9 }" u
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 E. T6 G: W: Q M* u" s0 b* n3 A- U. E( s3 B1 z
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则