0 U* ?) O' _& A! I% |Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. 7 W c! U9 L$ q2 z$ eThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. & k9 i- _3 u; V" a, G1 o; Q' g% c& y + I: \+ L% m: h' m7 H
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票?! f9 | C2 W& n u: o
pchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. / o7 Y- O5 v# @$ m$ _: q" g) aThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. ! I. V* E# h/ d& N' n. S 6 e- [/ ~9 s/ q9 d# I( U5 t4 _+ x; W
4 H3 T* _( ?! \" e( ` c/ K
' Z3 s3 E( v" D- j3 }
* c& J- a: K3 a u- m
8 G" C7 u& X( e# T! k
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
8 x' u4 z# f/ M/ p5 N2 h9 V% `9 F- ~( x0 M( `
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理,1 q, u; {0 [. [$ Q
% v! V& a- a) G- s
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 : C6 H5 \/ C" \6 E0 k2 ^4 v " a& f+ j( U3 u. Q" U记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则