 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
本帖最后由 小黄 于 2009-12-21 13:39 编辑 + p) y h9 h% g% }% Y, \
你也别整呢些弯弯绕了。你就说吧：CIVIC和卡车撞，谁比谁更吸能？谁比谁更容易死？/ a' Y- u# l# X- D
降龙十八掌 发表于 2009-12-21 11:33 
5 {$ O }1 b9 N o- O$ p$ X% S# WThere is no data available. If you do have some, please share. But please don't make up scenarios and data yourself, that's 意淫. Use a published source, or statistically controlled experiment.9 d7 [9 h1 R% n/ s# i
% ^* j7 `3 X3 H- ~6 ~' IFrom the existing data, there are 3 types of death:% F4 s" E4 p# s& U
1) MV: multi vehicle collision, like when a Civic hits another car/truck7 T8 _. R& T- f
2) SV: single vehicle, like hitting a tree, or roll over
8 p; ~5 c) I; x- y% a `8 R3) SV Roll: roll over, this a sub set of SV.3 ]2 O0 ]$ d1 B- ?& e' F* s
# D$ q N; a4 Q2 C; o) L, i: F
For Honda Civic:, B! ^! I3 T4 o% F' \
MV 34
& E5 d/ ?( k9 r: }/ p. kSV 33, w' b, ^( p4 X g
SV Roll 13
4 x2 |8 W' T) ^$ v: g; j4 z/ d; U3 t% O i
For Ford F150 (including super cab, crew cab):% j$ B' G( b/ ]1 X/ W
MV 28~34$ i1 m* ]8 i. r7 Z- V7 D0 @
SV 79~94
% \& x0 e: Q! P. }: r: }/ ]SV Roll 48~82) p0 N7 R; e, x( ~' Q' {
2 f$ t L% X* n* P
For Chevy Silverado 1500:
6 J! S5 ?6 A; L9 X c6 Y. ?MV 40
: O7 v7 {' ~: D' Q9 P/ k5 l' M) KSV 85
( m6 D5 @. p4 J; B+ S: r% Q, L7 eSV Roll 61: C& j8 r* d& a, A
* R' i3 t+ k) x7 X. @ A* C2 FAs you can see, not only would the trucks roll over more easily, they don't perform better even in a vehicle on vehicle collision. So, yeah, Civic is definitely safer than F150 or Silverado. |
|
楼主: kismet
狗仔卡
发表于 2009-12-20 16:58
显身卡
