埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2220|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly) N$ c) O  V/ Z% O5 D! _4 V
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove. \. c  Y8 p+ ?3 w1 N1 b* U( E
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house8 ?6 P* v; J$ q0 T. Z: T
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
4 e2 O+ Y2 W: K$ [) q5 I( Kfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This& i! I8 F* ]6 x  H
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction" A3 e! p2 K& A# k8 m) ~9 s* N
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately% B' O  X5 H. \# {
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past% V! G! ?3 E% g# o
three years.
% J8 ?! f; j1 p- b& n: H/ VBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
" \: r" c- E3 u: vtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
5 G; @. A% @" n1 u6 D, iaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
2 J+ t8 o( D9 Q, E/ r# A1 Qboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices1 N7 d2 K% C# q7 z
to fundamentally justified levels.
: X7 C- o) U: h5 tWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
% X3 {! m+ h3 F1 ?where homebuyers buy up too many houses and( |9 q! O  l3 B1 l- w0 K
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
, p' t( j$ r  _; P& |where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
6 S- D+ R# A$ z4 e: P$ M2 Wthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s+ K0 x2 O. m; B" ]0 H
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
! N' _, I) s/ H8 phomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch/ v/ R: D. E2 v& Y2 @4 f
that is now being rapidly reined in.
) Y& Z/ q7 e( C5 B: ]While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,: F( [+ \( [9 C4 w# p. S
the construction of too many new homes over the boom3 ]/ J4 b  ~% n+ t% o2 w' ~
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
& N: k7 R/ i) A7 ?8 ~on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers% h2 B5 q& }0 u. K$ A
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
8 Q: W1 s. W, f( Qremain choppy and new residential construction will be2 l! m* ?+ C6 T  N+ L1 ^2 r' O
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction  T5 D$ m9 @  G8 |* ^: o
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
0 |5 m- H% h2 v- v0 f% nto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide4 I# V( }( `7 B
residential construction will fall further to around6 a" g" k! h0 o) I; K! d, T
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units8 c+ A. R6 K0 h+ z8 O3 ^
in the fourth quarter.
5 g6 C: }; H# ]. kTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
) ?+ _7 K9 s5 c, G( ]3 {6 ^we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run4 j. g. S, m& q- e: Y( Q
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
" e  k% f- O. qprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
: I" h' {9 ^# E0 P4 h" Z! `values since house prices should track incomes over the
) {6 p4 Y* a1 m1 @long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we  a! n$ n) U4 K* s3 ~3 U9 W
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
" X, U, f. @. o" M6 E! M3 nof residential construction.
1 a8 {8 J- M* JTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
" z! L2 O! ]4 Q! C“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction2 i7 }% a9 o, x* w6 B' K0 y1 p
would have occurred if housing had been priced
( i8 X, h3 i; W0 Hoptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
% W. |: T& r( H+ K, Z! yfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new. ^/ A: Z9 Q7 @. f
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too5 j+ g, W; y+ z* o
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
0 ~7 v* P8 Y" JRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
9 @' {, x0 E7 T0 T1 B9 G1 w5 ~) Vwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
8 s  {: x& V# u+ Ipopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
8 z1 Q" W2 d4 s$ {already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the8 ?7 ~. Z. W7 J1 h3 `
very time that the resale market has swung into strong3 [+ h& r" W/ l
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
+ {( _% U1 H0 N* F* Mhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural9 Y; z4 ]/ _0 Z% A3 ?! X( Q
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
+ X" Y; y* t: o1 g3 \# F! UQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the0 f5 X% r1 t: M" i
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de' G. X! J0 a' H
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,' A" I; u6 r3 Z0 b
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership/ C# B" C4 n* {* L6 _
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
, m0 S0 ]# C% x; _$ [  u. n. x6 `" Ocyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears7 I  I3 s+ r+ `
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
- k- J' N8 J* ocondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically! X4 b5 A6 V7 a  F1 a# o3 ~& \& F
high levels of apartment-style units presently under- X0 s7 T3 f; \6 Z
construction mean that record numbers of condos will% V* V- d. s( `
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
% {: J, e6 N+ @( Z. u8 H: Y) }9 j! Gcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could5 ^' ]8 S0 d( J
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while: j0 a( g: d& |6 t, T: s1 w
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
+ w% ?: l, h( n0 ^6 g" j" y% canticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from& w1 f% |) V9 |
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming' [; d- [+ A7 M. q. S1 q
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
: y) G% z0 I3 c3 `* T7 xwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
  e+ D$ N9 S- i; b+ y7 ]2 qOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
' e$ F) |( k, T4 M6 R' t' g$ s4 GMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS8 }# @7 Y: M  J( A  A# ?! l  O9 n
Grant Bishop, Economist: @* T: u/ v1 z3 p/ a4 i
416-982-80631 I- s: }/ _8 w& t/ c! L
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
+ Q1 V/ x% K, C9 u/ k; p416-944-57303 y+ x( Q2 \9 f4 V' P& v, B

6 ]5 }* G. q: X) o1 {2 ^http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-24 06:12 , Processed in 0.164474 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表