 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员4 b. X# [, y! z% M* r) X
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
3 N" B/ N7 w" `3 Q `. s1 S/ X5 ]6 ~
- H3 @/ ^" q. L$ N( P- |5 Q3 ~EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.2 I- B# s8 H. q9 q2 b
4 P$ F! u: G( ]Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
( i# Q& k9 B4 L3 S5 b+ z# M% a9 n9 [, b9 w9 g
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
* N6 E1 T3 J2 @. |
+ V$ D K9 ~0 o9 m, Q* DDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.' t1 G4 o) ?! B1 I6 A6 @
6 [! z9 r/ k, H5 ` l% c) ?& A
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
7 N: p3 z( u$ s/ x2 t4 X4 A, z5 p% D6 `- z* }% j/ X6 {: T1 F
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
4 w( g2 ^# ]% C1 G7 n7 L: x' G. }% Z! x$ m( j
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.' Z! G3 a- V- x4 j6 @; t
% H5 I5 A" P7 g5 ~& u# `1 |( C3 QPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.6 W6 {; X% f! O, e' X0 f& e0 }$ D2 ^
1 l- E6 N( ?7 J1 D: y7 DDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|