埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2031|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员- U6 s1 ~! v0 j/ m6 M4 i
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs! y! C- _" r" F2 N0 \6 d1 e" R
! L3 z: I/ {+ |
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
6 E$ c3 k2 H( L8 e7 L( ?, ?* d9 r5 ~* W
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
) k! s3 P$ D; U5 N4 m2 t" O
, L0 p* |( |) DThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.3 d2 z; H2 g. h+ v
: I* |+ C5 z9 X1 N$ S
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.8 C9 J# q3 x# W# a' u' k- f
# Y9 m/ ^/ w* I9 S. Q$ F% z* [
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
7 v- U/ q) h# h. t1 C6 ?9 O! _3 _- b
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
" H. ?( D! I+ q; V/ w; f+ U7 ]
9 a; D* Q; I7 A* z0 fDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction., n  T. j* w2 ~* F

- |' r7 y  ?( h" C" \3 l" s+ l5 |* O% YPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.; V/ Z% o# x* V
5 @1 D5 G  G, j) j. R& b9 a" v
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-9-14 22:48 , Processed in 0.100443 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表