原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: Q8 l& R8 x) X" G( }. P \# i% \1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行.6 g: S4 [+ l8 T. U' z$ u8 p
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了.) D4 d& h) S) o! v# h3 n
' H: f9 F0 P+ W% D$ W/ W X
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. / W$ i7 U8 Z! S0 D+ e9 p4 H9 u. g8 g; t) W, g V+ f' |% X
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005* R4 ~" n _3 u. B
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"8 p3 L$ S) O6 \/ l. E
' H) E; o! ]8 w* X9 i% P' i
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."! `) ?0 q0 K- r2 k f
& s, X2 v" r6 ~! Y! s
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 4 ~6 F$ j" Z. G8 J/ a/ d + L: s+ x8 [- ?. W3 i3 v$ _, d* q% y* J, n' G: @3 }/ `- d
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: . `6 X; M9 i- p% h7 ^: m2 _Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 0 Z: \4 k0 P1 { o& [# rThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" 0 {7 H* C6 n+ w; q+ n0 ?8 M4 q+ q, `
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
4 I; ~; `$ g6 Z4 sDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.