 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
+ ~( t& M! y& J x( K楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
- k' [' @/ I8 q4 ccorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
) x m& }5 b' `! j A! G9 h8 J. F
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。( l5 G# k6 |# }' {
- u! W6 i) Z# c& [安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
# G" c4 |( Z8 [0 H/ ], ?9 a
8 T0 J) v u+ V6 {1 { x. E不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
: }$ t2 I5 b/ K6 ~! F5 r% N0 T9 O" U3 N6 P; q" Q
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
; N. [2 o. e) S$ m% g
) y- \/ b9 _; J: s% p; R关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):) a, q3 p6 {, G1 Z" }
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
! k- h2 B/ I# U) s" d/ h4 {0 ~' y% r# v% B& Z/ ^
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".( [2 ?& z' f3 p+ A6 w
5 e; r3 ?) r9 B2 v" ABut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.; x( Z( Z/ S. \3 D3 w
; ^2 W& x% U* q1 f9 V0 |
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|