 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
1 {' ?- G' e o+ T- O楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!/ }% H' k. w; }. a1 l. l
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
% u2 g# O& F, A8 m. S8 e/ G9 s% b" [$ k( ~
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。4 n/ b8 ^& E6 j
5 G- O; i$ a6 t, s: A6 @
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
5 J1 q r* h- ~3 E1 G7 j( j
7 l$ D& [/ v) d* F/ W5 e不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
4 I" u! L; G7 ]8 W% t
4 [) C& n) ?& T* s; q, l2 G另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
9 A* V0 Q V5 m3 E" u R( m6 N6 Z: `& X5 S! x% O& w, v- T
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):( E* {+ r5 p+ x! Y
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
6 G7 U6 A; @. \/ w0 p. q7 M" o$ w0 b- d) i* H5 Y
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
5 V8 i" f( p3 t9 J
6 k) ?6 B; U) _9 J& gBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.. @& u1 t" `' |9 O
- V8 f% m3 X. _5 z5 k1 `$ H
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|