 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
0 s+ Y& }& B' W1 |: Y$ Z/ M K楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!5 B* I/ w6 O- A) D k
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... $ b# E2 t1 ^% N; w7 @, _2 F) }6 ~
, ^, d1 t, r* h1 n, i" R" q9 b- M您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
" j) Y/ P9 G2 t+ m; D
$ n. X* W' P" v O安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.; @; B# Q8 Z B9 [4 a$ ~; y
# s6 x$ Y2 q4 y ]; v0 F4 z不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?4 N: h/ H, v& H- J$ g
3 F( {) F1 J) c# X另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。+ E! ^$ }3 h/ u9 J
2 H8 z- j8 W1 h R6 X
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
5 r$ X0 p! |# ~2 |6 ]9 p* |+ E" yYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.( [% Y+ Z# N0 s: B: @8 _( g
" Y" C2 n7 h3 V( n: ~. x
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
# C q7 S8 h- J" E! G4 d) P0 a9 {: T$ j1 ` ]8 q' o
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
3 H9 Y. j' o+ O2 D# I6 m0 F: i3 I) T& E+ c4 A# l) k7 t* Z
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|