Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
. ^2 [, d) O" C/ x$ |) ?  c
% L9 d0 s9 q* {* g$ r3 FLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
" Y. |) j4 g' G$ V& x4 X
5 e8 p, k9 N5 R9 [. ~2 b" b
5 ]$ L, l) J* ZIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
) a; V" f& ]7 M0 K) b
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
; C% b* Z( H: O2 q4 P$ W+ uSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
& M2 w2 G4 ]/ eNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
4 [+ p% u( l% @7 w$ _You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
1 w: _) y& U! b) V! j+ r( Z: m
6 a$ [8 F! \* M8 D4 `& s# FIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
2 O, c9 T7 h: e2 X& L8 l- c
3 n/ O' _/ D' {$ Q7 ~; O: m Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
% w: Y8 X, Y; y6 {" E$ C  j Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
! K7 @% }$ C1 @: s8 g  pLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
; H& D1 J$ y6 @- O& GDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
" j% {  ~, e& e. V- b7 l7 t0 GWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
. @: \3 A3 @) i& G  B8 l' d. y) @/ S1 p
" P6 u' F/ O7 [% W4 v

/ z$ a, i; g. m: j, WIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
# ]; @( V& O3 d/ Z2 c- m

4 t: B" t0 f8 L- q+ W) u: aFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
. K3 i$ v# T5 n" z, ^
it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
1 {6 @1 W3 e3 ^9 d6 t' Z7 E* p- l+ o+ o9 _
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]