Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
, \( G; k7 ?7 G" F" _+ k% iLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
0 R/ {) B2 ~* o$ l7 D/ {! v
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

$ v( L+ o- i$ K0 F0 T! W, i% b, `Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

3 I# w2 _% L! s- a  j1 i: GSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
, l; F* B1 I) z$ USan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
' j% E9 \. u7 U! q- _9 \
9 Q* q+ a  V0 E& pIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

1 H$ K5 k* {! z" b7 ?If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
0 T% K0 K- R  K' o5 _. d9 }& Z
% L: N2 n8 q% D! ~! N, [( b Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
8 o; d: v( O7 V. S  [ Avg. 1988-2000 2001
( |' F# `9 b" |* e5 lBoston  20.5 30.2
4 y/ A+ G+ s/ f9 O5 {1 r# _/ OSan Diego  22.8 29.7
$ j4 z$ i6 k8 u3 [! A1 d9 ~: ?/ kSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
3 _" J8 h9 T5 G- x  p7 {' |9 `Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
5 z. M. @8 P' e) s$ SChicago  17.2 20.8
  d9 L# {  E; Y! G7 ~Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



& V, m2 x  _7 Y1 ?! E3 S1 C( v7 iIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
7 @9 a, k) F+ W9 H% S/ p
, c7 g& h* I2 }6 M( L, L
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.
/ J8 @7 D! q$ F0 }2 `/ A
, N6 S4 u- {/ b3 b& `+ K2 y4 Gthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
4 M) {# R5 q1 B1 l9 |5 M1 b2 H0 q
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]