 鲜花( 172)  鸡蛋( 12)
|
5 U3 ]* y, P6 Z5 h
软体动物的逻辑比较奇怪,预设了一堆论点,要论据p都没有。
2 ], x3 h0 X. ~/ Y- O# P以下是那个妓者的提问:! l0 ~! S# p2 u( s2 `
“There are no shortage of concerns about China’s treatment of human rights
' \% h( _# {! b! Z: { advocates, such as the Hong Kong booksellers and its detention of the
2 {7 g& T* T8 d l: y, E" H) u1 g: N Garratts, not to mention the destabilizing effects of its territorial
J. v: v2 E" _; C+ `* c ambitions in the South China Sea. Given these concerns, why is Canada $ F: X' {( ]3 b$ r7 B
pursuing closer ties with China, how do you plan to use that relationship to! W& O+ a; I. W& l2 M8 J1 P2 ]/ E
improve human rights and security in the region, and did you specifically , D4 b. r# g8 C4 [& j" s- j, e
raise the case of the Garratts during your discussions with the foreign
7 f3 [2 m. ^ Q/ ? minister today?”
+ b4 ~3 e& m+ D7 e# b这问题其实主要是冲着加外长来的,Dion磨磨唧唧地没怎么回,然后王毅就飙了。' N, N. z- P; R1 ]0 s$ y
其实这种二逼问题就是下套,直接骂回去倒不是最坏的选项。 |
|