 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
- u4 P/ m1 y7 H' s& @. X: GEdmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14- t$ n1 D* I: t, C( ?4 c5 X( q2 o8 d
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
3 \4 T4 Z0 j R/ z
. |' J. y1 X6 xIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
2 {! G0 Q; k, l/ \5 F" _$ [+ e7 i v( O1 a: j( W4 h9 B) ~- X
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.034 y- e% P6 m ^' E
% v. `* s. G* Scomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
0 e% q7 F! H6 N: J( C
7 F7 }" {: b8 Z4 k4 ^Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
9 N- h8 M9 Q( M% a3 }7 w/ Q |
|