 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 # L @. F' s6 ?! {( y) G5 {2 O5 N9 v
: @: w9 T) x% s& j; H6 v( r" y9 v. L% Y4 J" Z
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
$ O1 E- I! W* M! S* _
0 {7 d, U# Q- o7 ?/ d0 |Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03( \8 S& J, A! c6 a- }; Y
1 G+ Y% ^! [7 Y& J- v$ N+ ?' x
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..) u* | {" G* `3 k
% ]2 X: q7 V; h& ?6 W1 F! \
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) ; M+ \, x e0 b; {# W; h
|
|