 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 8 M+ G& g7 J \( b c* m& R* t
& _7 u6 i& Q/ J- I C7 k
. U( }% c# L' ZIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. / Y7 q5 m% d: Y, \1 k/ Q2 V
" u, Y. L9 P/ T$ D( x$ r; @Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03) Y# l& }' @5 W9 Q
% M/ k& y) p7 K
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
8 l7 F$ f* U+ p; E E$ }7 t9 L3 b4 F, l
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 3 n2 K* c, ` o* u; J3 U
|
|