 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 : S, [' c% ^1 e; ?8 o$ j+ F! E. q
/ K8 S* h W! H! V7 G Q
+ I: I: Y* a% G* S0 X你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
1 X) H: L2 _6 c6 X5 p- yRalph Klein
. I a# S! u# A9 b+ l- p
/ k3 _& a" Y9 }9 x我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!: h6 ?$ b7 z; m: i& h7 D1 L
9 T. r/ l. J1 Q" s
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
* x7 p, R* L. m+ j% \, O Q: N# p
, B7 ]( J8 u2 W# [. X0 I4 \. t# j! X" f$ a
' u' N" S; M& h! G: A0 \/ n
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
7 T: ~) |" E# h w' sHistoric Alberta budget balances:
* f2 W8 o& L- h, ^/ L; C; r! N% z9 ]7 Q* l+ E
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus9 R$ U0 n% _$ }0 i& i5 t
4 L) w/ ~9 a: ^8 X1982-83: $796 million deficit
2 g7 |+ o" t" Z( T% O4 `4 f; B
1 `- f4 l( k. B' p. g' l1983-84: $129 million surplus. Q9 _' s! D$ {( W. ~( y
# [5 Z; {9 A, \8 E6 \/ m1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus* v8 N) E/ l. m
) {: M6 Z5 r9 ]5 b& L$ y$ T1985-86: $761 million deficit2 o' r$ n. E& G! h! i8 b& Y$ e5 l M; w
M5 @) v5 }$ C( P, d" D8 d# o9 t1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
0 M1 n" {' _4 z6 v I9 f0 K4 k0 @8 H* m9 j) s
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit7 Z* o# m5 s5 Z2 c. N
! R$ i. T+ \" B' Y
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
, B; ?( @! Z9 d6 v7 Q
* v1 M1 K8 x6 h1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit* O5 ?, R8 M1 j+ R5 b" E
$ L6 p) M( q& E( n/ D. O1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
4 ]8 A) s% I0 H$ I }
# i+ m, ~, S0 x$ Z6 I9 y1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit9 X3 K F5 i: z, r" W- T
: z; S& y5 ~, a, K2 H
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
8 S- o% l( S) M% H/ v) c6 [1 c
& u/ M% {8 r3 [& L1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit! _* f3 j' R" W% n# f; n% o
9 F( E9 _( _* N) h1994-95: $938 million surplus
3 b4 J( [' V3 ~1 m a" m; g( I% Z
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus: W, l# C5 J3 I3 U* f
1 O8 H. `+ m& H8 R1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus1 n7 g/ J- y2 |7 H% i; O$ V- U! E
. X: r* c; ^9 ~
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
) i% @) A- f# \5 `$ u$ m. R9 |( N# `* ?. J& r! j6 E) p
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus x. a& K1 H; m" t5 I( K! I: Z
( [2 S' }" y7 i1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
6 g g# s+ H1 y: Y) {) M! i
: c: |5 S* a1 W2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
`" ]" n4 O" t0 p
! d: o1 A1 K! L, U' W3 n2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
! j u: D" I. A# @, s+ f6 D! f
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus& m1 u2 X$ @+ v |( S
8 a q# M. F0 p# N, \
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
1 Z/ Q: \' E9 P& m; W* m% R: x, b2 S% r! r& _$ \3 t
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus, k% a5 |6 e) E u. I/ v+ J
8 d( H6 l: C* x, ?; y4 M7 @2 @! U$ u/ t
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
: g; [; n' g1 m$ d# b' Y" e% ~7 [* Q8 S5 Y- u
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus/ |9 `: E9 `0 h6 H( J9 m
* E8 _8 V6 g+ z4 H6 l5 l n3 S2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
" ~3 Y0 O$ x; `5 P" Y, b* f
6 V' W! y$ ~- F" Q9 \$ a2008-09: $852 million deficit
, H" c7 z' X9 a& ^
" t- x( d& P9 j" _& z# G2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit ?5 P/ p. h! T$ D* I. R
, T" p. D' v1 J. D6 w6 N+ O
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
1 [! D- `; ~ j! b) l0 K e$ ~, h- N+ L& S! c- Z
2011-12: $23 million deficit
& b$ i2 @! m+ X4 X5 P5 ?# w
: [3 i3 z5 |4 L2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
3 G+ b9 Z5 c) I5 W; {
9 D0 l8 W$ J4 ]% _. J2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|