 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
. x5 @ e; H: t5 Y5 k2 B0 `* {4 Q* l, q
- q$ @4 H/ v, {0 c
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
& S5 ^( o; m+ y: m3 DRalph Klein
* V" g% \1 a9 _
) Y) u0 g$ c* O! g3 c我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
) L o! V+ j: r. l k e: G" Y6 ]
' L- y' n% a1 j N& [2 w, a所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。 y$ r7 b* s2 m
# a7 A7 |5 \! ~ _! h! u
! c k1 P" ?. Q
+ b& ?% y# q6 q& _- ghttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
: E- C6 h9 n+ m5 OHistoric Alberta budget balances:; J: ^8 P3 a5 ^! J' d9 G$ Y
- J" R7 g) o9 j. X# U1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus E5 W9 t) g- O9 L. H+ E. A7 [# H
% Z# t7 E6 @$ D1982-83: $796 million deficit% F, ?0 p% T& o- ?! v3 X
1 @7 I) i6 v6 d8 y8 g h" |1983-84: $129 million surplus5 q& N& D! B5 V5 l2 k/ N
9 w }5 @( W" b, w! v, h5 i A1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus! H8 i! b5 _0 o+ {
' N2 s7 ^5 d7 b( U
1985-86: $761 million deficit/ n; x$ ^/ e0 e
$ d. w2 D1 N$ {$ q* o+ g& z' F1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
! t( `0 o. s6 s# N3 ~" C9 x; V- G9 J5 M! ]6 g, n
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit& Y/ B8 Y$ K; Z" P- D
5 H( }0 A9 v! v$ `5 c; ]% _1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit+ B; G1 f% y* w6 v7 {
6 |& m9 k7 Y+ o' H) O1 O4 D
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
( R% w \ S C! M7 H0 z. S: [- d( ~( n; a6 O
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
3 }- A3 Z8 `4 g" v) {7 @, U& x- t" }9 u
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
3 f+ I' ?( [) x/ d# v* ?. J& h% p) R; x7 e$ `
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit& A0 y* b2 S5 o1 j
4 @) v; C# F4 q( n$ i1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
# g: z& r8 `7 i7 _1 f! a9 \! V) l; N: G* U$ E
1994-95: $938 million surplus
- k) R$ s: G2 s. x+ t7 } s ^ Z7 {
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus) E: l- \ h: I: I$ B
$ O7 p3 J& U9 r$ c$ `: e, D" ~
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
) b2 C7 h# z `+ k2 a* Z
, y& v* }8 h% H. H1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
6 W% Q: ]: o/ X4 u
$ J9 c5 ?6 S, f2 q) ?( x0 _6 |9 R( s1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus# M7 L" d4 M) d! q1 x; X) Q9 [
; d/ f5 E! H4 y! V. K; s# \
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus" \5 i3 X6 R6 c" E$ ?7 S
$ H( J* g& Z+ X! Q; j8 Z* R2 _2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus+ o3 s1 D* F4 s5 s
8 ?% R2 r: ^. }4 Y5 E! _2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus5 k2 j/ P4 E, c/ C! m
( o2 |4 N! Z$ B3 k/ H8 Y- y8 }2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
+ C# y; I9 F/ D" G B
8 [) k/ F$ \/ f) }2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus! Q+ }, y! M" |) `
e$ r0 H% x h l5 B) g! b
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
' [# v; w# a T; h) n/ N0 z& K! d: P e$ v
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus; l) v4 g! M" Y6 i
2 H ]: n( p, \7 J) e" V2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
! f Q1 Z; R/ ]9 W0 @0 w4 _* ^8 {
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
- `# C5 x: m! M4 K6 l9 S1 l/ a, G8 a# ] ]& Z2 ^
2008-09: $852 million deficit
6 n' ?# Z7 P7 U! g" M$ I; {
$ d1 c9 |+ L6 `' V5 W' ]1 x8 W: x5 |; f2 J% J2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit0 \$ |6 ?6 d9 M# W- E, A$ A0 ^' `
: ~. @/ v7 a% ]; `
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
2 Z: H' t1 e0 x- E
/ C% [: }8 N+ ]% |1 _ y2011-12: $23 million deficit1 I5 p/ E# ?5 T/ b/ g
- ^% C+ A- G. \6 D4 `2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit5 G/ q( P( r4 u" \7 b; T) d
/ L' I$ M1 z3 y8 M, S, A2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|