 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
3 I0 N9 _3 U, `+ R, B) m# Z$ T9 G' L% n0 O
% J" {; f1 L# }( w你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
. I7 ?" L8 |3 T4 g( ?3 kRalph Klein: c9 l$ o; u% u* ^6 I
. y) Q' |- j% O* |: R$ N/ N我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!9 c! O: a8 d) k; d% \( ?0 n* L
$ ]: h, t/ A: E
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
+ v) @( W" w' p F
7 q5 |6 `& r6 P. m3 @; H3 H, \1 G/ i. `$ f
' V* D. y9 Z1 @$ L- p/ Uhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades& @% G8 T8 F2 C% l% |$ ?0 v
Historic Alberta budget balances:
% ~" |- v M1 t' C
# \" ?; H W( l! J6 k! i0 r( R1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus, @! u4 @& K# z/ U4 L
$ F' A! b4 {* q1 N+ l
1982-83: $796 million deficit
, f5 e' c/ g) u4 }+ d$ u% P5 N
1 n4 }' o- y* ~* k, a# |2 f1983-84: $129 million surplus8 W1 b, f1 L* {4 z# t7 E1 ^& a
0 ]6 ?/ v' ?3 S
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
5 d& L$ ~0 U( ~/ a+ V# R2 k, U/ A: T+ B$ _
1985-86: $761 million deficit
?' w( Y2 W) P# h4 u1 V, V- @, ]+ V! F1 Y+ T; A& s9 S! N
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit4 X. N `, w% c" o: M; }
0 g( S' i! Z! M7 F1 [; |# L w1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit4 g. q2 I4 K+ }% F
3 z! ^+ J$ t: c' w+ p8 @9 x" h1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit, H7 z# l/ D/ w+ x' o4 M
1 J, I# c( c# A5 v3 d4 Q. C: j1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
. G: N5 p5 r8 G& ^4 L1 Q* s/ c4 M( K/ p" W& m
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
3 ?+ Z$ y* l0 l% d# B/ s. x7 H# ]+ V# r2 K9 x, A: y
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
: v$ ?+ A) k/ d: L1 k' [; G
! {/ Y! u$ y$ G: M/ S4 B1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit/ h+ A0 X' x1 ^7 y
2 F& J# Q0 {& ~9 O9 `/ `8 x1 w
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
, ?- H- B: g8 \) R) q$ g7 O6 i1 I- A/ E1 J+ C
1994-95: $938 million surplus* p. ?9 y5 a2 N$ E. r$ ~
; u9 x0 B u6 O9 V# R
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
( e( m/ } [& z
) M4 K2 p& |! g- j6 g2 I. [8 _, x1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus) x0 w- f5 M) }" I8 _! |8 n
2 c1 n8 [2 }; b' ^, t1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus# a; _: h, X$ ]" _7 r9 D; i
3 p: {$ j* x: t( b
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus* z, P3 c E. A3 ?/ o
\ C7 C1 ~1 o& k) c% g" g+ k( o
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus B; V! H: V+ [
' w. j5 X r. A, y( p3 c
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
/ @+ X2 X4 {% u: l/ |8 U" T1 M# g. S: g8 U* y
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus/ ~ ?5 E- t# G
% a s1 b' J5 b k" K) }' c# T5 ^) Q" t
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
' a( w- U. ]6 t Y3 V3 | O% u. W/ f) E1 @. E
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
8 ^0 E5 @, ?& g3 \2 g4 ^; L" E4 D Z
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus. J$ r, B5 n2 J7 B8 o/ j& f" X
+ g7 c& ^5 N* x1 Y# L, |1 ?: M2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus. J4 S( B! m* I7 x
, |. A9 q, F# L, { c3 m% w
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus1 U- a1 @1 S/ N: i& `8 [2 E- {
* ]3 O$ U% q, g+ G7 b/ n
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus, B7 W" O" F7 C3 D" e& z
- H2 {6 [: M" T/ d
2008-09: $852 million deficit
4 ?0 O9 U0 _8 v% @: R. @6 o5 [* Y7 S: p. M6 f
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
# d) g! n: T0 G q2 c5 [: b& D/ A, h5 b8 s" ` g# W" X4 f; j( @
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit9 i/ A5 v4 C# v( ]* a" `4 {" N1 ^3 K3 M
1 a3 b! `# ^- T$ H
2011-12: $23 million deficit
. @9 w6 x7 o2 I8 ^0 t+ j) Y
j1 ]! P, `2 J6 v) c) K2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit5 u* g3 U) |# k9 V8 [/ m
7 I' s0 Q1 \' v) B) N
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|