 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 7 v* }2 E5 j+ P9 C
! A! b7 @4 B# Q- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -7 E) r+ g9 ^! w- H
1 ~; Y# Q0 A! E( q+ u. u5 u7 B
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market( X. D. D& k6 S6 m$ T4 W
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
) [. q$ _/ Z3 C# s" [+ zquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
% F7 t; w0 W- _, |+ s3 Sin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* Y) v1 D0 G+ U. V) K+ ] o
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
8 b5 [2 a9 a1 v: o0 L- U5 `# cmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
+ g$ U/ c6 f+ L H: [8 ~Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal( I* u9 L v- w% r1 S+ L; l
LePage Real Estate Services.
3 n$ ^1 m B9 \ K3 x( e9 _0 B: V8 v& u: q: C
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters& x; w5 S/ d! U* Z
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic, f+ u+ Z# L& r
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and& z0 O8 j7 [( b) y6 g
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the! L: n$ ?$ ~* ?
residential real estate sector.1 D" Z; @2 T) J" ~& D+ Y
, q$ K6 C4 {. Y1 t) n# Y
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation6 [" }$ M4 A8 t' h
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
4 |" Z+ ?: U, c- p6 vyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
8 F. r9 o8 {* W4 E(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380) H6 h' a# p; B2 U
(+13.2%).
5 I$ D e5 M4 B, ~, ]* R" f) \% I+ h. T. e% H2 L$ o2 `
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; s& W: z; f5 w
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
# d5 k1 e7 P4 z9 i6 L Mfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
5 x# P$ J% A4 j7 wpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,4 D& f" [# Q$ Z, }* Z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.% z/ _( N/ ]' S3 H* u
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- t) z, _. [3 d+ Z0 h7 k( E# ?0 e. Lwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
1 B2 f) ?4 C9 |balanced market."
& G& D0 H9 |, P. g
" d4 J! ]+ u7 w3 e2 y! S- _; J Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
* ]4 i/ {% ]* F7 C0 r* W5 p, ]considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
/ D6 d) q1 j0 s0 \6 t, u& fto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
2 H: R- W0 |& A- M1 P2 \" gthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core; f; }0 I% f, [1 b8 v) v
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
0 O6 c4 |$ w2 xmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record' P* g4 q" }% v% I
breaking price appreciations.% x1 x- M5 s' y& f
2 j) x) c5 T% k+ h Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding4 M' a6 I) X- i* k# Q/ T- R
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
- ~' g, O! E' ?0 ^& alargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
" V! B0 \' p# a- m! |
7 X+ r/ C( N+ x3 [) |6 @* b In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid% q6 D8 I4 z3 j$ S4 G/ A5 Q
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
- f9 B; t6 v9 J, t( s1 |confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off; `$ X* v6 h8 Q- Z
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.* b- I; ~' o L9 l
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers9 K1 ]! v8 }# b' V
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
; q( @) P7 W3 W- _( ~price appreciation when compared with 2005.
) d# _ F( [/ L& ]2 U# q4 G G( ^. y& z! A4 @/ Y
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing; W5 x3 K# m! R9 n
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
, Q; q- n0 p" n( o* E% efinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
, E# o1 f; s5 v* b7 fare markedly different than those found in the United States. z1 [4 V" l" F9 `- [
( {; S( o+ k( z& J& e
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the0 A/ _7 n2 P- H" c0 ?
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
& A. |5 X; p" E u- G0 y' Vfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ |1 Y( X- M! K; urelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general w$ T/ e+ g" H% t" U3 w& z
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ \! \4 t; F4 W& f6 b& @0 ]6 n5 a
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
. ~2 X: d1 A) S. {# P# J; Jaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
' o) S+ n+ G+ {& |2 ^mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.", E( n' o9 C* T: L7 ^# K o+ T+ a
0 k* q5 V& J1 {% | <<
: {/ P! [; B. @( ^ REGIONAL SUMMARIES. n, T9 p: Z X' a( E
>>
0 N8 m* I. f5 [$ F; ~$ |9 S2 ]: p/ Y! s5 p8 ~1 i
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
% E" O$ d) Z4 x$ YHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
( ]. {5 C" z t' d. X& L1 G2 sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
4 c7 q$ v* g4 c9 a& plooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of9 {! O: M& D l, }1 g, o# q
renovations.1 ^# V+ e. K5 r" B3 N: ?
; j2 k4 k8 q9 s- z3 F The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' _5 l" F7 ]8 ~, t. w/ l9 i0 z. jincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation$ G1 p7 G- G) U7 h- \! j% J
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
+ q1 b5 @3 k! Q5 aSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
3 Q6 d2 W: x7 \3 d& t) o* _& x; F/ l# u7 j" f7 c4 N w$ J
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer0 X" O9 \' b( q1 l8 C7 ^! q: `
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
3 P" x: ~ \! M% jquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
2 c, g* y7 D8 Y8 e, i1 O% U600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores& e4 ]6 T' Y7 W* M* S
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
, _# {! y" ^6 ]( r6 D: S! Cand are instead opting for more affordable housing options., p2 Q) H( m7 ~+ q) f4 O4 Z6 i) R
/ g* X; {4 p; K6 Y
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
( h. }# x% \, O7 A% Pconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their( a- j* d: }+ G4 X0 x
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
/ ?9 }5 ~9 a9 iwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian( M+ b7 @+ \ |+ w/ K$ e
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
* B; q8 H, Z* \8 x) h3 Vbuyers with more options when looking for a home.& q- ]9 r; h2 c: l7 Z8 ?6 ^
q( k' C6 t. ?7 E5 `1 q4 T
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
S3 e' B( S( Q' \# {among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
% V4 u3 u- i- q7 B6 |& epriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
; I2 Q. H" i- x- tas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
8 ]/ w9 n. a8 v1 Y/ E+ P% x% jfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
+ M( o$ c3 b4 S
, D. ?6 |/ E) F3 i; D# Q/ f Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
5 q( t* U) @3 `7 u3 oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
9 X7 t, d/ c2 e* U% b' }levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
$ p4 R$ @: D. w; D% F4 ~3 ?first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
B" K$ x' K, [5 G* \- J* W" `* [when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the2 u) |+ `% K3 k8 b+ o
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
% l1 P$ ]1 w9 @' a& kmaking a purchase.
; W8 M7 h9 o# Y' P2 a4 G
3 D3 q# ~) ]! e+ u5 ^$ J ^ u/ P4 `3 B Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
& M" [1 i) O( b) Y3 ~markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
! L. N( ?( X n$ D$ O, G! E9 b& xconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
5 k6 ^* _7 x2 z0 Y- Pcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting0 e+ f) y9 N1 K, G0 a3 n* t# M
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown6 S1 b# {- o/ |
amenities.5 ?2 p( U; L' d7 |$ u. {* |
" v9 T% F! n* s+ i. N The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels; F3 `5 g& j, q# C$ n. A! {7 p
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
7 L% j& ^% G1 k; {across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
5 V" M/ ~7 }. S9 gcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been. s$ }0 d- y; |9 w9 m, u/ V
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 X2 z6 b8 R' y6 o
residence, rather than for investment.; Y- R4 A0 T5 G/ j
. l8 c" P( w, T' K The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as: P: k+ J+ u1 p9 ?( @7 v
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
2 r$ T9 R0 A! b9 A0 D0 Uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
6 l% f$ x" I/ W" k- iconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization& U# G; \5 T! `' }$ K
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter4 C+ a1 {9 Y4 B0 v. `
the market.
( i- w+ U, x7 p# S" \7 |
6 P5 w6 M" @5 V3 ~; f In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
" e, H) R& s c9 U8 G$ o7 a: V# vJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
0 o) C* X, K& S+ Z1 x7 u+ P \August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring/ {/ k E ~1 h1 b& O% P; _- G$ B
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
M! T9 o: d( G( S* F$ L3 ato the shortage of available inventory.1 _4 T. o0 W- O# b! }) }: \2 _
& I, l5 J4 i* \, b8 q- T
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
. i+ s* C/ h6 ] [6 rmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains) C3 T( m8 ^, v3 [5 g
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
9 S' Y1 R: \! c5 m8 estruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& V% E& C/ b! g
8 l/ a1 t! {8 i2 ?
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
3 _) ?; v$ F( A' J- Jin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
9 C$ z' m; M2 T5 g! ^unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that- m- D8 M4 M9 X( Y. C
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring3 p7 v4 z; R( ?1 _2 m; q% j
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
2 F! P) u# |7 I; ^! |3 qseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as+ ?/ }1 ?: ^; \8 d+ X2 s) ]
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
* W) k9 E2 x* W- q2 I: S2 L! x* y. x
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter' N, y9 a6 ? a/ E% K0 t& n) F1 \7 L! q
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
# y' P/ E' I8 b, E+ _remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,( E* x" H& Z% g+ L
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices' ^; a" N2 N9 H. V1 D& q% z0 G
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
9 B; v! b) n2 C0 P- h. [' \5 a% ^/ Yin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly4 {+ B; \& B* U6 |4 }' ~5 G; \
towards the end of 2006. , p! N3 T# B( k1 f
, f; ^6 s& l6 F
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of% e5 X! b: ^9 |4 \$ i
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
! x$ q9 n5 z9 }! A+ jto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse7 t* e/ j0 Y! I- `5 A" h% ? ]7 a' `
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to3 r# k C( U t9 N7 D1 g- S
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added: m8 `8 y' F# z$ s& l5 A
pressure on tight inventory levels.3 I, J1 Q* Y. Y/ P' A4 C k0 M
8 [ C- Z7 a1 k+ x+ h% ^ Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic) @1 _9 }! {5 x1 u" r3 x& Y; ^; ^
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people2 W1 Q+ H) |; @" t
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;. M/ n% ^* ^ n
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching$ ^* g4 ^; m' C
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
3 p& E( V- r- H& N9 H- e0 I& n$ ^
# C$ x" L" o* Y9 s <<
; Y9 m9 H: S& z8 K/ \, R x Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006+ W$ @/ H0 i( F1 B
$ V3 l1 X. b) l: M8 s& Y' ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ y# }$ s% Q9 Y7 g7 X; ?* w
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey5 d- h, D* g3 K. u" p& b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ C/ a5 X/ \! X: C 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3, l. r" U& F, r3 C6 ~" M7 V5 F
Market Average Average % Change Average Average$ j5 h+ D( w: ~& a; n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' ~# k( L6 ?! P9 P& ]" w$ _
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
. h% Z5 g3 \* V4 G6 L! G0 ^5 e -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 t( m& n, b2 e S
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000% `2 ?5 E4 y" j, j/ z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& V1 s# _5 w5 Z p& W$ q7 k Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
- V3 s( C9 P2 y5 R+ A! R& M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 U, s; E0 M; d$ S. A Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
( b ?: ]2 _4 r6 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 p8 o; G o% L1 M" u5 P
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
. S- p! l0 X! D. G5 X j: n -------------------------------------------------------------------------( ], R0 U- D$ n6 w% ]
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
# U: B' K. O* u8 @2 `# P -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 u% \3 k7 P( E" l5 D* K Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1852 B$ e) [# @! V% n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! M, _3 X/ F- m& i3 y7 ?
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2505 ~% e% S' | s$ n" Y/ ?+ F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! j+ T$ m, E5 r$ _6 ~8 ~ Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
3 x& i9 g+ j8 u$ \; X -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 \- B! d% P) [( I t) D
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707! b2 f3 m8 c' `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( O; H9 A" L, T4 d9 [# E
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500# @& \1 y( J: V8 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( }7 y+ k- [9 z+ _! Q1 }( R5 F Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
( N: h, ]: w0 }- n; B) W9 L2 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------, H/ l E. n3 f
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
8 e# G3 e8 }7 |: T* s: {7 Q: l -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ e) W% n) Y- E! [ Q. R" C9 R
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
3 n- t6 U G8 m' c2 \' q, R0 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 F6 o% X0 }2 n3 l3 T; n Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000) Z. ]& ~# M4 s2 Y% X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* ?' M, |4 _7 w" [ National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8606 x7 m# c8 q+ n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 p9 x; ?. ^' D4 q3 V ]% e
- u+ U: S- ~" M
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ P1 D+ I7 Y& V" C Standard Condominium% j: j2 y; ?# T: Y4 t
-------------------------------------------------------------
! g' Z' b" O9 U2 x% }0 t# ~ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
1 U8 w! [. E8 _0 N Market % Change Average Average % Change
: w, y; W4 p, ^ -------------------------------------------------------------! f0 G: Z6 i! }; ]( W
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
( J# s# L+ ~3 F; t; R$ \5 i& U -------------------------------------------------------------
6 ?$ u0 q- W1 d7 O" `& J/ H Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
% r; J) f; L# L# g; g7 { -------------------------------------------------------------& l; w- c+ o( ?8 d9 x/ I2 r
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A" t$ i/ `3 U! e; t3 M& o
-------------------------------------------------------------
! B4 e3 R( D9 t8 M' h Saint John N/A - - N/A
/ }# K$ J! ~7 W+ W0 D3 D9 b -------------------------------------------------------------$ S/ x- [/ l+ [0 d! Q
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
, {/ h" ~/ p) ~: [$ }4 U9 U -------------------------------------------------------------
' x4 ?7 M; V# p: {" C/ n; P Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%3 |; e }6 k3 p+ D' g& j5 w; f9 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------7 _- B: I) y% h+ B( B7 r
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%9 _9 Q8 H! z' n) {
-------------------------------------------------------------* t6 S6 y1 |4 t/ f U* d s
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
& D8 l7 |4 q/ h6 ~' x, P5 J! @$ V -------------------------------------------------------------
4 T. g- p, z( r& b Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%8 w; E- h. }0 T/ p( [# U' z
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 I# Z f/ [: h. p. b Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%% G0 |. \* F5 O% T
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ U2 D3 C' h+ Z# k& y4 `9 v Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
* [/ w; a, L7 X2 Q0 k1 y -------------------------------------------------------------
: X* [+ K0 V, _' U( o7 g/ r: E Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
/ [* o3 I: y3 ]1 Z/ y -------------------------------------------------------------
3 F$ `( e' K5 g% O6 U* U" Z, o- j5 z Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
, q' i1 e& @. M' g3 F ------------------------------------------------------------- t/ P( q" o; I# E: O
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3% ]$ q: W/ [8 H7 s$ Y6 D b
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ l% y) o, q; g: X Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
- L- }' A, f4 r H -------------------------------------------------------------0 s* ]" z- z$ t0 o# D: h% ?( z
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 Q: G) W/ t2 ]4 f1 I4 P* e& W
-------------------------------------------------------------
. l' O$ [% h0 y# r8 i0 J( y y >># L' [. X0 q9 P+ \: u8 p- U6 _/ A
& ?1 ^" G& K8 i6 f2 I1 k( Z( r Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
1 h8 q. d" ]6 y, H% w8 a4 p5 Kin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
: N. V# c+ l) f, s( a# j6 ?John and Victoria. Q, B8 r$ W$ C9 d$ n! T: ~- X& c
5 F! y7 m- U. C The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most1 O* w2 t* \0 i6 t) l4 }
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
7 e* r1 `- D9 Q8 X9 Q% W% Xhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
' Q, D$ R2 m7 c6 Mreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price- n1 m) _( A6 i5 L$ @6 s
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
# W' \+ s% D6 M' T% e5 |across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is* L. D ~8 n& c) S: T
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
' e, V# @3 h' |7 [- W8 X' s$ kfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
# R. v3 o) t9 }9 z% ?+ Q$ N2 Nversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
: R* M/ X' N; n& y( wNovember 15, 2006.. M- X5 y% @* B' K* a
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
/ E Z) E- F! F' u/ M* Yfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge0 r0 p5 J4 O" k. ]0 \0 S
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is8 w$ a6 [$ t" Y' D
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|