 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
9 t/ _; Q A# z8 g$ @
1 Z# k6 ~; D& @- @- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
8 y' F( q' n% @. b1 y6 |3 R; J. A* y @1 V
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
) D" \6 ]9 N7 N! ^! S. ~+ V8 m7 vexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
" j; B' Q# z7 a9 W; Iquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic, T* ~2 y3 b. q3 T
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit& r9 Q1 B2 X7 M4 l' p
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
8 u# l: X' u3 Y1 ], r& {6 wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
! g! R4 \, e5 ] q. DQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
% E* r5 M9 D3 g& r# k5 ]: u" b5 r4 fLePage Real Estate Services.
8 }0 U" H" j# e; {
1 E& |% @: I5 I$ u+ D$ {; d Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
0 U# L5 I& f) ?$ t+ Oare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic1 C( u |) \, D) i
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and1 a1 v, {% s& v4 P N
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
, r; K1 \6 J, q% \; Z# N6 O2 fresidential real estate sector.
5 G6 N( l0 o) Q+ ^9 y$ c6 o- I" A' }# W: x8 W9 Y+ w' C% N8 ~+ i8 ]
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
* Z+ E" B M- S0 g; v% Poccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
6 x# d- e& R; G4 oyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
2 i# q# ]+ P, ` S5 H(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
: T' j- `0 K% `7 q4 o+ b; e(+13.2%).' Y8 L- n$ L& u
, Q/ Y- Y6 ^( n) E2 e- H
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
5 C' v: Y5 W: Oduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
' g4 N9 E# N% ^1 B# i/ H0 Rfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are# F0 Y# _; F$ X$ P" h# O) j
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,( G: V+ Z* |8 T3 Z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
' D- o5 J! M0 `6 p l' g"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We: k M/ U1 c; v# f2 I) T
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy' Q0 v3 z" s. F1 @( L
balanced market."
$ ~. t8 h: o/ G0 Y, \# z
9 {- N4 ]0 V# }+ k3 z Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
4 [ }* z9 M3 n) Jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift) O6 Q; j3 O' f: t; Q/ i
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
0 `2 |# I3 r! {0 Ethroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core, \' f- ` p$ B7 T `
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
* D9 O+ ^$ u/ j/ S2 \8 Fmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record7 e0 ?5 m3 ?5 H7 _7 y) |+ A7 |0 u. `
breaking price appreciations.+ y0 c' y5 y) g3 V( l% ]7 ^
1 [2 \* G4 Q4 N9 ?+ ~3 R
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding. B9 S3 v5 y, F4 r |" Z9 ` d
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the2 h. |( L9 Z( B/ X" X
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 V$ I. a. X( }8 x8 h& N0 C# k
. d5 }4 z; b$ J In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
, G7 e- ^# E- |( m! a9 ]! Xeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer+ O% i9 r6 p& W, G+ V+ m- x
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off, C# R/ k0 u/ I4 w; r
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
3 g. G: p0 i0 q; K. s, O8 C- dIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers( L4 u, m, K- X# x1 b
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
8 l/ C0 l# ?" T( a# }% e* bprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
0 ]6 y* G2 J) L0 D2 s7 A7 r
7 ]+ n- C* D( \ While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
( Z- V) d( S: Cmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
# Z7 S! G# i# ^4 Y/ g! zfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 x% b6 G" t( a8 ]0 Zare markedly different than those found in the United States.
" o. y/ s- \( E! X* d& t3 ]7 ^ y6 }3 R* {; e
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the4 ~) E4 O; K7 K# j! z5 O8 n. `
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
% ~; [( F0 n* Z( O' ~; C; t) h( ifavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the# n8 s5 p/ O5 J3 s1 L( s* p2 H ]
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general3 p% d) `( W5 ^5 q' J$ @* A0 K
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the* Z& @7 [9 I5 t# B
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
1 h/ I+ @/ A, t$ X) N+ W/ O6 daggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization9 B( A9 K# U) Q l3 E, M+ {' r
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
7 V( M4 k) I3 M% D' I/ X+ c3 ^1 A. g; ^5 ?( L, k$ [9 q0 H& t
<<8 i) {1 W6 p9 Y
REGIONAL SUMMARIES9 f5 c j& ]- |, d
>>
6 ^- Y! D8 {. Q
) T) T5 e, H( n% |; s Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
* J! q1 P8 }' y; w, L) E* x, kHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
) R0 d0 ?' ?4 B! [5 sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time1 |8 ?) m" l9 ?( i( @. d
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of" |% v3 a. E1 R7 i$ R% \
renovations.
. P; O& j3 u* K( v6 H9 K- i. f) k2 Z; K4 b! L3 d9 H2 B r
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight2 V0 E" P, k, B7 x; d& o, |" ?
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
, A; z, Q) E( R: Ocompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
7 n( ^4 _( d$ `+ R/ pSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 y0 c) L/ D+ S7 O M' S
( o7 h5 K% c. ?* f/ C
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
Q) G: C2 m. r9 C4 Q) E! i0 A- }slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
4 e0 D" r# A6 v+ K0 \. lquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new* Y; a0 }: p% v5 K) B" l+ Q. O
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores7 v5 K" C6 u0 ]4 u
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 j- m1 p: e3 N& n5 R3 S5 Qand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.* ~" S7 g; R4 H& F) ^7 W2 N6 N( k
7 u: ?. v) d8 R5 }
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
8 D0 M& v/ K- d! Oconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their% K$ ^3 n! o" g+ G' I- a! J
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
: W8 ~! q0 T3 x8 ?) r- W+ rwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian! ~1 d0 {2 M$ R* m# l4 G
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
( k! N! i6 ?$ |% P( p+ lbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
' f, c O5 D- V' u
. |- o% k/ x. W; x0 q A( k# M Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
$ I6 N, C/ {# k+ }among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
/ y! I1 X' J+ F- h$ \ ^7 Xpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,% q7 Y7 r5 B* o2 |9 X
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
# ?7 a$ X6 W' Y0 N5 cfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions." J* a% M; }- z; I. S
5 ]7 c$ a' ?/ J Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
0 v0 O& O5 G5 W7 H- g. u9 Oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory X3 R! j1 Z4 b1 _
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
$ p8 p1 p4 k, i* y. s6 I1 b/ Rfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
1 T; f% F5 h# x. ~" [when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
2 |" v K" c2 lpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before: ^0 G8 \% y+ }6 A" ?0 i% c
making a purchase. B) u2 ]6 c/ t: }
* o) I! K; W2 G/ C; a7 w; I! \7 o/ f Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing3 V j$ C& D3 U& W% D* t7 [' M
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong3 L/ R5 a- G4 j
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
L. E7 a1 t. m- rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting# }7 G" q/ d" r' m2 c9 u4 H/ O/ [
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
( ?" r$ m' k8 z# j7 K; o' Z4 ^/ Z9 mamenities.
! |" c2 D6 m, t# l9 n1 q
! L8 K" U( s( A j" E# v, d9 Q The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels: J0 g7 N# T' b! Q
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand. l0 F9 Q" L6 v9 R! r1 ~/ |/ D0 ?
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
! p x0 Q2 r1 q! p7 Wcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been& e) z% f3 p' ?+ Z2 \1 R- |
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
' g& c5 b0 O0 w7 b, Q7 t4 gresidence, rather than for investment.
: C6 p+ F' J2 }& {+ w0 T7 [ A: K s) M0 _+ }
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as- v$ O4 |0 ?) \! @
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) g$ c' Y2 X$ ]' N0 a/ W! z+ Tin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
6 o) q$ H4 y& G, j. wconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization- t! y# w: Z5 t: `9 w1 s0 e
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter' C2 t7 t' i0 t' g" d
the market." d, P+ E6 R! S* S2 C- G/ v- p
& B2 v, c% ^9 F/ S0 H
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through& H# U/ ^( x) q* V+ M
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In9 ?& P: E3 q# J
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
0 Y6 p9 r# j; Pmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
2 F" Y, S* g, a, I- E fto the shortage of available inventory.
4 X* y! P* b1 c$ u' m
6 q$ ] |( m" H0 ]& h5 S Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its) A( L. t: N! o1 A, n
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains u6 M; T* l$ A* [2 O
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
# J* N7 J8 M# gstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
, o8 L q; J( t4 s: j; g1 F* e* [: F% Y; P/ ~8 g t" v
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
( k; i# g1 l! e0 ?" win the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
2 D. k( w* H! y; a& n6 X! O, m3 Munemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that1 J6 I$ x% E! o9 @2 ?
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring% {5 E4 t, N: f
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
- T! e ]0 n4 ]season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
) V0 e) b8 n3 s) V; |8 ?7 wbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.- G/ A, C7 q' C; R4 B3 a
* I, t6 Z; } g; K6 t# |! E# [
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
8 b) H1 S" F k3 v8 G8 has activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
1 q ~/ d: f" a- a( R. Hremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
3 S! u) j5 J7 Y+ n2 I# v$ emaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
; p) j8 P9 F8 w* }, fincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
: n, | z1 B' K. T) w. oin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
- A8 {0 W) q8 atowards the end of 2006. , G# O. c, B+ j s1 y
. t# w# P0 C- U: F* V6 K. b
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( d+ ?+ w0 P- F: U' b; T
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable, x9 Z* ~/ F4 Q$ K* T7 r/ v
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse# R2 ^+ v1 H7 L( {4 \& s
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to! A* V: @2 J% |
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added( L, \6 R( v+ ^6 b6 n7 E, X6 r
pressure on tight inventory levels.& J% s Y+ Y4 w% w6 q7 E
8 I' t4 k C6 i+ P' c Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
% ^, F/ y0 Y! ufundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people: J! B1 B" T: H% K
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;$ ^9 d y- R, l7 j
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& ^# d. R x8 w" V/ V0 cfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.* W1 c5 j* J6 ^# h8 B
: P+ H; e) i4 G: t# U6 t7 Y <<* |) E+ b6 J/ x/ G1 C9 F, c2 X& }
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006- s1 h! | B0 [+ I! K+ s
+ h2 C* H7 M k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 [- K" q7 \/ P, U( H
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey$ X x( X$ O# n: M% G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 a1 b* f' M7 N 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
* ^; I% Q* ~1 k- E$ e+ J$ b Market Average Average % Change Average Average9 k8 H a& }' E; O' Q7 T) c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 v& ^1 t5 L: U. h, u
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000' r& {2 j& t% b3 p! {3 p) x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 P/ K+ Z2 ^* d- H" v Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
2 a6 T. h+ Y& Y* h2 P -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% D9 n# }0 |1 O Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000( @8 G( R# O0 `* D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ S7 I J6 g; D; d L/ N' K! H
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -! _, g" M8 K, @5 W) n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 a# O5 W8 i" t. K0 q2 D3 o' H0 Z
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
, @% g1 ^* }1 F; W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 v& G E% g9 Q" o, n4 S; l% r2 `% e Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
0 y9 {# U5 v5 x. L& ?* ^9 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 P5 o# U5 z1 Y0 G3 }
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
% g2 U1 L; u3 ?3 u V" ~# V! R -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 C* V; v P- Z1 S* I
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
( Y z, ^4 s$ G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 ]5 y5 r2 n L8 M; j! W Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7660 V' e4 Y( W) B+ X6 [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! n4 v$ ^4 r+ ?: f* x" W
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
+ G+ X. r/ F: l- g$ e+ B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ b ]5 }4 _) Z2 i5 u' D2 h Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500& v* e$ X; A C, G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* q/ C# q* K0 c5 @- l! C5 V
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389! a4 H( i& @$ |9 z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ R2 h/ n( L: p1 b; B9 Q5 F7 u
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
# m6 u% S* e A; R! y% Y' S! c -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ` ~5 U: ]5 r5 {1 V4 T( O
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
7 n$ C4 w: q2 ?0 k -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- p7 f/ |, i! t- P! F) \ w1 h Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
3 S z6 F' \% f& j' E4 g; F; \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% q* d- J. [9 T National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
5 E( Z' H Q) R$ L( @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 b" s+ b1 y0 p' E# i* c! H& W
( z& ?4 u5 `8 v- ?$ s" W
-------------------------------------------------------------* j7 N% T. r1 O, I& v
Standard Condominium1 ?2 l* g0 H3 m" X' P8 A7 c- x
-------------------------------------------------------------4 Y7 q) ~3 H) B4 G5 j
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
/ }5 ?8 X8 H+ T- Y Market % Change Average Average % Change2 {7 L2 |6 u- r+ `
-------------------------------------------------------------
, ^* F+ P$ e, Z" `0 I Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%& n9 Z2 I# _* l2 ^/ [
-------------------------------------------------------------
) m6 q' H8 v9 I Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%7 i; n3 }0 ^# w J: t8 d+ j
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ ] F6 w$ b, g+ d9 u! o' g Moncton 4.9% - - N/A; x8 W2 v5 r, H X; t
-------------------------------------------------------------: k6 Z+ m5 `6 j) W/ O
Saint John N/A - - N/A! Z3 l/ S1 a1 ~( R
-------------------------------------------------------------
. h: M/ g: F9 r" K St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
1 Q, K4 V8 J" m# `$ v -------------------------------------------------------------+ m* ]4 w4 M% m* L* @- u
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
( n3 _3 K4 k J9 s% s) Y1 i2 X9 { -------------------------------------------------------------$ K) u/ V* s5 H/ m
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%5 k/ x6 u) E2 U6 ^. |
-------------------------------------------------------------6 V8 ]2 ]- L/ V- ]
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%$ Z3 q5 l$ y+ {
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 N( ?# {6 t$ G& `) j& i7 k Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%# y+ S5 {, R, P1 \+ k0 U- t E3 i
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 E. o- G0 A$ d3 n) @ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%: Y }1 m, R! r7 o) S$ h6 V
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ ?2 Q) {. c3 C Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%# y5 k$ m: Y O& N3 x P
-------------------------------------------------------------
* |; f0 f7 t) b$ y Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%% z& A0 M! R+ @% k: a% }0 z
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ r5 u3 R8 u2 K/ K! P* s) v }1 t Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
6 W. j4 P" b. L) U -------------------------------------------------------------
( t* q7 E, k7 X" C Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%; K/ h- d/ N" J" d U6 V8 \7 j' o) n
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 r& F' y# ~* o% o* D, b- d Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%4 e5 I% D# r9 H: f) r5 N1 @; O
-------------------------------------------------------------
. e$ e! N) ?2 `$ \7 s National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
. [/ z- w% k3 _, A6 g X# P -------------------------------------------------------------- u9 L g7 s9 Z$ l8 J1 s
>>
9 d5 i# z2 f) w5 x- R
* f" K' f7 V3 S1 P6 X% L Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
1 W9 {5 {/ t0 a0 z& H" r v6 W* pin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint* h4 a! B. a6 I
John and Victoria./ A" g( k0 b' P4 d
. [. @. u! z: U( o, D! d The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most, Y. A2 W7 Y* ]& b
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of6 @0 K. `( Q( P( |/ B, _
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release- k1 T+ O$ Q/ R
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price6 e( _: R' \& a0 h4 c
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
y$ v! i7 D- e3 x% L& zacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
/ J; K! B+ e! Navailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
, Q) \) l! l+ h; _, b1 j) Y' Gfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
: o. L% O, d% ]" xversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
1 ~6 S- @" ]' i" ?November 15, 2006.
5 j: L) l8 P3 L6 J F Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of! ^$ H/ ~, d6 ^& x
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
: n+ D4 X8 n1 R1 oprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
$ f# N$ ^# z' Y9 Davailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|