 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 J- i1 c9 u. z+ D3 p/ b3 @
2 U/ j0 ]) A: K" C% B" T- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -! Z4 A( p: p. Q0 e: w
0 e! |9 y% W/ l) o' h TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
( F3 X) m% A L7 yexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
; q( R- `7 p. N1 d( l) G J; w* z5 Equarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
9 s8 f! I* Z* Z" S0 Jin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
2 t: V" e( F. E& F$ q; t/ mprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
$ y. _& h0 N5 F; C7 W- z/ Pmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,3 \) d4 J" V& e' \# C
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal- K. Z; z1 J; P2 ~; f" B
LePage Real Estate Services.
, x/ q& I4 A4 \7 l) L% s8 B3 i# [
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters. q4 e) |! k K! a4 h5 M
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
; g$ B- E5 R: x7 l& Rconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
# j6 p+ [5 r$ Y6 ~/ _sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
* F' g9 J& ^' eresidential real estate sector.4 C+ O0 d! T7 J' S4 l
3 ^8 d$ N% s# A8 J. _* A' y8 e Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation6 Y% Q* Z. Q% `/ y
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)" ^4 k t9 U* u1 ]: S; U" K* L8 J
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
' G% Q1 S; v# I( C& D# i! h(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
# `, `' ^. V& A, _(+13.2%).
" ]) X* [7 ?7 m) P1 y
7 t8 W; Q' D6 w0 ~ "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth/ A* A" z: d" d2 W
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
& F! A9 Y8 t' r1 v9 L& c: t. p+ v! Gfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are! w9 j, E b I8 ~6 n
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,8 h# S" l1 s; N' {7 N
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
N: h0 y# h/ F! [8 p- i: J"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
: C6 r6 t' p. Iwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy) O9 ?/ h( F' m
balanced market."
- X, i: D+ W' ] R, H; d6 B+ r; k b" m0 y, I
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,9 U* I- k0 z6 v+ `5 y# c2 U
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift& b: y/ f$ V4 Z$ ?% w8 W* q0 [
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued0 I4 q% P6 j+ g9 T, H; S
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
8 D- D0 i, X8 nenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,4 s" P% ^( J! J; ]& }5 ], ?
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record4 |/ P* Y! W( R8 e1 M4 g2 s0 q
breaking price appreciations.+ P# n- T4 g0 C N7 x
9 V# T$ l; v4 `$ M, l1 O' m Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding4 R* Q' {* z1 `
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
5 f. m! F, `+ qlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
! j7 i4 O; L& ~1 H# s! [$ A% @8 r7 d' I. T
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
6 n/ f- F1 R% V S4 |1 C4 Aeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer+ U) Z6 j# N4 S e" s
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off3 u0 r: H) E. {/ [2 V1 E
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.+ N& N% u3 ~% N9 m- S7 o( R
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
( k- T8 v8 v2 Wgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of8 q) l( b$ A f( s5 {
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
* l0 x1 t5 K# z Z# m# X
: ? K- B9 p2 M! E4 }0 Z While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing. S( [. P, H# S0 B% q2 ?
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and$ c: {2 q& |9 i6 t8 g
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
$ f! w1 [7 m r4 W7 j8 Yare markedly different than those found in the United States.1 U; N, x2 S( b* r. b& E
, F( [' j% M7 }( H
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the V S; t9 ]1 Y
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's! R. T1 ]; A* m# s6 U# j3 v
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, l3 [8 D4 o+ w5 Q3 N) y& g5 Yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general/ i8 N+ H1 J2 U2 N8 ?9 y9 a
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
- ~( F" W$ h9 V5 y% zdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
, c, f! @ L$ [! [" Eaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization' w0 D% Z- ^3 Z) O8 o' h# R; E$ ^
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
5 E, j" D4 Z5 r' C2 N& m
: L. ~ `9 {) I7 a: ?/ C6 B; L <<
$ A+ l4 c) d. s) T9 c REGIONAL SUMMARIES/ J) Z. s. U, x4 q
>>: \( e4 v0 M, ]' x5 l" Y; N
( f9 F# ?2 e; M5 P; S I' M& Y9 U k9 c1 ^ Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
3 \; k [) k+ s5 q9 \Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate+ b' _8 p- @9 \. j0 F
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time/ q4 y4 j& ]" F; D6 ?
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
4 I( r. P5 E* Xrenovations.1 U1 O# i7 K+ x: g* b% u
6 N$ \& x2 N/ e! v; a5 r
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
* N+ Y, a+ h" e2 J4 nincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation K7 e/ M$ r# o$ a% A
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and3 r6 D2 B, g, ~; N3 b' {& F0 |# }
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.! s, Z/ b7 H* \, k7 j
& L; W; B3 D2 `3 S6 ]8 i1 P
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
5 J2 I! R4 f2 q% f5 Kslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
0 D7 _$ @/ h- r: `( fquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new2 W8 Q0 r: t/ X; ^
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
, j3 m4 t/ e$ s1 xto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes' y' r9 }! R9 f4 m. g
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
4 |" C) r/ \ l% K9 W7 ^# H+ h" v
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced, Z. I- z! H" |3 B
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
6 V# O( c: f* l% ]& ~homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
7 \$ R4 z! \( iwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian. o3 i& ]3 Q* Y# N" d6 I
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing; M# I/ T7 O9 p/ Q' W" b" s0 B
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
, m8 b: ]9 J0 n& V' ?6 `
. B& ]; Y1 g- y8 t; B Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
9 E* X3 P, u. b. A$ u! Wamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
) s! O8 _* q3 P" Dpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
* A7 B& V b' g2 Bas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last2 f' ^4 R& ^3 R4 y$ i! z2 m$ o# d
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.9 @- x4 l: n' J5 j2 m+ G
4 G3 ^% q* F5 O+ Z& u/ W. `
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
" ^4 q" ?, D7 E! ]* Cprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
' _3 w% S3 Z5 K* {, k$ R; jlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting& p: d& M6 L6 G
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,0 A9 C1 V+ Z* @% l
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the ~$ P$ l" U5 k& b7 S/ b: e. J
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before& k7 t5 ?- t& \# a9 p: u
making a purchase.& T$ W, l6 x) |
2 u- i0 T5 e6 ^( i$ D4 Z0 B Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
: N" V1 J% V8 f" O5 Zmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
2 T N- W" k" }/ t, G! E3 \) i9 X0 jconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 f" d! U. ]* A& t% |- jcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
, F4 H# u% k& D5 a6 d) R9 zattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
, c! t! E8 F& j; p2 Lamenities." V2 q* Z7 `) u
9 b+ h* i8 P, B# ^4 @3 L2 ` The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels0 c Y8 f4 n1 V$ q) r6 z$ G, s4 z
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
4 ?" k- U& |# E1 X4 H0 Y; cacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
. I, o+ e6 l8 R |continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
& R2 U# l& h8 T9 k; ^driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
' I7 i. v( p2 c) lresidence, rather than for investment.1 R4 d( D! y+ E; K# j, M
. K$ L: i, ^" P7 [3 B- o2 ]- r The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) N0 Y. ]3 w/ e! B9 S$ a; S9 \
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted4 U) \% m( v4 T! Y9 b+ ]
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 Y* }+ q0 Y" uconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
$ E" X' Y4 ^, P' B* srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter* x1 V# W3 s* n8 @
the market.2 R- b7 K$ c' a- @( V
. c) y( `, Z: d- J/ e7 ? In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
* I) Y! c8 q# c5 P) `! sJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
4 r9 S& U ~. F. I. R; E# @: B, fAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
* p7 t" ]/ O4 \* Z# c ]' Fmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due% m* l% W; p$ j' Q m0 ]2 [
to the shortage of available inventory.
# a+ B) E2 X: l3 t" t, o/ H+ e( R8 I% X, h7 G/ T# `5 r0 F& Y
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
9 |( I5 a, N$ b$ e6 n( j: hmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains1 J4 b v! l2 {! d- a- f( n* p
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses* v! `7 O+ g9 D6 h1 z
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.: [, k, u1 B3 Y& U Z
; O$ G0 v8 w/ o+ _' Q* G3 j
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% `5 z4 q0 B% G/ M7 |; \
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
3 T% B# N: A" W7 t5 q# L$ Sunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
; t( Y4 T2 G- G% upressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
, b% X# `' x8 Y; P7 d2 M: @( ~prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer' K4 L# K. a4 N7 g" ~7 X6 s
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as j' }# M: c8 A1 g) c* Q! w$ K5 o
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.3 H, ]1 a3 |5 t4 U2 _
7 _2 {$ O- z3 t Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
9 l/ Y6 a$ e7 e% ^as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
: \2 \" ]& A8 l' @1 sremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! l9 B c# U" hmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices9 ~" ?9 I, }, X( L6 T3 @
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* E$ x. j) |+ S% B7 e9 n
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly( f9 w C4 a6 P$ g% l
towards the end of 2006. ( S! H% t: l, ?+ q
4 E' R O' A2 S j. m; j4 aWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) \. Q9 o, Q7 G7 a0 `
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
$ n6 `8 k" Y5 e" {! u. k: t* U- nto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
; t' _7 b7 J, z# M: Ygroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
# I% W8 K3 K+ A, v6 H' nforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added, V% O% C: y- h
pressure on tight inventory levels.
9 f7 L5 @; v8 w+ U! D
; f; r" ~$ B8 {; G2 \1 t5 i Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
6 i. s8 U% N5 ?5 F& S9 t3 ]fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
8 U* A7 }+ n$ V. h# E6 X& U, r: Ninto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;1 b0 G) I2 x# H- V: x0 G
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
" j# H/ F/ T' H( K' D+ j0 Cfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace., S6 t" K9 B4 s
/ Z( j3 z6 q4 h% z* Q3 T <<
1 z; Y' b) q' k& F" I Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20065 v% N ]# [% {- g4 C! ]$ G
6 M4 c: @; {' ~4 i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
T% P7 R1 ^1 ~' Y Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey9 B( Z% _, {) ^6 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ o$ @6 M0 W! h
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
) S% V9 A7 C( Y w Market Average Average % Change Average Average
: P$ U6 Y% f# y0 _7 Z% t9 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ ]4 K! G$ t" k5 z* A7 |# F Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
1 a* A) J: ^( r -------------------------------------------------------------------------. c" b0 M0 X3 E1 T& c
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
; I( \; g8 [6 p: D( a" L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ v4 T p8 a% A: O Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000. ^6 f* \+ B$ J( u, v$ c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, I' A* a- e3 H) v4 P+ B
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -, `3 q& [* [. T' w- q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 w" Z3 a, `, {$ G1 C D
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333+ l6 O5 ~" B$ ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Q, f* O) x" w8 W0 z
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
1 l, a) J. n e. W+ D% e -------------------------------------------------------------------------' E6 k3 f, e5 Y r) O
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185+ P- _8 `/ ?' A: d/ v) [3 T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* e, j3 p! Q) ^# j6 d0 |( |" E Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
& g5 w% w$ i6 [( z0 m5 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 \- l! X/ o* |* l; n
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
( N* k! h/ a4 R+ { -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 x& s0 m$ O: l8 u9 K
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707/ ^- v9 S/ `9 h. O7 Y4 v% i+ ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 x/ L: l: t1 v' t$ z) S1 p6 ~+ R7 b Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
, o1 O+ Y* g) j& G! z V% }- y. i -------------------------------------------------------------------------; Q _/ P- h) C
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3899 Y* c/ D( J9 z. ]1 i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( I2 _# ]4 W# d( S
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
7 `$ s4 z+ q: R( {1 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 I& z) K3 N- O, s+ r9 v/ H
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
, n! d$ n' _. V8 e7 a0 t1 p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 q" H3 _2 ?3 e3 [ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
- q% [- q6 ?% F$ C5 T" ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------& p7 q' Q9 Y7 i) L, E
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860 T* D0 C& S2 s9 I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* p) f8 [" }' g# n/ M/ U: m4 F, a8 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
& y1 E8 V3 y$ O& c$ r1 g+ O" i Standard Condominium: f4 J: O9 S( Z J# ?& t- v' X# w8 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
: r! ^& e2 ~' f l( O5 v: A0 U 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
0 h- w. q1 K0 W4 W' ?2 W4 n Market % Change Average Average % Change/ w0 ^6 n! G; r4 [6 q) G; j
-------------------------------------------------------------3 P: j& ~6 k4 f3 f: J5 m
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9% c0 E0 }& c+ `9 D' w0 m/ Q8 L
-------------------------------------------------------------8 B D* [$ h1 j0 ^4 }8 O' v5 Z
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%* q; O) M* x& F; s
-------------------------------------------------------------0 P+ S! S- j5 _" ^1 K3 u
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A1 l0 m4 Z% E% n
-------------------------------------------------------------
' z+ V$ R: G$ Q# u4 H Saint John N/A - - N/A
4 J9 @) E' {/ s* z/ S -------------------------------------------------------------6 R8 w9 I, y. D! ^
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%- P9 k& Z% `: l' E% e) V
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ e& n; h2 O& c Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
+ d ^2 G, F, u. D9 Y( H5 h4 K -------------------------------------------------------------
4 z; i& b7 ~; @, ]2 M. h% @, { Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
* I8 Z& {! K- G4 J/ C% S5 H) d -------------------------------------------------------------
! Y5 C7 v( y* d( K) [/ t4 g* V0 e) j Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%, [5 E# H7 l( O
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 d; i' ~' B1 u6 @) B4 K, V- i9 h Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%4 r R& C) t3 |- n
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ @! Z4 P3 _7 q2 C0 n" V( g& w) @ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%; S- S0 i8 J6 m( z. j2 t$ V
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 z! l" _ P8 z6 n, o1 M Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%; l$ U0 Y H6 S9 w
-------------------------------------------------------------
% ^4 Z* k, @0 A" d Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
0 E! R+ S& r4 \( Q -------------------------------------------------------------
& b$ S3 A! w6 ~8 s4 a Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
; p c; g. z" w" v* p -------------------------------------------------------------# N" T% M& k& T$ r' o
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%) ~8 T5 ]3 G) }+ E5 `+ i
-------------------------------------------------------------
, x' m" c+ J, T; a' R- g Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1% x- M' J5 X7 L5 W/ N
-------------------------------------------------------------
) j' E/ ?% |8 B National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
9 M Y9 J( f5 W$ W1 Q' Z2 u, r( l -------------------------------------------------------------
J% R( O) s+ g! E( l1 \ >>$ B& O) i6 P( O0 S. M4 M
' l# _, Q6 f ^1 ~ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined" u! O3 {7 u, h( C$ k
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
I+ O5 ]% d( [6 m/ Y+ e+ nJohn and Victoria.2 B& j) H# S- C3 z
3 i% g9 p( T# y& B7 u7 ?
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most6 ^8 o3 c& f$ s" d( y
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of3 G- \# r7 z3 e7 i, ~) V
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release7 u- s; `6 H) U3 l7 [
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
* X m( V+ T9 e* f+ X; gtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
6 `% [5 ~3 e1 b/ Pacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
8 G* F# |, K3 Y/ ]. a! aavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
& s5 q4 I7 o# w" Hfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable7 ` \- v O8 p. |
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 q" L$ m/ \: x9 I+ K* kNovember 15, 2006.: ]% M* L: ]5 C" |5 ?1 U
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of. O8 \! n+ q5 ^# l% N7 R. p: F
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
( Z0 w& C0 K9 r1 Wprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
- L L) v) a9 f; {" `) ~4 {available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|