大家支持Edmonton 与Calgray之间建一条高铁吗？

ram

新省长有这个意向。我觉得很好。不知大家意见如何。

yanzhewuzui

看看钱从哪儿出吧，加个人所得税就先缓缓，省里有钱就大胆地开工吧，有比没有好。

hongan

for sure, why not? China can offer the technology, 400km/hour.

frd2004

why?

醉酒当歌

高铁似乎不用，一条铁路就足够用了。

亮甲店

no money

willl

lopenwing

高铁到了,市内交通跟不上啊.

forwindy

不支持。

千度

不支持。没钱。

Elicai

龙虾

支持不支持会有多大的影响力吗？

用户

不支持，享受不了几次，但每年要多交很多税是肯定的。
一次性投入也就算了，可怕的是后面每年的维护费，亏本是肯定的，这个大洞谁来填？
在中国也好说，D可以补贴，在这里，谁来补贴？还不是最后加税。
! g: p0 v' k/ M4 k! Q人家美国都把这个给否了，不是没道理的。

" t2 @6 S9 ~) E再说了，假设建了高铁，票价是多少，大家可以接受？贵了没人坐，参考去温哥华的火车，看看有几个人坐吧。就这点客流量，灰狗已经够用了。

kingsnake

哈。從愛城到卡城，連條像樣的鐵路也沒有，還提高鐵？？

GoldenPinnacle

与其从爱城到卡尔加里还不如从爱城到Fort实际。

haojixing

支持!!!到时坐的肯定少不了.

倒霉孩子

先把城内的LRT搞定再说吧。。。  不是说还要修到nait, 西边，millwoods, 南边啊什么的么

无语

不知道如果要建的话，车票得多少钱才能维持高铁正常运营。。。光有高铁没那么多人去做也没钱赚呀

natson

800年前就讨论过了。
没戏。

天上明珠

不支持

tong_ting

同意楼上的~先把城内的LRT修好了再说吧。。什么时候能通向西贸还是个问题呢~

sweetlele

30块钱以内单程就干

天上明珠

两城的交通工具能跟上吗？你愿意在每一头都花上十来块钱去和到达目的地吗？那么说，每一次的来回，如果说30.00/次，就可能要达到100.00，另外打taxi还要预定。

nowave

The Calgary–Edmonton Corridor is approximately 260 km long (about 3 hours by car), and is serviced by the Queen Elizabeth II Highway.
6 o2 S" G+ c: Q2 ?& W) L$ ^) {
' b' }4 [# J  s( `2 y; fA study by the Van Horne Institute concluded that "high speed rail would bring significant benefits to the Calgary–Edmonton corridor and Alberta as a whole". The report also stated that the project would "generate between CAD $3.7 and $6.1 billion in quantifiable benefits". The study considered three options:

Upgrade of an existing Canadian Pacific freight route to allow trains up to 240 km/h using Bombardier's JetTrain, costing approximately $1.8 billion.
; j/ m0 [; Q; e! }- ~6 _3 r0 {A new dedicated passenger route, known as the "Green Field" route, also using the Jet Train, and costing approximately $2.2 billion.
An electrified version of the Green Field route, using TGV style trains running at 300 km/h, costing approximately $3.7 billion.
2 c: Q& [3 m/ ^7 v4 }: V/ I9 m8 AThe report also found that there was little incremental benefit in running at 300 km/h rather than 240 km/h, and therefore recommended the first option.

: L4 O/ I3 o7 B7 qOn September 22, 2006, the government of Alberta announced that it was deploying video cameras along a stretch of the Queen Elizabeth Highway to measure the number of cars that travel between the two cities.[6]

% l* s( [1 M9 X; C% vThe Calgary Herald announced on April 18, 2007, that the provincial government had purchased land in downtown Calgary for a possible station or terminal.[7] On April 7, 2011, Premier Stelmach said that the land being purchased for the new location of the Royal Alberta Museum could be used as the Edmonton terminal.[8]
- Q' j) K# u: p6 V* v
In 2011, Alberta premier Alison Redford said that the high speed rail is a priority for her. Saying "such an initiative could unite the province and send a message to Canada and the world about Alberta’s progress."[9]

. H9 Z) g: @& e2 v' x

NEB

it's useless, cost us tons of tax dollars and doesn't do most of us any good most of the time. with the increased securities these days, it'll take just as long to go through security check, wait for boarding time, travel over as driving ourselves. plus, now, we're without a vehicle and needing to rent.

NEB

it's useless, cost us tons of tax dollars and doesn't do most of us any good most of the time. with the increased securities these days, it'll take just as long to go through security check, wait for boarding time, travel over as driving ourselves. plus, now, we're without a vehicle and needing to rent.

green_w

不支持。人口才多少啊！

冷靖人

还是先把lrt建好再说吧。

giant

我觉得不是很有用  浪费钱  开车几个小时就到了  有钱还是用到更有用的地方去
' }5 ~5 n" c' K  ?; ^" o
% e1 Y! F% c' t7 Z, k6 l$ g

宝宝