埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2296|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
4 a- d# o( p9 x  x2 M上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
# n) y5 ~0 f( X# x0 @8 Y& h% Z% {! z1 D/ M1 J

; n( n$ H! |( F4 y' g
, i8 U1 J2 u' g+ f$ A% g$ S
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf; Y! U2 [$ \/ c3 P

3 f' {, w, H) `, M( _. k* D" Q. b8 k: C  H# d* X
Refund Requests
% k$ V  A( x0 H4 M! E+ ^' T8 X74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
5 K2 X8 q- L% ^; V+ i2 a0 @: Ypaid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part7 r7 f0 {' `2 j4 k2 q, x
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
! @1 T$ k+ r; A* @: z(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
# Z% |! d& Y7 oCanada to the time of release;
- e: @2 F7 R/ L* o+ M5 {5 a(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;
5 D1 t; V; Y8 l1 b+ e( B(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;. B: |" u7 R* [3 P+ E
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
2 y! t% G: ^* S7 d& A5 M% Jtariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the/ W$ U4 u; u, F2 D! s
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under" x0 E% l6 ?, I8 ?; N
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
6 T8 F5 {/ D' |: a3# Q2 H. L1 z$ ]: w
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for% V# a: e1 ^- \* s7 o
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
" n# R0 W, _5 m" w- o' aaccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
8 r6 Y) S. \: O0 N8 A2 Z: B(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
" j# p. L# |" F/ r(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)8 X0 v: e1 F& W, @' x1 W
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or
- u- W0 d( K& W; }: z" qvalue for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
3 Z& H; G- X! p) z' Sunder any of sections 59 to 61;+ N$ t( K5 u7 \, Q- n, ^
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
+ s3 n* {) @! N! T2 [(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
/ `2 n1 J, g8 Q1 Y% A+ F(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
- p  g; e- t( C$ e( `, k/ }on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of8 q9 }4 \2 K$ e# U  q; o3 h; J
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).$ ]. m8 _  M7 e9 j" D
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim! c1 t1 h' H) z) \
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
7 C. _# u& o7 F(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless2 C; }/ W! I- V+ f* n
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
( K, O! ?0 I. k* ~: k$ ]respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
7 T9 X3 y& x, c0 C$ p) m/ \(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
( s: K8 U" h/ sprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
/ h+ L1 t9 W  M1 Yprescribed information within
' r7 J, n& o# h(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
, q8 `9 n. p# ]6 d* d5 v. W  _$ Xor (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
% V0 R# f4 o8 U) N' Q(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods! r7 t1 u5 Q# l$ |# f* j4 f3 x
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.& f% N9 `. Y: A
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
( a/ m: ~! s- a  D+ ?, s  o' k3 sthis Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
1 A& ^  L( O. \$ C(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
/ G/ ~* [8 _# T) F: |because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not
9 G7 d" c: P$ P& W7 Meligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or& R! }$ w) B+ u8 W* @' o7 p
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
9 q' ?" D/ D5 |- f3 Gbecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is! b: P6 p  q, V2 ]
incorrect.
  p6 @% }/ }, @- R- c$ v8 R(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),1 \2 E9 O/ Z3 ^* p, g' `0 l
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground) [2 U5 \6 a- V% o, ^/ X; V  \
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
0 x# I" f- q. mwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
! O. ~- q" y( b
3 J" d0 [( {" E6 N) ^1 e( O这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-16 09:00 , Processed in 0.145836 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表